Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you endorse politicians who crusade to force women to suffer the harm of pregnancy against their will when for fifty years abortion was settled law and no woman was ever forced by the government to do anything against her will or conscience.Tell me ole wise ace, then how did the damned process get so out of order or screwed up ?
That's alright, because it will all just run in cycles, but in the mean time more poor would be human's are axed for their research part's, and to satisfy the lust of their baby momma's in hopes to just keep that raw sex a rolling like the waves tossing from the left to the right and the right to the left. Hope you're proud of your bull shite, but remember bud, judgement day is coming. You won't escape that one no matter how much you try. God ain't fooled by you either.Voting is not yelling.
Yell what enough?
Last Tuesday, Abortion rights won an abortion rights election that put an abortion rights majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court that replaced the abortion rights deniers on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
You keep on with your bull shite, when you know damned good and well that we have been setting precedent in all of this, and making historic blunders all over the place today. Abortion has become just one of our major blunders to date, but hell I'm losing count anymore.you endorse politicians who crusade to force women to suffer the harm of pregnancy against their will when for fifty years abortion was settled law and no woman was ever forced by the government to do anything against her will or conscience.
what did I say that was incorrect??DanteR230405-to: #1 ¥ Dante Reawakened ¥ Debates over abortion involve a woman's health. It's her body.
PH230405-#2 to: -1 ¥ progressive hunter ¥ “the majority of abortions have nothing to do with the mothers health”
NFBW: Where’s you data?
One of my three daughters is due in July. Her first. She spent last weekend in the hospital. She didn't check into a resort in the best of health. She’s gonna be ok but you have to be a pure asshole to say what you said in 00002. I suspect you have no data.
END2304062940
Thank you for the question. I am on the side of whatever produces the greatest amount of liberty for all.Samofvt230406-#2 to: -1 ¥ Samofvt ¥ Patriots need to be loud and proud. This is going to end one of two ways. Which side are you on: Liberty and justice; or slavery and oppression? your choice.
NFBW: I’m for liberty for the born women in this country. Let’s not make reproductive slaves of women who get pregnant unintentionally. Who’s side are you on?
END2304061451
NFBW: You mean ‘potential human beings,would be human's
I agree And Roe v Wade Codified what we agree upon already,It is grotesque to think a woman who becomes selfish and gets "cold feet" in the last month of pregnancy could use this as an option. There should be some limits.
Sounds reasonable, but we know what or how the problem had evolved over time, so the Fed's were right to wash their hands of it.Thank you for the question. I am on the side of whatever produces the greatest amount of liberty for all.
In the scenario you bring up, I believe there are many involved: 1) the woman 2) the man who contributed 3) the unborn child (the fetus itself is alive) 4) the families of the woman and the man 5) God
Personally, for myself and anyone I might be able to influence, life is precious and should only be snuffed out after careful consideration of all options. Today, babies are being taken from the womb at earlier and earlier stages of development and being nursed in incubators to become totally healthy human beings. With modern technology making such large advances, it is conceivable that in the not-so-distant future, any fertilized embryo could be transferred to an incubator and nursed to full development. So, personally, I am against abortion of any type.
As far as forcing my ideas on others, no. I am against an outright ban on all abortions.
These decisions about terminating a pregnancy prematurely need to be made by the individuals (<- PLURAL) involved. The fetus does not have a voice that modern science has discovered a way to hear. Abortion should not be the first option, it should be the last option. More emphasis and support should be given to other options, including pregnancy resource centers where women can get monetary support for their needs and health care if they can bear the child to term. If the child is unwanted, adoption is a great way to go, and some childless couples will pay HANDSOMELY to a woman who agrees to bear the child for them. This becomes a paid service the woman is providing, not slavery.
It is grotesque to think a woman who becomes selfish and gets "cold feet" in the last month of pregnancy could use this as an option. There should be some limits.
Not the issue, because under the RvW many transformations of the times and processes were added or deleted. It began to take on a monstrous trend and cult following. It had to go.I agree And Roe v Wade Codified what we agree upon already,
I agree. This moral decision belongs in the hands of the people: Any power not specifically granted to the federal government falls to the States and to the people.Sounds reasonable, but we know what or how the problem had evolved over time, so the Fed's were right to wash their hands of it.
TENNESSEE THREE - Republicans have lost young people of all colors and faiths in Tennessee and around the nation for generations.Sounds reasonable,
Not the issue, b
Not sure about any time spans, other than once a woman allows herself to get pregnant, then she should allow her motherly side to kick in. She should begin the process of nurturing a brand new life all the way to it's full maturity around 9 months give or take a few weeks or days.I agree. This moral decision belongs in the hands of the people: Any power not specifically granted to the federal government falls to the States and to the people.
I just hope a strong majority would agree there should be limits. The heartbeat limit seems reasonable. If you can't go along with that, surely you can go along with using the most premature birth on record who lived to maturity as a minimum standard. This will become earlier and earlier as modern science and medicine progresses.
Back to that bull shite now ? You are too predictable.Who are you to decide what is or is not the issue?
No it didn’t, It stood as legal precedent for fifty years / over 90 percent of abortions happen in the first three monthsIt began to take on a monstrous trend and cult following.
Back to that bull shite now ? Y
I live in the most civilized society in the history of mankind. I do not know where you live.Other than that, we as a human race should always side on the side of life, civility, and having a civilized SOCIETY in mind when dealing with these things.
Samofvt230406-#8,146 to: -1 ¥ @Samo ¥ “As far as forcing my ideas on others, no. I am against an outright ban on all abortions.”
NFBW: As a Christian you have a fundamental connection to Americans of Jewish faith. They vote for pro-choice DEMS and it is an article of many of Jewish religion that life begins at first breath.
So out of respect for the religious minority of Jewish people, wouldn’t it be fair to leave abortion as it was for fifty years instead of at six weeks which basically means abortion is banned outright with exceptions for the life of the mother or as a result of rape.
END2304062105
