Republican Senators send a letter to Iran. Wow. Damn!

The Gang of 47 aren't 'traitors,' they're cowards, fools, and partisan hacks – their letter amounts to a childish temper-tantrum because the president won reelection.


That's what they've been doing through his entire presidency. Now they're actually colluding with enemy.

Traitors.

An open letter is not "colluding with the enemy." Sheesh!

This is colluding with the enemy:

"We don't mind being used" --Jim McDermott

NBC News Whitewashes History on Iran Diplomacy The Weekly Standard
 
Republicans Warn Iran -- and Obama -- That Deal Won t Last - Bloomberg View

A group of 47 Republican senators has written an open letter to Iran's leaders warning them that any nuclear deal they sign with President Barack Obama's administration won’t last after Obama leaves office.
Organized by freshman Senator Tom Cotton and signed by the chamber's entire party leadership as well as potential 2016 presidential contenders Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, the letter is meant not just to discourage the Iranian regime from signing a deal but also to pressure the White House into giving Congress some authority over the process.

“It has come to our attention while observing your nuclear negotiations with our government that you may not fully understand our constitutional system … Anything not approved by Congress is a mere executive agreement,” the senators wrote. “The next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.”

Arms-control advocates and supporters of the negotiations argue that the next president and the next Congress will have a hard time changing or canceling any Iran deal -- -- which is reportedly near done -- especially if it is working reasonably well.

Well, this is new, even in the world of the GOP batshit-crazy. This really does one-up it all. It's also kind of funny that there is a constitutional error in what the Senators wrote to the government of Iran. The Senate does NOT ratify treaties. That is even indicated directly on their Senate website. Instead, the Senate takes up a resolution of ratification, by which the Senate formally gives its advice and consent, empowering the president to proceed with ratification” . It's a fine point, almost splitting hairs, but worth noting.

So, Republicans hate this Democratic President so much that they are even willing to pen a letter to someone they consider an enemy of ours.


Back to the Bloomberg link:

It's stunning. And it's a rebuke on an international stage that doesn't really have a precedent. Imagine Democrats micro-managing the START talks in the 80s by sending an open letter to Gorbachev? It just wouldn't have been viewed as an acceptable political move while the talks were still happening.

The only conclusion we can make is that the GOP is not the loyal opposition, it is a severly disloyal opposition and deserves to be treated with disdain and contempt for such unamerican behavior. The GOP simply hates America, it's that simple.
The GOP is nothing but a bunch of Israeli bitches, do what they're told like good little whores.

They love sucking that Israeli dick!

I thought Stashisfuckingnameis is a German Jew and supports Israel.... Was I mistaken?

Could be. You told people you were in Vietnam, and look what a mistake that turned out to be.

It was.
 
Republicans Warn Iran -- and Obama -- That Deal Won t Last - Bloomberg View

A group of 47 Republican senators has written an open letter to Iran's leaders warning them that any nuclear deal they sign with President Barack Obama's administration won’t last after Obama leaves office.
Organized by freshman Senator Tom Cotton and signed by the chamber's entire party leadership as well as potential 2016 presidential contenders Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, the letter is meant not just to discourage the Iranian regime from signing a deal but also to pressure the White House into giving Congress some authority over the process.

“It has come to our attention while observing your nuclear negotiations with our government that you may not fully understand our constitutional system … Anything not approved by Congress is a mere executive agreement,” the senators wrote. “The next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.”

Arms-control advocates and supporters of the negotiations argue that the next president and the next Congress will have a hard time changing or canceling any Iran deal -- -- which is reportedly near done -- especially if it is working reasonably well.

Well, this is new, even in the world of the GOP batshit-crazy. This really does one-up it all. It's also kind of funny that there is a constitutional error in what the Senators wrote to the government of Iran. The Senate does NOT ratify treaties. That is even indicated directly on their Senate website. Instead, the Senate takes up a resolution of ratification, by which the Senate formally gives its advice and consent, empowering the president to proceed with ratification” . It's a fine point, almost splitting hairs, but worth noting.

So, Republicans hate this Democratic President so much that they are even willing to pen a letter to someone they consider an enemy of ours.


Back to the Bloomberg link:

It's stunning. And it's a rebuke on an international stage that doesn't really have a precedent. Imagine Democrats micro-managing the START talks in the 80s by sending an open letter to Gorbachev? It just wouldn't have been viewed as an acceptable political move while the talks were still happening.

The only conclusion we can make is that the GOP is not the loyal opposition, it is a severly disloyal opposition and deserves to be treated with disdain and contempt for such unamerican behavior. The GOP simply hates America, it's that simple.
The GOP is nothing but a bunch of Israeli bitches, do what they're told like good little whores.

They love sucking that Israeli dick!

I thought Stashisfuckingnameis is a German Jew and supports Israel.... Was I mistaken?

Could be. You told people you were in Vietnam, and look what a mistake that turned out to be.

It was.

Uh-huh, so you keep saying. Feel free to elaborate.
 
Obama is not a master of diplomacy like Republicans are

He should begin all negotiations by declaring Iran as part of the Axis of Evil

GprHbA9.jpg
 
The thing to remember here reader, is that John Kerry is the front guy for the deal to help Iran acquire Nuclear weapons.

And John Kerry committed Treason against the United States way back in 1970.

"by Kerry’s own admission, he met in 1970 with delegations from the North Vietnamese communist government and discussed how the Vietnam War should be stopped.

Kerry explained to Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman J. William Fulbright in a question-and-answer session on Capitol Hill a year after his Paris meetings that the war needed to be stopped “immediately and unilaterally.” Then Kerry added: “I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations at the peace talks, that is to say the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government.


“Kerry was openly advocating that the communist position was correct and that we were wrong. He had become a spokesman for the communist party.”

"Kerry, through his actions, completely adopted the rhetoric and objectives of the North Vietnamese communist, enemy of the United States."


ROFLMNAO!

So, the Left is wetting their collective pant over 47 US Senators writing an open letter to a hostile regime, informing them that any agreement they make with the subversive regime, toward any end which could potentially lead to their acquiring nuclear weapons... thus aiding and abetting the means of that hostile nation to injure the United States, her interests and allies... even as those in charge of such negotiations: HAVE LONG ADMITTED TO FELONIOUS BEHAVIOR WHEREIN THEY ADOPTED THE RHETORIC AND OBJECTIVES OF THE ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES..., wherein he took >then< as he is taking now: adoption of, thus adherence to, the position of those who have demonstrated hostility toward the people of the United States, in pursuing policy which adheres to the policy of a foreign hostile and aiding their means to injure the United States.

Kerry was speaking as a young wounded warrior who saw wrong and tried to right it - half a century ago. 47 senators acted politically, in lock-step, and with one sole concern - winning the White House at any cost.

As I've previously posted, you must be nuts to continue to post irrelevancies of the partisan hack kind.


He tried to right nothing other than his own self gratification. He is no hero and a despicable yet disgusting human being for his actions against the US.

I was on active duty during the Vietnam War (1967-1969) and can assure you the opinions expressed by Kerry then were quite common among the military even that early.

Indeed they were... The North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong were unanimous in their support of Kerry's 7 Point Plan, which was created by the North Vietnamese communists was nothing more than a Democrat “surrender”, subversion of US interests and treason of the first order.
 
Well, for better or worse, the Pubs have served notice that they plan to overturn much of Obumble's work, if they win in 2016.



Yea, I think that was their objective in 2012 as well. Especially that pesky Omamcare. How'd that work out for them hateful Rethugs? Is that done yet? Or are they waiting till they overturn the illegal immigrant situation? How's that working out for them?

But really, the IF they win part is the truth. Big IF.
Agreed - although reversals were not attempted to either the ObamaCare and Immigration situations, with Pubs in control of both Congress and the Oval Office - which is, of course, their hope for 2016...

If the Pubs gain control of both Congress AND the White House in 2016, some of His Majesty's social re-engineering will be overthrown so frigging fast that it'll make our heads spin...

After the heads spin, then what?
Nothing, other than the gubmint laying-out less money?
 
So the senate who the president is on a daily basis threatening to bypass inserted their authority on a president who threatened to bypass them on this Iran deal and now the leftards are going apeshit crazy.

Some days it's just fun to watch the meltdown.
Yes, I keep hearing cat-calls of 'treason'... a sure sign that the Pubs have got their attention.
 
Our President has killed more ISIS fighters than any leader on earth

It is Republicans who pander to them by providing just what ISIS wants

Our President has killed a few beers ... And maybe a bird at the golf course.
King Abdullah of Jordan has killed more ISIS fighters than President Obama.

.
 
Last edited:
Iran called the letter propaganda. That must be so embarrassing for the signatories.
Nowhere near as embarrassing as being President when Congress invites foreign heads of state to address them without so much as a by-your-leave, and when they publicly bitch-slap you with a harsh letter to a potential Enemy, warning them that the lenient terms of the Wussbag-in-Chief will not be honored by the country once you leave office.
 
One good thing if Iran thought they could make obama crawl on his belly like the bitch he is, another president isn't bound by that agreement. It might make them not go as far as they thought they could.
I'm not really posting to you as I recognize you're just a flaming imbecile; but I am responding to a point you inadvertently make for the benefit of others with an IQ higher than 40....

The message those 47 Republican Senators sent, not just to Iran, but to the entire globe, is .... don't make deals with America -- we don't possess the honor to keep them.

Republicans did now to our image as a nation what they did to our credit rating a few years ago... they sabotaged it in an effort to undermine Obama and cost us our credibility.

excellent point! Country First was always a slogan, one they dropped along with the Big Tent liel Today's Republican Party is beginning to look like the Democratic Party in the first five decades of the 19th Century.
 

Forum List

Back
Top