Regressives Bluff Called, Abolish Ice Bill Will Be Voted ON

[OKTexas]

More proof everything idiot Dem's touch blows up in their face, just hilarious

The law of unintended consequences, I love it.


.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

In the be careful what you wish for column, republican leadership plans to bring the Abolish Ice bill to a vote in the house. This will force regressives to go on the record and trash their hyperbole. ROFLMAO

Democrats who drafted a bill to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] suddenly announced Thursday night that they would vote against it if the legislation went to the floor, after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Fox News he intended to call their bluff.

Dems who drafted bill to abolish ICE now say they'll vote against it


.

Don’t know if it’s possib but make the law read a yes vote abolished ICE and. No vote fully funds the wall and new ICE agents.

Don't see that as a possibility in any way. Passing laws require an affirmative vote.


.

Probably right. It would be a good time to have a vote on funding the wall though, preferably right befor or after the ICE vote. Dems are in damage control mode and a few red state dems may have to vote in favor to prove they aren’t open border idiots.

 

[BluesLegend]

Any Dem who votes no is a xenophobe

 

[BluesLegend]

Dem's bluff, Trump and the GOP call, Dem's fold like a cheap lawn chair

 

[OKTexas]

In the be careful what you wish for column, republican leadership plans to bring the Abolish Ice bill to a vote in the house. This will force regressives to go on the record and trash their hyperbole. ROFLMAO

Democrats who drafted a bill to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] suddenly announced Thursday night that they would vote against it if the legislation went to the floor, after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Fox News he intended to call their bluff.

Dems who drafted bill to abolish ICE now say they'll vote against it


.

Don’t know if it’s possib but make the law read a yes vote abolished ICE and. No vote fully funds the wall and new ICE agents.

Don't see that as a possibility in any way. Passing laws require an affirmative vote.


.

Probably right. It would be a good time to have a vote on funding the wall though, preferably right befor or after the ICE vote. Dems are in damage control mode and a few red state dems may have to vote in favor to prove they aren’t open border idiots.

The fact is, if either were passed in the house it would die in the senate. One side or the other would filibuster.


.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

In the be careful what you wish for column, republican leadership plans to bring the Abolish Ice bill to a vote in the house. This will force regressives to go on the record and trash their hyperbole. ROFLMAO

Democrats who drafted a bill to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] suddenly announced Thursday night that they would vote against it if the legislation went to the floor, after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Fox News he intended to call their bluff.

Dems who drafted bill to abolish ICE now say they'll vote against it


.

Don’t know if it’s possib but make the law read a yes vote abolished ICE and. No vote fully funds the wall and new ICE agents.

Don't see that as a possibility in any way. Passing laws require an affirmative vote.


.

Probably right. It would be a good time to have a vote on funding the wall though, preferably right befor or after the ICE vote. Dems are in damage control mode and a few red state dems may have to vote in favor to prove they aren’t open border idiots.

The fact is, if either were passed in the house it would die in the senate. One side or the other would filibuster.


.

Amazing how defending our borders isn’t a slam dunk isn’t it? This is how far the left have fallen.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yet the Dems have been winning steadily across the country since last fall.

Well, tell yourselves on the alt right that losing is winning, and you will be where you are at.

 

[OKTexas]

In the be careful what you wish for column, republican leadership plans to bring the Abolish Ice bill to a vote in the house. This will force regressives to go on the record and trash their hyperbole. ROFLMAO

Democrats who drafted a bill to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] suddenly announced Thursday night that they would vote against it if the legislation went to the floor, after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Fox News he intended to call their bluff.

Dems who drafted bill to abolish ICE now say they'll vote against it


.

Don’t know if it’s possib but make the law read a yes vote abolished ICE and. No vote fully funds the wall and new ICE agents.

Don't see that as a possibility in any way. Passing laws require an affirmative vote.


.

Probably right. It would be a good time to have a vote on funding the wall though, preferably right befor or after the ICE vote. Dems are in damage control mode and a few red state dems may have to vote in favor to prove they aren’t open border idiots.

The fact is, if either were passed in the house it would die in the senate. One side or the other would filibuster.


.

Amazing how defending our borders isn’t a slam dunk isn’t it? This is how far the left have fallen.

Yep, there's no accounting for un-American ass hats. They only want the laws they like enforced, even though their dear leader and other presidents said illegals hurt the country and they need to come in lawfully.


.

 

[Geaux4it]

The Dems want to cancel the vote

-Geaux

 

[Care4all]

In the be careful what you wish for column, republican leadership plans to bring the Abolish Ice bill to a vote in the house. This will force regressives to go on the record and trash their hyperbole. ROFLMAO

Democrats who drafted a bill to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] suddenly announced Thursday night that they would vote against it if the legislation went to the floor, after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Fox News he intended to call their bluff.

Dems who drafted bill to abolish ICE now say they'll vote against it


.

We'll abolish Ice...if we abolish the fbi, the bureau of land management...the epa...the usfs...and all the other corrupt unconstitutional agencies.

I knew this was where we're going.

Trump, and the people behind him, don't give two shits about ICE. We're just using them against the leftist morons who think big government is cool. We'll shove big government down your stupid throats until you beg us to close it down.

I don't see the bill going anywhere, but this vote will throw one hell of a wrench in the regressive hay bailer.


.

won't hurt one itty bitty bit.

The democrats already let their constituents know they would vote against it if the R's try their dirty trick and bring it up....

they would use the time though to debate some of the comprehensive immigration reform issues.

 

[OKTexas]

In the be careful what you wish for column, republican leadership plans to bring the Abolish Ice bill to a vote in the house. This will force regressives to go on the record and trash their hyperbole. ROFLMAO

Democrats who drafted a bill to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] suddenly announced Thursday night that they would vote against it if the legislation went to the floor, after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Fox News he intended to call their bluff.

Dems who drafted bill to abolish ICE now say they'll vote against it


.

We'll abolish Ice...if we abolish the fbi, the bureau of land management...the epa...the usfs...and all the other corrupt unconstitutional agencies.

I knew this was where we're going.

Trump, and the people behind him, don't give two shits about ICE. We're just using them against the leftist morons who think big government is cool. We'll shove big government down your stupid throats until you beg us to close it down.

I don't see the bill going anywhere, but this vote will throw one hell of a wrench in the regressive hay bailer.


.

won't hurt one itty bitty bit.

The democrats already let their constituents know they would vote against it if the R's try their dirty trick and bring it up....

they would use the time though to debate some of the comprehensive immigration reform issues.

Filing the bill was a stunt, republicans called their bluff forcing them to admit it was a stunt with no political conviction involved. They want the issue, not a solution, if they did they'd come to the table willing to find a solution. The public notices these things.


.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If the pubs bring it up, the dems will talk immigration, which is what they wanted

 

[HenryBHough]

[
A link for what? That INS existed before ICE? Are you INSANE?

Nay.

A bit retarded, mayhap, but for a 12 year old there might yet be some hope.

Or not.

 

[ptbw forever]

If the pubs bring it up, the dems will talk immigration, which is what they wanted

No, they will just vote against it and then lose like 60% of their lunatic base.

Which will destroy the Democratic Party.

 

[ptbw forever]

Yet the Dems have been winning steadily across the country since last fall.

Well, tell yourselves on the alt right that losing is winning, and you will be where you are at.

That was before #walkaway and #abolishICE.

 

[Leo123]

In 2013, a Democratic-controlled Senate passed an immigration bill that significantly beefed up border security, and today, some Senate Democrats are open to funding Trump's wall along the U.S.-Mexico border as part of a broader immigration deal.

But Democrats aren't helping make the distinction between outlandish political rhetoric and their actual positions when their left wing calls for abolishing the federal agency best known for deporting illegal immigrants. That's what new liberal darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez did in her remarkable upset of 10-term Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.) this week. A few days later, one of Democrats' most prominent and influential voices, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), joined in.

In an interview Thursday evening on CNN, the potential 2020 presidential contender said she agrees with escalating calls on the left for getting rid of ICE. “I agree with it. I don’t think ICE today is working as intended,” Gillibrand told CNN's Chris Cuomo.

She went on: “I believe that it has become a deportation force, and I think you should separate the criminal justice from the immigration issues, and I think you should reimagine ICE under a new agency with a very different mission and take those two missions out.”

Notice Gillibrand didn't say that the United States should stop deporting illegal immigrants altogether. She just said this particular agency should stop doing it because it has become too controversial.

That's not far from what 19 ICE agents argued recently in a letter to Homeland Security chief Kirstjen Nielsen that the Texas Observer uncovered. They claim that the drama over deportations is hindering all the other work ICE does, and they asked to have their agency spun off from the main one.


Calls to abolish ICE

So, even Democrats are fighting the George Soros funded 'Resist' movement. The DNC is under siege by the far-left, post-modern, neo Marxists who have, through liberal educational institutions, have made anti-American sentiment 'normal' to the 'brains full of mush' that youth typically exhibit.

 

[koshergrl]

Conservatives should applaud and support abolishing ICE. They are a redundant agency that exemplifies a bloated government.

BS, ICE has a critical law enforcement and national security mission. Just because you dislike a portion of their mission doesn't make them redundant. No one else is charged with interior immigration enforcement.

.

Why do we need feds doing it?
Let the feds notify the local law and they deal with it.

Then you have a situation like we have now, some locals will cooperate, others won't. The supreme court has ruled that the feds can't commandeer State resources, so they can't make them cooperate.


.

Then they will live with the consequences.

 

[OKTexas]

Conservatives should applaud and support abolishing ICE. They are a redundant agency that exemplifies a bloated government.

BS, ICE has a critical law enforcement and national security mission. Just because you dislike a portion of their mission doesn't make them redundant. No one else is charged with interior immigration enforcement.

.

Why do we need feds doing it?
Let the feds notify the local law and they deal with it.

Then you have a situation like we have now, some locals will cooperate, others won't. The supreme court has ruled that the feds can't commandeer State resources, so they can't make them cooperate.


.

Then they will live with the consequences.

Yep, they can deal with ICE coming into their communities and with the collateral damage that will entail when nonviolent illegals get swept up with the violent ones.


.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

If the pubs bring it up, the dems will talk immigration, which is what they wanted

That’s actually what we want. Talk it up. Open borders amnesty. Good luck.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Conservatives should applaud and support abolishing ICE. They are a redundant agency that exemplifies a bloated government.

BS, ICE has a critical law enforcement and national security mission. Just because you dislike a portion of their mission doesn't make them redundant. No one else is charged with interior immigration enforcement.

.

Why do we need feds doing it?
Let the feds notify the local law and they deal with it.

Then you have a situation like we have now, some locals will cooperate, others won't. The supreme court has ruled that the feds can't commandeer State resources, so they can't make them cooperate.


.

Then they will live with the consequences.

Yep, they can deal with ICE coming into their communities and with the collateral damage that will entail when nonviolent illegals get swept up with the violent ones.


.

I don’t really give a shit. Illegal is the crime. I don’t care what your other crime is. Both of you get a seat on the bus.