Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eventually, we will find out why he was deflecting with this. We know how this story ends a la Dennis Hastert.The only place I've ever heard of anyone ever being accused of embracing the teaching of K-3rd sex stuff is in DeSantis's Fla. I'm not sure I believe it ...... But wow, what a creepy guy he is.
We just want the grooming by kindergarten teachers to stop. It's not too much to ask.Is he hanging out in kindergarten classes?...or just outside?
Nope. I wouldn’t screen that.Interesting what is being projected.
My comment is not about the Mouse saving money---its about the Mouse paying taxes like everyone else does which is far far more than they are now.if you think the Mouse could have saved money by getting its bonds issued through the counties than with Reedy Creek, I have an amusment park that I can sell you very cheap.
Dems are thrilled they got away with it, they don't have any remorse.
My comment is not about the Mouse saving money---its about the Mouse paying taxes like everyone else does which is far far more than they are now.
A billion things can go wrong between now and then.
Especially when it comes to allocating the bond debt. I can't see Florida as a whole, and not the counties that effectively owe the debt, passing it onto the other residents of Florida
It would be like forcing the taxpayers of the other 49 states to pay for the debts of New York.
Bring it Chuckie........now he's on the side of big business, what a shock. I love how these people are getting exposed and the bullshit big gov vs big gov (which has never been the case) is not shown to be the hand job it is.Much ado has been made about the legality of Florida’s Senate Bill 4Cpurporting to dissolve Disney’s Reedy Creek Improvement District: whether it was retaliation prohibited by the First Amendment, whether it was passed with sufficient formality, and so on," wrote Schumer. "But there’s a much more basic reason Florida can’t dissolve Reedy Creek — it promised bond purchasers that it wouldn’t."
Ron DeSantis' war against Disney is about to hit a major snag: legal expert
On Tuesday, writing for Bloomberg Tax, attorney Jacob Schumer walked through how the plan by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) to strip the Walt Disney corporation of its special tax status could run into a brick wall.The plan, passed as part of a special session bill in which legislators also approved...www.rawstory.com
Those fiduciary responsibilities can be a problem.
That troll specializes in that faux observation.No, just answering posts, troll.
That troll specializes in that faux observation.
Disney and DeSantis. Both sides have some problems in what they’re doing.
Disney enjoys a tax break and then offers political criticism. It may have the right, but it’s akin to a not for profit organization then seeking to both take a tax break and engage in political speech. It’s kind of repugnant, especially where Disney chooses to lie about the law they are commenting on (which they have).
Florida did provide a significant tax break to Disney and the bonds do seem to have come with promises. This new law may be a violation of some of those promises so that Florida may have to make the bond purchasers whole for the law to survive. But I kind of doubt that the State can do that by dumping the new costs on the two adjoining counties.
Meanwhile, again: there is no war on Disney. Obviously.
From your post: "It may have the right, but it’s akin to a not for profit organization then seeking to both take a tax break and engage in political speech. It’s kind of repugnant, especially where Disney chooses to lie about the law they are commenting on (which they have)."That troll specializes in that faux observation.
Disney and DeSantis. Both sides have some problems in what they’re doing.
Disney enjoys a tax break and then offers political criticism. It may have the right, but it’s akin to a not for profit organization then seeking to both take a tax break and engage in political speech. It’s kind of repugnant, especially where Disney chooses to lie about the law they are commenting on (which they have).
Florida did provide a significant tax break to Disney and the bonds do seem to have come with promises. This new law may be a violation of some of those promises so that Florida may have to make the bond purchasers whole for the law to survive. But I kind of doubt that the State can do that by dumping the new costs on the two adjoining counties.
Meanwhile, again: there is no war on Disney. Obviously.
LMFAO. Now all of the conservatives whining FOR government regulation of corporations.