Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the democratic memo showed precisely how deceitful the Nunes memo was...... that is...for anyone who can read, and understand what they read....
And now there is no running from their established narrative...Democrats found themselves scurrying ….slithering….helter skelter to find some way to hide the facts Devin Nunes provided in his Memo.
The GOP Memo clearly revealed how corrupt and politically motivated the Left has been, using a weaponized FBI and DoJ to attack the man Americans voted in as President.
1. “Republicans had found that the DOJ and FBI left out Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign funding of the dossier, as well as the anti-Trump motivations of author and former British spy Christopher Steele, in its request for a warrant. Indeed, Republicans have pointed to this as proof that intelligence agencies abused surveillance powers.
2. The [Democrat] rebuttal added that the DOJ only made "narrow use" of information from Steele's sources and that in later FISA renewals the DOJ provided "additional information obtained through multiple independent sources" that backed up Steele's reporting. It challenged the Republican assertion that the FBI authorized payment to Steele, saying that it neglected that the payment was canceled.
3. The memo, however, did not directly challenge the Republican assertion that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe testified to the House Committee that they would not have sought the Page surveillance warrant had it not been for that infamous dossier.
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
5. However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.
6. ….it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious document for the FISA application."
Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'
I've asked the Leftists a dozen times to attempt to refute the Nunes Memo....and only one made a flaccid attempt.
Wanna try again???
the actual approval for the releasing of the democrat memo
was to pin them down to a certain set of answers
some of which are clearly false
this is getting to be like shooting fish in a barrel
And now there is no running from their established narrative...Democrats found themselves scurrying ….slithering….helter skelter to find some way to hide the facts Devin Nunes provided in his Memo.
The GOP Memo clearly revealed how corrupt and politically motivated the Left has been, using a weaponized FBI and DoJ to attack the man Americans voted in as President.
1. “Republicans had found that the DOJ and FBI left out Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign funding of the dossier, as well as the anti-Trump motivations of author and former British spy Christopher Steele, in its request for a warrant. Indeed, Republicans have pointed to this as proof that intelligence agencies abused surveillance powers.
2. The [Democrat] rebuttal added that the DOJ only made "narrow use" of information from Steele's sources and that in later FISA renewals the DOJ provided "additional information obtained through multiple independent sources" that backed up Steele's reporting. It challenged the Republican assertion that the FBI authorized payment to Steele, saying that it neglected that the payment was canceled.
3. The memo, however, did not directly challenge the Republican assertion that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe testified to the House Committee that they would not have sought the Page surveillance warrant had it not been for that infamous dossier.
4. The new memo also asserted that the dossier had been corroborated by multiple sources.
5. However, in June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI Director James Comey said the opposite -- that three months after the warrant on Page had been granted he still considered the dossier "unverified" and "salacious" when he briefed incoming President Trump in January 2017 at Trump Tower.
6. ….it seemed unlikely to mark an end to the ongoing fight over the FISA application and the role of that infamous dossier. Indeed, while the two parties clash over whether that dossier was a primary or secondary driver of the surveillance application, the newly declassified criminal referral for Christopher Steele from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the FBI and DOJ relied "heavily" on the controversial and salacious document for the FISA application."
Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'
I've asked the Leftists a dozen times to attempt to refute the Nunes Memo....and only one made a flaccid attempt.
Wanna try again???
the actual approval for the releasing of the democrat memo
was to pin them down to a certain set of answers
some of which are clearly false
this is getting to be like shooting fish in a barrel
the democratic memo showed precisely how deceitful the Nunes memo was...... that is...for anyone who can read, and understand what they read....
The Democrats would get The American People behind them if they came clean, cleaned their own house and then demanded that The FBI, DOJ, and Stste Department be purged of corruption.
Also FISA needs abolished or entirely rewritten to protect American Cirizens.
My point was, the redaction didn't seem to take out much of this wildly classified information the Republicans were whining about. I don't know what your post has to do with that.It was a ten page memo, according to the press, when Trump sent it to the FBI for redaction. It is STILL a ten page memo, so that leads me to believe not much got taken out. Hence, maybe it wasn't quite as "FULL" of classified information as the Republicans claim. Another delaying tactic, more like.First, that lying worm, Adam Schiff, filled the 'rebuttal' with classified data, so he could claim that Trump redacted exculpatory information...
....and Trump beat him at it by sending it to the FBI to be redacted.
Now everyone can read it, and see that Nunes was spot on.
7. “….Republicans on the intel committee responded with rebuttals to the rebuttal, providing more evidence that this battle has legs. For instance, while the Democrats say that the court was given information about the political motivations of Steele, Republicans say that such a statement is "buried in a footnote" that obscures rather than clarifies his motives.
8. “The American people now clearly understand that the FBI used political dirt paid for by the Democratic Party to spy on an American citizen from the Republican Party," Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif. said in a statement.
9. "Furthermore, the FISA court was misled about Mr. Page’s past interactions with the FBI in which he helped build a case against Russian operatives in America who were brought to justice. It defies belief that the Department of Justice and FBI failed to provide information to a secret court that they had provided to an open federal court regarding their past interactions with Mr. Page," he said.
10. The White House called the rebuttal a "politically driven document" that fails to answer the concerns raised by the Republican memo.” Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'
If you don't mind making a fool of yourself, I certainly don't mind, either.
So...here's your chance: any errors in the Nunes Memo?
1.The Hillary campaign paid for an anti-Trump Russian creation called the dossier: they used law firm Perkins Coie to funnel money to GPS Fusion and Christopher Steele
2. The Hillary campaign screamed that they had been hacked, but refused to allow any government agencies to inspect the supposedly hacked servers
3. The FBI admitted that they knew the dossier was fake from the start, but used it to get a FISA warrant to surveil Trump and associates
4. A secret cabal at the highest levels of the FBI and the DoJ worked with GPS Fusion to undermine the Trump campaign...before and after the election.
5. FBI found classified data on Huma and Anthony Weiner’s laptop….so they gave them a pass
6. The FBI decided no charges against Hillary before they interviewed her…..with no record kept of the interview, and not under oath.
7. Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were found to be lying to the FBI….but given a pass ...and allowed to keep their laptops, and destroy any evidence on same
8. FBI agents Strzok and Page and McCabe talked over a plan to overturn the election….an ‘insurance policy’
9. Loretta Lynch with Comey’s acquiescence, worked to benefit Hillary’s campaign
10. Obama knew about Hillary’s use of unsecured emails, as he conversed with her on same…kept his name out of the reports.
11. BTW…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.
....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....
12. The FBI offered to pay Christopher Steele if he could corroborate the dossier….so he told Yahoo New’s Michael Isikoff about the dossier, had him print the information….then told the FBI that Isikoff independently discovered the “facts”…
Steele admitted, in a British court, that he leaked the material to Yahoo. September 23 Yahoo ran the story.
The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:
13. After the FBI fired Steele, he continued to confer with Bruce Ohr and the DoJ…and Rod Rosestein and Sally Yates.
In September of 2016, this was Steele’s statement to Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”
14. Fired by the FBI as untrustworthy, Steele is maintained by the DoJ as a contact, and all the while, Bruce Ohr’s wife is drawing a salary from the group Hillary hired to produce the dossier….GPS Fusion.
Bruce Ohr’s wife’s connections to Hillary’s paid dossier-producers, GPS Fusion, was never disclosed to the FISA court.
15. Not Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, nor the DNC, nor Christopher Steel, nor Fusion GPS, nor Bruce Ohr’s wife, the roles of none of these participants in the creation of the dossier….not a one was revealed to the FISA court.
16. Let’s compare the zealous and very aggressive action by Mueller against Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and Carter Page with the immunity and passes given above…..
…and lots of evidence of associations of Democrats with the Kremlin….
…completely different treatment.
17. And all of the players in on the fix were demanding the Memo not be released….and lied about why it should not be released.
This is the most troubling part about this whole mess to me as a retired LEO.. They knew it was a lie and yet used it to gain a warrant to spy on a presidential candidate...The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:
They offered Steele $50k if he could get the dossier confirmed....so he goes out and spills it to Isikoff, Yahoo prints it....and Steele goes back to the FBI claiming that Isikoff gathered the info on is own.
Why isn't Steele arrested for lying to the FBI???
And....Steele tells a Brit court the opposite of what he told the FBI.
Again....why isn't he charged?????
the democratic memo showed precisely how deceitful the Nunes memo was...... that is...for anyone who can read, and understand what they read....
That committee had no business creating either memo. It was 100% partisan. And the crowning achievement? Nunes got a fucking medal from CPAC for it!the democratic memo showed precisely how deceitful the Nunes memo was...... that is...for anyone who can read, and understand what they read....
the democratic memo showed precisely how deceitful the Nunes memo was...... that is...for anyone who can read, and understand what they read....
Go ahead and offer point by point the deceit you claim is in Nunes memo. Every post in this thread is point by point and you just run your mouth without providing any evidence of your claim.
This is the most troubling part about this whole mess to me as a retired LEO.. They knew it was a lie and yet used it to gain a warrant to spy on a presidential candidate...The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:
They offered Steele $50k if he could get the dossier confirmed....so he goes out and spills it to Isikoff, Yahoo prints it....and Steele goes back to the FBI claiming that Isikoff gathered the info on is own.
Why isn't Steele arrested for lying to the FBI???
And....Steele tells a Brit court the opposite of what he told the FBI.
Again....why isn't he charged?????
I want to know what's going to happen with Flynn and the FISA judge who signed off on the warrant to tap Page and is now the Judge overseeing Flynn's case. Is he feeling stupid as he was duped? Is this why he is forcing the release of exculpatory evidence not provided by Mueller. I smell a turd. And Mueller's starting to look really bad here if the judge is pissed.
The good book says that near the end days the world will be poisoned by lies and liars.The Left will never have a wtf moment untilSomeone should ask Why Clinton wasn’t under surveillance because she was under 2 Criminal Investigations!
Let me say that again. She was under TWO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS!
One for Espionage, and Mishandling & Destruction of Government Documents and one for Money Laundering and I fluency Peddling through the Clinton Foundation.
Funny thing happened on the way to The Tarmac.... That’s how a “Matter” becomes a Criminal Coverup when Boss Hog gives the order to hand Crooked Hillary a get out of jail free card.
Woman defecates in pants to hide drugs during arrest, cops say
Somehow The President who is not under Criminal Investigation is under Surveillance, am day Clinton who is under TWO CRIMINAL Investigstions is not under Surveillance? And we aren’t even getting in to the $145 Million she took from Purin for Uranium One.
That should be a WTF moment for even Democrats. Somehow it’s not, which speaks to the moral decay of that party and those people.
Sheesh, you are the most extreme person here.I am?
Specifics, please, not platitudes.
.
A year of 24-7 illegal surveillance on The President & his family couldn’t prove Collusion, so Shitty Schiff or Murdering Mueller aren’t Going to do shit either!
See, that is the thing TOT, they had the whole Trump team under surveillance since before the election. They know what they said, what they did, read their e-mails, etc. And the Trump team did not know it until 10 days after the election, so they were speaking candidly.
In less than 10 months, look at all the evidence they already have against the Hillary team who was never surveilled! And yet, we are led to believe that Trump is going down.
If this is the best the FBI and DOJ can do with surveillance, how good are they really if the Left is correct? Does anyone actually believe these people are that incompetent?
You know where the Dems are going to be on the hook? When they have to answer the Nunes questionnaire or face a congressional subpoena. That is the end of the trail for the Democrats, because Nunes already knows the answers to the questions he is asking with all the files in his possession.
Also.............you know why the Hillary e-mail scandal was actually reopened? To prove that Obama knew she had a private e-mail account, when he said he didn't, that is why.....along with the rest of his administration having private accounts also, which is illegal if any business of the United States is done on them. That is exactly why Sessions reopened that case; and trust me on this...............he already has the e-mails-)
judgement day. All liars go to hell. It doesn’t say some. It says ALL. People need to repent of their sins because the day of reckoning is soon to come.
That committee had no business creating either memo. It was 100% partisan. And the crowning achievement? Nunes got a fucking medal from CPAC for it!the democratic memo showed precisely how deceitful the Nunes memo was...... that is...for anyone who can read, and understand what they read....
You want to talk about leading gullible people by the nose. A MEDAL? He should have been fired off the committee the day after he pulled that White House stunt last year.
Nunes is a tool. The Dems had no choice but to send out a memo giving the rest of the story.
Neither was important and neither deserves our energy. The FISA court knew that some of the information used in the original FISA application came from oppo research on Trump, and thinking that the judge couldn't figure out what camp paid for it (as if that makes a difference) is ridiculous. End of story.
The Democrats would get The American People behind them if they came clean, cleaned their own house and then demanded that The FBI, DOJ, and Stste Department be purged of corruption.
Also FISA needs abolished or entirely rewritten to protect American Cirizens.
My point was, the redaction didn't seem to take out much of this wildly classified information the Republicans were whining about. I don't know what your post has to do with that.It was a ten page memo, according to the press, when Trump sent it to the FBI for redaction. It is STILL a ten page memo, so that leads me to believe not much got taken out. Hence, maybe it wasn't quite as "FULL" of classified information as the Republicans claim. Another delaying tactic, more like.First, that lying worm, Adam Schiff, filled the 'rebuttal' with classified data, so he could claim that Trump redacted exculpatory information...
....and Trump beat him at it by sending it to the FBI to be redacted.
Now everyone can read it, and see that Nunes was spot on.
7. “….Republicans on the intel committee responded with rebuttals to the rebuttal, providing more evidence that this battle has legs. For instance, while the Democrats say that the court was given information about the political motivations of Steele, Republicans say that such a statement is "buried in a footnote" that obscures rather than clarifies his motives.
8. “The American people now clearly understand that the FBI used political dirt paid for by the Democratic Party to spy on an American citizen from the Republican Party," Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif. said in a statement.
9. "Furthermore, the FISA court was misled about Mr. Page’s past interactions with the FBI in which he helped build a case against Russian operatives in America who were brought to justice. It defies belief that the Department of Justice and FBI failed to provide information to a secret court that they had provided to an open federal court regarding their past interactions with Mr. Page," he said.
10. The White House called the rebuttal a "politically driven document" that fails to answer the concerns raised by the Republican memo.” Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'
If you don't mind making a fool of yourself, I certainly don't mind, either.
So...here's your chance: any errors in the Nunes Memo?
1.The Hillary campaign paid for an anti-Trump Russian creation called the dossier: they used law firm Perkins Coie to funnel money to GPS Fusion and Christopher Steele
2. The Hillary campaign screamed that they had been hacked, but refused to allow any government agencies to inspect the supposedly hacked servers
3. The FBI admitted that they knew the dossier was fake from the start, but used it to get a FISA warrant to surveil Trump and associates
4. A secret cabal at the highest levels of the FBI and the DoJ worked with GPS Fusion to undermine the Trump campaign...before and after the election.
5. FBI found classified data on Huma and Anthony Weiner’s laptop….so they gave them a pass
6. The FBI decided no charges against Hillary before they interviewed her…..with no record kept of the interview, and not under oath.
7. Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were found to be lying to the FBI….but given a pass ...and allowed to keep their laptops, and destroy any evidence on same
8. FBI agents Strzok and Page and McCabe talked over a plan to overturn the election….an ‘insurance policy’
9. Loretta Lynch with Comey’s acquiescence, worked to benefit Hillary’s campaign
10. Obama knew about Hillary’s use of unsecured emails, as he conversed with her on same…kept his name out of the reports.
11. BTW…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.
....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....
12. The FBI offered to pay Christopher Steele if he could corroborate the dossier….so he told Yahoo New’s Michael Isikoff about the dossier, had him print the information….then told the FBI that Isikoff independently discovered the “facts”…
Steele admitted, in a British court, that he leaked the material to Yahoo. September 23 Yahoo ran the story.
The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:
13. After the FBI fired Steele, he continued to confer with Bruce Ohr and the DoJ…and Rod Rosestein and Sally Yates.
In September of 2016, this was Steele’s statement to Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”
14. Fired by the FBI as untrustworthy, Steele is maintained by the DoJ as a contact, and all the while, Bruce Ohr’s wife is drawing a salary from the group Hillary hired to produce the dossier….GPS Fusion.
Bruce Ohr’s wife’s connections to Hillary’s paid dossier-producers, GPS Fusion, was never disclosed to the FISA court.
15. Not Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, nor the DNC, nor Christopher Steel, nor Fusion GPS, nor Bruce Ohr’s wife, the roles of none of these participants in the creation of the dossier….not a one was revealed to the FISA court.
16. Let’s compare the zealous and very aggressive action by Mueller against Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and Carter Page with the immunity and passes given above…..
…and lots of evidence of associations of Democrats with the Kremlin….
…completely different treatment.
17. And all of the players in on the fix were demanding the Memo not be released….and lied about why it should not be released.
My point was, the redaction didn't seem to take out much of this wildly classified information the Republicans were whining about. I don't know what your post has to do with that.It was a ten page memo, according to the press, when Trump sent it to the FBI for redaction. It is STILL a ten page memo, so that leads me to believe not much got taken out. Hence, maybe it wasn't quite as "FULL" of classified information as the Republicans claim. Another delaying tactic, more like.First, that lying worm, Adam Schiff, filled the 'rebuttal' with classified data, so he could claim that Trump redacted exculpatory information...
....and Trump beat him at it by sending it to the FBI to be redacted.
Now everyone can read it, and see that Nunes was spot on.
7. “….Republicans on the intel committee responded with rebuttals to the rebuttal, providing more evidence that this battle has legs. For instance, while the Democrats say that the court was given information about the political motivations of Steele, Republicans say that such a statement is "buried in a footnote" that obscures rather than clarifies his motives.
8. “The American people now clearly understand that the FBI used political dirt paid for by the Democratic Party to spy on an American citizen from the Republican Party," Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif. said in a statement.
9. "Furthermore, the FISA court was misled about Mr. Page’s past interactions with the FBI in which he helped build a case against Russian operatives in America who were brought to justice. It defies belief that the Department of Justice and FBI failed to provide information to a secret court that they had provided to an open federal court regarding their past interactions with Mr. Page," he said.
10. The White House called the rebuttal a "politically driven document" that fails to answer the concerns raised by the Republican memo.” Dems' rebuttal to GOP FISA memo is released; Trump deems it a 'bust'
If you don't mind making a fool of yourself, I certainly don't mind, either.
So...here's your chance: any errors in the Nunes Memo?
1.The Hillary campaign paid for an anti-Trump Russian creation called the dossier: they used law firm Perkins Coie to funnel money to GPS Fusion and Christopher Steele
2. The Hillary campaign screamed that they had been hacked, but refused to allow any government agencies to inspect the supposedly hacked servers
3. The FBI admitted that they knew the dossier was fake from the start, but used it to get a FISA warrant to surveil Trump and associates
4. A secret cabal at the highest levels of the FBI and the DoJ worked with GPS Fusion to undermine the Trump campaign...before and after the election.
5. FBI found classified data on Huma and Anthony Weiner’s laptop….so they gave them a pass
6. The FBI decided no charges against Hillary before they interviewed her…..with no record kept of the interview, and not under oath.
7. Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were found to be lying to the FBI….but given a pass ...and allowed to keep their laptops, and destroy any evidence on same
8. FBI agents Strzok and Page and McCabe talked over a plan to overturn the election….an ‘insurance policy’
9. Loretta Lynch with Comey’s acquiescence, worked to benefit Hillary’s campaign
10. Obama knew about Hillary’s use of unsecured emails, as he conversed with her on same…kept his name out of the reports.
11. BTW…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.
....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....
12. The FBI offered to pay Christopher Steele if he could corroborate the dossier….so he told Yahoo New’s Michael Isikoff about the dossier, had him print the information….then told the FBI that Isikoff independently discovered the “facts”…
Steele admitted, in a British court, that he leaked the material to Yahoo. September 23 Yahoo ran the story.
The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:
13. After the FBI fired Steele, he continued to confer with Bruce Ohr and the DoJ…and Rod Rosestein and Sally Yates.
In September of 2016, this was Steele’s statement to Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”
14. Fired by the FBI as untrustworthy, Steele is maintained by the DoJ as a contact, and all the while, Bruce Ohr’s wife is drawing a salary from the group Hillary hired to produce the dossier….GPS Fusion.
Bruce Ohr’s wife’s connections to Hillary’s paid dossier-producers, GPS Fusion, was never disclosed to the FISA court.
15. Not Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, nor the DNC, nor Christopher Steel, nor Fusion GPS, nor Bruce Ohr’s wife, the roles of none of these participants in the creation of the dossier….not a one was revealed to the FISA court.
16. Let’s compare the zealous and very aggressive action by Mueller against Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and Carter Page with the immunity and passes given above…..
…and lots of evidence of associations of Democrats with the Kremlin….
…completely different treatment.
17. And all of the players in on the fix were demanding the Memo not be released….and lied about why it should not be released.
Yes it does. It also says that In the last days men will be lovers of themselves Thank God for us who repent because that will be our saving grace. What is it worth if a man gains the whole world but loses his soul? I’d rather let my lips Speak the truth and be the woman that God would have me to be. Greed & lust will always be one of mans greatest downfalls.The good book says that near the end days the world will be poisoned by lies and liars.The Left will never have a wtf moment untilSomeone should ask Why Clinton wasn’t under surveillance because she was under 2 Criminal Investigations!
Let me say that again. She was under TWO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS!
One for Espionage, and Mishandling & Destruction of Government Documents and one for Money Laundering and I fluency Peddling through the Clinton Foundation.
Funny thing happened on the way to The Tarmac.... That’s how a “Matter” becomes a Criminal Coverup when Boss Hog gives the order to hand Crooked Hillary a get out of jail free card.
Woman defecates in pants to hide drugs during arrest, cops say
Somehow The President who is not under Criminal Investigation is under Surveillance, am day Clinton who is under TWO CRIMINAL Investigstions is not under Surveillance? And we aren’t even getting in to the $145 Million she took from Purin for Uranium One.
That should be a WTF moment for even Democrats. Somehow it’s not, which speaks to the moral decay of that party and those people.
Sheesh, you are the most extreme person here.I am?
Specifics, please, not platitudes.
.
A year of 24-7 illegal surveillance on The President & his family couldn’t prove Collusion, so Shitty Schiff or Murdering Mueller aren’t Going to do shit either!
See, that is the thing TOT, they had the whole Trump team under surveillance since before the election. They know what they said, what they did, read their e-mails, etc. And the Trump team did not know it until 10 days after the election, so they were speaking candidly.
In less than 10 months, look at all the evidence they already have against the Hillary team who was never surveilled! And yet, we are led to believe that Trump is going down.
If this is the best the FBI and DOJ can do with surveillance, how good are they really if the Left is correct? Does anyone actually believe these people are that incompetent?
You know where the Dems are going to be on the hook? When they have to answer the Nunes questionnaire or face a congressional subpoena. That is the end of the trail for the Democrats, because Nunes already knows the answers to the questions he is asking with all the files in his possession.
Also.............you know why the Hillary e-mail scandal was actually reopened? To prove that Obama knew she had a private e-mail account, when he said he didn't, that is why.....along with the rest of his administration having private accounts also, which is illegal if any business of the United States is done on them. That is exactly why Sessions reopened that case; and trust me on this...............he already has the e-mails-)
judgement day. All liars go to hell. It doesn’t say some. It says ALL. People need to repent of their sins because the day of reckoning is soon to come.
I've been watching this for several weeks now. Flynn has been handed a way out from the circus and I expect he will take it as long as the judge gives him the exit "with prejudice" due to the Mueller team official misconduct. IF it is granted, it will effectively kill the Mueller investigation dead and further taint it as intentional criminal misconduct.This is the most troubling part about this whole mess to me as a retired LEO.. They knew it was a lie and yet used it to gain a warrant to spy on a presidential candidate...The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.:
They offered Steele $50k if he could get the dossier confirmed....so he goes out and spills it to Isikoff, Yahoo prints it....and Steele goes back to the FBI claiming that Isikoff gathered the info on is own.
Why isn't Steele arrested for lying to the FBI???
And....Steele tells a Brit court the opposite of what he told the FBI.
Again....why isn't he charged?????
I want to know what's going to happen with Flynn and the FISA judge who signed off on the warrant to tap Page and is now the Judge overseeing Flynn's case. Is he feeling stupid as he was duped? Is this why he is forcing the release of exculpatory evidence not provided by Mueller. I smell a turd. And Mueller's starting to look really bad here if the judge is pissed.
The Flynn judge as been removed.
1. "How A Plea Reversal From Michael Flynn Could Uncover More Federal Corruption
2. ...Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order in United States v. Flynn that, while widely unnoticed, reveals something fascinating: A motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works.
3. ...Sullivan quietly directed Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team to provide Flynn’s attorneys “any exculpatory evidence,”...
4. On November 30, 2017, prosecutors working for Mueller charged former Trump national security advisor Flynn with lying to FBI agents. The following day, Flynn pled guilty before federal judge Rudolph Contreras. Less than a week later — and without explanation — Flynn’s case was reassigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.
5. One of Sullivan’s first orders of business was to enter a standing order, on December 12, 2017, directing “the government to produce to defendant in a timely manner – including during plea negotiations – any evidence in its possession that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment.”
6. ....the special counsel charged Flynn with lying to FBI agents on January 24. While the charge did not identify the FBI agents involved, we know that Peter Strzok conducted the January interview that eventually led to the criminal case against Flynn. Strzok formed a part of Mueller’s team until he was removed following the discovery of hostile text messages concerning Trump, including a planned “insurance policy” should Trump win the White House.
7. Obama political holdover Sally Yates’ involvement in the case raises additional concerns. While Strzok and Mueller initially indicated they believed Flynn had been truthful, Yates, while serving as acting attorney general, had directed Strzok to interview Flynn and had pushed for charges against Flynn...
8. ...Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea and suggests that Sullivan, as “the country’s premier jurist experienced in the abuses of our Department of Justice, . . . is the best person to confront the egregious government misconduct that has led to and been perpetrated by the Mueller-Weissmann ‘investigation’ and to right the injustices that have arisen from it.”
9. In his revised standing order issued on Friday, Sullivan dropped a lengthy footnote, detailing the case law and setting forth his position that, if material exculpatory evidence is withheld during plea negotiations, a defendant is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea.
10. Flynn’s attorneys now know what to do should Mueller’s team disclose such evidence. After the spanking Sullivan gave the prosecutors in the Stevens case, Mueller is on notice as well."
How A Michael Flynn Plea Reversal Could Uncover Federal Corruption
Memo to Mueller:
"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
A Republican President.
