Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.Wrong, wannabe traitor, wrong. The traitorous rebels wanted a war and were determined to have one. They got one and got beaten down.
Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.
Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.
ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.
Get sued and lose?
No, plant the dead he was responsible for at his doorstep.
They are still there...are they not? he he he
In other words, fuck his constitutional rights.
You got it.
That's what you get when you mess with the Good Ol USA buddy.... My only regret was that we didn't pile them into a pyramid Abu Grahib style with some black chick giving a big thumbs up to.
Too fucking stupid.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.
Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.
ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
LOL! The idiots will argue about anything brother. They have absolutely no idea how the world worked back in those days. Try explaining that both armies were largely comprised of the respective State Militias... and you'll see nothing looking back at ya but perplexed confusion.
The U.S. federal government had then, as they still have now, jurisdiction over Fort Sumpter. Try and deal with reality sometime. You might like it.
You have no evidence. You have dementia. You've proven you don't understand English and can't understand that the resolution where SC gave that land to the federal government, contained a provision to allow SC officers to process offenders of civil and criminal matters. That's it. That's the limit of SC's "legal jurisdiction." You even tried, and failed, to alter the meaning of that provision by truncating the sentence and adding punctuation that doesn't actually exist, just to change the meaning of that provision to what you delude yourself into believing it means.The only thing you've proven is that you're a complete fucking retard.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.
ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
Not only have you been shown that SC ceded the land so the U.S. government could build a fort...
Not only have you been shown that SC's "jurisdiction" was limited to arresting law breakers in criminal matters and serving process documents on civil matters...
But now you've been shown, with Encyclopedia Britannica, the fort was under U.S. jurisdiction when the confederates attacked.
And your stupidity is even double that of being a fucking retard if you think anyone in their right mind is going to take the word of a nutcase like you, who thinks he can rewrite history, over that of the Encyclopedia Britannica.
Sucks to be you.
I'm not going to waste my time posting the evidence that proves you're full of shit. The lurkers can read back through the threat to find it. All you've done here is the same shit you posted 2 dozen times previously and that I shot down two dozens times.
You're immune to logic, so it's pointless to debate you. Ridicule is all your good for.
Not to mention, history also betrays your delusions.
Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.
Get sued and lose?
No, plant the dead he was responsible for at his doorstep.
They are still there...are they not? he he he
In other words, fuck his constitutional rights.
You got it.
That's what you get when you mess with the Good Ol USA buddy.... My only regret was that we didn't pile them into a pyramid Abu Grahib style with some black chick giving a big thumbs up to.
Too fucking stupid.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.
ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
LOL! The idiots will argue about anything brother. They have absolutely no idea how the world worked back in those days. Try explaining that both armies were largely comprised of the respective State Militias... and you'll see nothing looking back at ya but perplexed confusion.
In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.
Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.
ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
LOL! The idiots will argue about anything brother. They have absolutely no idea how the world worked back in those days. Try explaining that both armies were largely comprised of the respective State Militias... and you'll see nothing looking back at ya but perplexed confusion.
You have no evidence. You have dementia. You've proven you don't understand English and can't understand that the resolution where SC gave that land to the federal government, contained a provision to allow SC officers to process offenders of civil and criminal matters. That's it. That's the limit of SC's "legal jurisdiction." You even tried, and failed, to alter the meaning of that provision by truncating the sentence and adding punctuation that doesn't actually exist, just to change the meaning of that provision to what you delude yourself into believing it means.The only thing you've proven is that you're a complete fucking retard.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
Not only have you been shown that SC ceded the land so the U.S. government could build a fort...
Not only have you been shown that SC's "jurisdiction" was limited to arresting law breakers in criminal matters and serving process documents on civil matters...
But now you've been shown, with Encyclopedia Britannica, the fort was under U.S. jurisdiction when the confederates attacked.
And your stupidity is even double that of being a fucking retard if you think anyone in their right mind is going to take the word of a nutcase like you, who thinks he can rewrite history, over that of the Encyclopedia Britannica.
Sucks to be you.
I'm not going to waste my time posting the evidence that proves you're full of shit. The lurkers can read back through the threat to find it. All you've done here is the same shit you posted 2 dozen times previously and that I shot down two dozens times.
You're immune to logic, so it's pointless to debate you. Ridicule is all your good for.
And then the icing on the cake. Encyclopedia Britannica completely and utterly destroying your hallucination.
Yet here you are, in all your mental retardation, maintaining your insanity that you know better than the Encyclopedia Britannica.
Too fucking stupid.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.
ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
LOL! The idiots will argue about anything brother. They have absolutely no idea how the world worked back in those days. Try explaining that both armies were largely comprised of the respective State Militias... and you'll see nothing looking back at ya but perplexed confusion.
Surrre, ya did.Too fucking stupid.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
LOL! The idiots will argue about anything brother. They have absolutely no idea how the world worked back in those days. Try explaining that both armies were largely comprised of the respective State Militias... and you'll see nothing looking back at ya but perplexed confusion.
I've already proven you wrong two dozen times, asshole.
You probably think you proved the Encyclopedia Britannica wrong too. 
You have no evidence. You have dementia. You've proven you don't understand English and can't understand that the resolution where SC gave that land to the federal government, contained a provision to allow SC officers to process offenders of civil and criminal matters. That's it. That's the limit of SC's "legal jurisdiction." You even tried, and failed, to alter the meaning of that provision by truncating the sentence and adding punctuation that doesn't actually exist, just to change the meaning of that provision to what you delude yourself into believing it means.The only thing you've proven is that you're a complete fucking retard.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
Not only have you been shown that SC ceded the land so the U.S. government could build a fort...
Not only have you been shown that SC's "jurisdiction" was limited to arresting law breakers in criminal matters and serving process documents on civil matters...
But now you've been shown, with Encyclopedia Britannica, the fort was under U.S. jurisdiction when the confederates attacked.
And your stupidity is even double that of being a fucking retard if you think anyone in their right mind is going to take the word of a nutcase like you, who thinks he can rewrite history, over that of the Encyclopedia Britannica.
Sucks to be you.
I'm not going to waste my time posting the evidence that proves you're full of shit. The lurkers can read back through the threat to find it. All you've done here is the same shit you posted 2 dozen times previously and that I shot down two dozens times.
You're immune to logic, so it's pointless to debate you. Ridicule is all your good for.
And then the icing on the cake. Encyclopedia Britannica completely and utterly destroying your hallucination.
Yet here you are, in all your mental retardation, maintaining your insanity that you know better than the Encyclopedia Britannica.
You are insanely stupid and you prove it over and over with every post you make.Too fucking stupid.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
LOL! The idiots will argue about anything brother. They have absolutely no idea how the world worked back in those days. Try explaining that both armies were largely comprised of the respective State Militias... and you'll see nothing looking back at ya but perplexed confusion.
Wrong. The title to Fort Sumter was on file in Charleston, just like any other piece of property in South Carolina. The legal status of Fort Sumter was no different than the legal status of the tobacco farm down the road.
Possession of a title does not in itself grant ownership to the possessor. The name on the title is what matters. Your senility foolishly informs you that you own my home if only I hand you the title.
Anti american should a been hung after Lincoln got shot.Robert E. Lee was a great American. He deserves a holiday
CIVIL WAR OP-ED Remembering Robert E. Lee American Patriot and Southern Hero Huntington News
Sir Winston Churchill called General Robert E. Lee, “one of the noblest Americans who ever lived.”
Please let me call to your attention that Monday, January 19, 2015, is the 208th birthday of Robert E. Lee, whose memory is still dear in the hearts of many Southerners. Why is this man so honored in the South and respected in the North? Lee was even respected by the soldiers of Union blue who fought against him during the War Between the States.
What is your community doing to commemorate the birthday of this great American?
General Lee’s portrait adorns the State Capitol in Atlanta where the Georgia Division Sons of Confederate Veterans hosted their 1st Lee birthday in 1988. The SCV will host their annual Robert E. Lee birthday celebration on Saturday January 17, 2015 at Georgia’s Old Secession Capitol on Greene Street in Milledgeville. Read more at: 2015 Annual Robert E Lee Birthday Celebration
During Robert E. Lee's 100th birthday in 1907, Charles Francis Adams, Jr., a former Union Commander and grandson of US President John Quincy Adams, spoke in tribute to Robert E. Lee at Washington and Lee College's Lee Chapel in Lexington, Virginia. His speech was printed in both Northern and Southern newspapers and is said to had lifted Lee to a renewed respect among the American people.
And In Lexington, Virginia events are scheduled for the birthday of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson on January 16th and 17th. Read more at: Home - Lee-Jackson Day Lexington VA
Dr. Edward C. Smith, respected African-American Professor of History at American University in Washington, D.C. , told the audience in Atlanta, Ga. during a 1995 Robert E. Lee birthday event, quote 'Dr. Martin Luther King and Robert E. Lee were individuals worthy of emulation because they understood history.' Unquote
Great, your insanity continues. In no terms in the English language does occupation mean jurisdiction. Not even in your mangled lexicon. As far as the Encyclopedia Britannica's authority -- they are most certainly an authority, even on American history. That's not to say they are the sole authority; certainly they are not. But if you think you have a higher respected authority -- post it.You have no evidence. You have dementia. You've proven you don't understand English and can't understand that the resolution where SC gave that land to the federal government, contained a provision to allow SC officers to process offenders of civil and criminal matters. That's it. That's the limit of SC's "legal jurisdiction." You even tried, and failed, to alter the meaning of that provision by truncating the sentence and adding punctuation that doesn't actually exist, just to change the meaning of that provision to what you delude yourself into believing it means.The only thing you've proven is that you're a complete fucking retard.In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.
Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter
By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.
Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.
No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.
Not only have you been shown that SC ceded the land so the U.S. government could build a fort...
Not only have you been shown that SC's "jurisdiction" was limited to arresting law breakers in criminal matters and serving process documents on civil matters...
But now you've been shown, with Encyclopedia Britannica, the fort was under U.S. jurisdiction when the confederates attacked.
And your stupidity is even double that of being a fucking retard if you think anyone in their right mind is going to take the word of a nutcase like you, who thinks he can rewrite history, over that of the Encyclopedia Britannica.
Sucks to be you.
I'm not going to waste my time posting the evidence that proves you're full of shit. The lurkers can read back through the threat to find it. All you've done here is the same shit you posted 2 dozen times previously and that I shot down two dozens times.
You're immune to logic, so it's pointless to debate you. Ridicule is all your good for.
And then the icing on the cake. Encyclopedia Britannica completely and utterly destroying your hallucination.
Yet here you are, in all your mental retardation, maintaining your insanity that you know better than the Encyclopedia Britannica.
"And then the icing on the cake. Encyclopedia Britannica completely and utterly destroying your hallucination."
All Britannica meant by "under federal jurisdiction" was that federal troops still occupied the forts. Any other claims are pure fantasy. If the other forts were not under federal jurisdiction, then the minute troops left Fort Sumter it would no longer be under federal jurisdiction either, but you claim that's impossible because a treaty with South Carolina supposedly says otherwise.
Furthermore, Britannica is not the ultimate authority on U.S. history. Only naive school boys would believe such a thing. Yet here you are thumping your chest like a chimp as if you've one an argument based on that premise.
Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.
Get sued and lose?
No, plant the dead he was responsible for at his doorstep.
They are still there...are they not? he he he
In other words, fuck his constitutional rights.
You got it.
That's what you get when you mess with the Good Ol USA buddy.... My only regret was that we didn't pile them into a pyramid Abu Grahib style with some black chick giving a big thumbs up to.
Thanks for showing everyone exactly what kind of people the members of the Lincoln cult are. It's hilarious that turds like you claim liberals are "compassionate" when you're really a bunch of bloodthirsty brutal assholes who are happy to wipe your asses on the Constitution. And you even claim to be patriots!
This was the money of the ConfederacyAnti american should a been hung after Lincoln got shot.Robert E. Lee was a great American. He deserves a holiday
CIVIL WAR OP-ED Remembering Robert E. Lee American Patriot and Southern Hero Huntington News
Sir Winston Churchill called General Robert E. Lee, “one of the noblest Americans who ever lived.”
Please let me call to your attention that Monday, January 19, 2015, is the 208th birthday of Robert E. Lee, whose memory is still dear in the hearts of many Southerners. Why is this man so honored in the South and respected in the North? Lee was even respected by the soldiers of Union blue who fought against him during the War Between the States.
What is your community doing to commemorate the birthday of this great American?
General Lee’s portrait adorns the State Capitol in Atlanta where the Georgia Division Sons of Confederate Veterans hosted their 1st Lee birthday in 1988. The SCV will host their annual Robert E. Lee birthday celebration on Saturday January 17, 2015 at Georgia’s Old Secession Capitol on Greene Street in Milledgeville. Read more at: 2015 Annual Robert E Lee Birthday Celebration
During Robert E. Lee's 100th birthday in 1907, Charles Francis Adams, Jr., a former Union Commander and grandson of US President John Quincy Adams, spoke in tribute to Robert E. Lee at Washington and Lee College's Lee Chapel in Lexington, Virginia. His speech was printed in both Northern and Southern newspapers and is said to had lifted Lee to a renewed respect among the American people.
And In Lexington, Virginia events are scheduled for the birthday of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson on January 16th and 17th. Read more at: Home - Lee-Jackson Day Lexington VA
Dr. Edward C. Smith, respected African-American Professor of History at American University in Washington, D.C. , told the audience in Atlanta, Ga. during a 1995 Robert E. Lee birthday event, quote 'Dr. Martin Luther King and Robert E. Lee were individuals worthy of emulation because they understood history.' Unquote
Notice no coins or stamps have his face?
This was the money of the ConfederacyAnti american should a been hung after Lincoln got shot.Robert E. Lee was a great American. He deserves a holiday
CIVIL WAR OP-ED Remembering Robert E. Lee American Patriot and Southern Hero Huntington News
Sir Winston Churchill called General Robert E. Lee, “one of the noblest Americans who ever lived.”
Please let me call to your attention that Monday, January 19, 2015, is the 208th birthday of Robert E. Lee, whose memory is still dear in the hearts of many Southerners. Why is this man so honored in the South and respected in the North? Lee was even respected by the soldiers of Union blue who fought against him during the War Between the States.
What is your community doing to commemorate the birthday of this great American?
General Lee’s portrait adorns the State Capitol in Atlanta where the Georgia Division Sons of Confederate Veterans hosted their 1st Lee birthday in 1988. The SCV will host their annual Robert E. Lee birthday celebration on Saturday January 17, 2015 at Georgia’s Old Secession Capitol on Greene Street in Milledgeville. Read more at: 2015 Annual Robert E Lee Birthday Celebration
During Robert E. Lee's 100th birthday in 1907, Charles Francis Adams, Jr., a former Union Commander and grandson of US President John Quincy Adams, spoke in tribute to Robert E. Lee at Washington and Lee College's Lee Chapel in Lexington, Virginia. His speech was printed in both Northern and Southern newspapers and is said to had lifted Lee to a renewed respect among the American people.
And In Lexington, Virginia events are scheduled for the birthday of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson on January 16th and 17th. Read more at: Home - Lee-Jackson Day Lexington VA
Dr. Edward C. Smith, respected African-American Professor of History at American University in Washington, D.C. , told the audience in Atlanta, Ga. during a 1995 Robert E. Lee birthday event, quote 'Dr. Martin Luther King and Robert E. Lee were individuals worthy of emulation because they understood history.' Unquote
Notice no coins or stamps have his face?
Slaves working the field --
This is the currency and the cause the idiot neoconfederates like bripat support and defend.
Anti american should a been hung after Lincoln got shot.Robert E. Lee was a great American. He deserves a holiday
CIVIL WAR OP-ED Remembering Robert E. Lee American Patriot and Southern Hero Huntington News
Sir Winston Churchill called General Robert E. Lee, “one of the noblest Americans who ever lived.”
Please let me call to your attention that Monday, January 19, 2015, is the 208th birthday of Robert E. Lee, whose memory is still dear in the hearts of many Southerners. Why is this man so honored in the South and respected in the North? Lee was even respected by the soldiers of Union blue who fought against him during the War Between the States.
What is your community doing to commemorate the birthday of this great American?
General Lee’s portrait adorns the State Capitol in Atlanta where the Georgia Division Sons of Confederate Veterans hosted their 1st Lee birthday in 1988. The SCV will host their annual Robert E. Lee birthday celebration on Saturday January 17, 2015 at Georgia’s Old Secession Capitol on Greene Street in Milledgeville. Read more at: 2015 Annual Robert E Lee Birthday Celebration
During Robert E. Lee's 100th birthday in 1907, Charles Francis Adams, Jr., a former Union Commander and grandson of US President John Quincy Adams, spoke in tribute to Robert E. Lee at Washington and Lee College's Lee Chapel in Lexington, Virginia. His speech was printed in both Northern and Southern newspapers and is said to had lifted Lee to a renewed respect among the American people.
And In Lexington, Virginia events are scheduled for the birthday of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson on January 16th and 17th. Read more at: Home - Lee-Jackson Day Lexington VA
Dr. Edward C. Smith, respected African-American Professor of History at American University in Washington, D.C. , told the audience in Atlanta, Ga. during a 1995 Robert E. Lee birthday event, quote 'Dr. Martin Luther King and Robert E. Lee were individuals worthy of emulation because they understood history.' Unquote
Notice no coins or stamps have his face?
This was the money of the ConfederacyAnti american should a been hung after Lincoln got shot.Robert E. Lee was a great American. He deserves a holiday
CIVIL WAR OP-ED Remembering Robert E. Lee American Patriot and Southern Hero Huntington News
Sir Winston Churchill called General Robert E. Lee, “one of the noblest Americans who ever lived.”
Please let me call to your attention that Monday, January 19, 2015, is the 208th birthday of Robert E. Lee, whose memory is still dear in the hearts of many Southerners. Why is this man so honored in the South and respected in the North? Lee was even respected by the soldiers of Union blue who fought against him during the War Between the States.
What is your community doing to commemorate the birthday of this great American?
General Lee’s portrait adorns the State Capitol in Atlanta where the Georgia Division Sons of Confederate Veterans hosted their 1st Lee birthday in 1988. The SCV will host their annual Robert E. Lee birthday celebration on Saturday January 17, 2015 at Georgia’s Old Secession Capitol on Greene Street in Milledgeville. Read more at: 2015 Annual Robert E Lee Birthday Celebration
During Robert E. Lee's 100th birthday in 1907, Charles Francis Adams, Jr., a former Union Commander and grandson of US President John Quincy Adams, spoke in tribute to Robert E. Lee at Washington and Lee College's Lee Chapel in Lexington, Virginia. His speech was printed in both Northern and Southern newspapers and is said to had lifted Lee to a renewed respect among the American people.
And In Lexington, Virginia events are scheduled for the birthday of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson on January 16th and 17th. Read more at: Home - Lee-Jackson Day Lexington VA
Dr. Edward C. Smith, respected African-American Professor of History at American University in Washington, D.C. , told the audience in Atlanta, Ga. during a 1995 Robert E. Lee birthday event, quote 'Dr. Martin Luther King and Robert E. Lee were individuals worthy of emulation because they understood history.' Unquote
Notice no coins or stamps have his face?
Slaves working the field --
This is the currency and the cause the idiot neoconfederates like bripat support and defend.
I would love for good god fearing black people who worked hard and raise their families could own white racists for just one generation. No two! Because part of the hell black people went through was knowing their kids would be slaves after they died.
I don't know why more slaves didn't massacre their owners and their families.
