Ricky LIbtardo
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2016
- 6,683
- 11,358
- 2,265
This is the most troubling part about this whole mess to me as a retired LEO.. They knew it was a lie and yet used it to gain a warrant to spy on a presidential candidate...The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrantâŚ.then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:
They offered Steele $50k if he could get the dossier confirmed....so he goes out and spills it to Isikoff, Yahoo prints it....and Steele goes back to the FBI claiming that Isikoff gathered the info on is own.
Why isn't Steele arrested for lying to the FBI???
And....Steele tells a Brit court the opposite of what he told the FBI.
Again....why isn't he charged?????
I want to know what's going to happen with Flynn and the FISA judge who signed off on the warrant to tap Page and is now the Judge overseeing Flynn's case. Is he feeling stupid as he was duped? Is this why he is forcing the release of exculpatory evidence not provided by Mueller. I smell a turd. And Mueller's starting to look really bad here if the judge is pissed.
The Flynn judge as been removed.
1. "How A Plea Reversal From Michael Flynn Could Uncover More Federal Corruption
2. ...Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order in United States v. Flynn that, while widely unnoticed, reveals something fascinating: A motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works.
3. ...Sullivan quietly directed Special Counsel Robert Muellerâs team to provide Flynnâs attorneys âany exculpatory evidence,â...
4. On November 30, 2017, prosecutors working for Mueller charged former Trump national security advisor Flynn with lying to FBI agents. The following day, Flynn pled guilty before federal judge Rudolph Contreras. Less than a week later â and without explanation â Flynnâs case was reassigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.
5. One of Sullivanâs first orders of business was to enter a standing order, on December 12, 2017, directing âthe government to produce to defendant in a timely manner â including during plea negotiations â any evidence in its possession that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendantâs guilt or punishment.â
6. ....the special counsel charged Flynn with lying to FBI agents on January 24. While the charge did not identify the FBI agents involved, we know that Peter Strzok conducted the January interview that eventually led to the criminal case against Flynn. Strzok formed a part of Muellerâs team until he was removed following the discovery of hostile text messages concerning Trump, including a planned âinsurance policyâ should Trump win the White House.
7. Obama political holdover Sally Yatesâ involvement in the case raises additional concerns. While Strzok and Mueller initially indicated they believed Flynn had been truthful, Yates, while serving as acting attorney general, had directed Strzok to interview Flynn and had pushed for charges against Flynn...
8. ...Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea and suggests that Sullivan, as âthe countryâs premier jurist experienced in the abuses of our Department of Justice, . . . is the best person to confront the egregious government misconduct that has led to and been perpetrated by the Mueller-Weissmann âinvestigationâ and to right the injustices that have arisen from it.â
9. In his revised standing order issued on Friday, Sullivan dropped a lengthy footnote, detailing the case law and setting forth his position that, if material exculpatory evidence is withheld during plea negotiations, a defendant is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea.
10. Flynnâs attorneys now know what to do should Muellerâs team disclose such evidence. After the spanking Sullivan gave the prosecutors in the Stevens case, Mueller is on notice as well."
How A Michael Flynn Plea Reversal Could Uncover Federal Corruption
Memo to Mueller:
"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
A Republican President.
Isn't Sullivan one of the FISA court justices that approved the Page surveillance?