Republicans are NOT supposed to know how to manage an economy; their function is to prevent politicians from managing the economy.
Link?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Republicans are NOT supposed to know how to manage an economy; their function is to prevent politicians from managing the economy.
Prove it. What are you waiting for?
Damn and did I call it or what?
About.com: http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/29/news/economy/stimulus_analysis/index.htmWASHINGTON (CNN) -- As Congress and the White House consider a $150 billion stimulus package that includes tax rebates and tax incentives for business, a report released Tuesday suggests that other methods would do a better job of infusing money into the flagging economy and doing it fast.
The industry research firm Moody's Economy.com tracked the potential impact of each stimulus dollar, looking at tax rebates, tax incentives for business, food stamps and expanding unemployment benefits.
The report found that "some provide a lot of bang for the buck to the economy. Others ... don't," said economist Mark Zandi.
I already showed how the idea of a "multiplier" is wrong. I showed how government spending only comes at the expense of more productive uses. I showed how all of this crap comes from one shithead pseudo-economist at Moody's. And of course I showed how despire the highest level of spending on UE and food stamps we have the worst economy in post war history.
If that doesn't persuade you Billy then nothing will. You are literally unteachable.
Nothing you said here is proof the graph is wrong.
Damn and did I call it or what?
About.com: http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/29/news/economy/stimulus_analysis/index.htm
I already showed how the idea of a "multiplier" is wrong. I showed how government spending only comes at the expense of more productive uses. I showed how all of this crap comes from one shithead pseudo-economist at Moody's. And of course I showed how despire the highest level of spending on UE and food stamps we have the worst economy in post war history.
If that doesn't persuade you Billy then nothing will. You are literally unteachable.
Nothing you said here is proof the graph is wrong.
Everything I wrote is proof the graph is wrong. You are literally unteachable, Billy.
Republicans are NOT supposed to know how to manage an economy; their function is to prevent politicians from managing the economy.
Link?
Moody did. Just because you have no understanding of economics, it doesn't mean other people don't.![]()
Just because some goof at Moody's pulled some numbers out of his ass doesn't mean it's anything other than ridiculous.
Yet you can't prove its bullshit.
Just because some goof at Moody's pulled some numbers out of his ass doesn't mean it's anything other than ridiculous.
Yet you can't prove its bullshit.
Prove that $1 taxed away from a productive member of our economy and given to someone unemployed produces $1.64 in GDP.
And then subtract out the GDP lost because government took the money out of the taxpayer's wallet in the first place. With all the lost efficiency that comes with government.
Try to use facts, not feelings. Thanks!!!
Just because some goof at Moody's pulled some numbers out of his ass doesn't mean it's anything other than ridiculous.
Yet you can't prove its bullshit.
Prove that $1 taxed away from a productive member of our economy and given to someone unemployed produces $1.64 in GDP.
And then subtract out the GDP lost because government took the money out of the taxpayer's wallet in the first place. With all the lost efficiency that comes with government.
Try to use facts, not feelings. Thanks!!!
Yet you can't prove its bullshit.
Prove that $1 taxed away from a productive member of our economy and given to someone unemployed produces $1.64 in GDP.
And then subtract out the GDP lost because government took the money out of the taxpayer's wallet in the first place. With all the lost efficiency that comes with government.
Try to use facts, not feelings. Thanks!!!
There's probably some type of Fractional Spending effect that occurs.
Just like the clown like notion that Institutional Fractional Reserves allow a $1.00 to equal something like a gazillion dollars in the real world.
Prove that $1 taxed away from a productive member of our economy and given to someone unemployed produces $1.64 in GDP.
And then subtract out the GDP lost because government took the money out of the taxpayer's wallet in the first place. With all the lost efficiency that comes with government.
Try to use facts, not feelings. Thanks!!!
There's probably some type of Fractional Spending effect that occurs.
Just like the clown like notion that Institutional Fractional Reserves allow a $1.00 to equal something like a gazillion dollars in the real world.
It works because when poor people receive money they spend it immediately on basic necessities like food clothing and shelter. That is what makes the economic growth so effective.
There's probably some type of Fractional Spending effect that occurs.
Just like the clown like notion that Institutional Fractional Reserves allow a $1.00 to equal something like a gazillion dollars in the real world.
It works because when poor people receive money they spend it immediately on basic necessities like food clothing and shelter. That is what makes the economic growth so effective.
And businesses can take out more loans and grow their businesses.
Hmmm...Sounds like Fractional Reserve Lending.
Nothing you said here is proof the graph is wrong.
Everything I wrote is proof the graph is wrong. You are literally unteachable, Billy.
Dude you have no idea what you are talking about and you know it. Accept you lost the argument.
It works because when poor people receive money they spend it immediately on basic necessities like food clothing and shelter. That is what makes the economic growth so effective.
And businesses can take out more loans and grow their businesses.
Hmmm...Sounds like Fractional Reserve Lending.
That is less effective because the extra stimulus is spent on investment rather than economic demand. Stimulating demand is the most effective way to stimulate growth.
Prove that $1 taxed away from a productive member of our economy and given to someone unemployed produces $1.64 in GDP.
And then subtract out the GDP lost because government took the money out of the taxpayer's wallet in the first place. With all the lost efficiency that comes with government.
Try to use facts, not feelings. Thanks!!!
There's probably some type of Fractional Spending effect that occurs.
Just like the clown like notion that Institutional Fractional Reserves allow a $1.00 to equal something like a gazillion dollars in the real world.
It works because when poor people receive money they spend it immediately on basic necessities like food clothing and shelter. That is what makes the economic growth so effective.
And businesses can take out more loans and grow their businesses.
Hmmm...Sounds like Fractional Reserve Lending.
That is less effective because the extra stimulus is spent on investment rather than economic demand. Stimulating demand is the most effective way to stimulate growth.
Yep, we all saw how handing money over to our Financial Institutions worked out so well.
Spoken like a true Communist there.How about you try? Go ahead. Humor me. Why am I wrong?
The problem is they think all government is bad and the other side thinks it can only do good. There's no reasonable middle ground like we once had.
Government is the only solution. Tax cutting is a function of government legislation. That is what makes the right so brain dead.
There's probably some type of Fractional Spending effect that occurs.
Just like the clown like notion that Institutional Fractional Reserves allow a $1.00 to equal something like a gazillion dollars in the real world.
It works because when poor people receive money they spend it immediately on basic necessities like food clothing and shelter. That is what makes the economic growth so effective.
There has been no economic growth. The multiplier effect is zero.
Why the Fiscal Multiplier is Roughly Zero | Mercatus
That is less effective because the extra stimulus is spent on investment rather than economic demand. Stimulating demand is the most effective way to stimulate growth.
Yep, we all saw how handing money over to our Financial Institutions worked out so well.
It did work out well. The U.S. received a windfall from the banks that borrowed money. Where have you been?
Yet you can't prove its bullshit.
Prove that $1 taxed away from a productive member of our economy and given to someone unemployed produces $1.64 in GDP.
And then subtract out the GDP lost because government took the money out of the taxpayer's wallet in the first place. With all the lost efficiency that comes with government.
Try to use facts, not feelings. Thanks!!!
LOL this is prove you have no idea how this works. What this graph is saying is that every government dollar spent on UE and food stamps creates 1.71 in economic growth. That is what makes it a gain. Tax cuts on the other hand are a loss in dollars.
Prove that $1 taxed away from a productive member of our economy and given to someone unemployed produces $1.64 in GDP.
And then subtract out the GDP lost because government took the money out of the taxpayer's wallet in the first place. With all the lost efficiency that comes with government.
Try to use facts, not feelings. Thanks!!!
LOL this is prove you have no idea how this works. What this graph is saying is that every government dollar spent on UE and food stamps creates 1.71 in economic growth. That is what makes it a gain. Tax cuts on the other hand are a loss in dollars.
What this graph is saying is that every government dollar spent on UE and food stamps creates 1.71 in economic growth.
And I'm saying you can't prove it.
If the "extra dollar" in spending creates that GDP, the "dollar less" spending, because you taxed it away from someone, would likewise cost that same amount of GDP.
Even more, because government is so damn inefficient.
Here is proof extending unemployment insurance stimulates economic growth and thus creates jobs. The heart of Obama's stimulus package. Proof that just because something seems counter intuitive, it doesn't mean it isn't true. Government can and does create jobs.
![]()