Rocket Not Shot Down?

Tank

Gold Member
Apr 2, 2009
18,809
2,649
280
WTF?

Why was that rocket allowed to travel so far?
 
Last edited:
They more than likely quickly did the calculations that it was going to crash in the sea which made it safer to just let that happen rather than try to shoot it down and risk pieces of it falling on people causing damage.
 
Maybe they realized from the trajectory that it was not going to hit land?
That Kim is flirting with disaster, though. One of these days.....
 
It broke into three parts, as Lewdog wrote, safer to watch than bring down over land.
 
This is why Bannon should never have offered his opinion that war with North Korea is not an option. Who in the hell does that and jeopardizes America and allies National Security? Not acceptable.

This sob in North Korea needs to go. If it requires isolating China and punishing those who do business with them so be it. If one little roach can cause so much mayhem and pose an International threat than every cockroach nation will use this as their blueprint to hold major powers hostage. In effect, this is the great fear those who worked on the atomic bomb had when they realized it might reach the hands of little dirty rats.
 
In effect, this is the great fear those who worked on the atomic bomb had when they realized it might reach the hands of little dirty rats.

Unfortunately that genie is out of the bottle. If some shithole like Pakistan or North Korea has nuclear capabilities nowadays imagine what the world stage will look like 50 years from now. It may not happen in our lifetime but it's inevitable that an event happens that makes the Cuban Missile Crisis look like the Bundy standoff.
 
This is why Bannon should never have offered his opinion that war with North Korea is not an option. Who in the hell does that and jeopardizes America and allies National Security? Not acceptable.

This sob in North Korea needs to go. If it requires isolating China and punishing those who do business with them so be it. If one little roach can cause so much mayhem and pose an International threat than every cockroach nation will use this as their blueprint to hold major powers hostage. In effect, this is the great fear those who worked on the atomic bomb had when they realized it might reach the hands of little dirty rats.

I believe China will at least not help Kim; China is starting those 'small scale' experiments with free trade. Standing behind the odious Kim hurts their reputation with those nations they are beginning to emulate.
 
This is why Bannon should never have offered his opinion that war with North Korea is not an option. Who in the hell does that and jeopardizes America and allies National Security? Not acceptable.

This sob in North Korea needs to go. If it requires isolating China and punishing those who do business with them so be it. If one little roach can cause so much mayhem and pose an International threat than every cockroach nation will use this as their blueprint to hold major powers hostage. In effect, this is the great fear those who worked on the atomic bomb had when they realized it might reach the hands of little dirty rats.

Quick question..................how exactly do you propose to isolate China? What's even more is how do you wish to punish those who do business with China without hurting our own economy?

You DO realize that China is a major world economy with connections everywhere, right?
 
This is why Bannon should never have offered his opinion that war with North Korea is not an option. Who in the hell does that and jeopardizes America and allies National Security? Not acceptable.

This sob in North Korea needs to go. If it requires isolating China and punishing those who do business with them so be it. If one little roach can cause so much mayhem and pose an International threat than every cockroach nation will use this as their blueprint to hold major powers hostage. In effect, this is the great fear those who worked on the atomic bomb had when they realized it might reach the hands of little dirty rats.

Quick question..................how exactly do you propose to isolate China? What's even more is how do you wish to punish those who do business with China without hurting our own economy?

You DO realize that China is a major world economy with connections everywhere, right?

You know better than to confuse a RWNJ in mid rant.
 
This is why Bannon should never have offered his opinion that war with North Korea is not an option. Who in the hell does that and jeopardizes America and allies National Security? Not acceptable.

This sob in North Korea needs to go. If it requires isolating China and punishing those who do business with them so be it. If one little roach can cause so much mayhem and pose an International threat than every cockroach nation will use this as their blueprint to hold major powers hostage. In effect, this is the great fear those who worked on the atomic bomb had when they realized it might reach the hands of little dirty rats.

Quick question..................how exactly do you propose to isolate China? What's even more is how do you wish to punish those who do business with China without hurting our own economy?

You DO realize that China is a major world economy with connections everywhere, right?
LOL! it does not matter what we do or do not realize about China, whatever you say is meaningless. China will do what it does and so will our leaders and there is nothing you can do about it in spite of all the media bullshit you swallow. You still know nothing.
 
No reason to isolate China, time to make kind gestures, to pull them away from the mad man. At least the RWNs are realizing Bannon was for no one but Bannon; a lot of those hanging around the White House, still.
 
No reason to isolate China, time to make kind gestures, to pull them away from the mad man. At least the RWNs are realizing Bannon was for no one but Bannon; a lot of those hanging around the White House, still.
It's really chilling to see people who have absolutely no idea what they are talking about giving opinions on things they are not involved in.
 
WTF?

Why was that rocket allowed to travel so far?


Why bring it down over populate area when it was safer to let it hit the water?

Why would you even ask such a dumb question?

That is not a kind statement to write; it is a valid question.

It's not so much that it was "allowed" but I think when they saw it didn't pose a threat to anyone, they simply allowed it to fall into the sea.

Now, if wartime conditions were in place, and we were at DEFCON 2 or 3, I'm pretty sure the response would have been much different.
 
WTF?

Why was that rocket allowed to travel so far?


Why bring it down over populate area when it was safer to let it hit the water?

Why would you even ask such a dumb question?

I think the US made rocket shoot down systems sold to Japan does not work.
So why show their cards here? Gee, they can make their own.
Your "thoughts" on the US rocket system are baseless. The missile failed. End of story.
 
WTF?

Why was that rocket allowed to travel so far?


Why bring it down over populate area when it was safer to let it hit the water?

Why would you even ask such a dumb question?

I think the US made rocket shoot down systems sold to Japan does not work.
So why show their cards here? Gee, they can make their own.
Your "thoughts" on the US rocket system are baseless. The missile failed. End of story.

It was a test missile, and they shot it off to test it's capabilities. Just because it landed in the sea DOES NOT mean that the missile failed. Were YOU in on the test when it happened? Do you know the original parameters assigned? Do you know if the missile met them or not? If not, STFU, because you are talking about something you know nothing about.

You should take your own advice that you wrote in post number 14.
 

Forum List

Back
Top