Renowned attorney comments on new indictment against Trump

[forkintheroad7]

Jonathan Turley: The Supreme Court will have problems with this indictment | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to the special filing a new indictment in the election subversion case against former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

www.foxnews.com

I just now heard of this a couple hours ago. Basically, this nut Jack Smith (who was not supposed to be bringing the original case!) re-did the old indictment after the Supreme Ct ruled that presidents have immunity from lawsuits when they are (my words) working in their capacity as a president.

 

[OldFlame]

It's intentionally done so they can create a 'head line' and 'report' on it, expect more of this bullshit the closer to November we get.

 

[JoeB131]

Wow, the minute I saw the headline, I knew it was Turley putting on his red dress and fishnets and whoring himself out.

 

[Mac1958]

Turley is Fox's pet lawyer.

 

[rightwinger]

If this is the case….The Supreme Court has ruled a President is immune from prosecution for stealing an election as long as he uses official staff to do it

 

[JoeB131]

Turley is Fox's pet lawyer.

Vichy Mac is jealous that he couldn't suck up to that position?

 

[rightwinger]

Turley is Fox's pet lawyer.

Was Allan Dershowitz busy?

 

[forkintheroad7]

It's intentionally done so they can create a 'head line' and 'report' on it, expect more of this bullshit the closer to November we get.

I know. Too bad the brain-dead lib media watchers don't understand that

 

[Rambunctious]

All Smith did was to pull out the job duty parts of his last charge and found a new eager and willing Grand Jury to prosecute Trump... but this won't ever see the lights of a courtroom... Smith is just butthurt and tired of explaining to his Trump hater friends why he blew it....

 

[0311]

Turdly is a shill. He is paid for his opinion.

 

[berg80]

Jonathan Turley: The Supreme Court will have problems with this indictment | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to the special filing a new indictment in the election subversion case against former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

www.foxnews.com

I just now heard of this a couple hours ago. Basically, this nut Jack Smith (who was not supposed to be bringing the original case!) re-did the old indictment after the Supreme Ct ruled that presidents have immunity from lawsuits when they are (my words) working in their capacity as a president.

I see your mistake. You spelled "renowned" incorrectly. References to Turley are spelled "right wing media sellout." Hence you get.............

Right wing media sellout attorney comments out of his ass on new indictment against Trump​

Glad I could help.

 

[my2¢]

I don't have opinion one way or other, but I wouldn't trust the word of any media hired "expert".

 

[Rawley]

Wow, the minute I saw the headline, I knew it was Turley putting on his red dress and fishnets and whoring himself out.

Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant.

 

[forkintheroad7]

All Smith did was to pull out the job duty parts of his last charge and found a new eager and willing Grand Jury to prosecute Trump... but this won't ever see the lights of a courtroom... Smith is just butthurt and tired of explaining to his Trump hater friends why he blew it....

I frankly am bewildered. I watched J6 -2021 unfold and didn't see Trump do one thing wrong. He told his followers to "peacefully" go to the capitol

(didn't even use the term Mostly peacefully... )

 

[berg80]

All Smith did was to pull out the job duty parts of his last charge and found a new eager and willing Grand Jury to prosecute Trump

Grand juries that are empaneled to hear evidence leading to a possible indictment aren't found. They are selected randomly. Holy moly, how you folks hate reality.

 

[JoeB131]

All Smith did was to pull out the job duty parts of his last charge and found a new eager and willing Grand Jury to prosecute Trump... but this won't ever see the lights of a courtroom... Smith is just butthurt and tired of explaining to his Trump hater friends why he blew it....

Trump only gets away with it if he wins, which he won't.

After he loses the election, you'll be amazed how many of his Republican friends turn their backs on him, before he can do more damage to the party.

 

[JoeB131]

I frankly am bewildered. I watched J6 -2021 unfold and didn't see Trump do one thing wrong. He told his followers to "peacefully" go to the capitol

(didn't even use the term Mostly peacefully... )

Well, you are bewildered... then again, you think that a man in Rome has a direct line to the Magic Sky Fairy.

 

[forkintheroad7]

I don't have opinion one way or other, but I wouldn't trust the word of any media hired "expert".

That's idiotic

He could lose his license for lying and/or be sued

Get a clue

 

[Rambunctious]

Trump only gets away with it if he wins, which he won't.

After he loses the election, you'll be amazed how many of his Republican friends turn their backs on him, before he can do more damage to the party.

This attempt by Smith will be thwarted by a higher court... and this time Smith will be warned to not do this again... he is trying to weasel his way around a supreme court decision and the courts do not like that...

 

[Shareprofit]

I know. Too bad the brain-dead lib media watchers don't understand that

In your dreams pal, Jack Smith knows what he's doing, you're rapist convicted felon will go to jail for this after he loses in November.