Right vs. Left is Logic vs. Emotion

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Jimmy Kimmel's recent viral monologue is a prime example of how the left values irrational emotions over logic and reason. That is why the left supports failed ideologies such as socialism, communism, etc. Because it feels good to them. They could care less that it ends in poverty, misery, and collapse.

Jimmy Kimmel illustrated this universal truth once again when he cried during his monologue about his baby (who is ok now) and proclaimed how nobody should have to decide between saving their child's life and money (as if anyone has ever had to make that "choice"). Life saving procedures cannot be denied regardless of a person's ability to pay. In addition to that inconvenient little fact, there is this gem:

The care, technology, and life saving treatment his family experienced was made possible by two, privately funded organizations. Both Cedars Sinai and Children’s Hospital LA are non-profit, not government-run, hospitals. This isn’t a coincidence.

When individuals are allowed to fund programs they like without a government mandate, we end up with more efficient and effective services. Hospitals are only one very important example.

Jimmy Kimmel’s Moving Story Shows Why Private Charity Trumps Government

Those private hospitals are great, I'm sure, but they sure are more expensive than most of the population can afford. So explain to me again how our current healthcare system is accessible to all? People can't afford to visit a hospital when they've got Obamacare--their $10,000 + deductibles are prohibitive. Same with doctor's visits. Kimmel as a father has every right to tear up relating the close call his newborn went through. You guys slamming "emotion" vs. "logic" aren't doing so hot when it comes to finding an actual solution to the problem, though. More and more people can't afford to visit doctors. Fix it.

The problem really begins with the perception of health care, is it merely a service that's provided or a right? This belief begins the discussion of coverage and affordability, and when you talk government you know there is going to be plenty of government bureaucracy involved along with out of control costs. Let's face it, government programs are anything but financially efficient with plenty of overhead to go around. Yet you'll find these certain groups who clams Washington can make it more affordable and cost effective, which I've yet to see a program that is without being associated to the increases in our debt or with finding cuts into what the program is actually able to provides. So are we actually talking honestly talking about reducing premiums and prescription costs to make it more affordable to the vast majority of middle class and elderly Americans, or simply providing free "entitled" health care regardless of its cost on to everyone else?

This is where I pretty much stand on the issue. We need to find ways that can bring health care premiums down for working Americans, and their families. Seniors need a health care account, that their paychecks contribute towards during their lifetime into an account of their choosing that's treated similar to an IRA. There needs to be a cushion barrier to cover the elderly that didn't have an opportunity to capitalize on such a future health investment until a senior generation has established 20 years of contributions. This does not tackle the problem of prescription costs, with the need to set up more affordable generics sooner once approved equivalent. Washington should set the options and the structure, but the private sector groups and patients should establish the overall coverage options and multiple plans ...NOT a predominant government plan that all citizens should accept as acceptable by Washington's list of coverages that must be tolerated. I started out by saying "working" Americans being defined as those that are physically and mentally capable of eventually providing for themselves without dependency of government as their own only chosen personal decision into seeking income. I believe we should be promoting and encouraging self sustainable job development with training available that encourages those endeavors.

 

[Papageorgio]

Over the next 10 years we are going to be paying $1 trillion to help subsidize those that can not afford their full premiums.

Good, perhaps we can start paying people enough versus right wings constant demand to race to the bottom for everyone except the 1/10th of 1%???

It's much easier to teach A man fish then give them fish every time they need it... The nanny state never has worked and never will work for the good of the people.

Without false premises, distortions and lies what would the right EVER have?

How about ONE TIME CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?

OR give me 3 policies GOP gave US that worked as promised last 50 years?

Nanny state huh? Yeah, Europe is horrible right?

The GOP establishment are progressives. shit for brains
And Europe is a fucking nanny state and a fucking shit hole… Jack weed

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

 

[Brain357]

Good, perhaps we can start paying people enough versus right wings constant demand to race to the bottom for everyone except the 1/10th of 1%???

It's much easier to teach A man fish then give them fish every time they need it... The nanny state never has worked and never will work for the good of the people.

Without false premises, distortions and lies what would the right EVER have?

How about ONE TIME CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?

OR give me 3 policies GOP gave US that worked as promised last 50 years?

Nanny state huh? Yeah, Europe is horrible right?

The GOP establishment are progressives. shit for brains
And Europe is a fucking nanny state and a fucking shit hole… Jack weed

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

 

[Papageorgio]

It's much easier to teach A man fish then give them fish every time they need it... The nanny state never has worked and never will work for the good of the people.

Without false premises, distortions and lies what would the right EVER have?

How about ONE TIME CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?

OR give me 3 policies GOP gave US that worked as promised last 50 years?

Nanny state huh? Yeah, Europe is horrible right?

The GOP establishment are progressives. shit for brains
And Europe is a fucking nanny state and a fucking shit hole… Jack weed

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

Depends on who you are and what you considered a shit hole. I can only speak of my son's and my experience in Europe, others may not like it. I hate Seattle, I consider it a hell hole, traffic is the worst, the rain and cloudy days are depressing, the few days a year they get snow, you would think the world had ended. Southern California is also hell for me. Paradise is the east side of Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, Idaho, especially the northern part, Wyoming anywhere near Yellowstone. It all depends.

 

[Brain357]

Without false premises, distortions and lies what would the right EVER have?

How about ONE TIME CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?

OR give me 3 policies GOP gave US that worked as promised last 50 years?

Nanny state huh? Yeah, Europe is horrible right?

The GOP establishment are progressives. shit for brains
And Europe is a fucking nanny state and a fucking shit hole… Jack weed

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

Depends on who you are and what you considered a shit hole. I can only speak of my son's and my experience in Europe, others may not like it. I hate Seattle, I consider it a hell hole, traffic is the worst, the rain and cloudy days are depressing, the few days a year they get snow, you would think the world had ended. Southern California is also hell for me. Paradise is the east side of Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, Idaho, especially the northern part, Wyoming anywhere near Yellowstone. It all depends.

Now compare those places to Afghanistan. People certainly will prefer one place over another. But one can comfortably live in Europe or anywhere in the US. I would not want to live in Syria.

 

[Papageorgio]

The GOP establishment are progressives. shit for brains
And Europe is a fucking nanny state and a fucking shit hole… Jack weed

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

Depends on who you are and what you considered a shit hole. I can only speak of my son's and my experience in Europe, others may not like it. I hate Seattle, I consider it a hell hole, traffic is the worst, the rain and cloudy days are depressing, the few days a year they get snow, you would think the world had ended. Southern California is also hell for me. Paradise is the east side of Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, Idaho, especially the northern part, Wyoming anywhere near Yellowstone. It all depends.

Now compare those places to Afghanistan. People certainly will prefer one place over another. But one can comfortably live in Europe or anywhere in the US. I would not want to live in Syria.

I would not want to live in Seattle and many other cities or states. Never been to Afghanistan so without actually ever being there I would not know what it is really like, the media distorts a lot. It is predominately Muslim so culture would be an issue for me.

 

[Rustic]

Over the next 10 years we are going to be paying $1 trillion to help subsidize those that can not afford their full premiums.

Good, perhaps we can start paying people enough versus right wings constant demand to race to the bottom for everyone except the 1/10th of 1%???

It's much easier to teach A man fish then give them fish every time they need it... The nanny state never has worked and never will work for the good of the people.

Without false premises, distortions and lies what would the right EVER have?

How about ONE TIME CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?

OR give me 3 policies GOP gave US that worked as promised last 50 years?

Nanny state huh? Yeah, Europe is horrible right?

The GOP establishment are progressives. shit for brains
And Europe is a fucking nanny state and a fucking shit hole… Jack weed

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

The nanny state is addictive... BTW - that does not mean it's a good thing. Lol

 

[Rustic]

The GOP establishment are progressives. shit for brains
And Europe is a fucking nanny state and a fucking shit hole… Jack weed

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

Depends on who you are and what you considered a shit hole. I can only speak of my son's and my experience in Europe, others may not like it. I hate Seattle, I consider it a hell hole, traffic is the worst, the rain and cloudy days are depressing, the few days a year they get snow, you would think the world had ended. Southern California is also hell for me. Paradise is the east side of Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, Idaho, especially the northern part, Wyoming anywhere near Yellowstone. It all depends.

Now compare those places to Afghanistan. People certainly will prefer one place over another. But one can comfortably live in Europe or anywhere in the US. I would not want to live in Syria.

I would not want anything to do with living in Europe. Far too much nanny state for my tastes.

 

[Rustic]

It's much easier to teach A man fish then give them fish every time they need it... The nanny state never has worked and never will work for the good of the people.

Without false premises, distortions and lies what would the right EVER have?

How about ONE TIME CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?

OR give me 3 policies GOP gave US that worked as promised last 50 years?

Nanny state huh? Yeah, Europe is horrible right?

The GOP establishment are progressives. shit for brains
And Europe is a fucking nanny state and a fucking shit hole… Jack weed

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

If you're an outdoor person Europe sucks… Fact

 

[Brain357]

Yet Europe has great freedoms and the happiest people on the planets. If they are a shithole that's about the best we have.

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

Depends on who you are and what you considered a shit hole. I can only speak of my son's and my experience in Europe, others may not like it. I hate Seattle, I consider it a hell hole, traffic is the worst, the rain and cloudy days are depressing, the few days a year they get snow, you would think the world had ended. Southern California is also hell for me. Paradise is the east side of Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, Idaho, especially the northern part, Wyoming anywhere near Yellowstone. It all depends.

Now compare those places to Afghanistan. People certainly will prefer one place over another. But one can comfortably live in Europe or anywhere in the US. I would not want to live in Syria.

I would not want anything to do with living in Europe. Far too much nanny state for my tastes.

You prefer Europe or Russia where you have no real rights?

 

[Rustic]

My son has lived in Europe since 2008, he asked for a transfer back to the US, he enjoys some aspects of European lifestyle but overall he prefers the US for more personal freedoms.

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

Depends on who you are and what you considered a shit hole. I can only speak of my son's and my experience in Europe, others may not like it. I hate Seattle, I consider it a hell hole, traffic is the worst, the rain and cloudy days are depressing, the few days a year they get snow, you would think the world had ended. Southern California is also hell for me. Paradise is the east side of Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, Idaho, especially the northern part, Wyoming anywhere near Yellowstone. It all depends.

Now compare those places to Afghanistan. People certainly will prefer one place over another. But one can comfortably live in Europe or anywhere in the US. I would not want to live in Syria.

I would not want anything to do with living in Europe. Far too much nanny state for my tastes.

You prefer Europe or Russia where you have no real rights?

There is no way I would have much for rights if I lived in Europe, they are overtaxed, overregulated, overbearing, politically correct, and financially dependent, energy dependent… The list goes on

 

[Brain357]

So isn't a shit hole a great exaggeration? I'm not saying they are better than us, but on a world scale they are really good. They have freedoms and happy people. They aren't waging war with others. They have voting rights.

Depends on who you are and what you considered a shit hole. I can only speak of my son's and my experience in Europe, others may not like it. I hate Seattle, I consider it a hell hole, traffic is the worst, the rain and cloudy days are depressing, the few days a year they get snow, you would think the world had ended. Southern California is also hell for me. Paradise is the east side of Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, Idaho, especially the northern part, Wyoming anywhere near Yellowstone. It all depends.

Now compare those places to Afghanistan. People certainly will prefer one place over another. But one can comfortably live in Europe or anywhere in the US. I would not want to live in Syria.

I would not want anything to do with living in Europe. Far too much nanny state for my tastes.

You prefer Europe or Russia where you have no real rights?

There is no way I would have much for rights if I lived in Europe, they are overtaxed, overregulated, overbearing, politically correct, and financially dependent, energy dependent… The list goes on

You ignored question...

 

[Rustic]

Depends on who you are and what you considered a shit hole. I can only speak of my son's and my experience in Europe, others may not like it. I hate Seattle, I consider it a hell hole, traffic is the worst, the rain and cloudy days are depressing, the few days a year they get snow, you would think the world had ended. Southern California is also hell for me. Paradise is the east side of Oregon, Washington, Western Montana, Idaho, especially the northern part, Wyoming anywhere near Yellowstone. It all depends.

Now compare those places to Afghanistan. People certainly will prefer one place over another. But one can comfortably live in Europe or anywhere in the US. I would not want to live in Syria.

I would not want anything to do with living in Europe. Far too much nanny state for my tastes.

You prefer Europe or Russia where you have no real rights?

There is no way I would have much for rights if I lived in Europe, they are overtaxed, overregulated, overbearing, politically correct, and financially dependent, energy dependent… The list goes on

You ignored question...

If you're an outdoors person Russia is great, I sell a lot of firearms and ammo to people that go over there to hunt… If you have money Russia is a great place to live.

 

[Brain357]

Now compare those places to Afghanistan. People certainly will prefer one place over another. But one can comfortably live in Europe or anywhere in the US. I would not want to live in Syria.

I would not want anything to do with living in Europe. Far too much nanny state for my tastes.

You prefer Europe or Russia where you have no real rights?

There is no way I would have much for rights if I lived in Europe, they are overtaxed, overregulated, overbearing, politically correct, and financially dependent, energy dependent… The list goes on

You ignored question...

If you're an outdoors person Russia is great, I sell a lot of firearms and ammo to people that go over there to hunt… If you have money Russia is a great place to live.

So you would prefer Russia? Thought there was lots of gun control?

 

[RealDave]

Jimmy Kimmel's recent viral monologue is a prime example of how the left values irrational emotions over logic and reason. That is why the left supports failed ideologies such as socialism, communism, etc. Because it feels good to them. They could care less that it ends in poverty, misery, and collapse.

Jimmy Kimmel illustrated this universal truth once again when he cried during his monologue about his baby (who is ok now) and proclaimed how nobody should have to decide between saving their child's life and money (as if anyone has ever had to make that "choice"). Life saving procedures cannot be denied regardless of a person's ability to pay. In addition to that inconvenient little fact, there is this gem:

The care, technology, and life saving treatment his family experienced was made possible by two, privately funded organizations. Both Cedars Sinai and Children’s Hospital LA are non-profit, not government-run, hospitals. This isn’t a coincidence.

When individuals are allowed to fund programs they like without a government mandate, we end up with more efficient and effective services. Hospitals are only one very important example.

Jimmy Kimmel’s Moving Story Shows Why Private Charity Trumps Government

Funny chit.

Three examples of right whinet's logic

1) Higher levels of CO2 are driving climate change, so lets go back to coal.

2) During the 2016 primaries, Republicans offer many qualified candidates including governors, Senators & they chose an orange man who was a liar, business cheat, woman groping flaming asshole.

3) In their charge to reduce abortions, they limit access to birth control.


So don't ever mention the word "logic" when discussing Republicans.

 

[JonKoch]

Most people are paying for Obamacare.

Over the next 10 years we are going to be paying $1 trillion to help subsidize those that can not afford their full premiums.

Good, perhaps we can start paying people enough versus right wings constant demand to race to the bottom for everyone except the 1/10th of 1%???

It's much easier to teach A man fish then give them fish every time they need it... The nanny state never has worked and never will work for the good of the people.

Without false premises, distortions and lies what would the right EVER have?

How about ONE TIME CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?

OR give me 3 policies GOP gave US that worked as promised last 50 years?

Nanny state huh? Yeah, Europe is horrible right?

Civil rights.
Free slaves.
Women's suffrage.
You Liberals have short memories.

Too funny cupcake

If you meant CONservatives were against those things, TRUE. Now the PROGRESSIVES/LIBERALS on the other hand???


LMAOROG, You poor cupcakes

 

[JonKoch]

Jimmy Kimmel's recent viral monologue is a prime example of how the left values irrational emotions over logic and reason. That is why the left supports failed ideologies such as socialism, communism, etc. Because it feels good to them. They could care less that it ends in poverty, misery, and collapse.

Jimmy Kimmel illustrated this universal truth once again when he cried during his monologue about his baby (who is ok now) and proclaimed how nobody should have to decide between saving their child's life and money (as if anyone has ever had to make that "choice"). Life saving procedures cannot be denied regardless of a person's ability to pay. In addition to that inconvenient little fact, there is this gem:

The care, technology, and life saving treatment his family experienced was made possible by two, privately funded organizations. Both Cedars Sinai and Children’s Hospital LA are non-profit, not government-run, hospitals. This isn’t a coincidence.

When individuals are allowed to fund programs they like without a government mandate, we end up with more efficient and effective services. Hospitals are only one very important example.

Jimmy Kimmel’s Moving Story Shows Why Private Charity Trumps Government

It's logical for Repugs to support the traitor Trump who loves Russia more than his own country? That's a head-scratcher.

Prove Trump loves Russia more than his own country or Shut The Fuck UP!

Cheeto already did that cupcake

Donald Trump Blasts Media and Intelligence Agencies
Tweets come in wake of adviser’s resignation and reports on probes of Russian communications

“The real scandal here is that classified information is illegally given out by ‘intelligence’ like candy. Very un-American!” Mr. Trump, a Republican, tweeted.


Following his election but before he was sworn in, Mr. Trump questioned the accuracy of U.S. intelligence officials over their conclusion that the Russian government had sought to interfere in the 2016 election. Mr. Trump initially resisted blaming Moscow, saying it was difficult to determine the cause of these operations.


...“Intelligence agencies should never have allowed this fake news to ‘leak’ into the public. One last shot at me. Are we living in Nazi Germany?”


Trump Blasts Media, Intelligence Agencies

 

[P@triot]

“The real scandal here is that classified information is illegally given out by ‘intelligence’ like candy. Very un-American!” Mr. Trump, a Republican, tweeted.

You poor dimwit. Like your fellow progressives, you are literally so stupid that you're forced to make up your own laws and attempt to pass them off as real.

The President of the United States is completely authorized to share classified information with anyone at any time and/or declassify information on a whim. That is a fact - stupid. Which means there is nothing "illegal" about what President Trump did.

 

[P@triot]

1) Higher levels of CO2 are driving climate change, so lets go back to coal.

"Global Warming" doesn't exist, snowflake. Science has proven as much. So has history. It's why your left-wing masters were forced to rebrand it to "Climate Change". If only you dimwitted left-wing minions were bright enough to recognize this is proof that you were duped.

 

[JonKoch]

“The real scandal here is that classified information is illegally given out by ‘intelligence’ like candy. Very un-American!” Mr. Trump, a Republican, tweeted.

You poor dimwit. Like your fellow progressives, you are literally so stupid that you're forced to make up your own laws and attempt to pass them off as real.

The President of the United States is completely authorized to share classified information with anyone at any time and/or declassify information on a whim. That is a fact - stupid. Which means there is nothing "illegal" about what President Trump did.

Weird YOU asked why Cheeto loved Russia more than US, I showed why cupcake, he doesn't "believe": US intel but LOVES him some Russians

Nothing illegal about the Cheeto divulging intel derived from other nations intel sources THEN confirming when he was in Israel, acknowledging it WAS from Israel? Nah