Ron DeSsntis War On Disney About To Hit A Major Snag

[skews13]

Much ado has been made about the legality of Florida’s Senate Bill 4Cpurporting to dissolve Disney’s Reedy Creek Improvement District: whether it was retaliation prohibited by the First Amendment, whether it was passed with sufficient formality, and so on," wrote Schumer. "But there’s a much more basic reason Florida can’t dissolve Reedy Creek — it promised bond purchasers that it wouldn’t."

Ron DeSantis' war against Disney is about to hit a major snag: legal expert

On Tuesday, writing for Bloomberg Tax, attorney Jacob Schumer walked through how the plan by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) to strip the Walt Disney corporation of its special tax status could run into a brick wall.The plan, passed as part of a special session bill in which legislators also approved...

www.rawstory.com

Those fiduciary responsibilities can be a problem.

 

[PinktheFloyd88]

Seems that Reedy Creek is safe until at least 2029

This is what happens when you craft a bill in two days and pass it out of spite. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/the-contractual-impossibility-of-unwinding-disneys-reedy-creek “In authorizing Reedy Creek to issue bonds, the Florida legislature included a remarkable...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[elektra]

. "But there’s a much more basic reason Florida can’t dissolve Reedy Creek — it promised bond purchasers that it wouldn’t."

Damn, that is a snag.

DeSantis must become a Democrat so that he can break promises.

 

[surada]

Damn, that is a snag.

DeSantis must become a Democrat so that he can break promises.

Contractual agreements are more binding than a promise. Nothing good comes from revenge legislation.

 

[elektra]

Contractual agreements are more binding than a promise. Nothing good comes from revenge legislation.

Yes, DeSantis must become a Democrat and then he will not have any trouble with this.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes, DeSantis must become a Democrat and then he will not have any trouble with this.

You can of course offer some example of Democrats passing legislation designed to punish an individual entity for exercising its free speech?

 

[Penelope]

DeSantis retaliated against Disney.

 

[occupied]

You can of course offer some example of Democrats passing legislation designed to punish an individual entity for exercising its free speech?

I haven't heard anyone talk about this thing maybe being a "bill of attainder". I thought it was unconstitutional to make laws punishing individuals for things that are not illegal.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Since when do cult members NOT WANT CORPORATIONS TO PAY TAXES?



You guys are a trip.

 

[Darkwind]

1. Corporations are not 'individuals.' They have 'person status' to enter into contracts but little else.

2. The alleged 'bonds,' promised over 60 years ago, were terrible then, and it is now an awful law.

3. Special carve-outs do not last forever, and the fact that they exist at all is what is wrong.

Most importantly,

Chucky is a slimy piece of shit known by thinking people as often wrong Schumer.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Since when do cult members NOT WANT CORPORATIONS TO PAY TAXES?



You guys are a trip.

where do you get the idea that Disney does not pay taxes?

 

[DBA]

You can of course offer some example of Democrats passing legislation designed to punish an individual entity for exercising its free speech?

Boy, that was difficult. Do you mean like this? This would punish doctors that disseminate "misinformation or disinformation" regarding COVID-19. Democrats couldn't care less about free speech. Just wait until Democrats start talking about amending section 230 when Twitter allows free speech from BOTH sides.

AB 2098 - California Assembly (20212022) - Open States

 

[elektra]

You can of course offer some example of Democrats passing legislation designed to punish an individual entity for exercising its free speech?

Of course, too easy.

How about Obama weaponizing the IRS denying conservatives the right to organize with tax exempt status just like the democrats organized.

Maybe we could also include the IRS investigations of these conservative groups as well.

Then of course if democrats don't like someone's speech they start a campaign to get that person fired.

Of course you state legislation, which can be offered but the fact is there are all kinds of ways the democrats actively deny free speech.

Disturbing meetings with yelling.

Organizing threatening and forcing universities to cancel conservative speakers.

Shouting down and even throwing pies at conservative speakers.

 

[Flash]

DeSantis retaliated against Disney.

...and well deserved. Disney has turned into a filthy woke queer company.

 

[Flash]

Of course, to easy.

How about Obama weaponizing the IRS denying conservatives to organize with tax exempt status just like the democrats organized.

Maybe we could also include the IRS investigations of these conservative groups as well.

Then of course if democrats don't like someone's speech they start a campaign to get that person fired.

Of course you state legislation, which certainly that can be offered but the fact is there are all kinds of ways the democrats actively deny free speech.

Disturbing meetings with yelling.

Organizing threatening and forcing universities to cancel conservative speakers.

Shouting down and even throwing pies at conservative speakers.

But but but that's different!

 

[Oddball]

Much ado has been made about the legality of Florida’s Senate Bill 4Cpurporting to dissolve Disney’s Reedy Creek Improvement District: whether it was retaliation prohibited by the First Amendment,

Wait a sec....

Now the liberoidals are saying that constitutional rights extend to corporations?!?

Bookmarked, for the next time one of you assholes starts weeping and wailing about Citizens United.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Boy, that was difficult. Do you mean like this? This would punish doctors that disseminate "misinformation or disinformation" regarding COVID-19. Democrats couldn't care less about free speech. Just wait until Democrats start talking about amending section 230 when Twitter allows free speech from BOTH sides.

AB 2098 - California Assembly (20212022) - Open States

While I am against Cali doing that, the law does not target one specific business as Florida did

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How about Obama weaponizing the IRS denying conservatives the right to organize with tax exempt status just like the democrats organized.

Maybe we could also include the IRS investigations of these conservative groups as well.

This was illegal and was stopped when found. It was not done via a bill passed and signed into law.

Then of course if democrats don't like someone's speech they start a campaign to get that person fired.

Which of course is different than the Government passing a bill targeting on specific company

Of course you state legislation, which can be offered but the fact is there are all kinds of ways the democrats actively deny free speech.

Disturbing meetings with yelling.

Organizing threatening and forcing universities to cancel conservative speakers.

Shouting down and even throwing pies at conservative speakers.

All of these are bad, but none reach the level of the government passing a bill and signing it into law targeting a specific business for exercising their free speech.

 

[elektra]

This was illegal and was stopped when found. It was not done via a bill passed and signed into law.



Which of course is different than the Government passing a bill targeting on specific company



All of these are bad, but none reach the level of the government passing a bill and signing it into law targeting a specific business for exercising their free speech.

Disney, the 1%, the rich that does not pay thier fair share, decides to take a political side and fight a law that protects children from being taught sex and you call that the right to free speech?

You are technically speaking, advocating that you have the right to teach my 5 year old son anything you want about sex.

You have a right to say what you want to my children about sex.

There is no place in any society for "today's", Democrats.

Democrats now claim rights over other people's children.