Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Lots of morons also believe if we all lived at the base of the Big Rock Candy Mountain it would be a good thing.Can we all at least agree that if this were true, it would be a good thing?
No, we shouldn't be "supporting" any kind of energy. We should let the market decide which kind of energy we use.Instead of fighting renewables we should be supporting every form of energy. different forms work better in some places and when possible we should have the choice to chose what works best for us. the oil company's don't want us to have choices. with big dollar donations they buy our government leaders.
No, we shouldn't be "supporting" any kind of energy. We should let the market decide which kind of energy we use.Instead of fighting renewables we should be supporting every form of energy. different forms work better in some places and when possible we should have the choice to chose what works best for us. the oil company's don't want us to have choices. with big dollar donations they buy our government leaders.
Then name one and argue against it.Lots of opinion, very little facts.
You're a fucking idiot, do you even know the definition of the word government subsidy is?
.
Sure I am, but you are delusional about what constitutes a "tax subsidy." Deducting drilling costs is not a subsidy.No, we shouldn't be "supporting" any kind of energy. We should let the market decide which kind of energy we use.Instead of fighting renewables we should be supporting every form of energy. different forms work better in some places and when possible we should have the choice to chose what works best for us. the oil company's don't want us to have choices. with big dollar donations they buy our government leaders.
So, you are against tax subsidies for oil and gas companies?
You don't have a clue how much fossil fuel is required to manufacture a wind turbine.......starting with the amount needed to get the iron ore out of the ground.Instead of fighting renewables we should be supporting every form of energy. different forms work better in some places and when possible we should have the choice to chose what works best for us. the oil company's don't want us to have choices. with big dollar donations they buy our government leaders.
You're a fucking idiot, do you even know the definition of the word government subsidy is?
.
California Oil Spill Cleanup Has Cost $69 Million so Far
Sure I am, but you are delusional about what constitutes a "tax subsidy." Deducting drilling costs is not a subsidy.No, we shouldn't be "supporting" any kind of energy. We should let the market decide which kind of energy we use.Instead of fighting renewables we should be supporting every form of energy. different forms work better in some places and when possible we should have the choice to chose what works best for us. the oil company's don't want us to have choices. with big dollar donations they buy our government leaders.
So, you are against tax subsidies for oil and gas companies?
BNEF analyzed pricing data from almost 7,000 power projects in 46 countries that span 20 energy technologies, including coal, gas, nuclear, battery storage, solar photovoltaics (PV), and wind.And are beginning to beat natural gas.
Renewables ‘have won the race’ against coal and are starting to beat natural gas
Lots of opinion, very little facts.
Even for Thinkprogress.
Of course, that is precisely what it is. That is what it is and what it is designed to be. It's a decrease in tax meant to encourage a particular behavior.Deducting drilling costs is not a subsidy.
And are beginning to beat natural gas.
Renewables ‘have won the race’ against coal and are starting to beat natural gas
If you are using a computer right now ask yourself how much fossil fuel was used to manufacture your computer.Not for quite a while....watch and check them out. They have improving to do but in time they will. ( I'm off grid)And are beginning to beat natural gas.
Renewables ‘have won the race’ against coal and are starting to beat natural gas
But that doesn't mean the reporting is not factual. That merely gauges that on which they choose to report. And you're just using as an excuse to stay ignorant and avoid reading the material.
Joe certainly is a touchy-feely kind guy. Too many pictures of him doing just what was described for him to deny it.
Then name one and argue against it.Lots of opinion, very little facts.
No, thats an idiotic talking point. The true humanist wants people to continue to thrive with less environmental impact. I have no desire to stop people from using co.puters tomorrow. But I do think we are smart enough to advance tech to the point that making computers has less impact on the environment.If you are using a computer right now ask yourself how much fossil fuel was used to manufacture your computer.Not for quite a while....watch and check them out. They have improving to do but in time they will. ( I'm off grid)And are beginning to beat natural gas.
Renewables ‘have won the race’ against coal and are starting to beat natural gas
How much fossil fuel was used to manufacture the technology that allows you to be 'off the grid'.
You remind me of Al Gore using a private jet to fly all over the world preaching the gospel of global warming.
Fucking hypocrites!
You didnt read a word of it. So your opinion on it means less than nothing.The entire article is false,
Every business is allowed to deduct the cost of doing business, moron. Income is defined as revenue - expenses. Do you actually believe drilling costs are not an expense? Do you believe Ford Motor Company should not be allowed to deduct the cost of sheet metal?Sure I am, but you are delusional about what constitutes a "tax subsidy." Deducting drilling costs is not a subsidy.No, we shouldn't be "supporting" any kind of energy. We should let the market decide which kind of energy we use.Instead of fighting renewables we should be supporting every form of energy. different forms work better in some places and when possible we should have the choice to chose what works best for us. the oil company's don't want us to have choices. with big dollar donations they buy our government leaders.
So, you are against tax subsidies for oil and gas companies?
of course it is. why should they get to deduct the cost of a basic part of their business.
Does WalMart get to deduct the cost of shipping the goods to their stores?
Every business is allowed to deduct the cost of doing business, moron. Income is defined as revenue - expenses. Do you actually believe drilling costs are not an expense? Do you believe Ford Motor Company should not be allowed to deduct the cost of sheet metal?Sure I am, but you are delusional about what constitutes a "tax subsidy." Deducting drilling costs is not a subsidy.No, we shouldn't be "supporting" any kind of energy. We should let the market decide which kind of energy we use.Instead of fighting renewables we should be supporting every form of energy. different forms work better in some places and when possible we should have the choice to chose what works best for us. the oil company's don't want us to have choices. with big dollar donations they buy our government leaders.
So, you are against tax subsidies for oil and gas companies?
of course it is. why should they get to deduct the cost of a basic part of their business.
Does WalMart get to deduct the cost of shipping the goods to their stores?
Moronic shit like that is why no intelligent person believes anything a leftist says.
But not any and all costs. So your entire rant, predicated on this false implication, is kind of worthless.Every business is allowed to deduct the cost of doing business,
