Rubio goes on homophobic rant ending political career.

[Valerie]

Did America not vote for candidates with that same exact position since forever..? yes they did!

 

[Valerie]

if the GOP platform is based on whining about the evil PC, it's a big time fail. true story.

 

[Redfish]

A Kasich-Paul ticket looks more and more realistic.

How likely do you think it is that the final ticket will be Paul/Kasich or Kasich/Paul?

Kasich/Rubio. Rubio did not hurt himself by expressing a view held by a majority of americans. The northeast and west coast media are not the USA.

A majority of Americans see gay marriage as a danger?

Where's that poll?

Being opposed to it does not mean you see it as a "danger". nice spin attempt, but once again you FAIL.

Rubio expressed his beliefs, if you disagree with him, don't vote for him.

A politician who has the guts to take a stand and stand by his principles is to be admired, not denigrated.

Remember how both HRC and obozo were against gay marriage when they thought it was the politically safe position? Its called hypocrisy or pandering, and the dims do it constantly.

Rubio said it was a danger, and you said most Americans agreed with him. You're an idiot.

most do agree with him. the voters of california voted against it twice.

But, lets settle it. Lets let the people vote as they did in Ireland. Then its over one way or the other.

 

[Redfish]

if the GOP platform is based on whining about the evil PC, it's a big time fail. true story.

wrong, the people are looking for candidates who stand for something and are not afraid to speak up about their principles and beliefs.

they are not fooled by the panderers who say whatever they think the audience of the day wants to hear.

 

[Valerie]

"We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech"


completely ridonkulous! ...only the overly emotional fringe believes such nonsense! ^

 

[Redfish]

"We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech"


completely ridonkulous! ...only the overly emotional fringe believes such nonsense! ^

are you so naive that you don't think Christianity is being attacked by the far left in this country?

 

[NYcarbineer]

How likely do you think it is that the final ticket will be Paul/Kasich or Kasich/Paul?

Kasich/Rubio. Rubio did not hurt himself by expressing a view held by a majority of americans. The northeast and west coast media are not the USA.

A majority of Americans see gay marriage as a danger?

Where's that poll?

Being opposed to it does not mean you see it as a "danger". nice spin attempt, but once again you FAIL.

Rubio expressed his beliefs, if you disagree with him, don't vote for him.

A politician who has the guts to take a stand and stand by his principles is to be admired, not denigrated.

Remember how both HRC and obozo were against gay marriage when they thought it was the politically safe position? Its called hypocrisy or pandering, and the dims do it constantly.

Rubio said it was a danger, and you said most Americans agreed with him. You're an idiot.

most do agree with him. the voters of california voted against it twice.

But, lets settle it. Lets let the people vote as they did in Ireland. Then its over one way or the other.

There's currently 60% support for legal same sex marriage in the US. That's the same as Ireland's was going into that landslide.

We don't have national referendums. We have a Supreme Court.

Let the Right pass its Marriage Amendment to the Constitution if they can. There's your 'referendum'.

 

[NYcarbineer]

"We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech"


completely ridonkulous! ...only the overly emotional fringe believes such nonsense! ^

are you so naive that you don't think Christianity is being attacked by the far left in this country?

Attacked how?

 

[NYcarbineer]

"We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech"


completely ridonkulous! ...only the overly emotional fringe believes such nonsense! ^

You have to remember that Rubio was at the 700 Club. Rubio is one of those standard issue politicians who change their rhetoric based on who they're talking to.

 

[NYcarbineer]

if the GOP platform is based on whining about the evil PC, it's a big time fail. true story.

wrong, the people are looking for candidates who stand for something and are not afraid to speak up about their principles and beliefs.

they are not fooled by the panderers who say whatever they think the audience of the day wants to hear.

So you'll be voting for Bernie Sanders.

 

[Misty]

I'm glad Marco Rubio said this. Please, I hope that more GOP candidates say this kind of stuff. Because the crazy-assed stuff that wins an Elephant the nomination will lose him the GE, because in the GE, that stuff is a poison pill.

So, Sen. Rubio, you just keep on talking. I'm cool with that.

Proof that you don't care about issues. You only care about your side winning.

 

[Redfish]

Kasich/Rubio. Rubio did not hurt himself by expressing a view held by a majority of americans. The northeast and west coast media are not the USA.

A majority of Americans see gay marriage as a danger?

Where's that poll?

Being opposed to it does not mean you see it as a "danger". nice spin attempt, but once again you FAIL.

Rubio expressed his beliefs, if you disagree with him, don't vote for him.

A politician who has the guts to take a stand and stand by his principles is to be admired, not denigrated.

Remember how both HRC and obozo were against gay marriage when they thought it was the politically safe position? Its called hypocrisy or pandering, and the dims do it constantly.

Rubio said it was a danger, and you said most Americans agreed with him. You're an idiot.

most do agree with him. the voters of california voted against it twice.

But, lets settle it. Lets let the people vote as they did in Ireland. Then its over one way or the other.

There's currently 60% support for legal same sex marriage in the US. That's the same as Ireland's was going into that landslide.

We don't have national referendums. We have a Supreme Court.

Let the Right pass its Marriage Amendment to the Constitution if they can. There's your 'referendum'.

The SC can rule on whether state laws banning gay marriage are constitutional. It cannot decree that gay marriage is constitutional. Do you understand the difference?

 

[martybegan]

Kasich/Rubio. Rubio did not hurt himself by expressing a view held by a majority of americans. The northeast and west coast media are not the USA.

A majority of Americans see gay marriage as a danger?

Where's that poll?

Being opposed to it does not mean you see it as a "danger". nice spin attempt, but once again you FAIL.

Rubio expressed his beliefs, if you disagree with him, don't vote for him.

A politician who has the guts to take a stand and stand by his principles is to be admired, not denigrated.

Remember how both HRC and obozo were against gay marriage when they thought it was the politically safe position? Its called hypocrisy or pandering, and the dims do it constantly.

Rubio said it was a danger, and you said most Americans agreed with him. You're an idiot.

most do agree with him. the voters of california voted against it twice.

But, lets settle it. Lets let the people vote as they did in Ireland. Then its over one way or the other.

There's currently 60% support for legal same sex marriage in the US. That's the same as Ireland's was going into that landslide.

We don't have national referendums. We have a Supreme Court.

Let the Right pass its Marriage Amendment to the Constitution if they can. There's your 'referendum'.

Nothing like appealing to 5 of 9 un-elected lawyers than the people.

Your love of oligarchy is noted.

 

[Redfish]

"We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech"


completely ridonkulous! ...only the overly emotional fringe believes such nonsense! ^

You have to remember that Rubio was at the 700 Club. Rubio is one of those standard issue politicians who change their rhetoric based on who they're talking to.

as I said, if you don't like Rubio, don't vote for him. Thats the way we do things. I will vote against HRC no matter who the GOP runs.

 

[martybegan]

A majority of Americans see gay marriage as a danger?

Where's that poll?

Being opposed to it does not mean you see it as a "danger". nice spin attempt, but once again you FAIL.

Rubio expressed his beliefs, if you disagree with him, don't vote for him.

A politician who has the guts to take a stand and stand by his principles is to be admired, not denigrated.

Remember how both HRC and obozo were against gay marriage when they thought it was the politically safe position? Its called hypocrisy or pandering, and the dims do it constantly.

Rubio said it was a danger, and you said most Americans agreed with him. You're an idiot.

most do agree with him. the voters of california voted against it twice.

But, lets settle it. Lets let the people vote as they did in Ireland. Then its over one way or the other.

There's currently 60% support for legal same sex marriage in the US. That's the same as Ireland's was going into that landslide.

We don't have national referendums. We have a Supreme Court.

Let the Right pass its Marriage Amendment to the Constitution if they can. There's your 'referendum'.

The SC can rule on whether state laws banning gay marriage are constitutional. It cannot decree that gay marriage is constitutional. Do you understand the difference?

What he understands is that he wants "X" and will get it no matter what.

 

[bodecea]

How likely do you think it is that the final ticket will be Paul/Kasich or Kasich/Paul?

Kasich/Rubio. Rubio did not hurt himself by expressing a view held by a majority of americans. The northeast and west coast media are not the USA.

A majority of Americans see gay marriage as a danger?

Where's that poll?

Being opposed to it does not mean you see it as a "danger". nice spin attempt, but once again you FAIL.

Rubio expressed his beliefs, if you disagree with him, don't vote for him.

A politician who has the guts to take a stand and stand by his principles is to be admired, not denigrated.

Remember how both HRC and obozo were against gay marriage when they thought it was the politically safe position? Its called hypocrisy or pandering, and the dims do it constantly.

Rubio said it was a danger, and you said most Americans agreed with him. You're an idiot.

most do agree with him. the voters of california voted against it twice.

But, lets settle it. Lets let the people vote as they did in Ireland. Then its over one way or the other.

In your honest opinion, if such a vote was held in California today....would gay marriage win or lose?

 

[Redfish]

if the GOP platform is based on whining about the evil PC, it's a big time fail. true story.

wrong, the people are looking for candidates who stand for something and are not afraid to speak up about their principles and beliefs.

they are not fooled by the panderers who say whatever they think the audience of the day wants to hear.

So you'll be voting for Bernie Sanders.

He won't be on the ballot, so your post is meaningless

 

[martybegan]

"We are at the water’s edge of the argument that mainstream Christian teaching is hate speech"


completely ridonkulous! ...only the overly emotional fringe believes such nonsense! ^

So publicly saying homosexual sex is sinful is not hate speech, hateful, or homophobic?

 

[Valerie]

the president isn't meant to be your Sunday school teacher.

 

[JakeStarkey]

A Kasich-Paul ticket looks more and more realistic.

How likely do you think it is that the final ticket will be Paul/Kasich or Kasich/Paul?

Kasich/Rubio. Rubio did not hurt himself by expressing a view held by a majority of americans. The northeast and west coast media are not the USA.

Majority of Americans disagree with you, Redfish. Kasich and Paul will be the finishers.