Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are 46 more States to go...i guess im one of those whack jobs that is going to write him in regardless. Hope you neocons enjoy another 4 more years of obama! Maybe you will reconsider the concept of liberty in 2016.
With his pitiful 4th place showing (barely ahead of Herman Cain) and weak perfomances Ron Paul has proven he has "no viable way forward" in this campaign.
He needs to drop out, endorse someone else, and go back to doing what he knows best:running his mouth for his half-crazy supporters.
Yep, drop out and run a third party campaign.
i guess im one of those whack jobs that is going to write him in regardless. Hope you neocons enjoy another 4 more years of obama! Maybe you will reconsider the concept of liberty in 2016.
Or....duh wabbit may hate RP because Ron knows Israel is really IsNtReal.Ron Paul wants to repeal this?
I have never once heard Ron Paul say this. Maybe Rabbi meant to say the 16th and 17th amendments
With Ron Paul you would not have another Iraq. He will use what ever force is necessary to defend America, within the constraints of the Constitution.
With Ron Paul you would not have another Iraq. He will use what ever force is necessary to defend America, within the constraints of the Constitution.
With Ron Paul you would not have another Iraq. He will use what ever force is necessary to defend America, within the constraints of the Constitution.
you'd also have a naive and dangerous isolationist foreign policy and economic policy.
anyone who thinks terrorists will be nice if you're nice to them isn't very bright. and paul isn't very bright.
Or....duh wabbit may hate RP because Ron knows Israel is really IsNtReal.
With Ron Paul you would not have another Iraq. He will use what ever force is necessary to defend America, within the constraints of the Constitution.
True.
You'd have a 9/11 every other week though. It would still be America's fault. Their chickens have come home to roost. Did Paul say that, or Jeremiah Wright? I can't tell them apart.
With Ron Paul you would not have another Iraq. He will use what ever force is necessary to defend America, within the constraints of the Constitution.
you'd also have a naive and dangerous isolationist foreign policy and economic policy.
anyone who thinks terrorists will be nice if you're nice to them isn't very bright. and paul isn't very bright.
Ron Paul is not an isolationist
With Ron Paul you would not have another Iraq. He will use what ever force is necessary to defend America, within the constraints of the Constitution.
True.
You'd have a 9/11 every other week though. It would still be America's fault. Their chickens have come home to roost. Did Paul say that, or Jeremiah Wright? I can't tell them apart.
Thats bullshit and you know it.
Butthurt Rabbit is still Butthurt I see.With Ron Paul you would not have another Iraq. He will use what ever force is necessary to defend America, within the constraints of the Constitution.
you'd also have a naive and dangerous isolationist foreign policy and economic policy.
anyone who thinks terrorists will be nice if you're nice to them isn't very bright. and paul isn't very bright.
With his pitiful 4th place showing (barely ahead of Herman Cain) and weak perfomances Ron Paul has proven he has "no viable way forward" in this campaign.
He needs to drop out, endorse someone else, and go back to doing what he knows best:running his mouth for his half-crazy supporters.
And you'd rather smear his supporters and libertarians in general, than snap out of your neocon bootlicker trance and recognize that your Wilsonian progressive policies are bankrupting the nation.
There is no "tea-party-libertarian" wing. That is a fantasy spun by the wookie-suiters. The Tea Party is still largely pro-defense.
Awesome! They you don't need our votes. And you won't be sobbing and whining afterwards about getting "Nadered" when the Republocrats lose the election right?
you'd also have a naive and dangerous isolationist foreign policy and economic policy.
anyone who thinks terrorists will be nice if you're nice to them isn't very bright. and paul isn't very bright.
Ron Paul is not an isolationist
I don't get you I used to like you, but if Ron Paul doesn't get the nominatin you won't vote Republican that's pretty stupid. we need Obama out. Rand Paul said he would support the nomnee who ever it is, You and people like you? Make no sense
Ron Paul is not an isolationist
I don't get you I used to like you, but if Ron Paul doesn't get the nominatin you won't vote Republican that's pretty stupid. we need Obama out. Rand Paul said he would support the nomnee who ever it is, You and people like you? Make no sense
Obama out would be a good thing, but not if you're going to turn around and replace him with Obama II. Then it's just pointless.
With his pitiful 4th place showing (barely ahead of Herman Cain) and weak perfomances Ron Paul has proven he has "no viable way forward" in this campaign.
He needs to drop out, endorse someone else, and go back to doing what he knows best:running his mouth for his half-crazy supporters.
Has the definition of "weak performance" changed? And which Keynesian warmonger should he endorse? A, B, or C?
I don't get you I used to like you, but if Ron Paul doesn't get the nominatin you won't vote Republican that's pretty stupid. we need Obama out. Rand Paul said he would support the nomnee who ever it is, You and people like you? Make no sense
Obama out would be a good thing, but not if you're going to turn around and replace him with Obama II. Then it's just pointless.
Obama II? So Rand Paul will support Obama II? None of the Republicans are like Obama. Sorry you folks can keep saying it, but there is no bases in reality for that kind of stupity.
