Republicans better be careful with the campaign lies. They are so easy to disprove.

[Billy_Kinetta]

Too funny.

The fact is, it won't really matter why she pulls out

What exactly is "funny"? Many of us on the left don't like Hillary, unlike the brain dead we care more about the country than any political party.

What's funny is your fretting over something that simply doesn't matter in the least. If she's out, she's out.

I care about the country too, and I belong to no political party. In this time I believe the only thing worse than a Republican is a Democrat, and holy shit, are they ever bad.

 

[nat4900]

Right the lie that Kerry and both Clinton's who 9 months earlier while in the White House agreed with Bush.

Moronic and trite response.......Let me ask you this:
"If someone told you a LIE, and you think its truthful, who is culpable?"

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It's impossible to disprove a NaziCon lie to NaziCons.

Well, first you need a lie to disprove.

Saddam has WMD's.

Sent from my 0PCV1 using Tapatalk

His own generals as well as much of Western intel believed he did.

 

[nat4900]

What's funny is your fretting over something that simply doesn't matter in the least. If she's out, she's out.

I care about the country too, and I belong to no political party. In this time I believe the only thing worse than a Republican is a Democrat, and holy shit, are they ever bad.

True, to some extent....and I for one do NOT want Hillary to win the Dem.'s nomination.....Now, almost anyone who remains from the democrat side HAS GOT TO BE BETTER than any republican clown running (except, maybe for Kasich.)

 

[nat4900]

His own generals as well as much of Western intel believed he did.

Which would make Saddam smarter than all of them? Or is someone lying?

 

[Papageorgio]

Right the lie that Kerry and both Clinton's who 9 months earlier while in the White House agreed with Bush.

Moronic and trite response.......Let me ask you this:
"If someone told you a LIE, and you think its truthful, who is culpable?"

Explain why Bill Clinton agreed with George Bush? Clinton had access to the information that Iraq had WMDs. It was Clinton that kept wanting the the UN investigators to keep up inspections. It wasn't until Iraq refused the inspections that trouble began.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

His own generals as well as much of Western intel believed he did.

Which would make Saddam smarter than all of them? Or is someone lying?

It means that intel is never a sure thing.

 

[Papageorgio]

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

 

[asaratis]

Right the lie that Kerry and both Clinton's who 9 months earlier while in the White House agreed with Bush.

Moronic and trite response.......Let me ask you this:
"If someone told you a LIE, and you think its truthful, who is culpable?"

Explain why Bill Clinton agreed with George Bush? Clinton had access to the information that Iraq had WMDs. It was Clinton that kept wanting the the UN investigators to keep up inspections. It wasn't until Iraq refused the inspections that trouble began.

Either he had WMDs or he didn't. Makes no difference. He fooled the world into thinking he had them. He used some on his own people. He needed to be taken out. He was. People rejoiced. Stability got a foothold. Obama took away the only thing preventing the revolutionary establishment of a radical terrorist state. You can thank that Muslim-loving asshole in the White House for the growth of radical Islam, the very thing he refuses to identify as the enemy of the world. And now the bastard is giving back over a hundred billion dollars to help Iran finance more terrorism. Obama is our worst enemy!

 

[RicO'Shea]

It's impossible to disprove a NaziCon lie to NaziCons.

Well, first you need a lie to disprove.

Saddam has WMD's.

Sent from my 0PCV1 using Tapatalk

His own generals as well as much of Western intel believed he did.

Prior to December, 1998.

Sent from my 0PCV1 using Tapatalk

 

[Papageorgio]

It's impossible to disprove a NaziCon lie to NaziCons.

Well, first you need a lie to disprove.

Saddam has WMD's.

Sent from my 0PCV1 using Tapatalk

His own generals as well as much of Western intel believed he did.

Prior to December, 1998.

Sent from my 0PCV1 using Tapatalk

Several Democrats knew he had WMDs, after 1998. I just posted several quotes of those Democrats that knew there were WMDs

 

[nat4900]

It wasn't until Iraq refused the inspections that trouble began.

No, the "trouble" began when Cheney, Wolfowitz and Tenet cooked the intel to suit their war-mongering, neo-con needs and blood thirst.
But do we really want too go down that road that led to the Iraq fiasco?
Somewhere there MUST be a letter of "thank you" from the Ayatollahs to GWB.

 

[Papageorgio]

It wasn't until Iraq refused the inspections that trouble began.

No, the "trouble" began when Cheney, Wolfowitz and Tenet cooked the intel to suit their war-mongering, neo-con needs and blood thirst.
But do we really want too go down that road that led to the Iraq fiasco?
Somewhere there MUST be a letter of "thank you" from the Ayatollahs to GWB.

Again, I posted several Democrats from 1998 to 2002 that had access to the intelligence, sorry but only lefty loons believe intelligence was cooked and never had any proof.

 

[nat4900]

Either he had WMDs or he didn't. Makes no difference. He fooled the world into thinking he had them. He used some on his own people. He needed to be taken out. He was. People rejoiced. Stability got a foothold. Obama took away the only thing preventing the revolutionary establishment of a radical terrorist state. You can thank that Muslim-loving asshole in the White House for the growth of radical Islam, the very thing he refuses to identify as the enemy of the world. And now the bastard is giving back over a hundred billion dollars to help Iran finance more terrorism. Obama is our worst enemy!

Too moronic to even respond to such hate-filled stupidity that the poster picked up from Sean Hannity......

Perfect example: "Obama is giving back to Iran a hundred billion dollars.....".......... How fucking stupid is this idiot?

 

[nat4900]

Again, I posted several Democrats from 1998 to 2002 that had access to the intelligence, sorry but only lefty loons believe intelligence was cooked and never had any proof.

Wiggle all you want, only ONE president launched an all out, mostly unilateral war on Saddam.....and as Shakespeare wrote, "the evil that men do lives after them..."

 

[Papageorgio]

Again, I posted several Democrats from 1998 to 2002 that had access to the intelligence, sorry but only lefty loons believe intelligence was cooked and never had any proof.

Wiggle all you want, only ONE president launched an all out, mostly unilateral war on Saddam.....and as Shakespeare wrote, "the evil that men do lives after them..."

And again, you have no proof that he lied and tons of evidence that top level Republicans, Democrats, and DOD officials believed that there were WMDs.

I have listened to the BS for decades and it is the lie you keep spewing.

 

[rdean]

Politicians lying, what a revelation! In my life time, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama and every Congressman lied,

Now the left is wanting to hold Republicans feet to the fire?

Let's hold everyone's feet to the fire. To me they all lie , stretch the truth and nutters on the left and nutters on the right, Trump and Hillary seem to be two of the worst.

Instead of blaming each other, clean up your own party and don't let either side get away with it.

I agree; HOWEVER, there are lies and there are damn lies.......Let us NEVER FORGET that the lies that brought us the Iraq war cost us thousands of US lives......hundred of thousands of Iraqi lives...and more than $2 trillion of borrowed money.

Comapare the above consequence to a lie, to the one regarding a BJ.

Lying is not against the law. Lying while under oath is against the law. Slick Willy broke the law. It doesn't matter what the lie was. It was perjury....by a sitting President.

Keeping TOP SECRET government documents on your private server...and attempting the hide the fact that you did...is definitely against the law. Hillary is TOAST! I look forward to the mug shot!

Then why wasn't he charged? I know the answer. So don't try to make something up.

He was impeached, you idiot! Only the second President in our history to be impeached.

Oh please. Impeached by the house over a blowjob. A meaningless gesture by Republicans that led to nothing. He is a more popular former president today than either Bush.

 

[rdean]

Politicians lying, what a revelation! In my life time, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama and every Congressman lied,

Now the left is wanting to hold Republicans feet to the fire?

Let's hold everyone's feet to the fire. To me they all lie , stretch the truth and nutters on the left and nutters on the right, Trump and Hillary seem to be two of the worst.

Instead of blaming each other, clean up your own party and don't let either side get away with it.

I agree; HOWEVER, there are lies and there are damn lies.......Let us NEVER FORGET that the lies that brought us the Iraq war cost us thousands of US lives......hundred of thousands of Iraqi lives...and more than $2 trillion of borrowed money.

Comapare the above consequence to a lie, to the one regarding a BJ.

Lying is not against the law. Lying while under oath is against the law. Slick Willy broke the law. It doesn't matter what the lie was. It was perjury....by a sitting President.

Keeping TOP SECRET government documents on your private server...and attempting the hide the fact that you did...is definitely against the law. Hillary is TOAST! I look forward to the mug shot!

So why didn't president Clinton resign? Why wasn't he charged with anything? Why only a meaningless gesture from the House GOP? I know why. Do you?

 

[Papageorgio]

Politicians lying, what a revelation! In my life time, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama and every Congressman lied,

Now the left is wanting to hold Republicans feet to the fire?

Let's hold everyone's feet to the fire. To me they all lie , stretch the truth and nutters on the left and nutters on the right, Trump and Hillary seem to be two of the worst.

Instead of blaming each other, clean up your own party and don't let either side get away with it.

I agree; HOWEVER, there are lies and there are damn lies.......Let us NEVER FORGET that the lies that brought us the Iraq war cost us thousands of US lives......hundred of thousands of Iraqi lives...and more than $2 trillion of borrowed money.

Comapare the above consequence to a lie, to the one regarding a BJ.

Lying is not against the law. Lying while under oath is against the law. Slick Willy broke the law. It doesn't matter what the lie was. It was perjury....by a sitting President.

Keeping TOP SECRET government documents on your private server...and attempting the hide the fact that you did...is definitely against the law. Hillary is TOAST! I look forward to the mug shot!

Then why wasn't he charged? I know the answer. So don't try to make something up.

He was impeached, you idiot! Only the second President in our history to be impeached.

Oh please. Impeached by the house over a blowjob. A meaningless gesture by Republicans that led to nothing. He is a more popular former president today than either Bush.

He was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice. He was barred from practicing law because of his actions. Nice spin though.

 

[nat4900]

And again, you have no proof that he lied and tons of evidence that top level Republicans, Democrats, and DOD officials believed that there were WMDs.

You are then asking me....a common citizen....to "prove" to you that Cheney (and his side-kick, Bush) lied???

Will you be as forgiving when asked to "prove" that Hillary Clinton is obviously not guilty of any wrong doings about Benghazi?