Shogun
Free: Mudholes Stomped
- Jan 8, 2007
- 30,528
- 2,263
- 1,045
I guess there are two ways to read his comment. I construe it to mean that the identification of additional Republican "perverts" (ala Foley, Craig, Haggard (sp?), etc) will impair the chances of the Republicans in 2008.
One could, I suppose, read this to imply that he thinks all Republicans are perverts. However, this seems like an overly inflammatory interpretation of what he wrote. In addition, it would be so silly a statement (and obviously untrue) that I doubt very strongly that this is what he meant.
This is backed up by the fact that in a post just a few inches down the thread, he states "And of course....a minority of republicans are perverts...." He also states "Clearly, all republicans are not perverts."
Indeed, polish the turd, homey! Give a good Wax on, Wax off!