Lakhota
Diamond Member
Because it is going broke idiot.
Going broke? It currently has a $2.5 trillion surplus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it is going broke idiot.
Cons have been saying that since 1935.
Because it is going broke idiot.
I think you would react the same if Mittens got drunk, stole a school bus full of kids and ran over a dozen nuns in a crosswalk.
you and miss gunslinger who thanked you clearly have reading comprehension problems....
is that my fault?
The chart I posted on this....included everyone working, filing their taxes.... the irs's numbers... that 47% that romney spoke about that the taxfoundation collaborated, was FOR THOSE WORKING, with income.....filing income taxes....that's what Romney said....read his full statement.
Most people over 65 are Republicans who don't pay federal taxes.
But it is the dependency issue that requires real information. Income for the lower half of American earners has been growing very slowly since the late 1970s -- more or less when Ronald Reagan took office. Compared to economies overseas, the wage performance has been just plain bad.
Why? The declines of unions, the refusal to raise the minimum wage with inflation, and the increased pressure by Wall Street to minimize expenses in the short run -- typically labor expenses -- have all contributed. So have rapidly lost manufacturing jobs and globalization in general. Finally, on average economic growth was slow in the 1980s until the mid-1990s. Only in the late 1990s did growth push the unemployment rate down adequately to boost incomes for the lower half. In the 2000s, we had adequate growth but little job or wage growth. Without social programs like the Earned Income Tax Credit, the lower half would have hardly seen incomes grow at all.
Was dependency a cause of low incomes? This is easily refuted nonsense. Had social programs hurt rather than helped Americans, poverty rates would have been low in the 1950s. As Michael Harrington alerted America, the poverty rate was probably 30 percent in the 1950s. Finally, the U.S. government computed a poverty line -- a low one, mind you. It found the poverty rate at about 22 percent.
Why? Couldn't have been dependency. The War on Poverty had not yet begun. By the 1970s, however, the poverty rate was down to 11 percent. As Social Security expanded, elderly poverty rates fell from 50 percent to about 10 percent. And so on. These are the purposes of government, Mitt.
On our Rediscovering Government website you can find a set of charts and an important summary paper by Lane Kenworthy on this issue.
Going broke? It currently has a $2.5 trillion surplus.
yay....another thread about this
yay
Going broke? It currently has a $2.5 trillion surplus.
Are you just a dishonest Hack, or are you really this stupid?
According to Romney's website, he wants more immigrants. But only those with degrees.
you keep forgetting that he and Obama both have the same opinion on this matter.
Romney needs to convince the middle class that he is in their corner. He didn't do it at the GOP convention and he definitely hasn't now
Romney needs to convince the middle class that he is in their corner. He didn't do it at the GOP convention and he definitely hasn't now
Well according to the over 50% of the people who disapprove of Obama, they don't believe Obama is for the middle class either.
As an 18 year old young man preparing to vote for my first time I want to pick the right person for the job. As a worker I can applaud Mitt Romney on his views.:Unfortunately he was mistaken for disparaging the homeless, but in fact he was calling out the people that have money to go buy cases upon cases of beer daily, yet complain about their food stamps getting cut.