Republicans war on women

[daws101]

It's neither hate or irrational .
thanks for playing.

It's extreme antipathy towards a group of people you don't know, and apparently know very little about. That's a pretty good definition of hate. It's also not based in reality, which makes it quite irrational. No, I'll stick with my original diagnosis.

What's it like to be wrong all the time?

I was hoping you could tell me.

I don't do fiction.

Neither do I. Now can we dispense with that whole silly hate stuff?

Not to worry I don't hate you. ....yet.

 

[Bush92]

Republican "war on women"

 

[daws101]

False the left doesn't hate family.
However the right dictating what family is
deserves to be hated

Don't be stupid Duhs, the left is dedicated to the eradication of the family and an impediment to the supremacy of the state, Both Marx and Lenin stated this openly - with you moron demagogue-crats implementing the program now.

Unhinged is having one of his spells!

 

[daws101]

Republican "war on women"

This coming from the guy who plays with his own shit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Unhinged is having one of his spells!

One of those spells where I expose your partisan bullshit?

Tell me duhs, are you even capable of a thought that doesn't originate on a Soros hate site?

 

[Bush92]

Republican "war on women"

This coming from the guy who plays with his own shit.

Nope only gays that are married stir each others shit.

 

[NLT]

Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.

Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?


Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”

The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.

House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women

Link goes to occupydemocrats....ROFL

 

[daws101]

Unhinged is having one of his spells!

One of those spells where I expose your partisan bullshit?

Tell me duhs, are you even capable of a thought that doesn't originate on a Soros hate site?

No one of in the continous series of of assuming facts not in evidence.

 

[daws101]

Republican "war on women"

This coming from the guy who plays with his own shit.

Nope only gays that are married stir each others shit.

Speaking from experience are we?

 

[theHawk]

Where is this war on woman????

Did you even read the OP? Can you even read? That is the war on women.........filing a bill that literally gives employers the right to fire pregnant single women is a war on women. Why not the men that got them pregnant? And, aren't they going against their own belief's? Won't this open the door for single women to want to get abortions? I thought you all were against abortion? And, won't this make single pregnant women qualify for welfare? I thought you all were against welfare? Isn't it a stupid decision? Hopefully there is enough Democrats to derail this bill.......but kudos to you all for winning the House and the Senate.....now you can wreck the country without interference. Well, maybe not, we still have a damn smart President......he'll veto the hell out of such stupidity.

Because only women get to choose. That's the lefty way.

Oh, and men get to choose to fire women that get pregnant and are not married....how quaint. That's like so 1930's......where you cons want to take the country.

I'd say 1330's

Actually, men still get to choose whether or not to acknowledge and support their offspring. They can walk away while the woman must bear the consequences of his irresponsibility.

Yes, men still get to "choose" to acknowledge and support their offspring or not. Care to guess where conservatives stand on that choice? Liberals are the ones who keep trying to convince women they should raise kids on their own.

If you have a problem with men who abandon their kids, take it up with the black community, because they are the worst culprits. Funny, since they tend to vote democrat 90% of the time.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Link goes to occupydemocrats....ROFL

Playtex has an IQ of DD - Duhs is considerably lower than that. So is it a surprise these two are chanting hate mantras from the Soros hate sites?

 

[daws101]

Link goes to occupydemocrats....ROFL

Playtex has an IQ of DD - Duhs is considerably lower than that. So is it a surprise these two are chanting hate mantras from the Soros hate sites?

Again assuming facts not in evidence.

 

[Dana7360]

Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.

Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?


Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”

The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.

House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women

This may sound cold but employers should be able to fire anyone and being pregnant shouldn't excuse the other reasons for firing. So are woman somehow so special that they shouldn't be fired???? Men get fired all the time for doing wrong or being a bad employee and in some cases they have to support a family too...

So being pregnant makes you wrong, or a bad employee? Tell me more.

No,,,doing something fireable makes you wrong....Being pregnant shouldn't justify different treatment. Yes this is cold but I don't think a employer should have to treat someone different for any reason.

You need read the article. It's not talking about firing a woman for any reason other than pregnancy and being single. The bill clearly states pregnancy. The republicans want employers to be able to fire a woman if she's single and pregnant.

That's the topic. Brining in other things is stupid because it's not a part of the bill.

So let me get this straight. You believe a woman who is pregnant should be forced to pick up and move heavy objects even though it can and does cause miscarriage. You believe that a pregnant women should be exposed to toxic chemicals that will cause the fetus birth defects or miscarriage. You believe that a pregnant woman who has morning sickness should never be allowed to go to the restroom to vomit, that she should just vomit at her work station or all over herself. You believe that a pregnant woman should be on her feet 8 hours a day 5 days a week even though it's bad for the fetus and the woman.

Wow way to be "pro life" and way to show there's no republican war on women.

Your post is further proof of the point the OP was making.

 

[Dana7360]

Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.

Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?


Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”

The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.

House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women

This may sound cold but employers should be able to fire anyone and being pregnant shouldn't excuse the other reasons for firing. So are woman somehow so special that they shouldn't be fired???? Men get fired all the time for doing wrong or being a bad employee and in some cases they have to support a family too...

Don't be an idiot.....getting fired for not doing the job is one thing......getting fired because you are pregnant and not married is a totally different thing. Hateful, mean and spiteful. I hope no Republican single woman gets pregnant while working for one of these bigoted, mean-spitired religious right-wingers.....she'll find out just how much Republican men really hate women, sex and children.

In wake of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of same-sex marriage, Republicans are pushing legislation that aims to protect Americans who oppose these unions on religious grounds. But critics say the language is so broad, the bill creates a license to discriminate that would let employers fire women for getting pregnant outside of wedlock.The legislation, already with 130 Republican sponsors in the House and a companion bill in the Senate, is nobly titled the "First Amendment Defense Act," but in real-world terms it has less to do with the free "exercise" of speech or religion, but with the right to impose one's bigotry (end economic power) on others, using "religion" as a fig leaf. Rightfully labelled "Indiana on steroids," the reactionary and mean-spirited bill would unravel anti-discrimination provisions applicable to federal contractors as well as provide so-called "protection" to religious broadcasters, charities and tax-exempt organizations by allowing them to fire with impunity same-sex couples who get married (notably, since there is no federal legislation barring discrimination against LGBT couples, such firings are already legal in most states). According to the ACLU, this measure would also allow "Christian" organizations to turn away gay people from homeless shelters and drug programs. The text of the proposed legislation, which seems certain to pass the House, is as follows:

Republican House and Senate Introduce Bills Allowing Companies To Fire Single Pregnant Women

It's apparent that the republicans believe that Bristol Palin should be fired immediately from any job she has while she's pregnant and not married.

Lets see. This is her second pregnancy without being married. Both children are the result of different men. She's been raising a child alone and will raise two alone soon.

One of them also believes that if Bristol works she should be forced to put the pregnancy at risk.

The republicans really don't know what they believe.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I live in a bubble all right. It's a bunch of white left wingers in the middle of a black county. They love talking about diversity and they all go gray. Gray sheeple.

Says the Lord of sheeple

You need to itemize your charge. Otherwise you're just a troll.

False l need do nothing but state the facts. All anyone needs to do is read your selfrightious shit to see I'm correct.

You just repeated more pointless troll shit. List your concerns. Can't have a discussion if you can't make a point.

asked and answerd.

Troll and trolling.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Again assuming facts not in evidence.

Again failing to grasp that hyperlinks are clickable....

You may be a hack,but at least you have nothing else going for you...

 

[Uncensored2008]

You need read the article. It's not talking about firing a woman for any reason other than pregnancy and being single. The bill clearly states pregnancy. The republicans want employers to be able to fire a woman if she's single and pregnant.

That's the topic. Brining in other things is stupid because it's not a part of the bill.

So let me get this straight. You believe a woman who is pregnant should be forced to pick up and move heavy objects even though it can and does cause miscarriage. You believe that a pregnant women should be exposed to toxic chemicals that will cause the fetus birth defects or miscarriage. You believe that a pregnant woman who has morning sickness should never be allowed to go to the restroom to vomit, that she should just vomit at her work station or all over herself. You believe that a pregnant woman should be on her feet 8 hours a day 5 days a week even though it's bad for the fetus and the woman.

Wow way to be "pro life" and way to show there's no republican war on women.

Your post is further proof of the point the OP was making.

The "article" is from a Soros hate site - pure demagoguery and filth - devoid of even a hint of fact in the slander and libel being propagated. There are no proposals to make pregnant women pick up heavy objects - either you or Soros are telling outright lies to smear those you hate.

The reason no one should ever believe a word you other the other assclowns post is because you're all a bunch of fucking liars who hold the only objective of slandering the hated enemies of the party.

You Communists are complete scum, you grasp that, right?

 

[daws101]

Again assuming facts not in evidence.

Again failing to grasp that hyperlinks are clickable....

You may be a hack,but at least you have nothing else going for you...

Still making false assumptions.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Still making false assumptions.

No, the link leads to a Soros hate site, No assumption at all - certainly not false.

You hacks have no ability to formulate thought - you only recite hate mantras from the Soros sites.

 

[daws101]

Still making false assumptions.

No, the link leads to a Soros hate site, No assumption at all - certainly not false.

You hacks have no ability to formulate thought - you only recite hate mantras from the Soros sites.

Your constant repetition of false assumptions provesyour lnability to do the thing you are bitching about.