- Apr 17, 2009
- 112,950
- 38,428
Your assuming that they would give a bomb to a third party proxy? I think it would be pretty easy to figure out who provided the material. They seem pretty good at tracing the movement of material with NK for example and NK is even more secretive and a totally closed society.
I also question whether Iran - if it gets - nuclear weaponry (and that is a long way off from it's current position) - that it would risk letting into the hands of proxies which are unstable and fluid and not necesarily under their complete control. I don't see that regime as "insane" - calculating, ambitious but not insane.
Yes, the nuclear anti-proliferation regime has a history of such effectiveness with countries like pakistan, india, and n korea...NOT.
Agree - it's not perfectly effective - yet no one presents viable alternatives. What do you do when you're faced with a set of bad alternatives? What would you do with NK? Attack it? And set loose a war on the border of SK and nuclear powered China who would be faced with millions of NK refugees? The world is interconnected and actions have profound and often unrealized consequences - like the invasion of Iraq.