Rep. Nadler Files Resolution That Could Be First Legislative Step Toward Impeachment

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
165,496
88,934
2,645
Native America
He's being interviewed on MSNBC right now. No link yet.

Finally found a link.

Washington, D.C. -- Today, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), senior Member of the House Judiciary Committee, introduced a Resolution of Inquiry directing the Department of Justice to provide the House of Representatives with any and all information relevant to an inquiry into President Trump and his associates’ conflicts of interest, ethical violations—including the Emoluments Clause—and Russia ties. If the House Judiciary Committee does not schedule the resolution for a Markup within 14 legislative days, it becomes a privileged resolution and can be brought to the floor in front of the full House for a vote.

More: Congressman Nadler Introduces Resolution of Inquiry to Force GOP Vote on Trump’s Conflicts, Ethics Violations, and Russia Ties
 
Last edited:
He's being interviewed on MSNBC right now. No link yet.

Go back to smoking meth Chief.

It will be impossible to remove Trump from the Presidency. First you need a majority vote for impeachment. You know like the majority vote that impeached Clinton (who yes was impeached). So the buck will stop there with a strong GOP majority in the house. Then to remove him you must get 67 senators to vote yes for removal (the reason Clinton wasn't removed from office after he was impeached). With the Dimocrats seating at 48 votes, good luck at flipping 19 Republicans.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
He's being interviewed on MSNBC right now. No link yet.

Go back to smoking meth Chief.

It will be impossible to remove Trump from the Presidency. First you need a majority vote for impeachment. You know like the majority vote that impeached Clinton (who yes was impeached). So the buck will stop there with a strong GOP majority in the house. Then to remove him you must get 67 senators to vote yes for removal (the reason Clinton wasn't removed from office after he was impeached). With the Dimocrats seating at 48 votes, good luck at flipping 19 Republicans.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I agree. I wonder what Shittingbull thinks they will impeach him for??

Shittingbull has really lost it. Hope she moves to Canada and inflicts herself on the Canucks.

You really, really can't cure stupid.
 
When will these idiots learn?
Hey Dems!!!! America is onto your bullshit scams!!


which are nothing like impeach Obama illegal President, fake birth certificate, muslim half breed, socialist, communist etc etc right?
 
You actually have to commit High Crimes and Misdemeanors to be impeached.

Now, Hillary Clinton? She violated, FOIA, The Espionage Act, Two Court Orders to Preserve her Emails, and She Committed Perjury under oath.
She actually was disqualified from holding any political office because of these violations.

She would have been impeached during her inauguration, and taken away in hand cuffs before should could complete her Oath of Office.

That is a far more realistic outcome than the delusions that psychotic schizoid liberals have of impeaching a man who has not committed any crimes.

But hey, the Butt Hurt never ends with The Barny Frank Brigade.
 
You actually have to commit High Crimes and Misdemeanors to be impeached.

Now, Hillary Clinton? She violated, FOIA, The Espionage Act, Two Court Orders to Preserve her Emails, and She Committed Perjury under oath.
She actually was disqualified from holding any political office because of these violations.

She would have been impeached during her inauguration, and taken away in hand cuffs before should could complete her Oath of Office.

That is a far more realistic outcome than the delusions that psychotic schizoid liberals have of impeaching a man who has not committed any crimes.

But hey, the Butt Hurt never ends with The Barny Frank Brigade.
Impeachment is a political process not a criminal process. All that is needed are the charges and the votes. The high crimes bit was copied from England and can anyone define a "high crime"?
 
That is a far more realistic outcome than the delusions that psychotic schizoid liberals have of impeaching a man who has not committed any crimes.
Your signature speaks for itself in regards to your comment:
1a154b2971b7de2fbe4b1fb2d47b5a89.jpg
 
You actually have to commit High Crimes and Misdemeanors to be impeached.

Now, Hillary Clinton? She violated, FOIA, The Espionage Act, Two Court Orders to Preserve her Emails, and She Committed Perjury under oath.
She actually was disqualified from holding any political office because of these violations.

She would have been impeached during her inauguration, and taken away in hand cuffs before should could complete her Oath of Office.

That is a far more realistic outcome than the delusions that psychotic schizoid liberals have of impeaching a man who has not committed any crimes.

But hey, the Butt Hurt never ends with The Barny Frank Brigade.
Impeachment is a political process not a criminal process. All that is needed are the charges and the votes. The high crimes bit was copied from England and can anyone define a "high crime"?
So if you get butt hurt enough over losing you can just impeach someone?

I think you need to brush up on our form of Government.

You have to have done something unlawful, committed perjury and other such violations of ethics.

Tell us oh ButHurtOwan.

Exactly on WHAT GROUNDS would you even begin to try to impeach Donald Trump?

You don't like his hair?

:afro:
 
That is a far more realistic outcome than the delusions that psychotic schizoid liberals have of impeaching a man who has not committed any crimes.
Your signature speaks for itself in regards to your comment:
1a154b2971b7de2fbe4b1fb2d47b5a89.jpg
Actually that is quite a valid point. I should never have to say anything at all but post this in response to every Lefty Fascist message posted in here.
1a154b2971b7de2fbe4b1fb2d47b5a89.jpg
 
You actually have to commit High Crimes and Misdemeanors to be impeached.

Now, Hillary Clinton? She violated, FOIA, The Espionage Act, Two Court Orders to Preserve her Emails, and She Committed Perjury under oath.
She actually was disqualified from holding any political office because of these violations.

She would have been impeached during her inauguration, and taken away in hand cuffs before should could complete her Oath of Office.

That is a far more realistic outcome than the delusions that psychotic schizoid liberals have of impeaching a man who has not committed any crimes.

But hey, the Butt Hurt never ends with The Barny Frank Brigade.
Impeachment is a political process not a criminal process. All that is needed are the charges and the votes. The high crimes bit was copied from England and can anyone define a "high crime"?
So if you get butt hurt enough over losing you can just impeach someone?

I think you need to brush up on our form of Government.

You have to have done something unlawful, committed perjury and other such violations of ethics.

Tell us oh ButHurtOwan.

Exactly on WHAT GROUNDS would you even begin to try to impeach Donald Trump?

You don't like his hair?

:afro:
Technically speaking, the legislative branch could very well do that. They can impeach for whatever they want. It is not going to happen of course.
 

Forum List

Back
Top