Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But in the process the US will be forced to retaliate. And most likely World War III will begin.
Israel's interests don't trump the rest of the worlds - particularly since Israel is a nuclear power that has refused to sign the NPT.
Sure, but when Iran threatens to wipe you from the face of the Earth, it won't matter who has second strike capability and who doesn't. One nuke ends Israel forever. It won't matter who signed the NPT. Israel will get the blunt end of this deal.
Iran is not suicidal - they're not going to "nuke Israel", and even if they did, "one nuke" won't come close to ending Israel forever.
Israel has second-strike capability, both from ground silos and from submarines. A nuclear attack on Israel would guarantee an automatic nuclear response against Iran.
Israel's nukes are modern thermonuclear fusion bombs - "H-bombs" - which are magnitudes more powerful than anything Iran is close to building. Not to mention the other 3 nuclear powers within 200 miles of Iran.
If a country behaves in a rational manner,,, your argument might work
Iran, or least it leaders are far from stable and trustworthy.
If a theocracy has a belief that suicidal acts can get one into heaven,
it seems a hard sell to believe they are not at least a bit irrational.
Besides, a nuclear bomb capability is the required "trigger" for a H bomb
so, yeah it is a big thing
Iran is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet.
They haven't lasted 6,000 years being irrational.
Israel's interests don't trump the rest of the worlds - particularly since Israel is a nuclear power that has refused to sign the NPT.
Sure, but when Iran threatens to wipe you from the face of the Earth, it won't matter who has second strike capability and who doesn't. One nuke ends Israel forever. It won't matter who signed the NPT. Israel will get the blunt end of this deal.
Iran is not suicidal - they're not going to "nuke Israel", and even if they did, "one nuke" won't come close to ending Israel forever.
Israel has second-strike capability, both from ground silos and from submarines. A nuclear attack on Israel would guarantee an automatic nuclear response against Iran.
Israel's nukes are modern thermonuclear fusion bombs - "H-bombs" - which are magnitudes more powerful than anything Iran is close to building. Not to mention the other 3 nuclear powers within 200 miles of Iran.
If a country behaves in a rational manner,,, your argument might work
Iran, or least it leaders are far from stable and trustworthy.
If a theocracy has a belief that suicidal acts can get one into heaven,
it seems a hard sell to believe they are not at least a bit irrational.
Besides, a nuclear bomb capability is the required "trigger" for a H bomb
so, yeah it is a big thing
Iran is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet.
They haven't lasted 6,000 years being irrational.
Problem. Iran isn't limited to its geographical borders. It holds influence over multiple countries in the ME.
Israel's interests don't trump the rest of the worlds - particularly since Israel is a nuclear power that has refused to sign the NPT.
Sure, but when Iran threatens to wipe you from the face of the Earth, it won't matter who has second strike capability and who doesn't. One nuke ends Israel forever. It won't matter who signed the NPT. Israel will get the blunt end of this deal.
If it comes to that - everyone will get the blunt end of the deal because Israel will strike back and then everyone will go nuts.
But Iran is not insane. It wants to be a major regional player but it does not want to destroy itself.
What people don't seem to grasp is that there will be no Isreal if Iran nukes them. Israel won't be there to strike back.
The largest uranium fission bomb (the only sort of nuclear weapon possible for Iran to build) ever built had a destructive radius of less than 5 miles.
Where are you getting your information from?
Israel's interests don't trump the rest of the worlds - particularly since Israel is a nuclear power that has refused to sign the NPT.
Sure, but when Iran threatens to wipe you from the face of the Earth, it won't matter who has second strike capability and who doesn't. One nuke ends Israel forever. It won't matter who signed the NPT. Israel will get the blunt end of this deal.
Iran is not suicidal - they're not going to "nuke Israel", and even if they did, "one nuke" won't come close to ending Israel forever.
Israel has second-strike capability, both from ground silos and from submarines. A nuclear attack on Israel would guarantee an automatic nuclear response against Iran.
Israel's nukes are modern thermonuclear fusion bombs - "H-bombs" - which are magnitudes more powerful than anything Iran is close to building. Not to mention the other 3 nuclear powers within 200 miles of Iran.
If a country behaves in a rational manner,,, your argument might work
Iran, or least it leaders are far from stable and trustworthy.
If a theocracy has a belief that suicidal acts can get one into heaven,
it seems a hard sell to believe they are not at least a bit irrational.
Besides, a nuclear bomb capability is the required "trigger" for a H bomb
so, yeah it is a big thing
Sure, but when Iran threatens to wipe you from the face of the Earth, it won't matter who has second strike capability and who doesn't. One nuke ends Israel forever. It won't matter who signed the NPT. Israel will get the blunt end of this deal.
Iran is not suicidal - they're not going to "nuke Israel", and even if they did, "one nuke" won't come close to ending Israel forever.
Israel has second-strike capability, both from ground silos and from submarines. A nuclear attack on Israel would guarantee an automatic nuclear response against Iran.
Israel's nukes are modern thermonuclear fusion bombs - "H-bombs" - which are magnitudes more powerful than anything Iran is close to building. Not to mention the other 3 nuclear powers within 200 miles of Iran.
If a country behaves in a rational manner,,, your argument might work
Iran, or least it leaders are far from stable and trustworthy.
If a theocracy has a belief that suicidal acts can get one into heaven,
it seems a hard sell to believe they are not at least a bit irrational.
Besides, a nuclear bomb capability is the required "trigger" for a H bomb
so, yeah it is a big thing
Iran is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet.
They haven't lasted 6,000 years being irrational.
Problem. Iran isn't limited to its geographical borders. It holds influence over multiple countries in the ME.
Iran has some level of influence in Syria and Iraq. That's about it.
The whole Iran empire-building meme is mostly just fantasy and fear-mongering.
Israel's interests don't trump the rest of the worlds - particularly since Israel is a nuclear power that has refused to sign the NPT.
Sure, but when Iran threatens to wipe you from the face of the Earth, it won't matter who has second strike capability and who doesn't. One nuke ends Israel forever. It won't matter who signed the NPT. Israel will get the blunt end of this deal.
Iran is not suicidal - they're not going to "nuke Israel", and even if they did, "one nuke" won't come close to ending Israel forever.
Israel has second-strike capability, both from ground silos and from submarines. A nuclear attack on Israel would guarantee an automatic nuclear response against Iran.
Israel's nukes are modern thermonuclear fusion bombs - "H-bombs" - which are magnitudes more powerful than anything Iran is close to building. Not to mention the other 3 nuclear powers within 200 miles of Iran.
If a country behaves in a rational manner,,, your argument might work
Iran, or least it leaders are far from stable and trustworthy.
If a theocracy has a belief that suicidal acts can get one into heaven,
it seems a hard sell to believe they are not at least a bit irrational.
Besides, a nuclear bomb capability is the required "trigger" for a H bomb
so, yeah it is a big thing
Iran is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet.
They haven't lasted 6,000 years being irrational.
There is no "constitutional overreach". What he is doing is perfectly legit and has been done by every president before him.
Edited to add: Consider the SALT talks: Strategic Arms Limitation Talks SALT Encyclopedia Britannica
Most of those agreements were executive agreements eventually leading to the ABM Treaty.
...The Interim Agreement froze each side’s number of ICBMs and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) at current levels for five years, pending negotiation of a more detailed SALT II. As an executive agreement, it did not require U.S. Senate ratification, but it was approved by Congress in a joint resolution
The agreements being negotiated with Iran are similar. Neither side can get everything they want but if they put a freeze on it for ten years, they can buy time to negotiate something more permenant.
Israel's interests don't trump the rest of the worlds - particularly since Israel is a nuclear power that has refused to sign the NPT.
Sure, but when Iran threatens to wipe you from the face of the Earth, it won't matter who has second strike capability and who doesn't. One nuke ends Israel forever. It won't matter who signed the NPT. Israel will get the blunt end of this deal.
If it comes to that - everyone will get the blunt end of the deal because Israel will strike back and then everyone will go nuts.
But Iran is not insane. It wants to be a major regional player but it does not want to destroy itself.
What people don't seem to grasp is that there will be no Isreal if Iran nukes them. Israel won't be there to strike back.
The largest uranium fission bomb (the only sort of nuclear weapon possible for Iran to build) ever built had a destructive radius of less than 5 miles.
Where are you getting your information from?
Does "radioactive fallout" mean anything?
There is no "constitutional overreach". What he is doing is perfectly legit and has been done by every president before him.
So every President has done everything within their means to promote the interests of the enemy of United States, without tipping their hand that they're actually doing so... ?
Now setting aside the obvious example of William The Bubba... would ya have an example or two?
An example supporting your distortion....is that what you are requesting?
But in the process the US will be forced to retaliate. And most likely World War III will begin.
Iran is not suicidal - they're not going to "nuke Israel", and even if they did, "one nuke" won't come close to ending Israel forever.
Israel has second-strike capability, both from ground silos and from submarines. A nuclear attack on Israel would guarantee an automatic nuclear response against Iran.
Israel's nukes are modern thermonuclear fusion bombs - "H-bombs" - which are magnitudes more powerful than anything Iran is close to building. Not to mention the other 3 nuclear powers within 200 miles of Iran.
If a country behaves in a rational manner,,, your argument might work
Iran, or least it leaders are far from stable and trustworthy.
If a theocracy has a belief that suicidal acts can get one into heaven,
it seems a hard sell to believe they are not at least a bit irrational.
Besides, a nuclear bomb capability is the required "trigger" for a H bomb
so, yeah it is a big thing
Iran is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet.
They haven't lasted 6,000 years being irrational.
Problem. Iran isn't limited to its geographical borders. It holds influence over multiple countries in the ME.
Iran has some level of influence in Syria and Iraq. That's about it.
The whole Iran empire-building meme is mostly just fantasy and fear-mongering.
Uh, and what proof do you have that Iran's influence is that limited?
Iran is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet.
They haven't lasted 6,000 years being irrational.
There is no "constitutional overreach". What he is doing is perfectly legit and has been done by every president before him.
So every President has done everything within their means to promote the interests of the enemy of United States, without tipping their hand that they're actually doing so... ?
Now setting aside the obvious example of William The Bubba... would ya have an example or two?
An example supporting your distortion....is that what you are requesting?
So you're claiming here that reality appears distorted to you?
Well, such is typical of the usage of deviant reasoning. (That's sorta the downside to delusion.)
There is no "constitutional overreach". What he is doing is perfectly legit and has been done by every president before him.
Edited to add: Consider the SALT talks: Strategic Arms Limitation Talks SALT Encyclopedia Britannica
Most of those agreements were executive agreements eventually leading to the ABM Treaty.
...The Interim Agreement froze each side’s number of ICBMs and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) at current levels for five years, pending negotiation of a more detailed SALT II. As an executive agreement, it did not require U.S. Senate ratification, but it was approved by Congress in a joint resolution
The agreements being negotiated with Iran are similar. Neither side can get everything they want but if they put a freeze on it for ten years, they can buy time to negotiate something more permenant.
There is no indication yet that it would endanger Israel or threaten the world or the US.
A 10 year sunset clause most certainly would.
Depends on exactly what is in the agreement and no, even then - it could just mean back to another set of sanctions or negotiations. A nuclear bomb isn't going to spring forth like Athena from the head of Zeus at the end of ten years.
I notice how so many people want to put wings and a halo on this deal and call it glorious, but it simply isn't. This deal is being negotiated without input from Israel, therefore whatever is being discussed is not in the best interests of Israel. All Iran needs to do is stonewall and play nice until they have enough centrifuges to make a bomb. They are already 1/4th of the way there.
It also requires one to believe that Papa Obama is a good judge of character
That could be a hard sell
This is what you guys don't get. It's really this simple.
"Character" has nothing to do with this. Nothing at all.
This is politics.
Israel's interests don't trump the rest of the worlds - particularly since Israel is a nuclear power that has refused to sign the NPT.
Sure, but when Iran threatens to wipe you from the face of the Earth, it won't matter who has second strike capability and who doesn't. One nuke ends Israel forever. It won't matter who signed the NPT. Israel will get the blunt end of this deal.
Iran is not suicidal - they're not going to "nuke Israel", and even if they did, "one nuke" won't come close to ending Israel forever.
Israel has second-strike capability, both from ground silos and from submarines. A nuclear attack on Israel would guarantee an automatic nuclear response against Iran.
Israel's nukes are modern thermonuclear fusion bombs - "H-bombs" - which are magnitudes more powerful than anything Iran is close to building. Not to mention the other 3 nuclear powers within 200 miles of Iran.
If a country behaves in a rational manner,,, your argument might work
Iran, or least it leaders are far from stable and trustworthy.
If a theocracy has a belief that suicidal acts can get one into heaven,
it seems a hard sell to believe they are not at least a bit irrational.
Besides, a nuclear bomb capability is the required "trigger" for a H bomb
so, yeah it is a big thing
Iran is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet.
They haven't lasted 6,000 years being irrational.
There is no "constitutional overreach". What he is doing is perfectly legit and has been done by every president before him.
Edited to add: Consider the SALT talks: Strategic Arms Limitation Talks SALT Encyclopedia Britannica
Most of those agreements were executive agreements eventually leading to the ABM Treaty.
...The Interim Agreement froze each side’s number of ICBMs and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) at current levels for five years, pending negotiation of a more detailed SALT II. As an executive agreement, it did not require U.S. Senate ratification, but it was approved by Congress in a joint resolution
The agreements being negotiated with Iran are similar. Neither side can get everything they want but if they put a freeze on it for ten years, they can buy time to negotiate something more permenant.
A 10 year sunset clause most certainly would.
Depends on exactly what is in the agreement and no, even then - it could just mean back to another set of sanctions or negotiations. A nuclear bomb isn't going to spring forth like Athena from the head of Zeus at the end of ten years.
I notice how so many people want to put wings and a halo on this deal and call it glorious, but it simply isn't. This deal is being negotiated without input from Israel, therefore whatever is being discussed is not in the best interests of Israel. All Iran needs to do is stonewall and play nice until they have enough centrifuges to make a bomb. They are already 1/4th of the way there.
It also requires one to believe that Papa Obama is a good judge of character
That could be a hard sell
This is what you guys don't get. It's really this simple.
"Character" has nothing to do with this. Nothing at all.
This is politics.
LOL!
And you guys thought when they started calling sexual deviants "Gay" that it was cute... and harmless.
But in your defense, who could have known that they'd eventually profess publicly that character has no relevance to governance. (But it does explain how they came up with 'The Constitution Protects the Right to murder your pre-born children.)
Yo, how quickly we forget? Just a few days back the "Socialist Progressive Democrats" showed their true colors as traitors! They boycotted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech, our only ally in the middle east? Now who is the real Hypocrite in Washington?
"GTP"
"OBAMA AND HIS PUPPETS HATE AMERICA"
View attachment 37678
If a country behaves in a rational manner,,, your argument might work
Iran, or least it leaders are far from stable and trustworthy.
If a theocracy has a belief that suicidal acts can get one into heaven,
it seems a hard sell to believe they are not at least a bit irrational.
Besides, a nuclear bomb capability is the required "trigger" for a H bomb
so, yeah it is a big thing
Iran is one of the oldest civilizations on the planet.
They haven't lasted 6,000 years being irrational.
Problem. Iran isn't limited to its geographical borders. It holds influence over multiple countries in the ME.
Iran has some level of influence in Syria and Iraq. That's about it.
The whole Iran empire-building meme is mostly just fantasy and fear-mongering.
Uh, and what proof do you have that Iran's influence is that limited?
What "proof" do you have that Iran's influence is any more than that?
