Bullshit! Once again the burden of proof is on those seeking to limit or restrict rights . However, I will add that those advocating for same sex marriage NOT ONLY were able to show that there was not rational basis for the bans, but also that there were concreate benefits to families as the result of legal same sex marriage -as documented in the judicial record which you apparently did not bother to read.I would not even call it a "ban" on same sex Marriage. Marriage was made a certain way, for reasons discussed in the linked article.
And your side, as the side requesting a change, is the one who should have made the argument that the change would be for the better. NOt the other way around. Your side is extremely arrogant and divisive.
Nice circular reasoning.
You decide that the structure of marriage is a restriction of rights, and then cite that as an excuse for not making your case for change.
The article I linked to, not only described the development of traditional marriage, and the reasons for it, it also contrasted it with the alternate forms of marriage and societies and why our Western form was superior.
NOne of the reasons listed had anything to do with "banning" homosexuals or anything like that.
You libs are lying or wrong when you claim that it is about restricting rights or bigotry.
But doing so, gives you an excuse to attack those you hate.