Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He explained this last nite on judge Jeannie
Yes he has it all and bringing it out
He is on fire to prove just how corrupt democrats are
People like Mac 1958 here proves every day with his posting
Mac 1958 you better run and hide now did you see the big jump in trumps approval
Just wait until Barr and Durham brings their proof that you people are indeed corrupt to the core
What? Schweitzer is one of the few actual jouirnalists out there. The left attacks him because he exposes you, but no one has found anything against him - despite dozens of hit pieces from the little Goebbels of the antisemitic New York Times.
{
Zlochevsky founded Burisma in Cyprus in 2006. He served as natural resources minister under Yanukovych, and gave himself the licenses to develop the country's abundant gas fields. He also had a flare for lavishness, running a super-exclusive fashion boutique named after himself.
Burisma's major subsidiaries ended up sharing the same business address as the natural gas firm controlled by Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky. He controlled the country's largest financial institution, ProvatBank, through which the Ukrainian military and government workers got paid. He also owned media companies and airlines. In violation of Ukraine law, he maintained Ukrainian, Israeli, and Cypriot passports.
Kolomoisky gained a reputation for violence and brutality, along with lawlessness. Rival oligarchs have sued him for alleged involvement in "murders and beheadings" related to a business deal. He also allegedly used "hired rowdies armed with baseball bats, iron bars, gas and rubber bullet pistols and chainsaws" to take over a steel plant in 2006. He built his multibillion-dollar empire by "raiding" other companies, forcing them to merge with his own using brute force.
For these and other reasons, the U.S. government placed Kolomoisky on its visa ban list, prohibiting him from entering the country legally. In 2015, however, after Hunter Biden and Devon Archer had joined Burisma's board, Kolomoisky was given admittance back into the U.S.
Archer and the younger Biden brought other benefits to Burisma, however. Archer represented the company at the Louisiana Gulf Coast Oil Exposition in 2015. Biden addressed the Energy Security for the Future conference in Monaco. The vice president's son brought much-needed legitimacy to the shoddy gas company.
Less than a month after Archer joined Burisma's board, the company hired another Kerry lackey, David Leiter, as a lobbyist in Washington, D.C. He successfully lobbied for more aid to the country.
Both Biden and Kerry championed $1.8 billion in taxpayer-backed loans to be given to Ukraine courtesy of the IMF. That money would go directly through Kolomoisky's PrivatBank, and then it would disappear.
According to the Ukrainian anticorruption watchdog Nashi Groshi, "This transaction of $1.8 billion ... with the help of fake contracts was simply an asset siphoning operation."}
Emphasis added to aid your faulty reading comprehension.
Schweitzer is not a journalist. He publishes poorly researched anti-Democratic party books with a lot of misleading conclusions and stretches the truth to the breaking point.
Case in point, perhaps you didn’t notice that the underline portion references PrivatBank, not Burisma. Those are two different companies. Did you not notice?
Lie much?
Oh and stupid, it listed who owns PrivatBank, same principle as Burisma.
I guess underlining only helps if someone has an IQ above room temperature.
PrivatBank was owned by Ihor Kolomoyski (it was nationalized forcibly in 2016).
Burisma is owned by Mykola Zlochevsky.
Maybe I’m not as smart as you but that would seem to be two different people.
And you impugn the integrity of OTHERS?
Kolomoyski and Zlochevsky. were long time business partners, as CLEARLY spelled out in the article.
You democrats got caught balls deep in the dog, you can't claim you didn't screw the pooch.
The article doesn’t say anything of the sort. This is the extent of the relationship between the two:
Burisma's major subsidiaries ended up sharing the same business address as the natural gas firm controlled by Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky.
This is what you claimed earlier:
Oh and stupid, it listed who owns PrivatBank, same principle as Burisma.
That seems to be quite different statements. Wouldn’t you say?
Democrat cheating will be massive and could overcome the actual will of the peopleI think it will be a close election no matter who wins the dem nominationI will be surprised if warren gets the nominationBiden won't win the nomination. It will be Warren most likely because of identity politics.
she has followers but surely not even democrats could choose her as the best choice for president
Sander's seems to be moving up in the ratings. I would love to see the voters nominate him just to see what slimy moves the DNC will pull to make sure he doesn't get the nomination. I would like to see them piss off their voters so badly, that Trump wouldn't even have to campaign to win reelection.
We are a nation embroiled in civil war. The middle is shrinking as people chose sides. Still, the antics of the Stalinists has turned an awful lot of people off. I don't think it's going to be close at all. I think the Stalinists shot themselves in the foot with this impeachment hoax. We need a 10% margin to overcome election fraud with democrats. In any election the democrats will rig at least 10% of the votes through ballot stuffing, illegal aliens, or altering counts. But I think the democrats have so badly damaged themselves that even that padding will not help them.
I sure hope I’m wrong
I pointed out that your first assertion is that they were owned by the same person. Obviously that’s not true. Your second assertion after moving the goal posts is that the article claims they had a long history of working together. That’s not true either.Schweitzer is not a journalist. He publishes poorly researched anti-Democratic party books with a lot of misleading conclusions and stretches the truth to the breaking point.
Case in point, perhaps you didn’t notice that the underline portion references PrivatBank, not Burisma. Those are two different companies. Did you not notice?
Lie much?
Oh and stupid, it listed who owns PrivatBank, same principle as Burisma.
I guess underlining only helps if someone has an IQ above room temperature.
PrivatBank was owned by Ihor Kolomoyski (it was nationalized forcibly in 2016).
Burisma is owned by Mykola Zlochevsky.
Maybe I’m not as smart as you but that would seem to be two different people.
And you impugn the integrity of OTHERS?
Kolomoyski and Zlochevsky. were long time business partners, as CLEARLY spelled out in the article.
You democrats got caught balls deep in the dog, you can't claim you didn't screw the pooch.
The article doesn’t say anything of the sort. This is the extent of the relationship between the two:
Burisma's major subsidiaries ended up sharing the same business address as the natural gas firm controlled by Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky.
This is what you claimed earlier:
Oh and stupid, it listed who owns PrivatBank, same principle as Burisma.
That seems to be quite different statements. Wouldn’t you say?
Do you think that helped your case? Really?
I pointed out that your first assertion is that they were owned by the same person. Obviously that’s not true. Your second assertion after moving the goal posts is that the article claims they had a long history of working together. That’s not true either.Lie much?
Oh and stupid, it listed who owns PrivatBank, same principle as Burisma.
I guess underlining only helps if someone has an IQ above room temperature.
PrivatBank was owned by Ihor Kolomoyski (it was nationalized forcibly in 2016).
Burisma is owned by Mykola Zlochevsky.
Maybe I’m not as smart as you but that would seem to be two different people.
And you impugn the integrity of OTHERS?
Kolomoyski and Zlochevsky. were long time business partners, as CLEARLY spelled out in the article.
You democrats got caught balls deep in the dog, you can't claim you didn't screw the pooch.
The article doesn’t say anything of the sort. This is the extent of the relationship between the two:
Burisma's major subsidiaries ended up sharing the same business address as the natural gas firm controlled by Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky.
This is what you claimed earlier:
Oh and stupid, it listed who owns PrivatBank, same principle as Burisma.
That seems to be quite different statements. Wouldn’t you say?
Do you think that helped your case? Really?
We’ve whittled your claim down basically nothing. A Burisma subsidy was located in the same building as Privatbank. That’s the entire extent of your claim that $1.8 billion went to Burisma. It’s bogus.
Are we allowed to use George Kent as a reliable source now? I sure hope you say yes because he’s not very helpful to the story you want us to believe.Everything you listed was provided to you by the Democrat party, and their accomplices in the MSM.
Let’s unpack this a little. It’s not strictly true. Yes, a lot comes from mainstream media outlets like the New York Times. I doubt that any media outlets you’d be more trustful of have covered this story or Ukraine in general before last year. A lot comes from career foreign service officials without a dog in the fight. Some of it comes from NGOs and some even comes from Congressional Republicans.
What is your point in this comment? Do you want to say that what I listed isn’t accurate?
That is what I'm saying.
OCTOBER 16, 2019 By Sean Davis
A top U.S. diplomat and expert on Ukraine testified to Congress yesterday that the Obama administration — with former Vice President Joe Biden as its point man — orchestrated the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating a company connected to the Biden family, sources familiar with the testimony told The Federalist.
The testimony of George Kent, a State Department official who works on the agency’s Ukraine portfolio, directly contradicts claims that the Obama administration was merely following the lead of the so-called international community in demanding the firing of Viktor Shokin, a controversial Ukrainian prosecutor who was reportedly investigating Burisma, a global energy company long suspected of corruption and money laundering. In 2014
Kent told lawmakers on Tuesday that the Obama administration spearheaded the efforts to have Shokin removed from his position as the top federal prosecutor in Ukraine. Kent said the international community — namely the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Western nations within the European Union — were deferential to U.S. directives on the matter.
After Shokin was fired, he was replaced by Yuri Lutsenko, who also has been dogged by allegations of corruption. The Obama administration never demanded Lutsenko’s ouster, despite worries that Lutsenko was similarly corrupt and untrustworthy.
Allies of Biden, who is currently vying for the Democratic presidential nomination, have defended the former vice president from charges of improperly taking official actions that could financially benefit his son by claiming that the international community, rather than Biden and the Obama administration, were behind the efforts to get rid of Shokin. Kent’s testimony, however, indicates it was Biden and the Obama administration who were running the show, not the so-called international community.
Diplomat Testified Obama Admin Orchestrated Ukraine Prosecutor's Ouster
So according to Kent, the international community was not forcing the hand of DumBama. He was doing this on his own. He also said that what they did was force the removal of Shokin, and he was replaced with somebody just as corrupt, but had no problem with that.
Another source makes the claim that the Obama administration wanted to takeover the Burisma investigation when they learned of the work Shokin was doing.
This is a strawman argument. I haven’t seen anyone claim we were following anyone else’s lead. Only that our allies were in agreement with us regarding Shokin’s lack of reform.
Yuri Lutsenko was indeed dogged by corruption allegations. There was hope for him early on but didn’t turn out well. This was at the very tail end of the Obama administration. I can’t speak to what they did or didn’t do about him other than knowing he was pushed by Yovanovich to clean up how act which resulted in the smear campaign against her and her dismissal as ambassador. Lutsenko has been working closely with Trump/Giuliani during this time. He’s even gotten a vote of confidence from Trump as part of that July 25th phone call with Zelensky.
So, is George Kent a reliable source now?
We’ve whittled your claim down basically nothing. A Burisma subsidy was located in the same building as Privatbank. That’s the entire extent of your claim that $1.8 billion went to Burisma. It’s bogus.
I pointed out that your first assertion is that they were owned by the same person. Obviously that’s not true. Your second assertion after moving the goal posts is that the article claims they had a long history of working together. That’s not true either.PrivatBank was owned by Ihor Kolomoyski (it was nationalized forcibly in 2016).
Burisma is owned by Mykola Zlochevsky.
Maybe I’m not as smart as you but that would seem to be two different people.
And you impugn the integrity of OTHERS?
Kolomoyski and Zlochevsky. were long time business partners, as CLEARLY spelled out in the article.
You democrats got caught balls deep in the dog, you can't claim you didn't screw the pooch.
The article doesn’t say anything of the sort. This is the extent of the relationship between the two:
Burisma's major subsidiaries ended up sharing the same business address as the natural gas firm controlled by Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky.
This is what you claimed earlier:
Oh and stupid, it listed who owns PrivatBank, same principle as Burisma.
That seems to be quite different statements. Wouldn’t you say?
Do you think that helped your case? Really?
We’ve whittled your claim down basically nothing. A Burisma subsidy was located in the same building as Privatbank. That’s the entire extent of your claim that $1.8 billion went to Burisma. It’s bogus.
Operating from the same address sure shows that there was no connection...
Trump. Ironically.
No, not Trump at all. Nothing Trump is involved with compares to having a prosecutor from another country fired because he was going after a business his son works for. Biden's son made millions of dollars for doing nothing. Trump's son is working for free.
Except the story about what Shokin was fired is false.
So Trump is using hundreds of millions of American dollars to have the Ukrainian government investigate a phony story. I’d say that’s a big deal.
And you know Shokin's story was false how--because that's what the commies told you? And what hundreds of millions of dollars do you speak of?
I know that at the time of Shokin’s removal, everyone in the US embassy at Ukraine thought Shokin was corrupt and his office was not investigating any corrupt oligarchs. I know the president of the IMF agreed. I know the top anti-corruption prosecutor in Ukraine resigned in protest of Shokin. I know that Ukrainian anti-corruption activists opposed him.
It seems that every person who both knows anything about Ukraine and has any integrity agreed that Shokin was not helping Ukraine clean up its act.
That is all you need to know to derail the phony narrative against Biden.
So I’ll ask you a similar question. After everything I just said, why do you believe Shokin?
Because the evidence supports his claims. Joe Biden gave Burisma $1.8 billion in taxpayer money that vanished. Burisma kicked back $3.2 million using his son Hunter as a mule. John Kerry and and Nancy Pelosi had their son working as mules for the embezzlement scheme as well.
Trump. Ironically.
No, not Trump at all. Nothing Trump is involved with compares to having a prosecutor from another country fired because he was going after a business his son works for. Biden's son made millions of dollars for doing nothing. Trump's son is working for free.
Except the story about what Shokin was fired is false.
So Trump is using hundreds of millions of American dollars to have the Ukrainian government investigate a phony story. I’d say that’s a big deal.
And you know Shokin's story was false how--because that's what the commies told you? And what hundreds of millions of dollars do you speak of?
I know that at the time of Shokin’s removal, everyone in the US embassy at Ukraine thought Shokin was corrupt and his office was not investigating any corrupt oligarchs. I know the president of the IMF agreed. I know the top anti-corruption prosecutor in Ukraine resigned in protest of Shokin. I know that Ukrainian anti-corruption activists opposed him.
It seems that every person who both knows anything about Ukraine and has any integrity agreed that Shokin was not helping Ukraine clean up its act.
That is all you need to know to derail the phony narrative against Biden.
So I’ll ask you a similar question. After everything I just said, why do you believe Shokin?
Because the evidence supports his claims. Joe Biden gave Burisma $1.8 billion in taxpayer money that vanished. Burisma kicked back $3.2 million using his son Hunter as a mule. John Kerry and and Nancy Pelosi had their son working as mules for the embezzlement scheme as well.
What spies were listening into Trump’s phone call?Trump's DOJ and SD are not buying what he is selling? Perhaps because it is bullshit....did that ever occur to you, even for one tiny second?
No, it didn't, because regardless of Trump being in charge, the deep state is alive and well. That's why Trump got impeached.
At least you are open and honest about being a closed minded sheep when it comes to Trump.
What's closed minded about it? How many other Presidents ever had spies listening in on their phone calls to try and find the stupidest excuse for his masters to impeach him on?
The one who relayed the details of the call to the so-called whistleblower. It's never happened before as long as I can remember.
