Ron Paul's view upon Eric Snowden issue

[earlycuyler]

Or was it that he was focused on his presidential run and could not condend his place and run for president. Regardless, if he's so irrelevant, WTF are you doing here? Shouldn't you find a more relevant thread to drool in. Take Rabbi the Clown with you when you leave. Thanks.

^ And this is why Ron Paul lost so much credibility in his district right here. First off Politicians go for the big one all the time and keep their jobs after. Paul Ryan is one example. Second, his presidential run was a flop out of the gate. Third, in his district, as soon as this weird Alex Jones crowed started following him ( mostly jilted Obama.supporters) he was done before he started as far as running for president go's . All that aside, Ron Paul was nothing more then a fad. An old ass washed up career politician who was facing crushing defeat in his district and worshiped by the 99%. You can have the moonbat. As for leaving, you can just go drink bleach. Its a public forum and I'll post what I please where I please and you can just cry to a mod or shut the fuck up. Sheesh, typical Paultard.

Lost cred? Bullshit. Ron Paul retired because he's 77years old. Get over yourself.

The loudest Texans are normally the California transplants. I lived a stones throw from this dudes district. 77 years old and he wants to be president ? Ya, that makes sense. He was done. He was dismissed in his district. He would have lost,and lost by a huge margin. All the tards would have bailed on him.

 

[J.E.D]

Ron Paul's view upon Eric Snowden issue

Yet another reason that Ron Paul never had a chance at the White House. He's a nutjob.

Snowden shared (is sharing) information with other nations. Does Paul (do you) think that China and/or Russia haven't gotten their hands on that laptop? If anybody thinks that they haven't, then they're being either willfully or unknowingly ignorant.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

^ And this is why Ron Paul lost so much credibility in his district right here. First off Politicians go for the big one all the time and keep their jobs after. Paul Ryan is one example. Second, his presidential run was a flop out of the gate. Third, in his district, as soon as this weird Alex Jones crowed started following him ( mostly jilted Obama.supporters) he was done before he started as far as running for president go's . All that aside, Ron Paul was nothing more then a fad. An old ass washed up career politician who was facing crushing defeat in his district and worshiped by the 99%. You can have the moonbat. As for leaving, you can just go drink bleach. Its a public forum and I'll post what I please where I please and you can just cry to a mod or shut the fuck up. Sheesh, typical Paultard.

That's wonderfully irrelevant to the topic. Yes, you dont like ron paul. Great. Speaking of complete irrelevancy...Your opinion is just that. Thanks for stopping in to derail the topic so you could share with us the utmost in irrelevancy. Ah, irony. It's sometimes delicious.

^ More Paultardery. Say there Paul guy, wanna talk about irrelevant, how come thegeatfagsby had to pull Paul's blather off google images ? Its also on above top secret as well as the lunatic underground, but that's about it. Why is that ? Irrelevancy ? You Paultards know all about that.

Irrelevancy; you have it down to a science. Why not stay on topic instead of character assassinating Paul. Your opinion isn't swaying anyone, dullard. Either come up with a valid point to the topic or please, STFU. Your opinions aren't relevant here.

 

[earlycuyler]

Ron Paul's view upon Eric Snowden issue

Yet another reason that Ron Paul never had a chance at the White House. He's a nutjob.

Snowden shared (is sharing) information with other nations. Does Paul (do you) think that China and/or Russia haven't gotten their hands on that laptop? If anybody thinks that they haven't, then they're being either willfully or unknowingly ignorant.

100%. And its not ignorance, its nothing more then a feeble attempt for Paul to remain relevant and have a voice.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Ron Paul's view upon Eric Snowden issue

Yet another reason that Ron Paul never had a chance at the White House. He's a nutjob.

Snowden shared (is sharing) information with other nations. Does Paul (do you) think that China and/or Russia haven't gotten their hands on that laptop? If anybody thinks that they haven't, then they're being either willfully or unknowingly ignorant.

You can't prove that. Even if you could, you really think China and Russia dont already more than anything a low level contractor for the NSA would know.

Snowden provided criminal activity of the government to the people of the US. It's that simple. If you love the State that much, I can understand the butt hurt over it. We cant have govt crimes exposed, now can we?

 

[earlycuyler]

That's wonderfully irrelevant to the topic. Yes, you dont like ron paul. Great. Speaking of complete irrelevancy...Your opinion is just that. Thanks for stopping in to derail the topic so you could share with us the utmost in irrelevancy. Ah, irony. It's sometimes delicious.

^ More Paultardery. Say there Paul guy, wanna talk about irrelevant, how come thegeatfagsby had to pull Paul's blather off google images ? Its also on above top secret as well as the lunatic underground, but that's about it. Why is that ? Irrelevancy ? You Paultards know all about that.

Irrelevancy; you have it down to a science. Why not stay on topic instead of character assassinating Paul. Your opinion isn't swaying anyone, dullard. Either come up with a valid point to the topic or please, STFU. Your opinions aren't relevant here.

^Utterly predictable. obviously, your guy had the same issue considering his statements are only memes on Google images. Sad you.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Alright, I'm gonna leave the Dullards to it. All they want to do is pick on Paul like fucking 10 year olds on the school yard. That's all fine and good, if complete irrelevancy is your game.

 

[J.E.D]

Ron Paul's view upon Eric Snowden issue

Yet another reason that Ron Paul never had a chance at the White House. He's a nutjob.

Snowden shared (is sharing) information with other nations. Does Paul (do you) think that China and/or Russia haven't gotten their hands on that laptop? If anybody thinks that they haven't, then they're being either willfully or unknowingly ignorant.

You can't prove that. Even if you could, you really think China and Russia dont already more than anything a low level contractor for the NSA would know.

And you can prove your assertion that he didn't?....link?

Snowden provided criminal activity of the government to the people of the US. It's that simple. If you love the State that much, I can understand the butt hurt over it. We cant have govt crimes exposed, now can we?

Snowden is a traitorous, self-serving sack of shit. I realize that people like you hold him up as some sort of hero. So tell me this; if he is such the hero, fighting for the people, then why is hiding like a coward in a nation with one of the worst human rights records in the world, and seeking asylum in other nations with equally appaling human rights records?

 

[earlycuyler]

Alright, I'm gonna leave the Dullards to it. All they want to do is pick on Paul like fucking 10 year olds on the school yard. That's all fine and good, if complete irrelevancy is your game.

^ Roughly translated, " I don't want to, and can not stick up for my washed up career politician or his childish attempt to get on the news so I'm leaving now". As for the topic, its pretty simple really. Paul is attempting to use Snowden to get in the news again. He failed. Again.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Yet another reason that Ron Paul never had a chance at the White House. He's a nutjob.

Snowden shared (is sharing) information with other nations. Does Paul (do you) think that China and/or Russia haven't gotten their hands on that laptop? If anybody thinks that they haven't, then they're being either willfully or unknowingly ignorant.

You can't prove that. Even if you could, you really think China and Russia dont already more than anything a low level contractor for the NSA would know.

And you can prove your assertion that he didn't?....link?

Snowden provided criminal activity of the government to the people of the US. It's that simple. If you love the State that much, I can understand the butt hurt over it. We cant have govt crimes exposed, now can we?

Snowden is a traitorous, self-serving sack of shit. I realize that people like you hold him up as some sort of hero. So tell me this; if he is such the hero, fighting for the people, then why is hiding like a coward in a nation with one of the worst human rights records in the world, and seeking asylum in other nations with equally appaling human rights records?

I dont need to prove a negative, you thundering dunderhead. The burden of proof is on the thos ewho make the accusation. it's not my responsibility to prove your no evidence claim is true.

Jesus you fucks are stupid.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Snowden is a traitorous, self-serving sack of shit. I realize that people like you hold him up as some sort of hero. So tell me this; if he is such the hero, fighting for the people, then why is hiding like a coward in a nation with one of the worst human rights records in the world, and seeking asylum in other nations with equally appaling human rights records?

Is exposing criminal activity by the government traitroous now? If he had gone through the govt. sanctioned channels, nothign would have happened except he would have been hung out to dry, like the whistleblowers that came before him with NSA criminal activity. Hence Paul's statement. If the government was interested in the wrongdoing of the NSA, they wouldn't have changed the story to be about the guy who exposed them. And if the American people (most anyway) had half a brain cell, they would be demanding answers instead of trying to blame the guy who exposed their crimes for fleeing because his life was in jeopardy

You can spin it anyway you want, but Snowden revealed the crimes of the govt. to the american people. It's very telling that your biggest concern is that he fled to supposedly less free countries to try and mantain such freedom.

And yet you State cheerleaders cant see the forest for the trees.

 

[J.E.D]

You can't prove that. Even if you could, you really think China and Russia dont already more than anything a low level contractor for the NSA would know.

And you can prove your assertion that he didn't?....link?

Snowden provided criminal activity of the government to the people of the US. It's that simple. If you love the State that much, I can understand the butt hurt over it. We cant have govt crimes exposed, now can we?

Snowden is a traitorous, self-serving sack of shit. I realize that people like you hold him up as some sort of hero. So tell me this; if he is such the hero, fighting for the people, then why is hiding like a coward in a nation with one of the worst human rights records in the world, and seeking asylum in other nations with equally appaling human rights records?

I dont need to prove a negative, you thundering dunderhead. The burden of proof is on the thos ewho make the accusation. it's not my responsibility to prove your no evidence claim is true.

Jesus you fucks are stupid.

So, you DON'T have any credible proof that Snowden hasn't already shared state secrets with China and Russia. You're just going with your own assumption that if given half a chance China or Russia wouldn't copy the hard drive of a laptop belonging to a former US intelligence agency employee with access to top-secret intelligence.

Too bright you are not...hmmm?

 

[J.E.D]

Snowden is a traitorous, self-serving sack of shit. I realize that people like you hold him up as some sort of hero. So tell me this; if he is such the hero, fighting for the people, then why is hiding like a coward in a nation with one of the worst human rights records in the world, and seeking asylum in other nations with equally appaling human rights records?

Is exposing criminal activity by the government traitroous now? If he had gone through the govt. sanctioned channels, nothign would have happened except he would have been hung out to dry, like the whistleblowers that came before him with NSA criminal activity. Hence Paul's statement. If the government was interested in the wrongdoing of the NSA, they wouldn't have changed the story to be about the guy who exposed them. And if the American people (most anyway) had half a brain cell, they would be demanding answers instead of trying to blame the guy who exposed their crimes for fleeing because his life was in jeopardy

You can spin it anyway you want, but Snowden revealed the crimes of the govt. to the american people. It's very telling that your biggest concern is that he fled to supposedly less free countries to try and mantain such freedom.

And yet you State cheerleaders cant see the forest for the trees.

So, you ARE ok with him seeking asylum in nations with atrocious human rights records. That's the type of "hero" you can get behind, right?

 

[earlycuyler]

You can't prove that. Even if you could, you really think China and Russia dont already more than anything a low level contractor for the NSA would know.

And you can prove your assertion that he didn't?....link?

Snowden provided criminal activity of the government to the people of the US. It's that simple. If you love the State that much, I can understand the butt hurt over it. We cant have govt crimes exposed, now can we?

Snowden is a traitorous, self-serving sack of shit. I realize that people like you hold him up as some sort of hero. So tell me this; if he is such the hero, fighting for the people, then why is hiding like a coward in a nation with one of the worst human rights records in the world, and seeking asylum in other nations with equally appaling human rights records?

I dont need to prove a negative, you thundering dunderhead. The burden of proof is on the thos ewho make the accusation. it's not my responsibility to prove your no evidence claim is true.

Jesus you fucks are stupid.

^Prelude to a Paultard going critical.

 

[J.E.D]

 

[earlycuyler]

Snowden is a traitorous, self-serving sack of shit. I realize that people like you hold him up as some sort of hero. So tell me this; if he is such the hero, fighting for the people, then why is hiding like a coward in a nation with one of the worst human rights records in the world, and seeking asylum in other nations with equally appaling human rights records?

Is exposing criminal activity by the government traitroous now? If he had gone through the govt. sanctioned channels, nothign would have happened except he would have been hung out to dry, like the whistleblowers that came before him with NSA criminal activity. Hence Paul's statement. If the government was interested in the wrongdoing of the NSA, they wouldn't have changed the story to be about the guy who exposed them. And if the American people (most anyway) had half a brain cell, they would be demanding answers instead of trying to blame the guy who exposed their crimes for fleeing because his life was in jeopardy

You can spin it anyway you want, but Snowden revealed the crimes of the govt. to the american people. It's very telling that your biggest concern is that he fled to supposedly less free countries to try and mantain such freedom.

And yet you State cheerleaders cant see the forest for the trees.

So, you ARE ok with him seeking asylum in nations with atrocious human rights records. That's the type of "hero" you can get behind, right?

Yes, because Ron Paul said so. Snowden should have made his case to the American people, not China or Russia. And if Paul gave such a fuck, he should have helped Snowden, not humped his name for political brownie points.

 

[dblack]

And that makes it all okay then ?

No. It makes it unbearably fucked up. We now live under the kind of regime we once despise.

^ we have become a national socialistic authoritarian state that uses it's power around the globe to bend the globe to it's will and it's power within to enslave the masses.

Instead of just putting a frigging lock on the pilot's cabin we created a MASSIVE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. We invaded a dozen countries in response to the act of one man who was not even the leader of a country. Osama was a paid agent of the USA.

We threw out liberty for an extremely small measure of security and no longer deserve to be called Americans.

I have to assume this is exactly what OBL hoped would happen.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

While the op makes sense I still feel like what he did was criminal. Thankfully I can have my opinion in a vacuum as it will affect neither snowden nor any of us.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

And you can prove your assertion that he didn't?....link?

Snowden is a traitorous, self-serving sack of shit. I realize that people like you hold him up as some sort of hero. So tell me this; if he is such the hero, fighting for the people, then why is hiding like a coward in a nation with one of the worst human rights records in the world, and seeking asylum in other nations with equally appaling human rights records?

I dont need to prove a negative, you thundering dunderhead. The burden of proof is on the thos ewho make the accusation. it's not my responsibility to prove your no evidence claim is true.

Jesus you fucks are stupid.

So, you DON'T have any credible proof that Snowden hasn't already shared state secrets with China and Russia. You're just going with your own assumption that if given half a chance China or Russia wouldn't copy the hard drive of a laptop belonging to a former US intelligence agency employee with access to top-secret intelligence.

Too bright you are not...hmmm?

So you dont have any proof that snowden revealed information to china or russia?

Thats what I thought. I dont have to prove a negative you half-witted, dullard.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Is exposing criminal activity by the government traitroous now? If he had gone through the govt. sanctioned channels, nothign would have happened except he would have been hung out to dry, like the whistleblowers that came before him with NSA criminal activity. Hence Paul's statement. If the government was interested in the wrongdoing of the NSA, they wouldn't have changed the story to be about the guy who exposed them. And if the American people (most anyway) had half a brain cell, they would be demanding answers instead of trying to blame the guy who exposed their crimes for fleeing because his life was in jeopardy

You can spin it anyway you want, but Snowden revealed the crimes of the govt. to the american people. It's very telling that your biggest concern is that he fled to supposedly less free countries to try and mantain such freedom.

And yet you State cheerleaders cant see the forest for the trees.

So, you ARE ok with him seeking asylum in nations with atrocious human rights records. That's the type of "hero" you can get behind, right?

Yes, because Ron Paul said so. Snowden should have made his case to the American people, not China or Russia. And if Paul gave such a fuck, he should have helped Snowden, not humped his name for political brownie points.

Snowden did that. He gave the information to the media. who reported it to the american people. Jeebus, you're a one stupid fucker. What was Paul suppose to do? I thought he was irrelevant? Stop humping Paul's leg for a minute and understand what's actually going on here. The government is saying that revealing information that they stole from the american people, to the american people is criminal. They are trying, and succeeding, at making their crime marginalized so you will demonize the man who exposed them. Who's the real traitors here?