Refugees are not currently vetted...

[Rustic]

The current so called "vetting" process is a joke - 18 to 24 months is nowhere near enough time…

 

[Coyote]

OP's a lie. They are vetted.

 

[Mousterian]

Are our security services so inept that they need years to check the credentials of an applicant?

 

[Rustic]

OP's a lie. They are vetted.

The vetting is a joke... 18 to 24 months is nowhere near long enough.

 

[Seawytch]

Even if you thought our two to four year vetting process isn't good enough, Herr Gropenfuhrer's EO is NOT the answer.

 

[edthecynic]

The current so called "vetting" process is a joke - 18 to 24 months is nowhere near enough time…

18 to 24 months AFTER the UN has vetted the refugees. Only 1% are passed on to the US after the UN vetting process.

 

[Rustic]

The current so called "vetting" process is a joke - 18 to 24 months is nowhere near enough time…

18 to 24 months AFTER the UN has vetted the refugees. Only 1% are passed on to the US after the UN vetting process.

It should be 10 to 12 years for vetting…

 

[The Great Goose]

Just cut off all immigration.

 

[bendog]

Just cut off all immigration.

Especially all those Asian engineers.

 

[Rustic]

I'd like what Donald Trump said about Chucky Schumer he's going to ask him who's his acting coache is - because he don't see him as much of a crier…

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Are our security services so inept that they need years to check the credentials of an applicant?

Many of them have no credentials.

 

[tinydancer]

Are our security services so inept that they need years to check the credentials of an applicant?

For just $2,000 you can buy a forged Syrian passport. Daily Mail Reporter got an excellent forgery in under a week.

Whoopsies an eta: Same one as one of the Paris terrorists

MailOnline reporter bought SAME Syrian passport used by ISIS Paris bomber | Daily Mail Online

 

[Coyote]

OP's a lie. They are vetted.

The vetting is a joke... 18 to 24 months is nowhere near long enough.

Sure it is. Some of them, infact, wait 6 years.

If it's a joke then why has it been largely successful? In 1980 we passed the Refugee Resettlement Act, which started the vetting process. It was temperarily halted and revamped after 9/11. Since 1980 some 3 million refugees have settled in the US.

I think fewer than a dozen have been implicated in any sort of terrorism, which can include anything from an action to providing financial support to a terrorist group, none were involved in a fatal attack. There's also a lot of confusion between refugeees who come in through the Refugee Resettlement Program and immigrants and asylum seekers that are completely different. The most often cited example is the Tsarnaev brothers, but their father was an assylum seeker, not a refugee and they came as small children.

So why do you say it's a joke? Maybe a dozen out of 3 million? Sounds like it's been pretty effective.

 

[Rustic]

'Who Is His Acting Coach?': Trump Calls Out Schumer's 'Fake Tears' Over Travel Ban

 

[Rustic]

OP's a lie. They are vetted.

The vetting is a joke... 18 to 24 months is nowhere near long enough.

Sure it is. Some of them, infact, wait 6 years.

If it's a joke then why has it been largely successful? In 1980 we passed the Refugee Resettlement Act, which started the vetting process. It was temperarily halted and revamped after 9/11. Since 1980 some 3 million refugees have settled in the US.

I think fewer than a dozen have been implicated in any sort of terrorism, which can include anything from an action to providing financial support to a terrorist group, none were involved in a fatal attack. There's also a lot of confusion between refugeees who come in through the Refugee Resettlement Program and immigrants and asylum seekers that are completely different. The most often cited example is the Tsarnaev brothers, but their father was an assylum seeker, not a refugee and they came as small children.

So why do you say it's a joke? Maybe a dozen out of 3 million? Sounds like it's been pretty effective.

It should be a dozen years

 

[Coyote]

OP's a lie. They are vetted.

The vetting is a joke... 18 to 24 months is nowhere near long enough.

Sure it is. Some of them, infact, wait 6 years.

If it's a joke then why has it been largely successful? In 1980 we passed the Refugee Resettlement Act, which started the vetting process. It was temperarily halted and revamped after 9/11. Since 1980 some 3 million refugees have settled in the US.

I think fewer than a dozen have been implicated in any sort of terrorism, which can include anything from an action to providing financial support to a terrorist group, none were involved in a fatal attack. There's also a lot of confusion between refugeees who come in through the Refugee Resettlement Program and immigrants and asylum seekers that are completely different. The most often cited example is the Tsarnaev brothers, but their father was an assylum seeker, not a refugee and they came as small children.

So why do you say it's a joke? Maybe a dozen out of 3 million? Sounds like it's been pretty effective.

It should be a dozen years

What further information could be gotten in a dozen years?

How many Syrian refugees have committed terrorist acts since they've been here?

 

[The Great Goose]

Just cut off all immigration.

Especially all those Asian engineers.

We need Asian engineers to build more bousing and infrastructure for all the newly arrived Asian engineers

 

[g5000]

The current so called "vetting" process is a joke - 18 to 24 months is nowhere near enough time…

Biometrics, fingerprints, IDs, iris scanning, DNS testing, refugees | Homeland Security News Wire
Refugees applying to come to the United States go through several different security measures aiming to make sure that they who they say they are, and that they are involved with terror organizations or criminal gangs. The security screening includes detailed interviews, three levels of background checks, three fingerprint screenings, contagious disease screening, and cultural orientation. The United States has plans in the works for additional biometric measures, including iris scanning and rapid-turnaround DNA testing.

What will Trump bring to the table with his "extreme vetting"? Have you ever noticed he has never given any details?

So what will he add?

 

[TNHarley]

We shouldn't be letting in people when we cant even take care of ourselves.

 

[g5000]

We shouldn't be letting in people when we cant even take care of ourselves.

Speak for yourself, child. I can take care of myself just fine.