Ron Paul Needs To Drop Out

[Katzndogz]

Ron Paul never drops out. He doesn't accept defeat even when he loses. Last time he had his own convention down the street from the Republican convention so he could pretend he won.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Ron Paul is not an isolationist

I don't get you I used to like you, but if Ron Paul doesn't get the nominatin you won't vote Republican that's pretty stupid. we need Obama out. Rand Paul said he would support the nomnee who ever it is, You and people like you? Make no sense

Obama out would be a good thing, but not if you're going to turn around and replace him with Obama II. Then it's just pointless.

Agreed.
Someone else get's it.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

you'd also have a naive and dangerous isolationist foreign policy and economic policy.

anyone who thinks terrorists will be nice if you're nice to them isn't very bright. and paul isn't very bright.

Ron Paul is not an isolationist

I don't get you I used to like you, but if Ron Paul doesn't get the nominatin you won't vote Republican that's pretty stupid. we need Obama out. Rand Paul said he would support the nomnee who ever it is, You and people like you? Make no sense

I have my values I don't care who Rand Paul supports that's on him if he votes for a republican just for the party sake shame on him' Let him throw his values away. If he does that I see exactly how he stands on the issues. He doesn't stand on them at all. Fuck the GOP if they replace obama with another obama, for the party sake.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Obama out would be a good thing, but not if you're going to turn around and replace him with Obama II. Then it's just pointless.

Obama II? So Rand Paul will support Obama II? None of the Republicans are like Obama. Sorry you folks can keep saying it, but there is no bases in reality for that kind of stupity.

It's the meme of the Paul-bots: If you're not Ron Paul, you're Barack Obama. There is no other choice.

You are an obama agenda supporter. if your going to say it get it right.

 

[Rocko]

Of Course he should quit. It would be for the good of the party and country. He always talks about not wasting money, but his campaign is the biggest waste of money ever!!

Look, i'm not going to kiss stupid Paul lunatic followers asses because I want them to vote for a rebulican. Vote or do not vote for whoever you want in November, but Ron Paul is still a loser, and he's fuckin nutts.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

He's lookin' to make a place for his pathetic teabagger son to move in to.

Well that’s pointless – Rand Paul is a bigger idiot than his father.

Ron Paul was speaking last night about ‘restoring the Constitution,’ what moronic nonsense.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Obama out would be a good thing, but not if you're going to turn around and replace him with Obama II. Then it's just pointless.

Obama II? So Rand Paul will support Obama II? None of the Republicans are like Obama. Sorry you folks can keep saying it, but there is no bases in reality for that kind of stupity.

It's the meme of the Paul-bots: If you're not Ron Paul, you're Barack Obama. There is no other choice.

What is the difference between your candidate and Obama?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Of Course he should quit. It would be for the good of the party and country. He always talks about not wasting money, but his campaign is the biggest waste of money ever!!

Look, i'm not going to kiss stupid Paul lunatic followers asses because I want them to vote for a rebulican. Vote or do not vote for whoever you want in November, but Ron Paul is still a loser, and he's fuckin nutts.

I suppose Romney or Newt will be good for the party? Those two rino's would fill obama's shoe pretty good.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

He's lookin' to make a place for his pathetic teabagger son to move in to.

Well that’s pointless – Rand Paul is a bigger idiot than his father.

Ron Paul was speaking last night about ‘restoring the Constitution,’ what moronic nonsense.

NDAA section 1021 and the Patriot act called. They want to know where you want to place the rest of the shredded Constitution.

 

[paulitician]

Insulting and alienating Ron Paul and his supporters is a very unwise strategy. These Voters could be incredibly valuable in the coming Election. The Neocons are making a big mistake alienating these people. But big mistakes do seem to be the norm for Neocon Republicans these days. They just can't get anything right.

 

[Rocko]

Of Course he should quit. It would be for the good of the party and country. He always talks about not wasting money, but his campaign is the biggest waste of money ever!!

Look, i'm not going to kiss stupid Paul lunatic followers asses because I want them to vote for a rebulican. Vote or do not vote for whoever you want in November, but Ron Paul is still a loser, and he's fuckin nutts.

I suppose Romney or Newt will be good for the party? Those two rino's would fill obama's shoe pretty good.

Ron Paul has much more in common with Obama than Newt or Romney

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

I don't get you I used to like you, but if Ron Paul doesn't get the nominatin you won't vote Republican that's pretty stupid. we need Obama out. Rand Paul said he would support the nomnee who ever it is, You and people like you? Make no sense

Obama out would be a good thing, but not if you're going to turn around and replace him with Obama II. Then it's just pointless.

Obama II? So Rand Paul will support Obama II? None of the Republicans are like Obama. Sorry you folks can keep saying it, but there is no bases in reality for that kind of stupity.

Yes, actually. He'll "support" the nominee whoever that is, but I doubt his "support" will translate into any real action on his part. Regardless, Rand is more of a politician than his father is, for good or bad. He'll take Mitt or Newt over Obama just because they're Republicans and he's a Republican. It's not a principled stand, but a pragmatic one.

As far as stupidity goes, I'd have to say looking at the records of Mitt and Newt and not seeing that they're almost identical to Obama ranks right up there. But hey, if you want to keep nominating criminals who have to continuously apologize for their record every time something new comes up then more power to you.

 

[paulitician]

Obama out would be a good thing, but not if you're going to turn around and replace him with Obama II. Then it's just pointless.

Obama II? So Rand Paul will support Obama II? None of the Republicans are like Obama. Sorry you folks can keep saying it, but there is no bases in reality for that kind of stupity.

Yes, actually. He'll "support" the nominee whoever that is, but I doubt his "support" will translate into any real action on his part. Regardless, Rand is more of a politician than his father is, for good or bad. He'll take Mitt or Newt over Obama just because they're Republicans and he's a Republican. It's not a principled stand, but a pragmatic one.

As far as stupidity goes, I'd have to say looking at the records of Mitt and Newt and not seeing that they're almost identical to Obama ranks right up there. But hey, if you want to keep nominating criminals who have to continuously apologize for their record every time something new comes up then more power to you.

The Neocons are lost. And so is the Republican Party. They all seem to be playing on the same team these days. Socialists/Progressives - Neocons?? I see very few differences. Their both Big Government Globalists. It's sad.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

With his pitiful 4th place showing (barely ahead of Herman Cain) and weak perfomances Ron Paul has proven he has "no viable way forward" in this campaign.
He needs to drop out, endorse someone else, and go back to doing what he knows best:running his mouth for his half-crazy supporters.

Has the definition of "weak performance" changed? And which Keynesian warmonger should he endorse? A, B, or C?

No, it has not. Three losses in a row, especially in a state like SC that ought to be a natural for him, means he has "no viable way forward."
And btw you were one of the ones beating the drum how he was going to clean up.

South Carolina is the only state where you can make the case that Ron Paul lost. He came in a strong third in Iowa and received the same number of delegates as Romney and Santorum, and came in second in New Hampshire. I don't think anybody counts second in New Hampshire as a loss. I don't see why you think South Carolina should have been a natural win for him. We all knew South Carolina wasn't going to be his best showing, and, as I said before, Florida is unlikely to be much better.

As for beating the drum for a Ron Paul clean up, I'd like to see those posts.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Of Course he should quit. It would be for the good of the party and country. He always talks about not wasting money, but his campaign is the biggest waste of money ever!!

Look, i'm not going to kiss stupid Paul lunatic followers asses because I want them to vote for a rebulican. Vote or do not vote for whoever you want in November, but Ron Paul is still a loser, and he's fuckin nutts.

I suppose Romney or Newt will be good for the party? Those two rino's would fill obama's shoe pretty good.

Ron Paul has much more in common with Obama than Newt or Romney

That's just plain old horse shit and you know it is.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

I think he is building a political slush fund from his cult followers to help him keep winning his backwoods district while lining his own pockets.....,

Except for the fact that he's retiring at the end of his current Congressional term.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Obama out would be a good thing, but not if you're going to turn around and replace him with Obama II. Then it's just pointless.

Obama II? So Rand Paul will support Obama II? None of the Republicans are like Obama. Sorry you folks can keep saying it, but there is no bases in reality for that kind of stupity.

It's the meme of the Paul-bots: If you're not Ron Paul, you're Barack Obama. There is no other choice.

Not true at all. It's only if you support the same policies that Obama supports. Like Mitt and Newt do.

 

[Sarah G]

Ron Paul should and will stay in as long as possible.

 

[dblack]

why do make up nonsense like he defends 911 terrorist and blames soldiers, Paul receives more donations from active duty solders than all candidates put together you fraud

Because made-up nonsense is all he's got?

 

[GoneBezerk]

Romney and Newt don't support Obamination's foreign policy, national defense, social justice and economic policies.

Quit with the lies.

Obama II? So Rand Paul will support Obama II? None of the Republicans are like Obama. Sorry you folks can keep saying it, but there is no bases in reality for that kind of stupity.

It's the meme of the Paul-bots: If you're not Ron Paul, you're Barack Obama. There is no other choice.

Not true at all. It's only if you support the same policies that Obama supports. Like Mitt and Newt do.