lieberalism
Active Member
- Apr 20, 2007
- 511
- 54
- 28
when will these liberals learn that you cant hide bathroom sex crimes from america? things arent looking good for liberals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
when will these liberals learn that you cant hide bathroom sex crimes from america? things arent looking good for liberals.
Why did Clinton negotiate a settlement instead of continuing to fight Paula Joness appeal if Bill Clinton were not guilty? Perhaps a fight would be too much of a bother and he just wanted to move on.
settling in a civil case is a different animal than pleading guilty to a crime
what you suspect, and what is the case are not always congruent. Quite honestly, I do not recall any democrat who ever claimed that, becuase of his or her superior morality, that the voters should chose them over an immoral republican...whereas, republicans HAVE made morality a centerpiece of their national campaign
I can recall a time, not too long ago when the democratic and republican senators from the state of maine were best of friends and co-authored a novel together. Collegiality and friendship used to be possible between democrats and republicans. When do you think that all started to really change?
BS!!! BS!!! BS!!!
Dems aren't running around campaigning for anti-gay marriage amendments to the Constitution or opposing gay rights or vilifying gays, while trying to play footsie with the guy in the next restroom stall. This guy did. Now, I'm sorry the republican tent is so small that a gay congressman needs to closet himself and resort to airport restrooms for solace, but they created that closet for themselves.
So it is fair to call these guys hypocrites.
It is NOT, I repeat, NOT intolerant to call them on their garbage. And, no, not every republican politician is a hypocrite, but if they're going to push policies which try to prohibit for other people the very behavior they engage in, they'd better be ready for the push-back.
And it's not just Dems saying it, real conservatives (as opposed to the radical right) are saying it too.
Nothing Gross about it, except her opinion. She has stated that the US is a terrorists State. She has STATED that American troops are involved willingly in targetting and killing innocent civilians. She has STATED the US military conduct is JUST like German Army conduct in WW2. She has stated the Bush Administration is just like Nazi Germany. She has STATED American citizens are just like German citizens in WW2, allowing the Government to commit crimes because they are to "afraid" to speak out.
No simplification at all. Other then your excuses to cover her opinion.
You can agree to pretend she hasn't said what she has. Just further evidence that to a liberal the ends justify the means. Toe tapping is code for sex BUT actually calling American Troops terrorists is a nuianced position that us neocon knuckle draggers just can't seem to grasp.
Already explained by the Individual. Do though keep pretending otherwise.
I will have to remember that Liberals have no problem with police power when used against Republicans when the same type of power would be decried as unfair, illegal, unacceptable and a slew of other words if used against a Democrat or any "minority".
So tell me, besides happy feet, what else must I avoid doing in a bathroom to avoid some cop arresting me for minding my own business and taking a dump?
Well, he did do a little more than just brush his foot against the person in the next stall. [However, this in itself is more than just a little odd. I have never been in a restroom stall that was so narrow that I actually placed my foot under the divider to touch the person next to me]
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/27/craig.arrest/index.html
I really don't know how to respond to your generalizations about liberals, as I am pretty sure I would think the behavior in question is problematic regardless of who is doing it.
As for things you shouldn't do in a restroom stall, I don't have a list for you, but I suppose the actions complained of represent a good start.
I give you that this isn't exactly the most important task that the police are assigned with, but it doesn't seem unreasonable to me that the police want to prevent lewd conduct in public restrooms - especially an airport restroom. Nobody wants to take their kids into a restroom and find a couple (man/woman or man/man or whatever) giving head to one another.
Why?
He pointed out the political ramifications to the Republican party of the moral lapses of its leaders.
He pointed out a bit of extreme hypocrisy by a socially conservative member of Congress.
I don't recall him ever saying that all Republicans are perverts.
I don't understand what he did that was so wrong.
another liberal in sheeps clothing.
i bet larry craig watches the daily show all night.
another liberal in sheeps clothing.
i bet larry craig watches the daily show all night.
The liberal media are again spreading their filthy lies about people who celebrate and uphold traditional family values of monogamous marriage between a man and a woman, being faithful to one spouse and respecting the sanctity of the family. Sen. Craig respects our family values, practices them and espouses them. Now the leftist media are impugning his reputation because they hate our heterosexual family values and want to destroy the sanctity of the traditional family. God bless Sen. Craig and please fight back against the evil-doers in the press.
not at all, I'm suggesting that if you are a republican and you see a democrat fall down on a non issue that perhaps you would be better served down the road if you were considerate of the FACT that such roadbumps happen in both parties. Obviously you think your own shit doesn't stink. When your house is made of glass I guess you find the largest stones to throw, right?
keep showing me all about that famous lefty tolorance, dude. It's probably not true that you are about as credible in this thread as Pat Robertson preaching about bombing muslims.
What.. two.. three weeks until the right has something on some democrat that puts egg on collective left wing?
"An elected politician runs on a platform promising to keep the lobbies out of Washington. It is discovered that his campaign was funded by private interest lobbies. Is this relevant? Can we discuss this, or is it merely lowering the dialogue?"
I guess that would depend on WHAT party this politician belongs to and how close you identify with said party. After all, it's big news for you when a republican takes money from a lobby but.. I just.. don't ever see.. you bitch about dems taking the same money from some other lobby... After all, if one politician gets busted with, say, THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IN THEIR FREEZER, then it MUST reflect upon the entire political ideology, right?
"An elected official runs on a platform stressing bringing equality to the masses of invisible in our society. Oooopppsss, turns out he is a member of the Klan. Is this relevant? Can we discuss this, or is it merely lowering the dialogue?"
You tell me. How many Byrd jokes does it take to razzle you? Or the reality of dixiecrats. Praytell, how often shall we bring this stuff up? Before or AFTER the congress sessions ends after a lackluster democratic majority? Just RAISING THE DIALOG when a conservative on this board slaps the shit out of you with a couple pages of Byrd jokes, right?
Yet I'm only talking about yours and not the entire democratic affiliation.
I guess you can't see the opposing question then, eh? why should others be tolorant of your acceptance of homosexuality while spouting off your OPINION on who is a hypocrit? Did that come too fast at you? Why should you be? Because you don't apply the same standard to your own side.
If you can show me a thread where you have pounced on your own with as much ferver as you would theright then post a link and prove me wrong.
Am I talking about you specifically based on your input to this thread or, say, the entire political affiliation of anyone who agrees with you on a given issue?!