Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and yet, someone does this to show you how the left redefines words, which IS a part of this topic, you say it's another topic and avoid it.I’m not defending anything genius I’m simply expanding the conversation by providing perspective and asking questions.
there is a posture that can be taken to resist civil rights protests which skates dangerously close to racist and white suprematists… it is also totally fine and understandable to try and protect property during a dangerous riot.
I said “don’t you” because I was assuming that you’d understand the perspective I was presenting. I guess I was wrong.You're dodging. Why did you say "don't you"? Why did you choose those words?
That definition has obviously changed so may vigilante. Correct? That is the crux of my point. You lost another debate. Loser.I define gender by how the dictionary defines it. You want definitions to be malleable? Really?! I wouldn’t have expected that from you… or are you just doing a childish “if they can’t do it then so can I” argument??
One of these days maybe you’ll do yourself a favor and look up the definition of gender… but that’s a different discussionThe same reason you defined a "man" differently as gender is suddenly a social construct. Definitions seem to malleable.
You lie. You said that to be demeaning as in if I didn't agree I was stupid. Nice try though. Your perspective is idiotic like most of your perspectives. I would not expect anything more from a Biden aka potted plant supporter. Someone who was offended by "Let's Go Brandon"...which is something the media created but you blamed the people not the media.I said “don’t you” because I was assuming that you’d understand the perspective I was presenting. I guess I was wrong.
Now that was condescending, but you kind of asked for it.
The definition is the definition. Just look it up. You don’t get to define words by what you think they “may” be changed to. The definitions are what they are. This is the dumbest defense you’ve made in a while.That definition has obviously changed so may vigilante. Correct? That is the crux of my point. You lost another debate. Loser.
You don’t have to agree with the perspective but you can express understanding of where it comes from. And yes, if you can’t see or understand that then you are a moronYou lie. You said that to be demeaning as in if I didn't agree I was stupid. Nice try though. Your perspective is idiotic like most of your perspectives. I would not expect anything more from a Biden aka potted plant supporter. Someone who was offended by "Let's Go Brandon"...which is something the media created but you blamed the people not the media.
which definition? the original one, or how it has morphed?One of these days maybe you’ll do yourself a favor and look up the definition of gender… but that’s a different discussion
yet i just showed you articles where that in effect has been done over and over again.The definition is the definition. Just look it up. You don’t get to define words by what you think they “may” be changed to. The definitions are what they are. This is the dumbest defense you’ve made in a while.
People are responsible for their own words and actions. I’m not personally offended by Let’s go Brandon. I just think it’s embarrassing for our country when elected leaders use it while on the job. Sad that parents get their children to use it. And pathetic that our society seems to be embracing these gutter tactics. I had hoped to see our people evolve for the better not spiral backwardsYou lie. You said that to be demeaning as in if I didn't agree I was stupid. Nice try though. Your perspective is idiotic like most of your perspectives. I would not expect anything more from a Biden aka potted plant supporter. Someone who was offended by "Let's Go Brandon"...which is something the media created but you blamed the people not the media.
You admitted that definitions are malleable. So the definition today may not be the same definition tomorrow. You know that don't you?The definition is the definition. Just look it up. You don’t get to define words by what you think they “may” be changed to. The definitions are what they are. This is the dumbest defense you’ve made in a while.
If we are talking about a subject today then we use today’s definition, I don’t see why you are so confused about that.You admitted that definitions are malleable. So the definition today may not be the same definition tomorrow. You know that don't you?
Thanks for admitting that you were being a condescending prick. I do see that your reality and my reality are not one in the same. Which is fine but you don't have to be a dick. You see that don't you?You don’t have to agree with the perspective but you can express understanding of where it comes from. And yes, if you can’t see or understand that then you are a moron
And I said it could change tomorrow given how quickly the world moves. You understand that don't you?If we are talking about a subject today then we use today’s definition, I don’t see why you are so confused about that.
What’s the old definition of gender that you seem to be referencing in this argument.You admitted that definitions are malleable. So the definition today may not be the same definition tomorrow. You know that don't you?
Are these elected leaders poking fun at Biden or the media or BOTH? In your honest opinion. To me it is the media and they deserve it as they blatantly lied. You see that don't you?People are responsible for their own words and actions. I’m not personally offended by Let’s go Brandon. I just think it’s embarrassing for our country when elected leaders use it while on the job. Sad that parents get their children to use it. And pathetic that our society seems to be embracing these gutter tactics. I had hoped to see our people evolve for the better not spiral backwards
My original question was not meant to be condescending but I’m sorry if it hurt your feelings… I’ll try and be more sensitive to that for you in the futureThanks for admitting that you were being a condescending prick. I do see that your reality and my reality are not one in the same. Which is fine but you don't have to be a dick. You see that don't you?
It was in the 1970s that feminist scholars adopted the term gender as way of distinguishing "socially constructed" aspects of male–female differences (gender) from "biologically determined" aspects (sex).What’s the old definition of gender that you seem to be referencing in this argument.
You admitted it was meant to be condescending as it implied disagreement meant I was a moron. LOLMy original question was not meant to be condescending but I’m sorry if it hurt your feelings… I’ll try and be more sensitive to that for you in the future
Wait… weren’t you just railing on me for being a dick?! Perhaps you should set a better example with your own words… ya think?Your perspective is idiotic like most of your perspectives. I would not expect anything more from a Biden aka potted plant supporter.
