2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,251
- 52,473
The behavior view of the extremist behind the gun IS the real issue. Exactly what effect would gun laws have "specifically" in preventing a group of religious zealots from using commercial airliners to destroy the World Trade Center resulting in those thousands of lives being killed for their religious cause? Your pursuit of the tightest gun regulations will not stop a terrorist, nor keep guns out of their hands if they are determined in possessing them.
But here's the thing. After 9/11, we put scanners in the airports. We replaced minimum wage Rent-a-cops with a professional TSA. We put steel doors on the cockpits and air marshals on the flight. In short, after 9/11... WE DID SOMETHING.
And we haven't had another hijacking of an airliner in US Airspace since.
But we have gun massacre after gun massacre, and you guys insist up and down tighter gun laws won't do a thing, even though other countries have tight gun laws and rarely have these sorts of things happen.
And we let pilots carry guns.....you forgot that one genius.......
And the thing we need to do today....to stop mass shooters.....get rid of stupid gun free zones...the only thing known that will send a mass shooter somewhere else.....