Rubio goes on homophobic rant ending political career.

[Flipper]

Marco Rubio: Gay Rights 'A Real And Present Danger' To Freedom

Marco Rubio was the subject of a fawning profile on today’s edition of “The 700 Club,” in which host Pat Robertson hailed the GOP presidential candidate as “the Democrats’ worst nightmare.”

In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody, Rubio warned that gay marriage represents “a real and present danger” to America because gay rights advocates are bent on labeling any anti-gay messages, including those from churches, as “hate speech.”

“We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech because today we’ve reached the point in our society where if you do not support same-sex marriage, you are labeled a homophobe and a hater,” Rubio said. “So what’s the next step after that? After they’re done going after individuals, the next step is to argue that the teachings of mainstream Christianity, the catechism of the Catholic Church, is hate speech. That’s a real and present danger.”

During a previous CBN interview, Rubio criticized gay marriage supporters for trying to sway the Supreme Court with “a ridiculous and absurd reading of the U.S. Constitution.”

When your base is that hateful and ignorant, you must cut them lose and rally the moderates and centrists.

But no, the GOP continue to open their big tent to most hateful and despicable people.

Why is it you faggots think everything is about you?

Rubio will be fine, 2% of the population doesn't control anything.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Marco Rubio: Gay Rights 'A Real And Present Danger' To Freedom

Marco Rubio was the subject of a fawning profile on today’s edition of “The 700 Club,” in which host Pat Robertson hailed the GOP presidential candidate as “the Democrats’ worst nightmare.”

In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody, Rubio warned that gay marriage represents “a real and present danger” to America because gay rights advocates are bent on labeling any anti-gay messages, including those from churches, as “hate speech.”

“We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech because today we’ve reached the point in our society where if you do not support same-sex marriage, you are labeled a homophobe and a hater,” Rubio said. “So what’s the next step after that? After they’re done going after individuals, the next step is to argue that the teachings of mainstream Christianity, the catechism of the Catholic Church, is hate speech. That’s a real and present danger.”

During a previous CBN interview, Rubio criticized gay marriage supporters for trying to sway the Supreme Court with “a ridiculous and absurd reading of the U.S. Constitution.”

When your base is that hateful and ignorant, you must cut them lose and rally the moderates and centrists.

But no, the GOP continue to open their big tent to most hateful and despicable people.

Why is it you faggots think everything is about you?

Rubio will be fine, 2% of the population doesn't control anything.

So sad for you, 2% still has rights.

 

[Flipper]

Marco Rubio: Gay Rights 'A Real And Present Danger' To Freedom

Marco Rubio was the subject of a fawning profile on today’s edition of “The 700 Club,” in which host Pat Robertson hailed the GOP presidential candidate as “the Democrats’ worst nightmare.”

In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody, Rubio warned that gay marriage represents “a real and present danger” to America because gay rights advocates are bent on labeling any anti-gay messages, including those from churches, as “hate speech.”

“We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech because today we’ve reached the point in our society where if you do not support same-sex marriage, you are labeled a homophobe and a hater,” Rubio said. “So what’s the next step after that? After they’re done going after individuals, the next step is to argue that the teachings of mainstream Christianity, the catechism of the Catholic Church, is hate speech. That’s a real and present danger.”

During a previous CBN interview, Rubio criticized gay marriage supporters for trying to sway the Supreme Court with “a ridiculous and absurd reading of the U.S. Constitution.”

When your base is that hateful and ignorant, you must cut them lose and rally the moderates and centrists.

But no, the GOP continue to open their big tent to most hateful and despicable people.

Why is it you faggots think everything is about you?

Rubio will be fine, 2% of the population doesn't control anything.

So sad for you, 2% still has rights.

So sad for you they don't control the Country, just because someone disagrees with the lifestyle doesn't mean they are homophobic, now our friend Hazel is a faggot, there are very intelligent homosexuals but he isn't one of them...he is garbage encased in flesh.

 

[mikegriffith1]

It is reckless rhetoric like the OP that makes genuine dialogue nearly impossible.

Rubio's comment happens to be perfectly factual. It has become crystal clear over the last two years that the gay rights movement is determined to use gay marriage to destroy religious liberty and to punish all those who dare to disagree with them. Yet, when states pass religious liberty laws to protect long-standing constitutional rights that were virtually universally recognized as ironclad until just the last few years, the gay rights gestapo goes crazy and postures as the victim.

 

[Seawytch]

I prefer the lessons from 2014.

How 'bout the lessons from 2012 and 2008 when Obama trounced your guys?

2014 was historic. What part of Republicans beat the ever living shit out of Democrats did you miss?

Only, 2014 was not historic. It broke no records. Try again.

Lowest turnout since WWII when the men were all overseas...

Republican turn out was just fine now wasn't it? Your team stayed at home.

No, it wasn't fine. Turnout was horrendous. 34% nationwide.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Marco Rubio: Gay Rights 'A Real And Present Danger' To Freedom

Marco Rubio was the subject of a fawning profile on today’s edition of “The 700 Club,” in which host Pat Robertson hailed the GOP presidential candidate as “the Democrats’ worst nightmare.”

In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody, Rubio warned that gay marriage represents “a real and present danger” to America because gay rights advocates are bent on labeling any anti-gay messages, including those from churches, as “hate speech.”

“We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech because today we’ve reached the point in our society where if you do not support same-sex marriage, you are labeled a homophobe and a hater,” Rubio said. “So what’s the next step after that? After they’re done going after individuals, the next step is to argue that the teachings of mainstream Christianity, the catechism of the Catholic Church, is hate speech. That’s a real and present danger.”

During a previous CBN interview, Rubio criticized gay marriage supporters for trying to sway the Supreme Court with “a ridiculous and absurd reading of the U.S. Constitution.”

When your base is that hateful and ignorant, you must cut them lose and rally the moderates and centrists.

But no, the GOP continue to open their big tent to most hateful and despicable people.

Why is it you faggots think everything is about you?

Rubio will be fine, 2% of the population doesn't control anything.

So sad for you, 2% still has rights.

So sad for you they don't control the Country, just because someone disagrees with the lifestyle doesn't mean they are homophobic, now our friend Hazel is a faggot, there are very intelligent homosexuals but he isn't one of them...he is garbage encased in flesh.

On this issue the little gay guys are spanking your little bare bottom, faggot-hater.

 

[BULLDOG]

Whether you butt humping queers and their lovers know it or not, the vast, VAST majority of people on the planet have, do and always will find homosexuality to be a disgusting, perverted, sexual mental illness. That will never change, because NORMAL people, HETEROSEXUAL people, are born with it. It's a natural revulsion to the thought of being attracted to and/or having your ass reamed by the same sex.

So don't mistake people loosening their opinion on letting fags marry each other with more people beginning to like butt fucking homosexuality, because that ain't happenin'.

Rubio will be fine, and is still doing good in the polls.

Deal with it, progtards.

Even though you worded it in a typical right wing way, you are right. Nobody will become gay just because gays will receive the rights they deserve. Rubio's chances were nonexistent to start with, and that probably hasn't changed much either.

You think that Rubio's chances are very low for the nomination or very low for the general or both? How low?

I won't venture a guess about the nomination, He is certainly crazy enough, but who knows what the right might do. They haven't made any logical decisions lately, and I don't expect them to start now. If nominated, he might as well rent a movie for the general election night so he will have something to do while waiting to be told how bad he lost.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It is reckless rhetoric like the OP that makes genuine dialogue nearly impossible.

Rubio's comment happens to be perfectly factual. It has become crystal clear over the last two years that the gay rights movement is determined to use gay marriage to destroy religious liberty and to punish all those who dare to disagree with them. Yet, when states pass religious liberty laws to protect long-standing constitutional rights that were virtually universally recognized as ironclad until just the last few years, the gay rights gestapo goes crazy and postures as the victim.

There is no constitutional right to deny equal protection. The opposite is in fact the case.

 

[NYcarbineer]

No....it's a sincerely held religious belief. See...this is America. You have the right to religious freedom and free speech.

Only Libturds want to squash religious freedom and free speech. That is the real intolerance and bigotry. All of you should be ashamed.

So if human sacrifice is a 'sincerely held religious belief' the US govt. should be powerless to stop the practice?

We as a Nation from it's beginning have never been the Aztecs and we never will be.
Do come back to the real world.

So you don't really want religious freedom. You want the GOVERNMENT to decide which religions are acceptable and which aren't.

Bingo.

Just because you think that, does not make it correct.
Like I said, come back to reality.

You admitted it was correct when you agreed with the government's decision not to protect polygamy as a 1st amendment religious exercise.

You do indeed want the government to decide which religions are acceptable and which aren't, as long as the government picks the right ones from your perspective.

 

[007]

Rubio will be fine, and is still doing good in the polls.

Sure, Republican primary polls. In the general election, though, he's dead meat.

No. Sorry.

Dems are dead, thanks to the radical muslim kenyan.

 

[JoshuaZ]

Rubio will be fine, and is still doing good in the polls.

Sure, Republican primary polls. In the general election, though, he's dead meat.

No. Sorry.

Dems are dead, thanks to the radical muslim kenyan.

You sound very certain that the Democrats will lose the general. How certain of that are you?

 

[007]

Rubio will be fine, and is still doing good in the polls.

Sure, Republican primary polls. In the general election, though, he's dead meat.

No. Sorry.

Dems are dead, thanks to the radical muslim kenyan.

You sound very certain that the Democrats will lose the general. How certain of that are you?

Every bit as certain that you probably think dems will win.

 

[JoshuaZ]

Rubio will be fine, and is still doing good in the polls.

Sure, Republican primary polls. In the general election, though, he's dead meat.

No. Sorry.

Dems are dead, thanks to the radical muslim kenyan.

You sound very certain that the Democrats will lose the general. How certain of that are you?

Every bit as certain that you probably think dems will win.

Hmm? Probably not. I estimate around a 55% chance of the Democrats winning.

Let me ask you a question. If someone offered to make you a bet where you got paid $10 if a Republican wins, and you paid them $20 if a Democrat wins, would you take it?

 

[Flopper]

lol, if gays get to marry legally, the next thing you know they'll be trying to stop Christian churches from being built near ground zero.

The ground breaking for the church was last October and is scheduled for completion in 2016 or 2017.

However, I understand your logic. If you allow gays to marry, people will be marrying their pets, including their pet rocks.

A Church Near Ground Zero Reimagined - WSJ

 

[007]

Rubio will be fine, and is still doing good in the polls.

Sure, Republican primary polls. In the general election, though, he's dead meat.

No. Sorry.

Dems are dead, thanks to the radical muslim kenyan.

You sound very certain that the Democrats will lose the general. How certain of that are you?

Every bit as certain that you probably think dems will win.

Hmm? Probably not. I estimate around a 55% chance of the Democrats winning.

Let me ask you a question. If someone offered to make you a bet where you got paid $10 if a Republican wins, and you paid them $20 if a Democrat wins, would you take it?

I'm sure you'd have asked just as stupid of a question right before the 2012 elections where it was basically a blood bath for dems. You lost more seats of power than just about ever before in history.

Now, I lived for 8 years in Nevada, so I know all about gambling, and I'd take any odds you'd wanna give that a repub takes the white house.

THINK... if you can.

 

[Wildman]

And 19 countries where its legal.

but still considered a perversion by many more than 19, muslimes kill gays and lesbos. AND those who support them, did you know that ?

 

[Wildman]

USE the f...king internet Dummy!

if there are any fucking dummies, it is YOU, you said you know and asked for a guess, i guessed at your idiotic question, now buck up and tell us the exact number as you claimed you knew.

i sometimes wish GOD had given you liberfools a scintilla of brain power.

 

[JakeStarkey]

A Kasich-Paul ticket looks more and more realistic.

 

[Wildman]

what's the case against gay marriage?

marriage was intended to propagate children to carry on the human race, how are two same sex couples going to do that ? asexual reproduction ? explain that one if you can.

........................

 

[hortysir]

When your base is that hateful and ignorant, you must cut them lose and rally the moderates and centrists.
But no, the GOP continue to open their big tent to most hateful and despicable people.

Why do you believe that opposing same-sex marriage is hate speech?

Because it's no longer about freedom of speech.
They have long since passed that mile marker.
It's transformed into forced speech and forced thought.
Orwell was off by about thirty years, but the Thought Police have graduated from the academy and are now walking the beat.
You are commanded to agree