Respect for Marriage Act?

[initforme]

Go ahead, mix the reproductive products of two gay men. You won’t get offspring.

That's good we have a surplus of births so less married people having kids strengthens the nation. Even alot of hetero couples are foregoing kids. Good on them if they can't find the time to raise them.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Fun fact, the only time a opposite sex couple requires in vitro is when one of the partners are reproductively disabled.

Same sex couples MUST go outside of their relationship 100% of the time to make babies.

Are you saying gays can’t reproduce because they have a disability?

Interesting, I’ll give that some thought.

Back to that shit again. Round and around. Having children is NOT a requirement of marriage. Period. End of story. You just keep proving your bigotry over and over again

 

[HeyNorm]

So you think children should be allowed to marry and maybe even marry adults? That tracks with your mutant ideology.

Marriage law is quite clear on this. The individuals must be of legal age to consent. It is a contract after all.

Odd you would think differently though. I do not want to know what goes through that weird mind of yours.

 

[HeyNorm]

That's good we have a surplus of births so less married people having kids strengthens the nation. Even alot of hetero couples are foregoing kids. Good on them if they can't find the time to raise them.

You are unaware that we are experiencing a drop in the birth rate, and even Chuckie Schumer finds that alarming?

 

[Curried Goats]

Marriage law is quite clear on this. The individuals must be of legal age to consent. It is a contract after all.

Odd you would think differently though. I do not want to know what goes through that weird mind of yours.

I know for a fact you like to cosplay and fantasize.

Want me to quote for you where you said you don't discriminate against age?

 

[HeyNorm]

Back to that shit again. Round and around. Having children is NOT a requirement of marriage. Period. End of story. You just keep proving your bigotry over and over again

Thank you. It just requires that a male marry a female, the two demographic groups that combined makes babies.

It’s really not that hard to understand the reasoning “not too closely related” is allowed to exist in the law. Fun Fact, no other civil contract prohibits more than two parties, not too closely related. Hmmmm, wonder why?

 

[surada]

Nope, just to prove their opinion had any merit.

How does same sex marriage affect your life?

 

[HeyNorm]

I know for a fact you like to cosplay and fantasize.

Want me to quote for you where you said you don't discriminate against age?

Sure, go ahead, BUT THE LAW DOES’NT consider exclusion based on those under the age of legal consent, a discriminatory practice.

But, sure, educate someone who is a contract professional about this.

 

[HeyNorm]

How does same sex marriage affect your life?

Those 4 poor college kids killed in Idaho don’t affect my life either.

 

[surada]

Sure, go ahead, BUT THE LAW DOES’NT consider exclusion based on those under the age of legal consent, a discriminatory practice.

But, sure, educate someone who is a contract professional about this.

Minors can't consent. The state doesn't care about your marriage. They aren't party to the contract. All they do is register the contract.

 

[surada]

Those 4 poor college kids killed in Idaho don’t affect my life either.

So you think same sex marriage is like felony murder? Really? Did you finish high school?

 

[Curried Goats]

Thank you. It just requires that a male marry a female, the two demographic groups that combined makes babies.

Wrong again dipshit. It could also happen after a woman marries a woman and they have in vitro fertilization. Or a man marries a man and they find a surrogate.

It’s really not that hard to understand the reasoning “not too closely related” is allowed to exist in the law. Fun Fact, no other civil contract prohibits more than two parties, not too closely related. Hmmmm, wonder why?

The reason is to prevent the births of babies with compromised DNA not to prevent same sex couples from marrying on behalf of bigots. Your cowardly Simp arguments have incredibly simple explanations.

 

[surada]

Wrong again dipshit. It could also happen after a woman marries a woman and they have in vitro fertilization. Or a man marries a man and they find a surrogate.

The reason is to prevent the births of babies with compromised DNA not to prevent same sex couples from marrying on behalf of bigots. Your cowardly Simp arguments have incredibly simple explanations.

Raging stupidity.

 

[Curried Goats]

Sure, go ahead, BUT THE LAW DOES’NT consider exclusion based on those under the age of legal consent, a discriminatory practice.

A red herring. I wasn't discussing the law, I was discussing your hilarious comment.

But, sure, educate someone who is a contract professional about this.

Okay.

I do not discriminate based on anyones disability or age. Geez, why do you hate the disabled so much?

 

[HeyNorm]

Minors can't consent. The state doesn't care about your marriage. They aren't party to the contract. All they do is register the contract.

Ok, try and get a license to marry while under the legal age of consent. Report back.

 

[surada]

Ok, try and get a license to marry while under the legal age of consent. Report back.

What? I'm a grandmother. Why would I seek a marriage license?

 

[HeyNorm]

Wrong again dipshit. It could also happen after a woman marries a woman and they have in vitro fertilization. Or a man marries a man and they find a surrogate.

The reason is to prevent the births of babies with compromised DNA not to prevent same sex couples from marrying on behalf of bigots. Your cowardly Simp arguments have incredibly simple explanations.

So why is it that I, a heterosexual male, who marries another heterosexual male need to be “not too closely related”?

I mean, geez, my partner and I would most likely be banging chicks the whole time, not each other.

 

[HeyNorm]

A red herring. I wasn't discussing the law, I was discussing your hilarious comment.

Okay.

And…….

 

[surada]

So why is it that I, a heterosexual male, who marries another heterosexual male need to be “not too closely related”?

I mean, geez, my partner and I would most likely be banging chicks the whole time, not each other.

Is that what you call a same sex marriage?

 

[Curried Goats]

So why is it that I, a heterosexual male, who marries another heterosexual male need to be “not too closely related”?

I don't know how the rules work in your fantasy space so why are you asking me? Who don't you ask the adults meeting there...

I mean, geez, my partner and I would most likely be banging chicks the whole time, not each other.

Buddy, no one finds its likely you've banged a chick, ever.