RELEASED: Schiff Democratic rebuttal memo released after FBI redactions

Americans that were on the EC voted for him, he didn't win the popular vote...Which means the popular vote doesn't count in electing the president...


did you just figure that out? The entire delta in the PV was in California, land of fruits and nuts.

Moonbeam Brown just signed a law that prohibits teachers from protecting their students by shooting back at a murderer intent on killing innocent kids. The insanity continues.


And Brown admitting that Democrats are on the side of the killers....

"Gov. Jerry Brown Signs Bill Removing Penalty for Using Gun in Crime"
Gov. Jerry Brown Signs Bill Removing Penalty for Using Gun in Crime | Breitbart



Democrats in action.
It was a law the population voted on...By a legal slip of word the law is letting some people that use a gun but not in a violent crime..The law is being amended...
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?
 
God loves a broken and a contrite heart.

And he asks us to have wisdom to see the signs, with no promise of us ever knowing the time.

Look towards the Destruction of Damascus and the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem.

Know when the fig tree beats ripe fruit, and that “this generation” shall not pass until these things will have happened.

Israel celebrates its 70th anniversary since it’s return marking the beginning of its 2nd generation, while the first continues on with it.

Be yee therefore watchful.


The good book says that near the end days the world will be poisoned by lies and liars.
Someone should ask Why Clinton wasn’t under surveillance because she was under 2 Criminal Investigations!

Let me say that again. She was under TWO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS!

One for Espionage, and Mishandling & Destruction of Government Documents and one for Money Laundering and I fluency Peddling through the Clinton Foundation.

Funny thing happened on the way to The Tarmac.... That’s how a “Matter” becomes a Criminal Coverup when Boss Hog gives the order to hand Crooked Hillary a get out of jail free card.

Woman defecates in pants to hide drugs during arrest, cops say

Somehow The President who is not under Criminal Investigation is under Surveillance, am day Clinton who is under TWO CRIMINAL Investigstions is not under Surveillance? And we aren’t even getting in to the $145 Million she took from Purin for Uranium One.

That should be a WTF moment for even Democrats. Somehow it’s not, which speaks to the moral decay of that party and those people.


Sheesh, you are the most extreme person here.

A year of 24-7 illegal surveillance on The President & his family couldn’t prove Collusion, so Shitty Schiff or Murdering Mueller aren’t Going to do shit either!

See, that is the thing TOT, they had the whole Trump team under surveillance since before the election. They know what they said, what they did, read their e-mails, etc. And the Trump team did not know it until 10 days after the election, so they were speaking candidly.

In less than 10 months, look at all the evidence they already have against the Hillary team who was never surveilled! And yet, we are led to believe that Trump is going down.

If this is the best the FBI and DOJ can do with surveillance, how good are they really if the Left is correct? Does anyone actually believe these people are that incompetent?

You know where the Dems are going to be on the hook? When they have to answer the Nunes questionnaire or face a congressional subpoena. That is the end of the trail for the Democrats, because Nunes already knows the answers to the questions he is asking with all the files in his possession.

Also.............you know why the Hillary e-mail scandal was actually reopened? To prove that Obama knew she had a private e-mail account, when he said he didn't, that is why.....along with the rest of his administration having private accounts also, which is illegal if any business of the United States is done on them. That is exactly why Sessions reopened that case; and trust me on this...............he already has the e-mails-)
The Left will never have a wtf moment until
judgement day. All liars go to hell. It doesn’t say some. It says ALL. People need to repent of their sins because the day of reckoning is soon to come.
Yes it does. It also says that In the last days men will be lovers of themselves Thank God for us who repent because that will be our saving grace. What is it worth if a man gains the whole world but loses his soul? I’d rather let my lips Speak the truth and be the woman that God would have me to be. Greed & lust will always be one of mans greatest downfalls.
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.


"After 18 months of steely-eyed investigation, the only parts of the dossier that have been "confirmed" are bland factual statements -- Moscow is a city in Russia -- while the untrue parts are anything having to do with Trump or his associates.

As New York Times national security reporter Matthew Rosenberg explained to MSNBC's easily excited Chris Hayes last March:

"Both journalists and others who had copies of it for a long time have not been able to report much of it out. We've heard that, you know, the FBI and the Intelligence Community believe about 30 percent of it may be accurate, but most of that 30 percent, if not all, has been non-Trump stuff."
February 7, 2018 - CARTER PAGE: AGENT 000


Remember the last time you were right?



Me neither.
 
So one party says one thing and the other party says the other.

And each side is treating what their guy says as gospel.

Well. I, for one, am shocked. Shocked, I say.

Come on, seriously: Is this all a joke?
.
God, do you ever stop bragging about not being an extreme when you actually are?
I am?

Specifics, please, not platitudes.
.
Sheesh, you are the most extreme person here.

A year of 24-7 illegal surveillance on The President & his family couldn’t prove Collusion, so Shitty Schiff or Murdering Mueller aren’t Going to do shit either!

See, that is the thing TOT, they had the whole Trump team under surveillance since before the election. They know what they said, what they did, read their e-mails, etc. And the Trump team did not know it until 10 days after the election, so they were speaking candidly.

In less than 10 months, look at all the evidence they already have against the Hillary team who was never surveilled! And yet, we are led to believe that Trump is going down.

If this is the best the FBI and DOJ can do with surveillance, how good are they really if the Left is correct? Does anyone actually believe these people are that incompetent?

You know where the Dems are going to be on the hook? When they have to answer the Nunes questionnaire or face a congressional subpoena. That is the end of the trail for the Democrats, because Nunes already knows the answers to the questions he is asking with all the files in his possession.

Also.............you know why the Hillary e-mail scandal was actually reopened? To prove that Obama knew she had a private e-mail account, when he said he didn't, that is why.....along with the rest of his administration having private accounts also, which is illegal if any business of the United States is done on them. That is exactly why Sessions reopened that case; and trust me on this...............he already has the e-mails-)
Lakhota laughed again. What a useful idiot her and every redskin is for their democrat masters.

I’m a whiter shade of pale, what insult do I get?
 
Did you all notice Carter Page is being painted as a spy by democrats when he was AN FBI INFORMANT FOR 5+ YEARS yet they fail to even mention that in their lie memo..

Deception from the start.. Jim Hines - Democrat lyin his ass off on TV an failing to disclose all of those contacts he was making were while working for the FBI.... LYIN PIECES OF SHIT!
 
Last edited:
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.



5. "However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.

6. ….it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious document for the FISA application."
Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'




Don't you feel uncomfortable using the word 'learn'????
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.
You've been feed a pile of left wing crap... and you refuse to learn..
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.



5. "However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.

6. ….it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious document for the FISA application."
Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'




Don't you feel uncomfortable using the word 'learn'????
Comey and McCabe both stated the Dossier was the primary source.. Now democrats want us to believe them that it wasn't... what a load of bull shit!

Funny how that narrative has now changed since the dossier can be physically shown to be a false construct of the DNC and Hillary Campaign colluding with Russian foreign agents..
 
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.



5. "However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.

6. ….it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious document for the FISA application."
Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'




Don't you feel uncomfortable using the word 'learn'????
Comey and McCabe both stated the Dossier was the primary source.. Now democrats want us to believe them that it wasn't... what a load of bull shit!

Funny how that narrative has now changed since the dossier can be physically shown to be a false construct of the DNC and Hillary Campaign colluding with Russian foreign agents..



"FBI Director James Comey has been caught going around to secret Congressional briefings in “recent weeks” touting the lurid fake “Trump dossier.” He has been claiming that it is a major foundation of the FBI’s investigation of purported Russian collusion with Trump to interfere in the election—months after the FBI had already assessed the “dossier” as non-credible."
The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”


Non-credible....


Yet, as the Memo shows, the corrupt Deep State used it ....thrice.....as the basis for getting the FISA warrant.


And it was known by the heads of the FBI and DoJ.




Jail 'em all!!!!
 
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.



5. "However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.

6. ….it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious document for the FISA application."
Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'




Don't you feel uncomfortable using the word 'learn'????
Comey and McCabe both stated the Dossier was the primary source.. Now democrats want us to believe them that it wasn't... what a load of bull shit!

Funny how that narrative has now changed since the dossier can be physically shown to be a false construct of the DNC and Hillary Campaign colluding with Russian foreign agents..

No they didn’t. They said the opposite.
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.

Thank you! The misinformed, disturbed, and outright liars can repeat the same deflections and distractions, but the truth will prevail! It's just unfortunate so many follow the lead of a scum-bucket like Trump who couldn't tell the truth if on the doorsteps of Hell or Heaven! If there's any justice, he'll be feeling the HEAT in more ways than one after his performance which is becoming more reckless and treacherous! It's amazing how conservatives are backing every play no matter how extreme because they're getting something out of it! It's truly pathetic! :bang3: :dunno: :uhoh3:
 
You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.



5. "However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.

6. ….it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious document for the FISA application."
Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'




Don't you feel uncomfortable using the word 'learn'????
Comey and McCabe both stated the Dossier was the primary source.. Now democrats want us to believe them that it wasn't... what a load of bull shit!

Funny how that narrative has now changed since the dossier can be physically shown to be a false construct of the DNC and Hillary Campaign colluding with Russian foreign agents..

No they didn’t. They said the opposite.



Geee.....another vapid "Is not, issssss nooooottttttt!!!" post from a Liberal.

Insightful.
 
God loves a broken and a contrite heart.

And he asks us to have wisdom to see the signs, with no promise of us ever knowing the time.

Look towards the Destruction of Damascus and the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem.

Know when the fig tree beats ripe fruit, and that “this generation” shall not pass until these things will have happened.

Israel celebrates its 70th anniversary since it’s return marking the beginning of its 2nd generation, while the first continues on with it.

Be yee therefore watchful.


The good book says that near the end days the world will be poisoned by lies and liars.
Someone should ask Why Clinton wasn’t under surveillance because she was under 2 Criminal Investigations!

Let me say that again. She was under TWO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS!

One for Espionage, and Mishandling & Destruction of Government Documents and one for Money Laundering and I fluency Peddling through the Clinton Foundation.

Funny thing happened on the way to The Tarmac.... That’s how a “Matter” becomes a Criminal Coverup when Boss Hog gives the order to hand Crooked Hillary a get out of jail free card.

Woman defecates in pants to hide drugs during arrest, cops say

Somehow The President who is not under Criminal Investigation is under Surveillance, am day Clinton who is under TWO CRIMINAL Investigstions is not under Surveillance? And we aren’t even getting in to the $145 Million she took from Purin for Uranium One.

That should be a WTF moment for even Democrats. Somehow it’s not, which speaks to the moral decay of that party and those people.


See, that is the thing TOT, they had the whole Trump team under surveillance since before the election. They know what they said, what they did, read their e-mails, etc. And the Trump team did not know it until 10 days after the election, so they were speaking candidly.

In less than 10 months, look at all the evidence they already have against the Hillary team who was never surveilled! And yet, we are led to believe that Trump is going down.

If this is the best the FBI and DOJ can do with surveillance, how good are they really if the Left is correct? Does anyone actually believe these people are that incompetent?

You know where the Dems are going to be on the hook? When they have to answer the Nunes questionnaire or face a congressional subpoena. That is the end of the trail for the Democrats, because Nunes already knows the answers to the questions he is asking with all the files in his possession.

Also.............you know why the Hillary e-mail scandal was actually reopened? To prove that Obama knew she had a private e-mail account, when he said he didn't, that is why.....along with the rest of his administration having private accounts also, which is illegal if any business of the United States is done on them. That is exactly why Sessions reopened that case; and trust me on this...............he already has the e-mails-)
The Left will never have a wtf moment until
judgement day. All liars go to hell. It doesn’t say some. It says ALL. People need to repent of their sins because the day of reckoning is soon to come.
Yes it does. It also says that In the last days men will be lovers of themselves Thank God for us who repent because that will be our saving grace. What is it worth if a man gains the whole world but loses his soul? I’d rather let my lips Speak the truth and be the woman that God would have me to be. Greed & lust will always be one of mans greatest downfalls.
The Jews ARE Gods chosen people & HE will not be mocked. Every knee shall bow & every mouth will confess that Jesus is the Son of GOD. The very incarnation of God. Jehovah..I am God. Isaiah 42:8.
 
You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.



5. "However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.

6. ….it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious document for the FISA application."
Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'




Don't you feel uncomfortable using the word 'learn'????
Comey and McCabe both stated the Dossier was the primary source.. Now democrats want us to believe them that it wasn't... what a load of bull shit!

Funny how that narrative has now changed since the dossier can be physically shown to be a false construct of the DNC and Hillary Campaign colluding with Russian foreign agents..

No they didn’t. They said the opposite.
You've been shown by others three times in this thread alone... get a new talking point that is factual..
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.

Thank you! The misinformed, disturbed, and outright liars can repeat the same deflections and distractions, but the truth will prevail! It's just unfortunate so many follow the lead of a scum-bucket like Trump who couldn't tell the truth if on the doorsteps of Hell or Heaven! If there's any justice, he'll be feeling the HEAT in more ways than one after his performance which is becoming more reckless and treacherous! It's amazing how conservatives are backing every play no matter how extreme because they're getting something out of it! It's truly pathetic! :bang3: :dunno: :uhoh3:



Wanna take a try?????


Here ya' go......any errors you can refute?


1.The Hillary campaign paid for an anti-Trump Russian creation called the dossier: they used law firm Perkins Coie to funnel money to GPS Fusion and Christopher Steele


2. The Hillary campaign screamed that they had been hacked, but refused to allow any government agencies to inspect the supposedly hacked servers

3. The FBI admitted that they knew the dossier was fake from the start, but used it to get a FISA warrant to surveil Trump and associates

4. A secret cabal at the highest levels of the FBI and the DoJ worked with GPS Fusion to undermine the Trump campaign...before and after the election.

5. FBI found classified data on Huma and Anthony Weiner’s laptop….so they gave them a pass

6. The FBI decided no charges against Hillary before they interviewed her…..with no record kept of the interview, and not under oath.

7. Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were found to be lying to the FBI….but given a pass ...and allowed to keep their laptops, and destroy any evidence on same

8. FBI agents Strzok and Page and McCabe talked over a plan to overturn the election….an ‘insurance policy’

9. Loretta Lynch with Comey’s acquiescence, worked to benefit Hillary’s campaign

10. Obama knew about Hillary’s use of unsecured emails, as he conversed with her on same…kept his name out of the reports.

11. BTW…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.

....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....


12. The FBI offered to pay Christopher Steele if he could corroborate the dossier….so he told Yahoo New’s Michael Isikoff about the dossier, had him print the information….then told the FBI that Isikoff independently discovered the “facts”…

Steele admitted, in a British court, that he leaked the material to Yahoo. September 23 Yahoo ran the story.

The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:

13. After the FBI fired Steele, he continued to confer with Bruce Ohr and the DoJ…and Rod Rosestein and Sally Yates.

In September of 2016, this was Steele’s statement to Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”


14. Fired by the FBI as untrustworthy, Steele is maintained by the DoJ as a contact, and all the while, Bruce Ohr’s wife is drawing a salary from the group Hillary hired to produce the dossier….GPS Fusion.

Bruce Ohr’s wife’s connections to Hillary’s paid dossier-producers, GPS Fusion, was never disclosed to the FISA court.

15. Not Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, nor the DNC, nor Christopher Steel, nor Fusion GPS, nor Bruce Ohr’s wife, the roles of none of these participants in the creation of the dossier….not a one was revealed to the FISA court.


16. Let’s compare the zealous and very aggressive action by Mueller against Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and Carter Page with the immunity and passes given above…..

…and lots of evidence of associations of Democrats with the Kremlin….

…completely different treatment.

17. And all of the players in on the fix were demanding the Memo not be released….and lied about why it should not be released.
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.


"After 18 months of steely-eyed investigation, the only parts of the dossier that have been "confirmed" are bland factual statements -- Moscow is a city in Russia -- while the untrue parts are anything having to do with Trump or his associates.

As New York Times national security reporter Matthew Rosenberg explained to MSNBC's easily excited Chris Hayes last March:

"Both journalists and others who had copies of it for a long time have not been able to report much of it out. We've heard that, you know, the FBI and the Intelligence Community believe about 30 percent of it may be accurate, but most of that 30 percent, if not all, has been non-Trump stuff."
February 7, 2018 - CARTER PAGE: AGENT 000


Remember the last time you were right?



Me neither.

Well PoliticalChump, you’re not very well informed, but given that you don’t read anything that challenges what passes for your intellect, I’ve found this:

How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims
 
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Only obvious points were verified and those were know years ago. The dossier, according to the FBI was used as the PRIMARY SOURCE for the FISA warrants.. SO who is lyin? The FBI and McCabe or you democrats?

Another lie debunked.

The Dossier was NOT the primary source of information in the application. Only one small part of it was used. This claim is utterly false and has been thoroughly debunked.

Furthermore, the warrant was subsequently renewed and applications reviewed by four different judges appointed by Republican Presidents. New and relevant information proving the value of the information obtained had to have been contained in the renewal applications.

The more you learn about this warrant, the more obvious it is that the intent of the Nunes Memo was to mislead the public.

Thank you! The misinformed, disturbed, and outright liars can repeat the same deflections and distractions, but the truth will prevail! It's just unfortunate so many follow the lead of a scum-bucket like Trump who couldn't tell the truth if on the doorsteps of Hell or Heaven! If there's any justice, he'll be feeling the HEAT in more ways than one after his performance which is becoming more reckless and treacherous! It's amazing how conservatives are backing every play no matter how extreme because they're getting something out of it! It's truly pathetic! :bang3: :dunno: :uhoh3:



Wanna take a try?????


Here ya' go......any errors you can refute?


1.The Hillary campaign paid for an anti-Trump Russian creation called the dossier: they used law firm Perkins Coie to funnel money to GPS Fusion and Christopher Steele


2. The Hillary campaign screamed that they had been hacked, but refused to allow any government agencies to inspect the supposedly hacked servers

3. The FBI admitted that they knew the dossier was fake from the start, but used it to get a FISA warrant to surveil Trump and associates

4. A secret cabal at the highest levels of the FBI and the DoJ worked with GPS Fusion to undermine the Trump campaign...before and after the election.

5. FBI found classified data on Huma and Anthony Weiner’s laptop….so they gave them a pass

6. The FBI decided no charges against Hillary before they interviewed her…..with no record kept of the interview, and not under oath.

7. Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were found to be lying to the FBI….but given a pass ...and allowed to keep their laptops, and destroy any evidence on same

8. FBI agents Strzok and Page and McCabe talked over a plan to overturn the election….an ‘insurance policy’

9. Loretta Lynch with Comey’s acquiescence, worked to benefit Hillary’s campaign

10. Obama knew about Hillary’s use of unsecured emails, as he conversed with her on same…kept his name out of the reports.

11. BTW…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.

....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....


12. The FBI offered to pay Christopher Steele if he could corroborate the dossier….so he told Yahoo New’s Michael Isikoff about the dossier, had him print the information….then told the FBI that Isikoff independently discovered the “facts”…

Steele admitted, in a British court, that he leaked the material to Yahoo. September 23 Yahoo ran the story.

The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:

13. After the FBI fired Steele, he continued to confer with Bruce Ohr and the DoJ…and Rod Rosestein and Sally Yates.

In September of 2016, this was Steele’s statement to Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”


14. Fired by the FBI as untrustworthy, Steele is maintained by the DoJ as a contact, and all the while, Bruce Ohr’s wife is drawing a salary from the group Hillary hired to produce the dossier….GPS Fusion.

Bruce Ohr’s wife’s connections to Hillary’s paid dossier-producers, GPS Fusion, was never disclosed to the FISA court.

15. Not Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, nor the DNC, nor Christopher Steel, nor Fusion GPS, nor Bruce Ohr’s wife, the roles of none of these participants in the creation of the dossier….not a one was revealed to the FISA court.


16. Let’s compare the zealous and very aggressive action by Mueller against Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and Carter Page with the immunity and passes given above…..

…and lots of evidence of associations of Democrats with the Kremlin….

…completely different treatment.

17. And all of the players in on the fix were demanding the Memo not be released….and lied about why it should not be released.
Not one of the leftards has taken you up on this... insightful to say the least...
 
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
Funny,

Both the FBI and DOJ have stated there is no cooberating evidence... No other evidence was used to obtain the FISA warrants..

Sooooo who is lying? Democrats or the Agencies?

You are. Comey’s testimony was that “parts of the Dossier were unverified” because at the time of his testimony, they had just received it and were still working to verify it. Since that time more of the allegations have been confirmed, including its basic claim that the Russians were conducting a well funded long term campaign of propaganda and misinformation to get Trump elected.


"After 18 months of steely-eyed investigation, the only parts of the dossier that have been "confirmed" are bland factual statements -- Moscow is a city in Russia -- while the untrue parts are anything having to do with Trump or his associates.

As New York Times national security reporter Matthew Rosenberg explained to MSNBC's easily excited Chris Hayes last March:

"Both journalists and others who had copies of it for a long time have not been able to report much of it out. We've heard that, you know, the FBI and the Intelligence Community believe about 30 percent of it may be accurate, but most of that 30 percent, if not all, has been non-Trump stuff."
February 7, 2018 - CARTER PAGE: AGENT 000


Remember the last time you were right?



Me neither.

Well PoliticalChump, you’re not very well informed, but given that you don’t read anything that challenges what passes for your intellect, I’ve found this:

How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims
Do you read your links before posting them.... This one calls you a lair in the second paragraph alone...
But some of the document's seemingly wild claims have held up to a year's worth of scrutiny, even as many more parts remain disputed or have no evidence of being true.



Epic FAIL
 

Forum List

Back
Top