Remember when Paula Jones showed off her $850k check from Bill Clinton at a national press conference?

[Marener]

Weird, huh.

What a classy lady.

 

[22lcidw]

Sure it did. Clinton was held to account.

Now it's time for Trump to be held to account.

He got off with a slap on the wrist for that time. Progs control near everything now as the world government gains steam.

 

[JoeB131]

He got off with a slap on the wrist for that time. Progs control near everything now as the world government gains steam.

I wouldn't want to go through what Clinton went through at the time.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Because Clinton used his own money to pay her off. He didn't entice others to pay her, so that payment didn't violate campaign finance laws. And he also didn't falsify financial records to cover up the payments.

What campaign finance laws did Trump break? The FEC said none. Trump never falsified a record. All records were made by someone else, and he was paying his lawyer so that is why it was recorded as legal expenses.

 

[JoeB131]

What campaign finance laws did Trump break? The FEC said none. Trump never falsified a record. All records were made by someone else, and he was paying his lawyer so that is why it was recorded as legal expenses.

No, the FEC didn't say "no laws were broken", they just declined to prosecute, like they decline to prosecute most offenses of campaign finance law.

The rest of your arguments were trotted out by Trump's lawyers, and rejected by the jury.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I wouldn't want to go through what Clinton went through at the time.

All Clinton had to do to avoid the entire mess was to NOT sexually harass women who worked under him.

 

[JoeB131]

All Clinton had to do to avoid the entire mess was to NOT sexually harass women who worked under him.

True enough. The guy had issues.
He paid for those issues.

 

[AZrailwhale]

True enough. The guy had issues.
He paid for those issues.

Not really, he got away with a slap on the wrist. He didn’t even have to pay her out of his own pocket. We know he harassed at least four women, probably many more.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Okay, you are leaving a few points out.

Clinton went to court, and was found not to be liable for sexual harassment because under Federal Law, Jones was not a direct report and she suffered no consequences.

She was paid, essentially, to not drag the case she lost out through appeals AFTER she dropped her demands for an apology for seeing Clinton's Weiner, which must be a thing of Lovecraftian Horror the way she was carrying on.

You really think that helps? LMAO!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

True enough. The guy had issues.
He paid for those issues.

What did he enter those payments as in his financial statements? Legal fees maybe?

 

[JoeB131]

Not really, he got away with a slap on the wrist. He didn’t even have to pay her out of his own pocket. We know he harassed at least four women, probably many more.

Um, no, frankly, you had a bunch of liars, who even Ken Starr didn't believe. Not that he wasn't keen on slandering the Clintons anyway.

 

[JoeB131]

What did he enter those payments as in his financial statements? Legal fees maybe?

Again, wasn't his money, and it was legally recorded as a settlement

Unlike Trump, who tried to hide what he was doing, Clinton faced Lying Slut Paula Jones in Court.

 

[Dragonlady]

Weird, huh.

That payoff was not so bad, huh?

Why is that?

Paul Jones did not claim "sexual assault". She claimed "sexual harassment in the workplace". She claimed that she refused to have sex with Bill Clinton and he punished her and her husband - a state trooper, by blocking raises and promotions.

THE CASE WAS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE, AND JONES APPEALED THE DISMISSAL. CLINTON SETTLED THE CASE BECAUSE OF THE IMPEACHMENT.
CLINTON DID NOTHING WRONG!!

In a ruling that shocked both sides, U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright rejected all of Jones's claims stemming from her 1991 encounter with Clinton in a hotel suite. Even if Clinton did make a crude proposition, the judge concluded that it would not constitute sexual assault and that there was no proof Jones was emotionally afflicted or punished in the workplace for rebuffing him. "There are no genuine issues for trial in this case," she wrote.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/jones040298.htm

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yet Trump is a better Christian than all of them.

odd you think being married 3 times, fucking around on all 3 wives, fucking a porn star while wife 3 was home recovering from child birth makes someone a good Christian.

perhaps you are reading the wrong bible.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Was this election interference?

It was a payoff for RAPE.

WHY DIDNT BILL GO TO PRISON FOR RAPE INSTEAD OF PAYING OFF PAULA JONES?

He paid with his own money.

That is what Trump should have done.

 

[LeftofLeft]

True enough. The guy had issues.
He paid for those issues.

Trump is going to pay for a conviction where reasonable doubt abounds but he’s also going to benefit from it as non-supporters will vote for him over protest and disgust over the use of lawfare.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Trump is going to pay for a conviction where reasonable doubt abounds but he’s also going to benefit from it as non-supporters will vote for him over protest and disgust over the use of lawfare.

The jurors didn't have reasonable doubt.

The court of public opinion carries no legal weight.

 

[HeyNorm]

odd you think being married 3 times, fucking around on all 3 wives, fucking a porn star while wife 3 was home recovering from child birth makes someone a good Christian.

perhaps you are reading the wrong bible.

And you think men wearing dresses and high heals makes them an actual woman.

You have nothing to talk about.

 

[HeyNorm]

The jurors didn't have reasonable doubt.

The court of public opinion carries no legal weight.

Thanks Matlock.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And you think men wearing dresses and high heals makes them an actual woman.

I do?

Feel free to find a post from me saying that.

I will be happy to wait.