Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Poor People Should Have Abortions, Not Children

I wish that old Jew hair bag would die and go to hell where she belongs. She's been a blight on this planet for too long.
 
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."
..........
she stated what the Dems have been denying for years now, but it is how most of the party elite really feel.

I was hoping someone would post that gem.
 
Maybe it the copper.

The it's the copper in The Lincoln Head Penny that makes it such an effective birth control tool.

Only needs one.

Place it against the inside of one knee; position the other knee to hold it there.
 
I get it. You have to punish these women for having sex by watching their children starve.
Oh these right wingers. More clever each day.
 
Maybe it the copper.

The it's the copper in The Lincoln Head Penny that makes it such an effective birth control tool.

Only needs one.

Place it against the inside of one knee; position the other knee to hold it there.

That's too difficult for liberals to manage, and it's probably racist too.
 
Tough one.

Killing off the liberal voters before they are born is not in step with the votes needed to continue the socialism slide
No need for abortion for white liberals. They have very few kids anyway.
I had 5, that I know of.
There is always the exceptions, but on average libs have fewer kids.
My sister had none, but she would have just tortured them like she did her men...My cousins all had 4 kids and I have a lot of cousins...some kissing cousins...well not now, their spouse would think it rude for me to make out with them at the family reunion..
 
Ginsburg is correct.

Further, our society has it exactly backwards. The more intelligent and wealthier have fewer children than the poor and dumb. Whether it is genetics or environmental practices, the intelligent and wealthy do a better job of producing productive children than do the poor and dumb. Secondly, if child outcomes are determined by the amount of resources a parent can direct to the children, then poor families are spreading few resources amongst many children rather than concentrating all of their resources onto one child and improving the odds for that one child. Wealthy parents actually have the resources to spread over many children. Thirdly, in terms of intergenerational wealth transfer, inheritances from poor families get spread over many, many grandchildren, while inheritances from wealthy families get concentrated onto few grandchildren.

Society would be better off in closing the wealth, income and quality of life gap between the wealthy and the poor.

Rich people need to have more kids. Poor people need to stop at one.
 
I wish that old Jew hair bag would die and go to hell where she belongs. She's been a blight on this planet for too long.

And have Eric "The Red' Holder put in her place?..... NO THANK YOU, some things CAN GET WORSE!

Rush was talking about that today.and as long as dems control the senate, it could happen. Eric Hitler is a monster .

We really need popular election of SC judges.
 
I get it. You have to punish these women for having sex by watching their children starve.
Oh these right wingers. More clever each day.

Hey einstein. Why can't poor women use birth control including abortion? THINK
 
Ginsburg is correct.

Further, our society has it exactly backwards. The more intelligent and wealthier have fewer children than the poor and dumb. Whether it is genetics or environmental practices, the intelligent and wealthy do a better job of producing productive children than do the poor and dumb. Secondly, if child outcomes are determined by the amount of resources a parent can direct to the children, then poor families are spreading few resources amongst many children rather than concentrating all of their resources onto one child and improving the odds for that one child. Wealthy parents actually have the resources to spread over many children. Thirdly, in terms of intergenerational wealth transfer, inheritances from poor families get spread over many, many grandchildren, while inheritances from wealthy families get concentrated onto few grandchildren.

Society would be better off in closing the wealth, income and quality of life gap between the wealthy and the poor.

Rich people need to have more kids. Poor people need to stop at one.

Why are so many stupid people interested in EQUALITY of WEALTH?.... Especially in this country, BEFORE the subversives took over control, it was the WORK ETHIC and AMERICAN DREAM to do the very best you could, AT EVERYTHING that made us SPECIAL..... Now you get a fucking trophy for LAST PLACE...and increased food stamps!
 

Forum List

Back
Top