Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,519
- 2,288
There is where you confusion lies.
For some reason you are fixated on the fact that Kyle had the AR when he may not have been legal when it doesn't mean jackshit given the events of the night.
Really?
Huh. Tell that to Dominick Black, who's facing two felony charges for providing that firearm to Rittenhouse...
I don't give a crap how he got the weapon but I am glad he had it because the BLM shitheads would have probably killed him or done him serious harm had he not had it.
Maybe they would have.
But the fact that you "don't give a crap" about how he got the gun is proof that you're only interested in respecting the law when it supports your argument. Your view of the law is subjective, where an intelligent person takes an objective view of the law. The fact that Rittenhouse broke the law to obtain the gun is not negated by the fact that he used while acting in self defense. The way he obtained it is still illegal.
For some reason, it appears as though you stupidly believe otherwise...
I am a certified firearms instructor and range officer.
I sincerely doubt that...
So what? How often do you deal with riotous mobs on the range?I live and breath firearm safety.
I see nothing wrong with Kyle having a firearm that night.
Well, see, your opinion means dick, because your uneducated opinion has no bearing on this case whatsoever.
I'm also remarkably safety conscious about firearms and one thing I know is that it's probably not prudent to hand a child an AR-15 and then let him go off unsupervised...
I see nothing wrong with his good friend purchasing the AR for him and keeping it at his house.
Had he kept it at the house, I wouldn't have too big a problem with it, either...
It is not even clear if it is illegal for Kyle to have the weapon on that night.
Maybe a brain dead moron would have difficulty deciphering the law, bubt it's pretty clear and unambiguous...
Of all the things that happen last year with the massive riots and insurrection by the Negroes and Communists the fact a straw purchase was made for Kyle does not defect my give 'o shit meter at all.
Again, your opinion is rather meaningless.
For some reason, you believe that Rittenhouse shouldn't be held to account for his actions because BLM thugs weren't held responsible for theirs.
That proves you have no respect for the law. If you're not going to respect the law where it pertains to Rittenhouse, you have no right to whine about BL:M thugs being let off scott free.
I, on the other hand, want BOTH sides held accountable to the law. You just don't know how to deal with objectivity...
You really are a retarded little fuck, aren't you?Kyle is innocent. Stop taking their side. It just makes you look like one of the Moon Bats and be subject to ridicule.
I haven't taken "their side". You're just filling your diaper because I haven't taken yours.
Go read everything I have ever posted regarding this case, and you won't find a single post in which I state I want Rittenhouse to be found guilty and be put in jail. You won't find a single post from me which states that, you ignorant little bitch. What you will see is that I've said I believe he will be found guilty. That's very, very different than saying I think he should be. See, that's called "being objective", and it's something you're incapable of.
I believe he'll be found guilty of weapons charges (and so will Dominick Black). I don't hope he's found guilty; that'd be stupid. Him being found guilty or innocent has no bearing on me whatsoever, as it's an impossibility that I'll ever find myself in his position. Based on what I've seen, read and heard, the weapons charges are solid. Murder? No, probably no guilty verdict there. Involuntary manslaughter? Maybe. Again, despite what your idiotin' little brain is telling you, I'm not hoping he's found guilty. I can simply see how a guilty verdict would be possible...