Romney's Mormon Patriotism: 5 Privileged Sons and No Volunteers?

[Sallow]

You Guy's do know military service is voluntary right? This thread is laughable the left supported Bill Clinton who did not serve over both George H.W.Bush and Bob Doyle who did you supported Barak Obama who never served over John McCain who did but now it's some big deal because neither Romney or his sons choose to serve in the military.Can anyone else smell the hypocrisy?

The problem is, Clinton was opposed to the war and Obama wasn't really a hawk, either. (Of course, both of these guys learned to love military action when they got into the big chair. They all do.)

Romney, on the other hand, never saw a war he didn't like, so long as the working class scum were the ones doing the fighting and coming home in the body bags.

And that would be Romney..his dad and his Grandfather.

Kind of strange to elect a guy to "serve" the country...from a family with little or no history of service in terms of actually fighting for the country.

 

[JoeB131]

the left is as wrong for jumping on Romney's religion as the right is for Obama's religion. Neither attack advances the cause of the American republic.

You mean other than telling us abuot their character?

The thing is, Obama's religion has been litigated, and he has been asked if he agreed with some of the stranger things that came out of the mouth of Reverand Wright (who is not the head guy in his religion). He was held to account, and if he hadn't gotten the answer right, they'd have nailed him for it. (I frankly don't like the way he threw his grandmother under the bus, but that's another discussion.)

On the other hand, no one has asked Romney seriously if he thinks that dark skin is a curse from God, or if he really thinks all other religions are of the devil and an abomination, or if he really thinks that a civilization of Hebrews lived in North America and God cursed them with dark skin.

No one has asked him if he really thinks a woman can only get into the really cool heaven if she is bonded to a Mormon man or about his church's weird positions on gays and women.

Oh, wait. That's his religion, we have to treat it with respect.

Bull-shit.

 

[Sallow]

the left is as wrong for jumping on Romney's religion as the right is for Obama's religion. Neither attack advances the cause of the American republic.

You mean other than telling us abuot their character?

The thing is, Obama's religion has been litigated, and he has been asked if he agreed with some of the stranger things that came out of the mouth of Reverand Wright (who is not the head guy in his religion). He was held to account, and if he hadn't gotten the answer right, they'd have nailed him for it. (I frankly don't like the way he threw his grandmother under the bus, but that's another discussion.)

On the other hand, no one has asked Romney seriously if he thinks that dark skin is a curse from God, or if he really thinks all other religions are of the devil and an abomination, or if he really thinks that a civilization of Hebrews lived in North America and God cursed them with dark skin.

No one has asked him if he really thinks a woman can only get into the really cool heaven if she is bonded to a Mormon man or about his church's weird positions on gays and women.

Oh, wait. That's his religion, we have to treat it with respect.

Bull-shit.

Not true.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pcw0woPX5VY]Mitt Romney on mormon racism - YouTube[/ame]

And he gave some really weird answers.

 

[Unkotare]

Well to be fair..no Democrat really attacks their opponent's religion.

Did you type that with a straight face, Swallow? You are truly a shameless fucking clown.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Well to be fair..no Democrat really attacks their opponent's religion.

Did you type that with a straight face, Swallow? You are truly a shameless fucking clown.

But Democratic candidates like Papa Obama are willing to throw anyone under the bus
to save their own ass- no real values there

The left/ concerned trolls would have the American people believe that
in 20 years he never heard any of those statements



Papa Obama on Rev Wright

"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother"​

sure you can't
-------------------





Here boy

 

[Sallow]

Well to be fair..no Democrat really attacks their opponent's religion.

Did you type that with a straight face, Swallow? You are truly a shameless fucking clown.

I'm sure you got a link..you little faggot.

Or you busy cleaning up after a long night of sucking off sailors and dock workers? China girl?

 

[Sallow]

But Democratic candidates like Papa Obama are willing to throw anyone under the bus
to save their own ass- no real values there

The left/ concerned trolls would have the American people believe that
in 20 years he never heard any of those statements

"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother"​

sure you can't
-------------------





Here boy

Link a Democratic candidate attacking an opponent's religion.

Should be easy. I did it.

 

[Neotrotsky]

But Democratic candidates like Papa Obama are willing to throw anyone under the bus
to save their own ass- no real values there

The left/ concerned trolls would have the American people believe that
in 20 years he never heard any of those statements

"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother"​

sure you can't
-------------------





Here boy

Link a Democratic candidate attacking an opponent's religion.

Should be easy. I did it.

You mean the Left's McCain "preacher problem " in the last election
wasn't an attack on his religion and a poor attempt to
cover for Papa Obama's radical past?

Good to know


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------






Here boy

 

[Sallow]

But Democratic candidates like Papa Obama are willing to throw anyone under the bus
to save their own ass- no real values there

The left/ concerned trolls would have the American people believe that
in 20 years he never heard any of those statements

"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother"​

sure you can't
-------------------





Here boy

Link a Democratic candidate attacking an opponent's religion.

Should be easy. I did it.

You mean the Left's McCain "preacher problem " in the last election
wasn't an attack on his religion and a poor attempt to
cover for Papa Obama's radical past?

Good to know


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------






Here boy

So I guess you give up..

And you should be careful who you align yourself with around here..

China Girl puts out scat videos..

Don't believe me? Use google. "Scat Unkotare".

 

[Neotrotsky]

Link a Democratic candidate attacking an opponent's religion.

Should be easy. I did it.

You mean the Left's McCain "preacher problem " in the last election
wasn't an attack on his religion and a poor attempt to
cover for Papa Obama's radical past?

Good to know


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------



Here boy

So I guess you give up..

And you should be careful who you align yourself with around here..

China Girl puts out scat videos..

Don't believe me? Use google. "Scat Unkotare".

Give up
so McCain's Preacher problem was just a poor attempt to
cover for Papa Obama's radical past and not an attack on his religion?

As for the rest...

I hear you

Just type in sex sallow and see what you get
No doubt you guys must be associated

---------------------------------------------------------








here boy

 

[Sallow]

I hear you

Just type in sex sallow and see what you get
No doubt you guys must be associated

---------------------------------------------------------








here boy

You get alot of bad spelling.

In any case..got anything? I mean showing a Democratic candidate attacking a Republican candidate for religion.

Link? Something?

 

[Neotrotsky]

Sure

if you really want it
Hey whatever floats your boat


Sex sallow - free download

 

[Sallow]

Sure

if you really want it
Hey whatever floats your boat

Which means you got nothing.

And you shouldn't post pornographic links.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Sure

if you really want it
Hey whatever floats your boat

Which means you got nothing.

And you shouldn't post pornographic links.

Well you asked for links
and actually it is just a link to a page of links with no pictures
and the link does not work

but you already knew that


As for the rest
Your original statement was that Democrats (not candidates) attack their opponents religion
Now you want Candidate specific

I hope you know that a view on one being secular
is not a attack on religion but their lack of ....
Your video does not support your claim of "attack" on his religion
or as you like to say, "you have nothing"

Though one could argue that it does allow a look at his religion since
he brought it up. But do not expect the MSM and the majority of the left
to do this- Papa Obama has too much negative baggage on this topic
for them to really bring it up. Religion is a losing issue for Papa Obama.



Of course we all knew that religion means little to Papa Obama
by the way he threw his preacher of 20 years under the bus

--------------------------------------------








here boy

 

[JakeStarkey]

But Democratic candidates like Papa Obama are willing to throw anyone under the bus to save their own ass- no real values there

That's not true. Obama and Romney are morally no better or worse than the other. Talking about Wright or about Mormonism reveals one's lack of understanding about religion in America.

Thank God you are going to vote with me for Romney, but your forces will have far less influence in the Romney administration than mine.

 

[Sallow]

Sure

if you really want it
Hey whatever floats your boat

Which means you got nothing.

And you shouldn't post pornographic links.

Well you asked for links
and actually it is just a link to a page of links with no pictures
and the link does not work

but you already knew that


As for the rest
Your original statement was that Democrats (not candidates) attack their opponents religion
Now you want Candidate specific

I hope you know that a view on one being secular
is not a attack on religion but their lack of ....
Your video does not support your claim of "attack" on his religion
or as you like to say, "you have nothing"

Though one could argue that it does allow a look at his religion since
he brought it up. But do not expect the MSM and the majority of the left
to do this- Papa Obama has too much negative baggage on this topic
for them to really bring it up. Religion is a losing issue for Papa Obama.



Of course we all knew that religion means little to Papa Obama
by the way he threw his preacher of 20 years under the bus

--------------------------------------------








here boy

You're missing the point.

Republicans..well conservatives..hold religion as a litmus test for office.

Democrats..well Liberals..do not.

Which is part of the reason..Obama had to throw "his preacher under the bus".

It became a political issue. And one that should have been an embarrassment for the right wing. It wasn't. It was a victory.

 

[HUGGY]

Oh yeah, the onus is on him for you being a fucking bigot. That makes a lot of sense.

Funny how that works. You wanna be POTUS? Prove you are not bat shit crazy!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Constitutional illiterates from the far left and constitutional illiterates from the far right and libertarians lost in the woods, to boot.

Atheists to theocrats: what a buncha loons.

 

[blackhawk]

You Guy's do know military service is voluntary right? This thread is laughable the left supported Bill Clinton who did not serve over both George H.W.Bush and Bob Doyle who did you supported Barak Obama who never served over John McCain who did but now it's some big deal because neither Romney or his sons choose to serve in the military.Can anyone else smell the hypocrisy?

The problem is, Clinton was opposed to the war and Obama wasn't really a hawk, either. (Of course, both of these guys learned to love military action when they got into the big chair. They all do.)

Romney, on the other hand, never saw a war he didn't like, so long as the working class scum were the ones doing the fighting and coming home in the body bags.

Cheap attempt at rationalization

 

[Sallow]

You Guy's do know military service is voluntary right? This thread is laughable the left supported Bill Clinton who did not serve over both George H.W.Bush and Bob Doyle who did you supported Barak Obama who never served over John McCain who did but now it's some big deal because neither Romney or his sons choose to serve in the military.Can anyone else smell the hypocrisy?

The problem is, Clinton was opposed to the war and Obama wasn't really a hawk, either. (Of course, both of these guys learned to love military action when they got into the big chair. They all do.)

Romney, on the other hand, never saw a war he didn't like, so long as the working class scum were the ones doing the fighting and coming home in the body bags.

Cheap attempt at rationalization

It's not "rationalization"..it's history.