Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK. Then we can expect no hypocrisy from you on that. Clinton, Biden, just for starters, got deferments. What does that say about their character to you?Using deferments allowed by law does not a draft dodger make, but I suspect you know that.
We're not talking about laws, we're talking about character...
I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers
I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers
No, they're just typical liberal pussies.
I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers
No, they're just typical liberal pussies.
and both of them are dumb as dirt!
Your hypocrisy is so very transparent, thus whatever you are trying to claim about another's character just doesn't seem to have much weight.OK. Then we can expect no hypocrisy from you on that. Clinton, Biden, just for starters, got deferments. What does that say about their character to you?We're not talking about laws, we're talking about character...
I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers... Rudy is...
Ex-NY mayor says 'America won' in Moussaoui trial - ki news ?
But the former mayor added: "If you believe in this system, you have to be willing to agree with conclusions that you would not share.
"The greater value I think would have been if he was executed. But the greater value is demonstrating what America is like.
"America won tonight," he said, arguing that the United States had upheld the worth of its legal system in the eyes of the world.
Oh dear....that's leaving a mark, isn't it?
The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.
And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.
The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.
And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.
So, according to Rudy, it was OK to try the 1993 bombers in civilian court, but not now? Why would that be, do you think?
The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.
And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.
I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers
No, they're just typical liberal pussies.
The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.
And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.
Yes - the White House has made a terrible error in judgement here.
Just heard a report that Holder stated on one of the weekend news programs that he simply called Obama to inform him of his decision - meaning Obama was "out of the loop". Holder stated he had only consulted his wife and brother regarding the decision. WTF?????
In the political world this is a clear message of trying to construct deniability for Obama if/when this fiasco blows up in their faces - OR - we have a president who is in fact out of the loop and is a mere figurehead while various operatives are actually running the show. To have a president not be the primary policy decision maker on something as important as these 9-11 trials, would be astounding - and disturbing...
So far, the Islamists have attacked us twice under the reign of the Boy King Obama.
And where are the attackers?
Calling a black president "boy" is racist. Turd. But you knew that. Both.
The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.
And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.
Yes - the White House has made a terrible error in judgement here.
Just heard a report that Holder stated on one of the weekend news programs that he simply called Obama to inform him of his decision - meaning Obama was "out of the loop". Holder stated he had only consulted his wife and brother regarding the decision. WTF?????
In the political world this is a clear message of trying to construct deniability for Obama if/when this fiasco blows up in their faces - OR - we have a president who is in fact out of the loop and is a mere figurehead while various operatives are actually running the show. To have a president not be the primary policy decision maker on something as important as these 9-11 trials, would be astounding - and disturbing...
So, getting back to YOUR boy Rudy.....why was is OK to try the 1993 bombers in civilian court, but not now?