Rittenhouse Family In Dire Straits

[tahuyaman]

I mean, I'm not gonna lie, how many times does one have to be PROVEN a liar before they feel embarrassed? Every 'point' you've made in this thread has been proven to be a lie, but yet here you still are, pretending that you're the righteous party. It WOULD be funny if it weren't so comically sad...

Not one point was proven to be a lie. Is it a lie that he decided on his own to become a participant in a violent riot? Is it a lie that had he made the decision to stay home that night, this incident would not have happened?

The fact that Rittenhouse won't take care of his mom is very telling about his character. …

I don’t believe he can. I’m sure he’s not making enough money to support himself and assist the rest of his family. The kid is pretty much uneducated and has no skills which make him above mediocre.

 

[Hollie]

Um, his motives were kind of important to the case.

If he was going there with the intent to murder people, then it wasn't self-defense.

And his fantasizing about how he wished he had his gun so he could shoot a black man leaving a CVS would have been Germaine.

Facts are kind of important. The jury ruled Rittenhouse fired in self defense. You’re just angry that a child molester was shot, right?

 

[tahuyaman]

Um, his motives were kind of important to the case.

If he was going there with the intent to murder people, then it wasn't self-defense.

And his fantasizing about how he wished he had his gun so he could shoot a black man leaving a CVS would have been Germaine.

I don’t believe he went there with the intent to kill people. That said, he obviously knew the risk involved in becoming a participant in a violent riot.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Not one point was proven to be a lie. Is it a lie that he decided on his own to become a participant in a violent riot?

Yes, it is. He didn't participate in the riot.

Is it a lie that had he made the decision to stay home that night, this incident would not have happened?

No. But it's also true that had Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz stayed home, it wouldn't have happened.

This philosophical what-if exercise is pointless given the facts. Every person on the street in Kenosha that night had the choice to stay home. If they had, it wouldn't have happened. Also, if Rosenbaum had not made the choice to chase and attack Rittenhouse for merely extinguishing a dumpster fire, it wouldn't have happened.

What's more, Rittenhouse gets criticism for being from out of town. This is also pointless because Grosskreutz was from out of town as well. In fact, probably a good portion of the crowd there that night was from out of town.

 

[tahuyaman]

Yes, it is. He didn't participate in the riot.


No. But it's also true that had Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz stayed home, it wouldn't have happened….

Of course he was a participant. How could he have killed or wounded other participants if he wasn’t also a participant?

He was a troubled teenager obsessed with being a soldier or police officer.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Of course he was a participant. How could he have killed or wounded other participants if he wasn’t also a participant?

He was not a participant in the riot. Rioters were there to protest the shooting of Jacob Blake and to loot, vandalize and destroy. Rittenhouse was not there for - nor did he participate in - any of those things.

He was a troubled teenager obsessed with being a soldier or police officer.

Define "troubled teenager" in this case. Lots of young boys long to be soldiers or police officers. So what?

 

[tahuyaman]

Yes, it is. He didn't participate in the riot.


No. But it's also true that had Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz stayed home, it wouldn't have happened.

This philosophical what-if exercise is pointless given the facts. Every person on the street in Kenosha that night had the choice to stay home. If they had, it wouldn't have happened. Also, if Rosenbaum had not made the choice to chase and attack Rittenhouse for merely extinguishing a dumpster fire, it wouldn't have happened.

What's more,

He was not a participant in the riot. Rioters were there to protest the shooting of Jacob Blake and to loot, vandalize and destroy. Rittenhouse was not there for - nor did he participate in - any of those things.

Define "troubled teenager" in this case. Lots of young boys long to be soldiers or police officers. So what?

When you are a civilian and engage people in a violent riot, you are a participant. The side you are supporting doesn’t make you a non-participant.

Rittenhouse has history of mental health issues. That’s why he will never become a soldier or police officer.

 

[westwall]

Um, he was an active shooter at that point.

You guys always say a "Good guy with a gun"... but funny, you don't think that Gaige Grosskreutz is a "good guy" with a gun.

No he wasn't. He only shot people who attacked him you lying piece of dung.

 

[Mr Natural]

Nice way to treat a mother who bought you a gun and drove you to a riot so you could shoot people with it.

 

[westwall]

When you are a civilian and engage people in a violent riot, you are a participant. The side you are supporting doesn’t make you a non-participant.

Rittenhouse has history of mental health issues. That’s why he will never become a soldier or police officer.

Awww, look at the progressive spreading more lies about Rittenhouse.

Rioters trying to burn a a city down should be shot. They will if they try that in our cities.

 

[tahuyaman]

How does someone become involved in a shooting during a riot if they are not a participant in the riot?

 

[tahuyaman]

Nice way to treat a mother who bought you a gun and drove you to a riot so you could shoot people with it.

I read somewhere that he drove himself to the riot, not his mother.

 

[tahuyaman]

…Rioters trying to burn a a city down should be shot. They will if they try that in our cities.

By trained and qualified law enforcement, not a troubled and untrained teenager.

 

[westwall]

By trained and qualified law enforcement, not a troubled and untrained teenager.

You mean the same assholes who sat by and allowed children to be murdered? Or the same assholes who allowed cities to be burned?

Fuck them. They refused to do their jobs.

So the people are forced to do it themselves.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

When you are a civilian and engage people in a violent riot, you are a participant. The side you are supporting doesn’t make you a non-participant.

First, there was no "side" in Kenosha that night except maybe between rioters and police. Secondly, Rittenhouse did not engage any of the rioters; a rioter engaged him.

Rittenhouse has history of mental health issues. That’s why he will never become a soldier or police officer.

Do you have a link? I searched and have found nothing to suggest Rittenhouse had mental health issues.

 

[tahuyaman]

By trained and qualified law enforcement, not a troubled and untrained teenager.

So some idiot disagrees that fighting crime should be left up to trained and qualified law enforcement officers.

 

[john doe 101]

I have not heard "the right" equating unemployment with welfare. Perhaps you are mistaken.

All the time on here. Open your eyes.

 

[Mr Natural]

Maybe mom bought the gun and drove the kid to the riot in hopes of finally getting rid of the little twerp.

 

[theHawk]

No, he shot one homeless man and two people who tried to take him into custody.

Because he's scum.

Won't even take care of his own family.

“Take him into custody”? LMAO

You people are so fucking beyond help.

 

[struth]

Um, his motives were kind of important to the case.

If he was going there with the intent to murder people, then it wasn't self-defense.

And his fantasizing about how he wished he had his gun so he could shoot a black man leaving a CVS would have been Germaine.

Well we had that trial and the govt couldn’t prove her there to murder people and in fact his defense team was able to show he acted rationally and used proportional force in defending himself from your fellow brownshirts