Robert Mueller Just Killed Impeachment

[The Purge]

Special Counsel Robert Mueller had a bad day last week. The build-up to his congressional testimony rivaled that of Geraldo Rivera opening Al Capone’s vault. Endless fanfare and hype, but both Mueller and the vault were empty, devoid of treasure, or any smoking gun.

At one level, Mueller is a sad figure, a doddering old man, looking foolish on an international stage, after being praised for two years for his legal acumen and integrity.

Was his performance genuine or contrived? Was he trying to salvage his reputation as a card-carrying deep-state elitist by playing a sympathetic old man being badgered by nasty Republicans? Did Democrats throw him under the bus in their unending quest to nullify the 2016 election, regardless of the personal toll on him and his family?

It’s clear he was not in charge of his own investigation. He not only didn’t write the report, which bears his name, but it’s uncertain if he even read it. If he did, he was certainly unfamiliar with the basics of the investigation. Anyone who listens to conservative talk radio or watches any of the Fox News opinion shows knew far more about the “Mueller Report” than its namesake.

Mueller seems to know only what he read in the New York Times or Washington Post, or watched on CNN, understanding little more about the investigation than the average low-information Democrat voter.

Most readers of American Thinker know what Fusion GPS is and the role it played in the Russian collusion hoax. Or who some of the key players are including Christopher Steele, Glenn Simpson and Natalia Veselnitskaya. The former FBI director did not and could only say, “I’m not familiar with that.”

If Robert Mueller wasn’t in charge of the “Mueller investigation,” who was?

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ..

 

[JusticeHammer]

Robert Mueller’s congressional testimony was lethal to the legal pretext for keeping the Russian collusion story alive.

Indeed, the maundering and semi-coherent manner with which he answered the questions posed to him during Wednesday’s hearings suggests that he was probably never up to the job of running the special counsel investigation into Russian interference with our 2016 election.

Mueller’s excruciating testimony made it obvious that he was unfamiliar with crucial passages of the report that bears his name. He had obvious difficulty grasping the point of many questions he was asked.

The report is so tainted by Mueller’s obvious incapacity — combined with the notorious partisanship of the people who actually investigated the president and wrote the so-called Mueller report — that it will now be suicidal for the Democrats to pursue impeachment.

Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) lecturing Mueller for flouting special counsel rules:

You told us this morning and in your report that you made no determination so respectfully director, you didn’t follow the special counsel regulations. It clearly says, “Write a confidential report about decisions reached.” Nowhere in here does it say write a report about decisions that weren’t reached. You wrote 180 pages about decisions that weren’t reached about potential crimes that weren’t charged.… And respectfully, by doing that you managed to violate every principle in the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis about potential crimes that aren’t charged.

The aging G-Man delivered the coup de grâce. Resuscitation was “outside his purview,” as he would phrase it. It’s time for the Democrats to call the undertaker and give impeachment a decent burial.

Mueller’s reputation and impeachment weren’t Wednesday’s only casualties. Democratic credibility is also bleeding out.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...

Good. Now it’s time for Republicans to start telling people about the Hildebeast and the Surrender Monkeys collusion with Russia. Forget about calling for a new investigation or special needs counsel, just have some backbone and speak up....Yes PAT THE RUSSIAN...we KNOW what that means!!!

The case for impeachment is alive and well. The only question is whether Democrats want to waste their time. The Republican Party is corrupted and stood by while all of this was going on. This is the party that voted to impeach Clinton over a personal affair. Spectator is a pro-Trump so their article is hardly surprising.

We know the report was damning as Republicans rush to attack Muller with the very talking points that you use. These are nothing but spitballs thrown by desperate Trump supporters.

Ratcliffe is a Trump rat. A partisan hack. The decision was made by the DOJ that a sitting President cannot be indicted. Mueller has every right to write the report as he sees fit.

The whole report can be summed up in one sentence.

The Special Counsel did NOT determine the president committed a crime.

It's as simple as that.

.

Well no it can't since that's bullshit.

Special Counsel WAS NOT LEGALLY PERMITTED to determine if the president commited a crime. But Special Counsel did present the facts of the matter without prosecuratorial determination.

Those fact plainlys add up to Trump commiting Obstruction of Justice.

Incorrect:

What Mueller and his team did was prosecutor misconduct of the worst kind. He was tasked with one of two outcomes. No prosecution Or finding sufficient evidence to prosecute. Nothing more and nothing less. It was up to Barr to meet other statutory obligations.

Totally wrong again, but not unexpected..

Nonsence - OLC Memo precludes DOJ from charging a sitting president.

When you say "finding sufficient evidence to prosecute"...then Mueller did find that, he just could not declare it as such under DOJ policy.

Wrong

 

[JusticeHammer]

The whole report can be summed up in one sentence.

The Special Counsel did NOT determine the president committed a crime.

It's as simple as that.

.

Well no it can't since that's bullshit.

Special Counsel WAS NOT LEGALLY PERMITTED to determine if the president commited a crime. But Special Counsel did present the facts of the matter without prosecuratorial determination.

Those fact plainlys add up to Trump commiting Obstruction of Justice.

Incorrect:

What Mueller and his team did was prosecutor misconduct of the worst kind. He was tasked with one of two outcomes. No prosecution Or finding sufficient evidence to prosecute. Nothing more and nothing less. It was up to Barr to meet other statutory obligations.

Totally wrong again, but not unexpected..

Nonsence - OLC Memo precludes DOJ from charging a sitting president.

When you say "finding sufficient evidence to prosecute"...then Mueller did find that, he just could not declare it as such under DOJ policy.

The OLC memo is BARR'S RESPONSIBILITY. Not the SP's office. Mueller was given a task to determine if prosecution was warranted. He did not. Game over...

Barr's opinion is worth fuck-all.

Sessions was fired and Barr was hired specifically so our crooked president can have his very own Roy Cohn heading the DOJ.

In auditioning for his job Barr pretty much said - HIRE ME AND I WILL CLEAR YOU!

Idiot

 

[OKTexas]

Tired of these Fucking Leftist DemNazi Shills, LYING 24-7 and trying to get away with it, hood wink and bamboozle people in to thinking anything they say is The TRUTH.

They Lie, and They Lie about The Lies They Tell.

Wake up people.

That Party has turned their back on Truth, Justice and America. Mueller like Starr was charged with recommending indictment on crimes he was able to prove occurred. These recommendations for indictment are for purposes of Impeachment first and then if they are so heinous, criminal prosecution after a President leaves office.

"The OLC memorandum began by considering whether the plain terms of the Impeachment Judgment Clause prohibit the institution of criminal proceedings against any officer subject to that Clause prior to that officer's conviction upon impeachment. OLC Memo at 2. The memorandum concluded that the plain terms of the Clause do not impose such a general bar to indictment or criminal trial prior to impeachment and therefore do not, by themselves, preclude the criminal prosecution of a sitting President. Id. at 7.3

The Impeachment Judgment Clause provides:

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

OLC: A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution

Moron, take it easy with your half-baked retard ramblings.

Do you recall why Comey was officially fired? I'll remind you - he was officially fired for non-compliance with DOJ policy not to talk shit about people you do not indict (Hillary).

Mueller worked under OLC memo guidance that he could not indict and therefore also could not make negative judgements about the president. Recomendation for impeachment would of course be a nagative judgement.

Yet he spent 180 pages doing just that. Barr should be fired for allowing it outside of the DOJ.

.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Tired of these Fucking Leftist DemNazi Shills, LYING 24-7 and trying to get away with it, hood wink and bamboozle people in to thinking anything they say is The TRUTH.

They Lie, and They Lie about The Lies They Tell.

Wake up people.

That Party has turned their back on Truth, Justice and America. Mueller like Starr was charged with recommending indictment on crimes he was able to prove occurred. These recommendations for indictment are for purposes of Impeachment first and then if they are so heinous, criminal prosecution after a President leaves office.

"The OLC memorandum began by considering whether the plain terms of the Impeachment Judgment Clause prohibit the institution of criminal proceedings against any officer subject to that Clause prior to that officer's conviction upon impeachment. OLC Memo at 2. The memorandum concluded that the plain terms of the Clause do not impose such a general bar to indictment or criminal trial prior to impeachment and therefore do not, by themselves, preclude the criminal prosecution of a sitting President. Id. at 7.3

The Impeachment Judgment Clause provides:

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

OLC: A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution

Moron, take it easy with your half-baked retard ramblings.

Do you recall why Comey was officially fired? I'll remind you - he was officially fired for non-compliance with DOJ policy not to talk shit about people you do not indict (Hillary).

Mueller worked under OLC memo guidance that he could not indict and therefore also could not make negative judgements about the president. Recomendation for impeachment would of course be a nagative judgement.

You libtards keep proving how stupid you are.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Incorrect:

What Mueller and his team did was prosecutor misconduct of the worst kind. He was tasked with one of two outcomes. No prosecution Or finding sufficient evidence to prosecute. Nothing more and nothing less. It was up to Barr to meet other statutory obligations.

Totally wrong again, but not unexpected..

Nonsence - OLC Memo precludes DOJ from charging a sitting president.

When you say "finding sufficient evidence to prosecute"...then Mueller did find that, he just could not declare it as such under DOJ policy.

The OLC memo is BARR'S RESPONSIBILITY. Not the SP's office. Mueller was given a task to determine if prosecution was warranted. He did not. Game over...

Barr's opinion is worth fuck-all.

Sessions was fired and Barr was hired specifically so our crooked president can have his very own Roy Cohn heading the DOJ.

In auditioning for his job Barr pretty much said - HIRE ME AND I WILL CLEAR YOU!

Dude your face is so far up Putin's Ass

Dude you are retarded. Straight up.

No, that would be you.

 

[The Original Tree]

Here is the Dealio for any Moron that wants to believe a single F'n thing these Leftist Commie Bastards are trying to sell you.

Let me break it down for you.

Mueller is either a complete Moron, or a Complete Coward.

If he was just a figure head, then Weismann's team of political partisan hacks, simply wrote the report as nothing but political fodder to impact the elections, because they had nothing to recommend indictments on....so they were Negligent in reaching conclusions they were ordered to reach, and they did so INTENTIONALLY.

The OLC Memo only references prosecuting The President in a Normal Criminal Proceeding WHILE IN OFFICE.

It does not prohibit Mueller doing his job like Ken Starr did and recommending Crimes for Which The President Can Be Indicted for later after leaving office, or for purposes of IMPEACHMENT.

The Memo was written in 1973. This NEVER Stopped Starr from Recommending 13 crimes to indict Clinton for.

Mueller made ZERO recommendations for Indictment and in his own words this was due to lack of evidence to come to any such conclusions.

So it's over. Mueller could not even recommend a single crime to indict The President on, which could be used by The Congress to vote on Impeachment, and The Senate to hold an Impeachment Trial.

No Recommendations on Indictment, means that there can be No Drafting of Articles of Impeachment.

Do Some Damn Reading FOR GOD SAKES PEOPLE, and then you don't have to listen to Leftist Propaganda.

OLC: A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution

 

[bripat9643]

Robert Mueller’s congressional testimony was lethal to the legal pretext for keeping the Russian collusion story alive.

Indeed, the maundering and semi-coherent manner with which he answered the questions posed to him during Wednesday’s hearings suggests that he was probably never up to the job of running the special counsel investigation into Russian interference with our 2016 election.

Mueller’s excruciating testimony made it obvious that he was unfamiliar with crucial passages of the report that bears his name. He had obvious difficulty grasping the point of many questions he was asked.

The report is so tainted by Mueller’s obvious incapacity — combined with the notorious partisanship of the people who actually investigated the president and wrote the so-called Mueller report — that it will now be suicidal for the Democrats to pursue impeachment.

Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) lecturing Mueller for flouting special counsel rules:

You told us this morning and in your report that you made no determination so respectfully director, you didn’t follow the special counsel regulations. It clearly says, “Write a confidential report about decisions reached.” Nowhere in here does it say write a report about decisions that weren’t reached. You wrote 180 pages about decisions that weren’t reached about potential crimes that weren’t charged.… And respectfully, by doing that you managed to violate every principle in the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis about potential crimes that aren’t charged.

The aging G-Man delivered the coup de grâce. Resuscitation was “outside his purview,” as he would phrase it. It’s time for the Democrats to call the undertaker and give impeachment a decent burial.

Mueller’s reputation and impeachment weren’t Wednesday’s only casualties. Democratic credibility is also bleeding out.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...

Good. Now it’s time for Republicans to start telling people about the Hildebeast and the Surrender Monkeys collusion with Russia. Forget about calling for a new investigation or special needs counsel, just have some backbone and speak up....Yes PAT THE RUSSIAN...we KNOW what that means!!!

The case for impeachment is alive and well. The only question is whether Democrats want to waste their time. The Republican Party is corrupted and stood by while all of this was going on. This is the party that voted to impeach Clinton over a personal affair. Spectator is a pro-Trump so their article is hardly surprising.

We know the report was damning as Republicans rush to attack Muller with the very talking points that you use. These are nothing but spitballs thrown by desperate Trump supporters.

Ratcliffe is a Trump rat. A partisan hack. The decision was made by the DOJ that a sitting President cannot be indicted. Mueller has every right to write the report as he sees fit.

Your post is a classic example of Trump derangement Syndrome. You completely ignore all the known facts. You live in a fantasy land.

 

[The Original Tree]

Tired of these Fucking Leftist DemNazi Shills, LYING 24-7 and trying to get away with it, hood wink and bamboozle people in to thinking anything they say is The TRUTH.

They Lie, and They Lie about The Lies They Tell.

Wake up people.

That Party has turned their back on Truth, Justice and America. Mueller like Starr was charged with recommending indictment on crimes he was able to prove occurred. These recommendations for indictment are for purposes of Impeachment first and then if they are so heinous, criminal prosecution after a President leaves office.

"The OLC memorandum began by considering whether the plain terms of the Impeachment Judgment Clause prohibit the institution of criminal proceedings against any officer subject to that Clause prior to that officer's conviction upon impeachment. OLC Memo at 2. The memorandum concluded that the plain terms of the Clause do not impose such a general bar to indictment or criminal trial prior to impeachment and therefore do not, by themselves, preclude the criminal prosecution of a sitting President. Id. at 7.3

The Impeachment Judgment Clause provides:

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

OLC: A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution

Moron, take it easy with your half-baked retard ramblings.

Do you recall why Comey was officially fired? I'll remind you - he was officially fired for non-compliance with DOJ policy not to talk shit about people you do not indict (Hillary).

Mueller worked under OLC memo guidance that he could not indict and therefore also could not make negative judgements about the president. Recomendation for impeachment would of course be a nagative judgement.

You libtards keep proving how stupid you are.

They aren't STUPID. They are EVIL and INTENTIONALLY LIE and Play DUMB when called on it.

They LIE, and then the Dem Tard Party Heads and their attorneys get together and craft Lies, to defend The Previous Lies, then they send out their Packages of Lies (talking points) for their mindless drones to regurgitate.

They have an entire system and army of people to generate and propagate lies to manipulate the populous. They never solve problems, they create them, and they create them because they want to draw power to themselves, so they can weaponize it against their rivals.

Wake up and realize what you are fighting and who you are fighting and realize they have ZERO ETHICS, and ZERO MORALS, and NO CONSCIENCE!

THE TRUTH IS NOT IN THEM.
Every interaction with a leftist is nothing but an invitation for them to craft, or regurgitate a lie.

They are born of lies, and will descend in to Hell to spend eternity with their fellow liars Forever when their lives are over.

 

[bripat9643]

Tired of these Fucking Leftist DemNazi Shills, LYING 24-7 and trying to get away with it, hood wink and bamboozle people in to thinking anything they say is The TRUTH.

They Lie, and They Lie about The Lies They Tell.

Wake up people.

That Party has turned their back on Truth, Justice and America. Mueller like Starr was charged with recommending indictment on crimes he was able to prove occurred. These recommendations for indictment are for purposes of Impeachment first and then if they are so heinous, criminal prosecution after a President leaves office.

"The OLC memorandum began by considering whether the plain terms of the Impeachment Judgment Clause prohibit the institution of criminal proceedings against any officer subject to that Clause prior to that officer's conviction upon impeachment. OLC Memo at 2. The memorandum concluded that the plain terms of the Clause do not impose such a general bar to indictment or criminal trial prior to impeachment and therefore do not, by themselves, preclude the criminal prosecution of a sitting President. Id. at 7.3

The Impeachment Judgment Clause provides:

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

OLC: A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution

Moron, take it easy with your half-baked retard ramblings.

Do you recall why Comey was officially fired? I'll remind you - he was officially fired for non-compliance with DOJ policy not to talk shit about people you do not indict (Hillary).

Mueller worked under OLC memo guidance that he could not indict and therefore also could not make negative judgements about the president. Recomendation for impeachment would of course be a nagative judgement.

Nevertheless, that's exactly what he did. The whole second half of the report was nothing but talking shit about a man he wasn't going to indict.

 

[The Original Tree]

Tired of these Fucking Leftist DemNazi Shills, LYING 24-7 and trying to get away with it, hood wink and bamboozle people in to thinking anything they say is The TRUTH.

They Lie, and They Lie about The Lies They Tell.

Wake up people.

That Party has turned their back on Truth, Justice and America. Mueller like Starr was charged with recommending indictment on crimes he was able to prove occurred. These recommendations for indictment are for purposes of Impeachment first and then if they are so heinous, criminal prosecution after a President leaves office.

"The OLC memorandum began by considering whether the plain terms of the Impeachment Judgment Clause prohibit the institution of criminal proceedings against any officer subject to that Clause prior to that officer's conviction upon impeachment. OLC Memo at 2. The memorandum concluded that the plain terms of the Clause do not impose such a general bar to indictment or criminal trial prior to impeachment and therefore do not, by themselves, preclude the criminal prosecution of a sitting President. Id. at 7.3

The Impeachment Judgment Clause provides:

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

OLC: A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution

Moron, take it easy with your half-baked retard ramblings.

Do you recall why Comey was officially fired? I'll remind you - he was officially fired for non-compliance with DOJ policy not to talk shit about people you do not indict (Hillary).

Mueller worked under OLC memo guidance that he could not indict and therefore also could not make negative judgements about the president. Recomendation for impeachment would of course be a nagative judgement.

Nevertheless, that's exactly what he did. The whole second half of the report was nothing but talking shit about a man he wasn't going to indict.

Mueller therefore and his team were Derelict in their duty and Negligent in carrying out the Mandate to come to a conclusion and make recommendations on Indictment. They Made None, so there Are None.

They were SORE LOSERS, so they essentially wrote a report worthy of a Tabloid Magazine, instead of doing what they were Legally Bound to do.

Tried to rig a primary
Tried to rig an election
Tried to rig an investigation

And all they did was educate The Public on how Evil and Plotting The Obama Administration, and Hillary Clinton were.

 

[The Original Tree]

Simple to break this down.

No Recommendations for Indictment = No Articles of Impeachment.

GAME

SET

MATCH!

 

[The Purge]

If Mueller Wasn’t in Charge, Who Was? A rundown of the possibilities and why they matter.....

Special Counsel Robert Mueller had a bad day last week. The build-up to his congressional testimony rivaled that of Geraldo Rivera opening Al Capone’s vault. Endless fanfare and hype, but both Mueller and the vault were empty, devoid of treasure, or any smoking gun.

At one level, Mueller is a sad figure, a doddering old man, looking foolish on an international stage, after being praised for two years for his legal acumen and integrity.

Was his performance genuine or contrived? Was he trying to salvage his reputation as a card-carrying deep-state elitist by playing a sympathetic old man being badgered by nasty Republicans? Did Democrats throw him under the bus in their unending quest to nullify the 2016 election, regardless of the personal toll on him and his family?

It’s clear he was not in charge of his own investigation. He not only didn’t write the report, which bears his name, but it’s uncertain if he even read it. If he did, he was certainly unfamiliar with the basics of the investigation. Anyone who listens to conservative talk radio or watches any of the Fox News opinion shows knew far more about the “Mueller Report” than its namesake.

Mueller seems to know only what he read in the New York Times or Washington Post, or watched on CNN, understanding little more about the investigation than the average low-information Democrat voter.

Most readers of American Thinker know what Fusion GPS is and the role it played in the Russian collusion hoax. Or who some of the key players are including Christopher Steele, Glenn Simpson and Natalia Veselnitskaya. The former FBI director did not and could only say, “I’m not familiar with that.”

If Robert Mueller wasn’t in charge of the “Mueller investigation,” who was?

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

 

[xyz]

Robert Swan Mueller III was reportedly an officer in the Marine Corps at the time of the Vietnam War.

Military democrats are a dangerous breed.

1. Baby Boomers did a lot of marijuana at the time, and soldiers were not all clean and sober on the battlefield.
2. There is a lot of emotional ☮&❤ (read: disarmament & gun control) baggage left over from the Vietnam War era.

Mueller is a registered Republican.

Furthermore, you post like a Russian troll.

 

[FA_Q2]

Robert Mueller’s congressional testimony was lethal to the legal pretext for keeping the Russian collusion story alive.

Indeed, the maundering and semi-coherent manner with which he answered the questions posed to him during Wednesday’s hearings suggests that he was probably never up to the job of running the special counsel investigation into Russian interference with our 2016 election.

Mueller’s excruciating testimony made it obvious that he was unfamiliar with crucial passages of the report that bears his name. He had obvious difficulty grasping the point of many questions he was asked.

The report is so tainted by Mueller’s obvious incapacity — combined with the notorious partisanship of the people who actually investigated the president and wrote the so-called Mueller report — that it will now be suicidal for the Democrats to pursue impeachment.

Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) lecturing Mueller for flouting special counsel rules:

You told us this morning and in your report that you made no determination so respectfully director, you didn’t follow the special counsel regulations. It clearly says, “Write a confidential report about decisions reached.” Nowhere in here does it say write a report about decisions that weren’t reached. You wrote 180 pages about decisions that weren’t reached about potential crimes that weren’t charged.… And respectfully, by doing that you managed to violate every principle in the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis about potential crimes that aren’t charged.

The aging G-Man delivered the coup de grâce. Resuscitation was “outside his purview,” as he would phrase it. It’s time for the Democrats to call the undertaker and give impeachment a decent burial.

Mueller’s reputation and impeachment weren’t Wednesday’s only casualties. Democratic credibility is also bleeding out.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...

Good. Now it’s time for Republicans to start telling people about the Hildebeast and the Surrender Monkeys collusion with Russia. Forget about calling for a new investigation or special needs counsel, just have some backbone and speak up....Yes PAT THE RUSSIAN...we KNOW what that means!!!

The case for impeachment is alive and well. The only question is whether Democrats want to waste their time. The Republican Party is corrupted and stood by while all of this was going on. This is the party that voted to impeach Clinton over a personal affair. Spectator is a pro-Trump so their article is hardly surprising.

We know the report was damning as Republicans rush to attack Muller with the very talking points that you use. These are nothing but spitballs thrown by desperate Trump supporters.

Ratcliffe is a Trump rat. A partisan hack. The decision was made by the DOJ that a sitting President cannot be indicted. Mueller has every right to write the report as he sees fit.

The whole report can be summed up in one sentence.

The Special Counsel did NOT determine the president committed a crime.

It's as simple as that.

.

Well no it can't since that's bullshit.

Special Counsel WAS NOT LEGALLY PERMITTED to determine if the president commited a crime. But Special Counsel did present the facts of the matter without making a prosecuratorial determination.

Those facts plainly describe Trump commiting Obstruction of Justice and it's the job of Congress (and ONLY Congress) to hold him accountable.

No, he was not legally permitted to indict the president. He was fully within his power to determine if a crime was likely comitted. He refused to do so.

And pointing to the Comey firing is not a defense here - he did EXACTLY the same thing that Comey did wrong. Just like Comey, he failed to establish a crime had been committed but opined endlessly and publicly about haw bad the target of his investigation was.

If Barr really wanted to cover for Trump he would have released the report in the first place.