Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey Jills....Your post would more aptly apply to the OP who not only claims mueller can indict but will, and he put it in the title in big bold print, he may be more entitled to a civics lesson based on your information than anyone else, he is certainly more entitled to the titles you handed out...lolmueller doesn't indict, moron....
damn, you're one of the stupidest least informed people I've ever seen....
Releasing what info, exactly? I think you're confused.Lawyers involved in the probe releasing such info would be fired for malfeasance. This is another fake story.
You are the biggest lying traitor here.Lawyers involved in probe: Mueller may indict Trump
The lawyers know what Mueller has and they have spoken with attorneys on Mueller's team. Here is the Donald trying desperately to discredit the Dossier and all the while....it is the very effort he and his Repub conspirators are staging that is sinking him. The more distractions they throw out there, the more Mueller has in his case of obstruction of justice.
The way Mueller sees it, even if the indictment is challenged, and certainly it will be, it will doom the Donald for another term and will send the matter to the court to decide. If the court throws it back to Congress, then either the present congress puts on their "big boy pants" and impeaches him or the next Democratic congress impeaches him.
Sorry Donald, you may win a few battles in the short game, but Mueller is playing the long game. And personally, I feel Mueller has more evidence against Trump or his family in the areas of money laundering and/or collusion.
So, Nunes, keep pumping out the distractions! Each one puts another nail into the coffin of your boy.
Uh...hey professor....the original scope was Russian interference and collusion between the trump campaign and russia.So the original scope of mewler was bullshit
Why not? They're not talking about their own clients.Do you really think that a lawyer is going to come out and say that?
There was a thread on this yesterday. Lawyers involved in the probe releasing such info would be fired for malfeasance. This is another fake story.Lawyers involved in probe: Mueller may indict Trump
The lawyers know what Mueller has and they have spoken with attorneys on Mueller's team. Here is the Donald trying desperately to discredit the Dossier and all the while....it is the very effort he and his Repub conspirators are staging that is sinking him. The more distractions they throw out there, the more Mueller has in his case of obstruction of justice.
The way Mueller sees it, even if the indictment is challenged, and certainly it will be, it will doom the Donald for another term and will send the matter to the court to decide. If the court throws it back to Congress, then either the present congress puts on their "big boy pants" and impeaches him or the next Democratic congress impeaches him.
Sorry Donald, you may win a few battles in the short game, but Mueller is playing the long game. And personally, I feel Mueller has more evidence against Trump or his family in the areas of money laundering and/or collusion.
So, Nunes, keep pumping out the distractions! Each one puts another nail into the coffin of your boy.
Really? Can you point to reputable news sources citing multiple sources for the credibility of those claims you mentioned? I doubt it.There was a thread on this yesterday. Lawyers involved in the probe releasing such info would be fired for malfeasance. This is another fake story.Lawyers involved in probe: Mueller may indict Trump
The lawyers know what Mueller has and they have spoken with attorneys on Mueller's team. Here is the Donald trying desperately to discredit the Dossier and all the while....it is the very effort he and his Repub conspirators are staging that is sinking him. The more distractions they throw out there, the more Mueller has in his case of obstruction of justice.
The way Mueller sees it, even if the indictment is challenged, and certainly it will be, it will doom the Donald for another term and will send the matter to the court to decide. If the court throws it back to Congress, then either the present congress puts on their "big boy pants" and impeaches him or the next Democratic congress impeaches him.
Sorry Donald, you may win a few battles in the short game, but Mueller is playing the long game. And personally, I feel Mueller has more evidence against Trump or his family in the areas of money laundering and/or collusion.
So, Nunes, keep pumping out the distractions! Each one puts another nail into the coffin of your boy.
It's more unnamed sources. I would put this in the same bin as all the BREAKING - Comey and/or Hillary being perpwalked somewhere.
Really? Can you point to reputable news sources citing multiple sources for the credibility of those claims you mentioned? I doubt it.There was a thread on this yesterday. Lawyers involved in the probe releasing such info would be fired for malfeasance. This is another fake story.Lawyers involved in probe: Mueller may indict Trump
The lawyers know what Mueller has and they have spoken with attorneys on Mueller's team. Here is the Donald trying desperately to discredit the Dossier and all the while....it is the very effort he and his Repub conspirators are staging that is sinking him. The more distractions they throw out there, the more Mueller has in his case of obstruction of justice.
The way Mueller sees it, even if the indictment is challenged, and certainly it will be, it will doom the Donald for another term and will send the matter to the court to decide. If the court throws it back to Congress, then either the present congress puts on their "big boy pants" and impeaches him or the next Democratic congress impeaches him.
Sorry Donald, you may win a few battles in the short game, but Mueller is playing the long game. And personally, I feel Mueller has more evidence against Trump or his family in the areas of money laundering and/or collusion.
So, Nunes, keep pumping out the distractions! Each one puts another nail into the coffin of your boy.
It's more unnamed sources. I would put this in the same bin as all the BREAKING - Comey and/or Hillary being perpwalked somewhere.
Wrong. The source is Politico.Really? Can you point to reputable news sources citing multiple sources for the credibility of those claims you mentioned? I doubt it.There was a thread on this yesterday. Lawyers involved in the probe releasing such info would be fired for malfeasance. This is another fake story.Lawyers involved in probe: Mueller may indict Trump
The lawyers know what Mueller has and they have spoken with attorneys on Mueller's team. Here is the Donald trying desperately to discredit the Dossier and all the while....it is the very effort he and his Repub conspirators are staging that is sinking him. The more distractions they throw out there, the more Mueller has in his case of obstruction of justice.
The way Mueller sees it, even if the indictment is challenged, and certainly it will be, it will doom the Donald for another term and will send the matter to the court to decide. If the court throws it back to Congress, then either the present congress puts on their "big boy pants" and impeaches him or the next Democratic congress impeaches him.
Sorry Donald, you may win a few battles in the short game, but Mueller is playing the long game. And personally, I feel Mueller has more evidence against Trump or his family in the areas of money laundering and/or collusion.
So, Nunes, keep pumping out the distractions! Each one puts another nail into the coffin of your boy.
It's more unnamed sources. I would put this in the same bin as all the BREAKING - Comey and/or Hillary being perpwalked somewhere.
The source for this is MSNBC and it's well known to swing strongly to the left.
And I think most people in this thread are confused. The lawyers mentioned dont claim to know what info Mueller has, or what actions he will take. They are speaking from their knowledge of legal procedure and the actions they have witnessed, speculating as to the possibility of the indictment of Trump.Really? Can you point to reputable news sources citing multiple sources for the credibility of those claims you mentioned? I doubt it.There was a thread on this yesterday. Lawyers involved in the probe releasing such info would be fired for malfeasance. This is another fake story.Lawyers involved in probe: Mueller may indict Trump
The lawyers know what Mueller has and they have spoken with attorneys on Mueller's team. Here is the Donald trying desperately to discredit the Dossier and all the while....it is the very effort he and his Repub conspirators are staging that is sinking him. The more distractions they throw out there, the more Mueller has in his case of obstruction of justice.
The way Mueller sees it, even if the indictment is challenged, and certainly it will be, it will doom the Donald for another term and will send the matter to the court to decide. If the court throws it back to Congress, then either the present congress puts on their "big boy pants" and impeaches him or the next Democratic congress impeaches him.
Sorry Donald, you may win a few battles in the short game, but Mueller is playing the long game. And personally, I feel Mueller has more evidence against Trump or his family in the areas of money laundering and/or collusion.
So, Nunes, keep pumping out the distractions! Each one puts another nail into the coffin of your boy.
It's more unnamed sources. I would put this in the same bin as all the BREAKING - Comey and/or Hillary being perpwalked somewhere.
The source for this is MSNBC and it's well known to swing strongly to the left.
Wrong. The source is Politico.Really? Can you point to reputable news sources citing multiple sources for the credibility of those claims you mentioned? I doubt it.There was a thread on this yesterday. Lawyers involved in the probe releasing such info would be fired for malfeasance. This is another fake story.Lawyers involved in probe: Mueller may indict Trump
The lawyers know what Mueller has and they have spoken with attorneys on Mueller's team. Here is the Donald trying desperately to discredit the Dossier and all the while....it is the very effort he and his Repub conspirators are staging that is sinking him. The more distractions they throw out there, the more Mueller has in his case of obstruction of justice.
The way Mueller sees it, even if the indictment is challenged, and certainly it will be, it will doom the Donald for another term and will send the matter to the court to decide. If the court throws it back to Congress, then either the present congress puts on their "big boy pants" and impeaches him or the next Democratic congress impeaches him.
Sorry Donald, you may win a few battles in the short game, but Mueller is playing the long game. And personally, I feel Mueller has more evidence against Trump or his family in the areas of money laundering and/or collusion.
So, Nunes, keep pumping out the distractions! Each one puts another nail into the coffin of your boy.
It's more unnamed sources. I would put this in the same bin as all the BREAKING - Comey and/or Hillary being perpwalked somewhere.
The source for this is MSNBC and it's well known to swing strongly to the left.
Why not? They're not talking about their own clients.Do you really think that a lawyer is going to come out and say that?
It’ll be interesting to see trump debate the democratic nominee. My moneys on trump especially if the economy is good
Okay, you're right. I'll try to be more helpful.trump is a sick, sorry, joke. He is in NO way fit to be in the White House - in ANY capacity.
Oh come on, be kind......Trump would make an excellent usher at the WH....you know, one of the guys who opens car doors and maybe parks the limos?
In other words, you pulled that out of your ass and can't really explain it. Not only do lawyers say these things, they are saying them a lot.Why not? They're not talking about their own clients.Do you really think that a lawyer is going to come out and say that?
Hang in there...you'll eventually catch on.
Uh...hey professor....the original scope was Russian interference and collusion between the trump campaign and russia.So the original scope of mewler was bullshit
Both have been established as fact. Where ya been?
In other words, you pulled that out of your ass and can't really explain it. Not only do lawyers say these things, they are saying them a lot.Why not? They're not talking about their own clients.Do you really think that a lawyer is going to come out and say that?
Hang in there...you'll eventually catch on.
Really? Can you point to reputable news sources citing multiple sources for the credibility of those claims you mentioned? I doubt it.There was a thread on this yesterday. Lawyers involved in the probe releasing such info would be fired for malfeasance. This is another fake story.Lawyers involved in probe: Mueller may indict Trump
The lawyers know what Mueller has and they have spoken with attorneys on Mueller's team. Here is the Donald trying desperately to discredit the Dossier and all the while....it is the very effort he and his Repub conspirators are staging that is sinking him. The more distractions they throw out there, the more Mueller has in his case of obstruction of justice.
The way Mueller sees it, even if the indictment is challenged, and certainly it will be, it will doom the Donald for another term and will send the matter to the court to decide. If the court throws it back to Congress, then either the present congress puts on their "big boy pants" and impeaches him or the next Democratic congress impeaches him.
Sorry Donald, you may win a few battles in the short game, but Mueller is playing the long game. And personally, I feel Mueller has more evidence against Trump or his family in the areas of money laundering and/or collusion.
So, Nunes, keep pumping out the distractions! Each one puts another nail into the coffin of your boy.
It's more unnamed sources. I would put this in the same bin as all the BREAKING - Comey and/or Hillary being perpwalked somewhere.
The source for this is MSNBC and it's well known to swing strongly to the left.
In other words, you pulled that out of your ass and can't really explain it. Not only do lawyers say these things, they are saying them a lot.Why not? They're not talking about their own clients.Do you really think that a lawyer is going to come out and say that?
Hang in there...you'll eventually catch on.
The stupidity on display.....
I hate to ask but doesnt your mental acuity exposed to the general public embarrass you?
Proof? No? Still? Liar.Uh...hey professor....the original scope was Russian interference and collusion between the trump campaign and russia.So the original scope of mewler was bullshit
Both have been established as fact. Where ya been?
