🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

RW domestic war on words ..

Bullshit, if he's up to something arrestable then he's arrestable. We’ve got plenty of folks making this religious as well.


Nice moving of the goal posts there.

The bar a moment ago was "up to no good".

Now it's "Arrestable".

Did you google what he was up to and realize that you had taken an indefensible position?


Nidal Hasan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"Hasan was investigated by the FBI after intelligence agencies intercepted at least 18 e-mails between him and Anwar al-Awlaki between December 2008 and June 2009.[63] al-Awlaki was a major influence on radical English-speaking jihadis internationally, and contact with him by an American officer would naturally raise concerns.[64]

In one of the e-mails, Hasan wrote al-Awlaki: "I can't wait to join you" in the afterlife. Hasan also asked al-Awlaki when jihad is appropriate, and whether it is permissible if innocents are killed in a suicide attack.[65] In the months before the shooting, Hasan increased his contacts with al-Awlaki to discuss how to transfer funds abroad without coming to the attention of law authorities.[63]

A DC-based Joint Terrorism Task Force operating under the FBI was notified of the e-mails. Its Defense Criminal Investigative Service personnel reviewed the material. Army employees were informed of the e-mails, but did not perceive any terroristic threat in Hasan's questions"


He at least should have been relieved of his position in the army, and dishonorably discharged.

Reckoin someone somewhere didn't see what they felt they needed to see, point? Goalpost related or otherwise?


If they couldn't see the problem, it was because they didn't WANT to see the problem.


IMO, because of POlitical Correctness and resistance to admit that this War has a religious aspect.

it has a religious aspect because simpletons want it to.

fighting terrorists wouldn't suffer one iota if we omit Islamic, and it won't advance fighting terrorism if we use it.


Ignoring the facts doesn't hurt your ability to deal with a problem?

LOL!

using one word allows you to lump one of the largest religions in the world together with a select few, making everyone equally guilty.
 
"... after being treated to the depressing spectacle of indoctrinated young children praising the tyrant who enslaved and impoverished their nation, D.C. officials spoke in glowing terms about the visit [to CUBA]. “Given Cuba’s emphasis on a strong education, I know there’s a lot we can learn from each other,” Mayor Bowser told American journalists on a conference call from Havana, where there is not even a semblance of a free press and critics are routinely thrown into Castro's prisons. “There’s a focus on teaching here and making sure all citizens have access to high-quality teaching.” By “high-quality teaching,” she presumably meant high-quality brainwashing by teachers who earn less in a month than minimum-wage Americans earn in a few hours.

"Cuban students also do not have access to outside information, with the Internet and all independent sources being banned across the open-air prison island known as Cuba. But for schools chief Henderson, that was all overlooked. “There’s a sense of pride and a sense of history that they clearly prioritize,” she claimed about the Cuban schools, as if the regime was actually teaching the students history rather than Castro's lies. “It is important to give people a sense of belonging and self-confidence, and I think that’s one of the things we’re missing in our education system.” How communist indoctrination would increase self-confidence or a sense of belonging was not immediately clear."

Yeah, commies are well known for educating people lololol...

D.C. Leaders Look to Communist Cuba for “Education Successes”
 
Would the blood from the victims of a Suicide Bomber be as red (or would they be as dead) if the bomber were call by a different name?


Being honest about the problem is the first step to dealing with it.

A pile of shit would smell just as nasty if we called it a rose.

It's a non issue for all except those in the bubble. And the talking heads will make sure the rubes are good and riled up, after all it's Obama and his hidden agenda.........:ack-1:


Denial prevents sound action.

I doubt they care what you call them. But we are certainly invested in a religious war here too, so I guess all this comes down to, "well you made it religious first!", "nu huh, you guys did!". Ya gotta wonder if Osama won, we seem just as fucked up and incoherent is a society as much of the middle east. And just as rabidly frothy mouthed fundamentalist.

No reasonable observer would compare our secular societies with religious freedom with the shitholes of the ME.
 
We have different ideas of what constitutes "education".

Commies are the enemy of educators...they wipe them out and replace them with propagandists. That has happened in the US though so far with minimal bloodshed.

But things are amping up.

We have different ideas of what constitutes "education".

And it works swimmingly.

Which is why many "home school", to keep the cult pure.

Actually, it's to avoid the cultists.
And to give kids an actual education, of course.
And it works great.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, so you can control what they're exposed to lest they make up their own minds.

Your position is invalidated by the many examples of lefties, especially on campus, using various means, up to and including violence to suppress conservative speech.

Which the "conservatives" always champion of course.

Example please.

This should be good. This is usually where fake appears and tells us to look it up.
 
Nice moving of the goal posts there.

The bar a moment ago was "up to no good".

Now it's "Arrestable".

Did you google what he was up to and realize that you had taken an indefensible position?


Nidal Hasan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"Hasan was investigated by the FBI after intelligence agencies intercepted at least 18 e-mails between him and Anwar al-Awlaki between December 2008 and June 2009.[63] al-Awlaki was a major influence on radical English-speaking jihadis internationally, and contact with him by an American officer would naturally raise concerns.[64]

In one of the e-mails, Hasan wrote al-Awlaki: "I can't wait to join you" in the afterlife. Hasan also asked al-Awlaki when jihad is appropriate, and whether it is permissible if innocents are killed in a suicide attack.[65] In the months before the shooting, Hasan increased his contacts with al-Awlaki to discuss how to transfer funds abroad without coming to the attention of law authorities.[63]

A DC-based Joint Terrorism Task Force operating under the FBI was notified of the e-mails. Its Defense Criminal Investigative Service personnel reviewed the material. Army employees were informed of the e-mails, but did not perceive any terroristic threat in Hasan's questions"


He at least should have been relieved of his position in the army, and dishonorably discharged.

Reckoin someone somewhere didn't see what they felt they needed to see, point? Goalpost related or otherwise?


If they couldn't see the problem, it was because they didn't WANT to see the problem.


IMO, because of POlitical Correctness and resistance to admit that this War has a religious aspect.

it has a religious aspect because simpletons want it to.

fighting terrorists wouldn't suffer one iota if we omit Islamic, and it won't advance fighting terrorism if we use it.


Ignoring the facts doesn't hurt your ability to deal with a problem?

LOL!

using one word allows you to lump one of the largest religions in the world together with a select few, making everyone equally guilty.


You have allowed your concern for the delicate feelings of the Muslims around the world to outweigh your concern for the life and limbs of your fellow Americans.
 
We have different ideas of what constitutes "education".

Commies are the enemy of educators...they wipe them out and replace them with propagandists. That has happened in the US though so far with minimal bloodshed.

But things are amping up.

We have different ideas of what constitutes "education".

And it works swimmingly.

Which is why many "home school", to keep the cult pure.

Actually, it's to avoid the cultists.
And to give kids an actual education, of course.
And it works great.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, so you can control what they're exposed to lest they make up their own minds.

Your position is invalidated by the many examples of lefties, especially on campus, using various means, up to and including violence to suppress conservative speech.

Which the "conservatives" always champion of course.


Your statement made absolutely no sense in relation to my post.

You ARE aware of the large trend on college campuses to suppress conservative speech, not to mention the recent brownshirt tactics of the "Anti-Trump" protesters?
 
We have different ideas of what constitutes "education".

And it works swimmingly.

Which is why many "home school", to keep the cult pure.

Actually, it's to avoid the cultists.
And to give kids an actual education, of course.
And it works great.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, so you can control what they're exposed to lest they make up their own minds.

Your position is invalidated by the many examples of lefties, especially on campus, using various means, up to and including violence to suppress conservative speech.

Which the "conservatives" always champion of course.


Your statement made absolutely no sense in relation to my post.

You ARE aware of the large trend on college campuses to suppress conservative speech, not to mention the recent brownshirt tactics of the "Anti-Trump" protesters?

Oh certainly!!! And don't forget the "liberal" MSM, the war on christmas, the war on christianity, the war on the family. So much anxiety, so little time. And there's a foreign halh black guy in the white house!
 
Reckoin someone somewhere didn't see what they felt they needed to see, point? Goalpost related or otherwise?


If they couldn't see the problem, it was because they didn't WANT to see the problem.


IMO, because of POlitical Correctness and resistance to admit that this War has a religious aspect.

it has a religious aspect because simpletons want it to.

fighting terrorists wouldn't suffer one iota if we omit Islamic, and it won't advance fighting terrorism if we use it.


Ignoring the facts doesn't hurt your ability to deal with a problem?

LOL!

using one word allows you to lump one of the largest religions in the world together with a select few, making everyone equally guilty.


You have allowed your concern for the delicate feelings of the Muslims around the world to outweigh your concern for the life and limbs of your fellow Americans.

have allowed myself to believe all men are created equal

you allow yourself to believe all Muslims are guilty

my "concern" is for simpleminded dolts to have a chance to run the country.
 
If they couldn't see the problem, it was because they didn't WANT to see the problem.


IMO, because of POlitical Correctness and resistance to admit that this War has a religious aspect.

it has a religious aspect because simpletons want it to.

fighting terrorists wouldn't suffer one iota if we omit Islamic, and it won't advance fighting terrorism if we use it.


Ignoring the facts doesn't hurt your ability to deal with a problem?

LOL!

using one word allows you to lump one of the largest religions in the world together with a select few, making everyone equally guilty.


You have allowed your concern for the delicate feelings of the Muslims around the world to outweigh your concern for the life and limbs of your fellow Americans.

have allowed myself to believe all men are created equal

you allow yourself to believe all Muslims are guilty

my "concern" is for simpleminded dolts to have a chance to run the country.

Nobody said all muslims are guilty.

Their guilt is irrelevant. It's a security issue. We currently are being killed by people who, however else they differ, all are muslim, and they are traveling to the Middle East regularly to get money and training.

So we don't allow muslims to traverse back and forth. That's how it goes when someone declares war on you. It isn't like we've never closed borders before. Our borders were closed from WWII until 1965.
 
Actually, it's to avoid the cultists.
And to give kids an actual education, of course.
And it works great.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, so you can control what they're exposed to lest they make up their own minds.

Your position is invalidated by the many examples of lefties, especially on campus, using various means, up to and including violence to suppress conservative speech.

Which the "conservatives" always champion of course.


Your statement made absolutely no sense in relation to my post.

You ARE aware of the large trend on college campuses to suppress conservative speech, not to mention the recent brownshirt tactics of the "Anti-Trump" protesters?

Oh certainly!!! And don't forget the "liberal" MSM, the war on christmas, the war on christianity, the war on the family. So much anxiety, so little time. And there's a foreign halh black guy in the white house!


It seems that you are claiming to be unaware of the problem.

Here is ONE example, took me nearly 5 seconds to find.

Public College Bans Conservative Speaker Shapiro After Liberals Protest | Fox Business


"California State University Los Angeles President William Covino abruptly canceled a speech by conservative author and advocate Ben Shapiro that was scheduled to take place on Thursday February 25th. He is Editor-at-Large, Breitbart.com.
Shapiro’s speech titled “When Diversity Becomes A Problem” was twice approved by the student budget board and was sponsored by the conservative student group Young America’s Foundation (YAF).


But liberal groups aggressively protested Shapiro’s upcoming speech and one CSULA professor threatened to wrestle conservative students who supported the event. President Covino sent an email to YAF late Monday night saying, “After careful consideration I have decided that it will be best for our campus community if we reschedule Ben Shapiro’s appearance for a later date, so that we can arrange for him to appear as part of a group of speakers with differing viewpoints on diversity.” "
 
it has a religious aspect because simpletons want it to.

fighting terrorists wouldn't suffer one iota if we omit Islamic, and it won't advance fighting terrorism if we use it.


Ignoring the facts doesn't hurt your ability to deal with a problem?

LOL!

using one word allows you to lump one of the largest religions in the world together with a select few, making everyone equally guilty.


You have allowed your concern for the delicate feelings of the Muslims around the world to outweigh your concern for the life and limbs of your fellow Americans.

have allowed myself to believe all men are created equal

you allow yourself to believe all Muslims are guilty

my "concern" is for simpleminded dolts to have a chance to run the country.

Nobody said all muslims are guilty.

Their guilt is irrelevant. It's a security issue. We currently are being killed by people who, however else they differ, all are muslim, and they are traveling to the Middle East regularly to get money and training.

So we don't allow muslims to traverse back and forth. That's how it goes when someone declares war on you. It isn't like we've never closed borders before. Our borders were closed from WWII until 1965.

"Nobody said all muslims are guilty.

Their guilt is irrelevant. It's a security issue."


This is how you move from a free open society toward internment camps, gulags, concentration camps and reservations.
 
Would the blood from the victims of a Suicide Bomber be as red (or would they be as dead) if the bomber were call by a different name?


Being honest about the problem is the first step to dealing with it.

A pile of shit would smell just as nasty if we called it a rose.

It's a non issue for all except those in the bubble. And the talking heads will make sure the rubes are good and riled up, after all it's Obama and his hidden agenda.........:ack-1:


Denial prevents sound action.

When will Congress act on the Presidents request for a new authorization of military force against ISIS?

Never.


I accept your changing of the subject as a token of surrender.

Perhaps if President Obama would use the term "Islamic Radical Terrorist" Congress would take the threat serious enough to pass a measure?
 
If they couldn't see the problem, it was because they didn't WANT to see the problem.


IMO, because of POlitical Correctness and resistance to admit that this War has a religious aspect.

it has a religious aspect because simpletons want it to.

fighting terrorists wouldn't suffer one iota if we omit Islamic, and it won't advance fighting terrorism if we use it.


Ignoring the facts doesn't hurt your ability to deal with a problem?

LOL!

using one word allows you to lump one of the largest religions in the world together with a select few, making everyone equally guilty.


You have allowed your concern for the delicate feelings of the Muslims around the world to outweigh your concern for the life and limbs of your fellow Americans.

have allowed myself to believe all men are created equal

you allow yourself to believe all Muslims are guilty

my "concern" is for simpleminded dolts to have a chance to run the country.



This has nothing to do with any claim on my part the Muslims are genetically inferior and any such nonsense.

THis has to do with the fact that random Muslims radicalize and then randomly kill US.

It does seem very simple to me that we want less of that, not more.
 
Being honest about the problem is the first step to dealing with it.

A pile of shit would smell just as nasty if we called it a rose.

It's a non issue for all except those in the bubble. And the talking heads will make sure the rubes are good and riled up, after all it's Obama and his hidden agenda.........:ack-1:


Denial prevents sound action.

When will Congress act on the Presidents request for a new authorization of military force against ISIS?

Never.


I accept your changing of the subject as a token of surrender.

Perhaps if President Obama would use the term "Islamic Radical Terrorist" Congress would take the threat serious enough to pass a measure?

I already accepted your surrender. I got it. You are completely unable to counter my point on Denial.

You don't have to rub your face in it.
 
Hmmmm. Visit ANY liberal college campus. Then tell me who has a "War of Words"

I just told you. Pay attention. Attending a campus of any type would do you some good.

Liberal campuses are the most heavily censored places in America.

And yall accuse us of a "War on Words".

They don't only have war on words, but speech and ideas too.

In safe space most words aren't allowed. However, Islamic terrorism allowed in the whole of the campus. Speaking of that, how is using a word war on words? Isn't the inability to speak the word a ban on words?
 
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, so you can control what they're exposed to lest they make up their own minds.

Your position is invalidated by the many examples of lefties, especially on campus, using various means, up to and including violence to suppress conservative speech.

Which the "conservatives" always champion of course.


Your statement made absolutely no sense in relation to my post.

You ARE aware of the large trend on college campuses to suppress conservative speech, not to mention the recent brownshirt tactics of the "Anti-Trump" protesters?

Oh certainly!!! And don't forget the "liberal" MSM, the war on christmas, the war on christianity, the war on the family. So much anxiety, so little time. And there's a foreign halh black guy in the white house!


It seems that you are claiming to be unaware of the problem.

Here is ONE example, took me nearly 5 seconds to find.

Public College Bans Conservative Speaker Shapiro After Liberals Protest | Fox Business


"California State University Los Angeles President William Covino abruptly canceled a speech by conservative author and advocate Ben Shapiro that was scheduled to take place on Thursday February 25th. He is Editor-at-Large, Breitbart.com.
Shapiro’s speech titled “When Diversity Becomes A Problem” was twice approved by the student budget board and was sponsored by the conservative student group Young America’s Foundation (YAF).


But liberal groups aggressively protested Shapiro’s upcoming speech and one CSULA professor threatened to wrestle conservative students who supported the event. President Covino sent an email to YAF late Monday night saying, “After careful consideration I have decided that it will be best for our campus community if we reschedule Ben Shapiro’s appearance for a later date, so that we can arrange for him to appear as part of a group of speakers with differing viewpoints on diversity.” "

I'm sorry, did you think I was arguing that there's no way anyone can find support for any thought they claim as reality on the internet? I know what Fox News is all about, sure you can find something like that there. So send your kids to Bob Jones', Jerry Falwall's, or Pat Robertson's and let the market decide, right?
 
Hmmmm. Visit ANY liberal college campus. Then tell me who has a "War of Words"

The Leftists have the War on Words, some are now even offended with the words "Father" and "Mother", of course they don't like people referring to fat people as fat and the words "Male" and "Female" are also considered "offensive"

The term Radical Islamic Terrorist is just that, someone decides to commit mass murder by shooting dead a ton of people in the name of Allah, someone decides to strap a suicide vest to themselves and commit mass murder by blowing up a ton of people in the name of Allah, this is Radical Islamic Terrorism, committed by Radical Islamists who are ALL Muslims.
 
A pile of shit would smell just as nasty if we called it a rose.

It's a non issue for all except those in the bubble. And the talking heads will make sure the rubes are good and riled up, after all it's Obama and his hidden agenda.........:ack-1:


Denial prevents sound action.

When will Congress act on the Presidents request for a new authorization of military force against ISIS?

Never.


I accept your changing of the subject as a token of surrender.

Perhaps if President Obama would use the term "Islamic Radical Terrorist" Congress would take the threat serious enough to pass a measure?

I already accepted your surrender. I got it. You are completely unable to counter my point on Denial.

You don't have to rub your face in it.

Ah, another self declared victor on a poli chat board.
 
Ignoring the facts doesn't hurt your ability to deal with a problem?

LOL!

using one word allows you to lump one of the largest religions in the world together with a select few, making everyone equally guilty.


You have allowed your concern for the delicate feelings of the Muslims around the world to outweigh your concern for the life and limbs of your fellow Americans.

have allowed myself to believe all men are created equal

you allow yourself to believe all Muslims are guilty

my "concern" is for simpleminded dolts to have a chance to run the country.

Nobody said all muslims are guilty.

Their guilt is irrelevant. It's a security issue. We currently are being killed by people who, however else they differ, all are muslim, and they are traveling to the Middle East regularly to get money and training.

So we don't allow muslims to traverse back and forth. That's how it goes when someone declares war on you. It isn't like we've never closed borders before. Our borders were closed from WWII until 1965.

"Nobody said all muslims are guilty.

Their guilt is irrelevant. It's a security issue."


This is how you move from a free open society toward internment camps, gulags, concentration camps and reservations.

Again you blame me for the things that commies do.

Attention..I think commies should be summarily executed.

Then we don't have to worry about indoctrination in the schools, gulags, concentration camps, reservations (a progressive concept, incidentally)...all those issues go away.
 
Hmmmm. Visit ANY liberal college campus. Then tell me who has a "War of Words"

The Leftists have the War on Words, some are now even offended with the words "Father" and "Mother", of course they don't like people referring to fat people as fat and the words "Male" and "Female" are also considered "offensive"

The term Radical Islamic Terrorist is just that, someone decides to commit mass murder by shooting dead a ton of people in the name of Allah, someone decides to strap a suicide vest to themselves and commit mass murder by blowing up a ton of people in the name of Allah, this is Radical Islamic Terrorism, committed by Radical Islamists who are ALL Muslims.


Yes, leftists hate their fathers and mothers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top