Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
- 0
- Banned
- #201
I do?Here, I will number things to make it more clear for you:
1. Who is wanting 10 year olds to go to work for 20-24 hours a week?
2. Who said I want to replace a janitor earning money for his family?
3. How does my saying that no single group of workers should be protected from competition mean I want a man to lose his job?
4. How is wanting equality for all groups of workers with respect to competent competition immoral?
Newt wants child workers to replace janitors. Janitors who happen to earn enough to support families will be replaced by cheaper child workers. You support Newt's stupid views.
....
My saying that some child labor laws are stupid, completely stupid means I want janitors to lose their jobs?
How does that work?
.... Typical Republican answer to everything. Screw workers and screw poor people. The GOP is the party of cheap labor and foreign outsourcing. It's the party of tax breaks for the rich and corruption.
So, you ask a question, and you make up the answer, and that's what your argument is.
Straw has no nutritional value to me, just so you know.
I think pathetic liars are immoral, Sky.
You say you support Newt's ideas. That's on you. You call me a liar for pointing out what YOU said. YOU said child labor laws are stupid. IMO, you don't understand that by agreeing with Newt, you support putting a family supporting janitor out of work with a cheaper child worker.
It may not be your intent, but it will be the result of your support for Newt Gingrich. It's Newt's vision and your vote. Good luck.
Last edited: