Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet the surveillance began back in 2015 according to documents Nunes was viewing, long before that probe and continued right up to and possibly beyond Jan 20, 2017. No warrant has been identified for the surveillance.Uh....Chunky?Can You Believe How Much Bilge They'll Swallow...
....the Leftists, the reliable Democrat voters, the Lock-Step-Liberals, the government school grads????
The very same dolts who foam at the mouth when believers stand up for religion, demand evidence and proof!
But not when it comes to Obama surveillance of the new administration, or collusion of the Trump folks and Russia: no evidence necessary!
1. It's the sort of horrifying phenomenon that one simply cannot take their eyes off: a horrible traffic accident, or a snake swallowing a little bird......supposedly educated, adult, thinking human beings who will accept clearly, distinctly, manifestly provable lies...simply because they are put out by the political party they've aligned themselves with.
These dunces behave less like thinking human beings, and more iron filings in a magnetic field.
2. OK....here we go: Long story short.
a. There is no proof of any sort that the Trump folks sought or accepted Russian aid in winning the election.... nor has any intelligence official claimed that there is.
b. Felonies associated with the recent campaign and election were committed, with evidence of same....by the Obama administration and their supporters.
There is nothing astounding in the proof of the two claims above....but what is astounding is how resolute Bills wife's voters are in slamming their eyes closed when the facts are provided.
Long time fav, Kimberly Strassel, of the WSJ, put the whole soap opera together...
Here, as a public service......the facts:
4. Lying sleaze Democrat "Rep. Adam Schiff .... ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee ... successfully buried this week’s only real (and bombshell) news.
....Schiff and fellow Democrats spent this week accusing Chairman Devin Nunes of carrying water for President Trump, undermining the committee’s Russia investigation, and hiding information. The press dutifully regurgitated the outrage, as well as Mr. Schiff’s calls for Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation into possible Russian electoral meddling.
5. Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
6. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
The truth, and nothing but the truth!!!
More in a moment.
There never was any "Obama surveillance of the new administration".....
But not when it comes to Obama surveillance of the new administration
You are not off to a very promising start....
That's two lies I just caught you trying to advance.
1. I am Cygnian in style and grace, and a thing of beauty to behold.
2. Clearly Obama had Trump surveilled
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
And another dunce bites the dust.
Why are you obliged to "augment" your citations?
Clearly Obama had Trump surveilled
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
they are claiming that the Russians presented facts/lies about Hillary that apparently must of switched about 15 Million Hillary Snowflakes to Trump. What? Hillary had a private server? deleted 30,000 emails, and had nothing to do with the Benghazi attacks? dam!,,,thank you Herr Putin! if it wasnt for u,,,i would of voted for the dumb bitchif the russians were influencing us Americans,,wouldnt u think that we would of had some kind of video evidence of "Russians Telling Americans To Vote For Trump"? or maybe Political ads running all over Russia gloating over what a dumb bitch Hillary is, and therefore she is unqualified to be President?
Even simpler to destroy the meme....
Simply ask the drones to list the things that were suddenly known about the congenital liar and career criminal that had not been known before the leaks.
I've asked them that a dozen times and they have never been able to come up with a single thing.
"they are claiming that the Russians presented facts/lies about Hillary..."
What happens when they are asked to provide same?
Crickets.
"Hillary had a private server? deleted 30,000 emails, and had nothing to do with the Benghazi attacks?"
All known before WikiLeaks.
Funny...I seem to recall congressional hearings on Hillary's server and Benghazi. If there's no fire, why are you all so concerned that people are investigating the smoke?
Clearly Obama had Trump surveilled
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
I asked you which documents you've read, and you didn't cite one. Did you see the documents that Nunes and Schiff saw? Or did you start a thread about documents you haven't even seen?How about you articulate which documents you read?"Information about Trump officials" was there? LOL. What a crime.
How about you articulate your perspective so I can more easily shred it.
Sooooo....we can conclude that you have no ability to articulate, present, nor defend your position?
Must be pretty weak, huh?
"How about you articulate which documents you read?"
Clean off your specs....I did so in the OP, when I wrote this:
Long time fav, Kimberly Strassel, of the WSJ, put the whole soap opera together...
Here, as a public service......the facts....
So far you're batting below the Mendoza Line, you dunce.
This is what you wrote:
"How about you articulate which documents you read?"
I smashed a custard pie in your kisser by pointing out that the OP states which I read, and was quoting: the Wall Street Journal.
The OP, and thread is exactly as stated: The Truth And Nothing But The Truth.
That dictum was proven when i named you a dunce.
You still haven't been able to articulate your position.
BTW....I don't expect you to be able to: you are simply a drone who will parrot the Liberal line.
True?
That's misleading. You quoted a conservative opinion columnist from the Wall Street Journal. An op-ed is not a document. It's an op-ed. Did you write the document read by Nunes and Schiff yes or no? Please let your readers know that you were not quoting a news article from the Wall Street Journal. The columnist you quoted is Kimberley Strassel:they are claiming that the Russians presented facts/lies about Hillary that apparently must of switched about 15 Million Hillary Snowflakes to Trump. What? Hillary had a private server? deleted 30,000 emails, and had nothing to do with the Benghazi attacks? dam!,,,thank you Herr Putin! if it wasnt for u,,,i would of voted for the dumb bitchif the russians were influencing us Americans,,wouldnt u think that we would of had some kind of video evidence of "Russians Telling Americans To Vote For Trump"? or maybe Political ads running all over Russia gloating over what a dumb bitch Hillary is, and therefore she is unqualified to be President?
Even simpler to destroy the meme....
Simply ask the drones to list the things that were suddenly known about the congenital liar and career criminal that had not been known before the leaks.
I've asked them that a dozen times and they have never been able to come up with a single thing.
"they are claiming that the Russians presented facts/lies about Hillary..."
What happens when they are asked to provide same?
Crickets.
"Hillary had a private server? deleted 30,000 emails, and had nothing to do with the Benghazi attacks?"
All known before WikiLeaks.
Funny...I seem to recall congressional hearings on Hillary's server and Benghazi. If there's no fire, why are you all so concerned that people are investigating the smoke?
Why do I always hope for better prepared, more intelligent opposition.....but wind up with this???????
I said that the voting public knew about all the lies and scandals of Bill's wife before any alleged involvement of Wiki or Russia.....
....and you post this:
".I seem to recall congressional hearings on Hillary's server and Benghazi."
You dunce....you're proving my point.
Aren't there ANY smart Leftists???????
Any???????
Fridays. Kimberley Strassel - WikipediaKimberley A. Strassel (born July 24, 1972) is an author, journalist, and member of the Wall Street Journal editorial board. She writes a weekly conservative column, "Potomac Watch", which appears on
even at the start of the Hillary Campaign, hillary was around 70% dissaproval, then she had to hire a few hundred kids who were borderline snowflake/comatized to show up at her boring opening rally in New York. I wonder what she had to do to get them to show up? everyone at the door gets 50.00 and a free cath bag?
Since we are in the "reminder" mode...And.....more of the truth:
7. Democrat sleaze "Schiff’s howls about Mr. Nunes’s methods are bluster; the Republican was doing his job, and well..... the Senate has confirmed few Trump political appointees, which means there aren’t many loyal staffers among the Obama holdovers to attempt it. ... few things match the ludicrous furor over Mr. Nunes’s source-meeting place, or his visit to brief Mr. Trump. Congress members must view most classified material on executive-branch grounds, since that’s the only way to access it physically.
Having discovered the former administration’s surveillance of Trump officials, Mr. Nunes had a duty to let the White House know. (Imagine if he’d sat on it.) He could hardly let Democrats know first, since their only interest these days is in leaking and twisting stories. And the reason he held press briefings before and after his meeting with Mr. Trump was to be transparent about his purpose.
8. If Mr. Schiff wants to be trusted with important information, he might start by proving he is trustworthy—rather than rumor-mongering that there is “more than circumstantial evidence” of Trump-Russia collusion. He might voice some concern that a prior White House was monitoring its political opponents. He might ask whether Obama officials had been “reverse monitoring”—tracking foreign officials solely so they could spy on the Trump team."
What Devin Nunes Knows
"....some concern that a prior White House was monitoring its political opponents. "
This might be an appropriate time to remind all that Barack Hussein Obama is a dirt-eating low-life crypto-Islamist back-stabbing infanticide-supporting incompetent snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being.
But...probably a reminder isn't necessary, huh?
in 2016, Hillary was already a world wide laughing stock. Trump was already 15 points ahead!, Russia didnt have to work that hard to change the mind of about 20 Million voters. I mean, all u had to do was go to you-tube and look for any of those Hillary Gaff videos. Loved the one when she had a 5 second brain freeze and had nothing to say.
even at the start of the Hillary Campaign, hillary was around 70% dissaproval, then she had to hire a few hundred kids who were borderline snowflake/comatized to show up at her boring opening rally in New York. I wonder what she had to do to get them to show up? everyone at the door gets 50.00 and a free cath bag?
You might recall this:
Madonna offers blowjob to those who vote for Hillary Clinton
Really classy these Liberals, huh?
Putin and Russia has taught you well. Keep posting this shit and we will all be speaking RUSSIAN!!!!!Can You Believe How Much Bilge They'll Swallow...
....the Leftists, the reliable Democrat voters, the Lock-Step-Liberals, the government school grads????
The very same dolts who foam at the mouth when believers stand up for religion, demand evidence and proof!
But not when it comes to Obama surveillance of the new administration, or collusion of the Trump folks and Russia: no evidence necessary!
1. It's the sort of horrifying phenomenon that one simply cannot take their eyes off: a horrible traffic accident, or a snake swallowing a little bird......supposedly educated, adult, thinking human beings who will accept clearly, distinctly, manifestly provable lies...simply because they are put out by the political party they've aligned themselves with.
These dunces behave less like thinking human beings, and more iron filings in a magnetic field.
2. OK....here we go: Long story short.
a. There is no proof of any sort that the Trump folks sought or accepted Russian aid in winning the election.... nor has any intelligence official claimed that there is.
b. Felonies associated with the recent campaign and election were committed, with evidence of same....by the Obama administration and their supporters.
There is nothing astounding in the proof of the two claims above....but what is astounding is how resolute Bills wife's voters are in slamming their eyes closed when the facts are provided.
Long time fav, Kimberly Strassel, of the WSJ, put the whole soap opera together...
Here, as a public service......the facts:
4. Lying sleaze Democrat "Rep. Adam Schiff .... ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee ... successfully buried this week’s only real (and bombshell) news.
....Schiff and fellow Democrats spent this week accusing Chairman Devin Nunes of carrying water for President Trump, undermining the committee’s Russia investigation, and hiding information. The press dutifully regurgitated the outrage, as well as Mr. Schiff’s calls for Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation into possible Russian electoral meddling.
5. Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
6. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
The truth, and nothing but the truth!!!
More in a moment.
in 2016, Hillary was already a world wide laughing stock. Trump was already 15 points ahead!, Russia didnt have to work that hard to change the mind of about 20 Million voters. I mean, all u had to do was go to you-tube and look for any of those Hillary Gaff videos. Loved the one when she had a 5 second brain freeze and had nothing to say.
November 6th
How Forecasts Compare
NYT Upshot: Clinton 84%, Trump 16%
Clinton vs. Trump: Election Odds for Nov. 7
84% lol......what was her electoral vote projection? 653 to Trumps 42?
I asked you which documents you've read, and you didn't cite one. Did you see the documents that Nunes and Schiff saw? Or did you start a thread about documents you haven't even seen?How about you articulate which documents you read?How about you articulate your perspective so I can more easily shred it.
Sooooo....we can conclude that you have no ability to articulate, present, nor defend your position?
Must be pretty weak, huh?
"How about you articulate which documents you read?"
Clean off your specs....I did so in the OP, when I wrote this:
Long time fav, Kimberly Strassel, of the WSJ, put the whole soap opera together...
Here, as a public service......the facts....
So far you're batting below the Mendoza Line, you dunce.
This is what you wrote:
"How about you articulate which documents you read?"
I smashed a custard pie in your kisser by pointing out that the OP states which I read, and was quoting: the Wall Street Journal.
The OP, and thread is exactly as stated: The Truth And Nothing But The Truth.
That dictum was proven when i named you a dunce.
You still haven't been able to articulate your position.
BTW....I don't expect you to be able to: you are simply a drone who will parrot the Liberal line.
True?That's misleading. You quoted a conservative opinion columnist from the Wall Street Journal. An op-ed is not a document. It's an op-ed. Did you write the document read by Nunes and Schiff yes or no? Please let your readers know that you were not quoting a news article from the Wall Street Journal. The columnist you quoted is Kimberley Strassel:they are claiming that the Russians presented facts/lies about Hillary that apparently must of switched about 15 Million Hillary Snowflakes to Trump. What? Hillary had a private server? deleted 30,000 emails, and had nothing to do with the Benghazi attacks? dam!,,,thank you Herr Putin! if it wasnt for u,,,i would of voted for the dumb bitchEven simpler to destroy the meme....
Simply ask the drones to list the things that were suddenly known about the congenital liar and career criminal that had not been known before the leaks.
I've asked them that a dozen times and they have never been able to come up with a single thing.
"they are claiming that the Russians presented facts/lies about Hillary..."
What happens when they are asked to provide same?
Crickets.
"Hillary had a private server? deleted 30,000 emails, and had nothing to do with the Benghazi attacks?"
All known before WikiLeaks.
Funny...I seem to recall congressional hearings on Hillary's server and Benghazi. If there's no fire, why are you all so concerned that people are investigating the smoke?
Why do I always hope for better prepared, more intelligent opposition.....but wind up with this???????
I said that the voting public knew about all the lies and scandals of Bill's wife before any alleged involvement of Wiki or Russia.....
....and you post this:
".I seem to recall congressional hearings on Hillary's server and Benghazi."
You dunce....you're proving my point.
Aren't there ANY smart Leftists???????
Any???????
Fridays. Kimberley Strassel - WikipediaKimberley A. Strassel (born July 24, 1972) is an author, journalist, and member of the Wall Street Journal editorial board. She writes a weekly conservative column, "Potomac Watch", which appears on
1. I am Cygnian in style and grace, and a thing of beauty to behold.Uh....Chunky?Can You Believe How Much Bilge They'll Swallow...
....the Leftists, the reliable Democrat voters, the Lock-Step-Liberals, the government school grads????
The very same dolts who foam at the mouth when believers stand up for religion, demand evidence and proof!
But not when it comes to Obama surveillance of the new administration, or collusion of the Trump folks and Russia: no evidence necessary!
1. It's the sort of horrifying phenomenon that one simply cannot take their eyes off: a horrible traffic accident, or a snake swallowing a little bird......supposedly educated, adult, thinking human beings who will accept clearly, distinctly, manifestly provable lies...simply because they are put out by the political party they've aligned themselves with.
These dunces behave less like thinking human beings, and more iron filings in a magnetic field.
2. OK....here we go: Long story short.
a. There is no proof of any sort that the Trump folks sought or accepted Russian aid in winning the election.... nor has any intelligence official claimed that there is.
b. Felonies associated with the recent campaign and election were committed, with evidence of same....by the Obama administration and their supporters.
There is nothing astounding in the proof of the two claims above....but what is astounding is how resolute Bills wife's voters are in slamming their eyes closed when the facts are provided.
Long time fav, Kimberly Strassel, of the WSJ, put the whole soap opera together...
Here, as a public service......the facts:
4. Lying sleaze Democrat "Rep. Adam Schiff .... ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee ... successfully buried this week’s only real (and bombshell) news.
....Schiff and fellow Democrats spent this week accusing Chairman Devin Nunes of carrying water for President Trump, undermining the committee’s Russia investigation, and hiding information. The press dutifully regurgitated the outrage, as well as Mr. Schiff’s calls for Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation into possible Russian electoral meddling.
5. Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
6. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
The truth, and nothing but the truth!!!
More in a moment.
There never was any "Obama surveillance of the new administration".....
But not when it comes to Obama surveillance of the new administration
You are not off to a very promising start....
That's two lies I just caught you trying to advance.
1. I am Cygnian in style and grace, and a thing of beauty to behold.
2. Clearly Obama had Trump surveilled
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
And another dunce bites the dust.
