Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Exactly...the fact that you could make that statement and still not understand it is quite amusing.Feel free to point out where the Constitution mentions marriage at all.
Well my friend - NASA photos of the polar ice-cap expanding 60% (over 900,000 sq. miles) is pretty indisputable. However, if you'd like to attempt to dispute it - be my guest. Just don't be surprised when you don't receive a favorable response.Dude...."Global Warming" is a hoax.This is a horseshit opinion piece that they try to back up with bogus research by a breakaway fringe group. If you believe them, you must also believe that man made climate change is a hoax because three out of 100 scientists say so
Here are the facts (backed up with links) and they are indisputable:.
Whenever anyone says that what they are saying is 'indisputable' my BS meter goes off.
Oh Christ, I'm not even getting into that here . It's off topic. You are so easily led!! I only brought it up as an analogy. FOCUS FOCUS FOCUSDude...."Global Warming" is a hoax.This is a horseshit opinion piece that they try to back up with bogus research by a breakaway fringe group. If you believe them, you must also believe that man made climate change is a hoax because three out of 100 scientists say so
Here are the facts (backed up with links) and they are indisputable:
Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate
- If "Global Warming" existed - why have "scientists" (ie dirt-bags on the Democrat payroll) been caught in not one, but two rounds of "Climate Gate" in which they were caught talking in emails about how they falsified their research in order to make it look like "Global Warming" existed?
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails:
(1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions;
(2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and
(3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling
- If "Global Warming" existed - why has the planet been on a "cooling period" which was predicted decades in advance as part of a natural cycle?
- If "Global Warming" existed - why did liberals rebrand it to "Climate Change" after several years of cooler than normal periods proved them wrong? The left's entire position was that greenhouse gases were being trapped in the atmosphere causing the planet to heat up. Well then how in the hell is that also causing cooler temperatures. The same thing cannot cause opposite results. It's like saying my automobile drives both forward and backward simultaneously. Um...no. No it doesn't. I have to change the transmission manually from drive to reverse and can only do one at a time. It defies the laws of physics to proclaim that trapped greenhouse gases which are causing the earth to heat up are also causing the earth to cool down.
Updated NASA Data: Global Warming Not Causing Any Polar Ice Retreat
- If "Global Warming" existed - why did the polar ice-cap expand a mind-boggling 60% (or over 900,000 miles) when "scientists" (ie political activists on the Dumbocrat payroll) predicted it would be completely melted by 2014?
Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Record Maximum
Thanks for playing my friend - but this here is a comprehensive beatdown backed with indisputable facts and links to them.
Well duh... if the Supreme Court was willing to violate the U.S. Constitution to even hear Obergefell vs. Hodges, and then again use it to create law from the bench, why would any state attempt take a case back to that same body about it being unconstitutional?!?Notice how, in all of their desperation, none of the states fighting marriage equality are invoking nullification of federal supremacy because they know that it’s a losing proposition
I get why you brought it up. And I just wanted to show the USMB community why your analogy proved me right.Oh Christ, I'm not even getting into that here . It's off topic. You are so easily led!! I only brought it up as an analogy. FOCUS FOCUS FOCUSDude...."Global Warming" is a hoax.This is a horseshit opinion piece that they try to back up with bogus research by a breakaway fringe group. If you believe them, you must also believe that man made climate change is a hoax because three out of 100 scientists say so
Here are the facts (backed up with links) and they are indisputable:
Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate
- If "Global Warming" existed - why have "scientists" (ie dirt-bags on the Democrat payroll) been caught in not one, but two rounds of "Climate Gate" in which they were caught talking in emails about how they falsified their research in order to make it look like "Global Warming" existed?
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails:
(1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions;
(2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and
(3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling
- If "Global Warming" existed - why has the planet been on a "cooling period" which was predicted decades in advance as part of a natural cycle?
- If "Global Warming" existed - why did liberals rebrand it to "Climate Change" after several years of cooler than normal periods proved them wrong? The left's entire position was that greenhouse gases were being trapped in the atmosphere causing the planet to heat up. Well then how in the hell is that also causing cooler temperatures. The same thing cannot cause opposite results. It's like saying my automobile drives both forward and backward simultaneously. Um...no. No it doesn't. I have to change the transmission manually from drive to reverse and can only do one at a time. It defies the laws of physics to proclaim that trapped greenhouse gases which are causing the earth to heat up are also causing the earth to cool down.
Updated NASA Data: Global Warming Not Causing Any Polar Ice Retreat
- If "Global Warming" existed - why did the polar ice-cap expand a mind-boggling 60% (or over 900,000 miles) when "scientists" (ie political activists on the Dumbocrat payroll) predicted it would be completely melted by 2014?
Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Record Maximum
Thanks for playing my friend - but this here is a comprehensive beatdown backed with indisputable facts and links to them.
Numerous Federal Judges, Justices, and constitutional scholars vehemently disagree with you, and your bloviated about what reality you would like there to be vs. the reality that is there won't change that,:Exactly...the fact that you could make that statement and still not understand it is quite amusing.Feel free to point out where the Constitution mentions marriage at all.
The U.S. Constitution outlines our structure of federal government and their roles and responsibilities. It clearly outlines that the federal government is explicitly restricted to 18 enumerated powers. Anything outside of those 18 enumerated powers are (and I quote) "reserved to the states and the people" per the 10th Amendment.
Nobody can disagree about what is written on a page (unless they were illiterate of course). What you call "numerous justices" is what in reality are called "progressive activists" who (like the so-called "scientists" caught in the Climate Gate scandal) are simply pushing a political agenda.Numerous Federal Judges, Justices, and constitutional scholars vehemently disagree with youThe U.S. Constitution outlines our structure of federal government and their roles and responsibilities. It clearly outlines that the federal government is explicitly restricted to 18 enumerated powers. Anything outside of those 18 enumerated powers are (and I quote) "reserved to the states and the people" per the 10th Amendment.
There is considerable data - and all of it proves that a same-sex couple environment does not produce results as good as traditional families.There is a considerable body of data, some of which I ( and others- see just above) have posted here, that shows that children raised by same sex couple do as well as children raised in "traditional" homes and that having a "mom and a dad" is not important to their development. There are many factors that far out weigh that by far.
This leaves only four studies that are methodologically sound. And as the American College of Pediatricians brief shows, all four—the four most recent—find that children do not fare as well when raised by same-sex couples as when raised by married, biological parents.
How Children Raised By Same-Sex Married Couples Fare
The facts prove otherwise my dear...Gender does not make any difference in parenting.
How Children Raised By Same-Sex Married Couples Fare
There is considerable data - and all of it proves that a same-sex couple environment does not produce results as good as traditional families.There is a considerable body of data, some of which I ( and others- see just above) have posted here, that shows that children raised by same sex couple do as well as children raised in "traditional" homes and that having a "mom and a dad" is not important to their development. There are many factors that far out weigh that by far.
This leaves only four studies that are methodologically sound. And as the American College of Pediatricians brief shows, all four—the four most recent—find that children do not fare as well when raised by same-sex couples as when raised by married, biological parents.
How Children Raised By Same-Sex Married Couples Fare
The American College of Pediatrics is the equivalent of Trump University.
Oh...you mean the ultras-successful billionaire who was elected as President of the United States?There is considerable data - and all of it proves that a same-sex couple environment does not produce results as good as traditional families.There is a considerable body of data, some of which I ( and others- see just above) have posted here, that shows that children raised by same sex couple do as well as children raised in "traditional" homes and that having a "mom and a dad" is not important to their development. There are many factors that far out weigh that by far.
This leaves only four studies that are methodologically sound. And as the American College of Pediatricians brief shows, all four—the four most recent—find that children do not fare as well when raised by same-sex couples as when raised by married, biological parents.
How Children Raised By Same-Sex Married Couples Fare
The American College of Pediatrics is the equivalent of Trump University.
Thank you for admitting that the states should have been permitted to continue to define marriage as being between a man and a woman of the same race as well. Same legal theories apply to both so don't even bother to bloviate about haw sexual orientation is not race.Not being able to redefine marriage does not require "protection". Nice try though. I respect your desperate stretch to make something in the Constitution fit your false narrative. That is considerably more effort than most progressives will give.It's called enforcing the equal protection clause of the Constitution as per the 14th Amendment.The law which stipulates that all 50 states must accept and recognize gay marriage. I believe it is called "progressives are cry babies and can't accept the American people reject their bat-shit crazy, anti-constitutional ideology" law.What law did the Supreme Court create? What is the name of it?
Oh...you mean the ultras-successful billionaire who was elected as President of the United States?There is considerable data - and all of it proves that a same-sex couple environment does not produce results as good as traditional families.There is a considerable body of data, some of which I ( and others- see just above) have posted here, that shows that children raised by same sex couple do as well as children raised in "traditional" homes and that having a "mom and a dad" is not important to their development. There are many factors that far out weigh that by far.
This leaves only four studies that are methodologically sound. And as the American College of Pediatricians brief shows, all four—the four most recent—find that children do not fare as well when raised by same-sex couples as when raised by married, biological parents.
How Children Raised By Same-Sex Married Couples Fare
The American College of Pediatrics is the equivalent of Trump University.
Way to defeat your own argument Sea...
From your own link:Homosexuals never deserved special rights in the first place. God has stepped in and made it possible for this glorious man of Christian values to become our holy Emperor so he can restore the moral values and Christian family traditions that have been under attack in our Fatherland. It's time to reverse these immoral rights such as homosexuals adopting children for their own sexual predatory pedophilia fetish's. With that said, bow your heads with me my children and join me, American patriot Steve McGarrett (heterosupremacist alpha male), in prayer:
Heavenly Father, We praise Your Holy Name. We continue to plea for Your unmerited mercy and favor. We pray that all those who are purposely blocking President Trump’s progress in putting our country on a path pleasing to You will be outed for their evil ways and brought to swift justice. We ask for the removal of those from positions of leadership or authority that are causing dissent and social unrest. We pray for the safety of those who stand in harm’s way protecting us. Let the citizens of this great country realize that blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Help us, Lord Jesus. In Your Name we pray, Amen
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/31/donald-trump-considering-reversing-lgbt-rights-reforms-tuesday/
All of this blather about kids doing "less well" with parents of the same sex is useless, pointless and clearly bigoted and I will tell you why.There is considerable data - and all of it proves that a same-sex couple environment does not produce results as good as traditional families.There is a considerable body of data, some of which I ( and others- see just above) have posted here, that shows that children raised by same sex couple do as well as children raised in "traditional" homes and that having a "mom and a dad" is not important to their development. There are many factors that far out weigh that by far.
This leaves only four studies that are methodologically sound. And as the American College of Pediatricians brief shows, all four—the four most recent—find that children do not fare as well when raised by same-sex couples as when raised by married, biological parents.
How Children Raised By Same-Sex Married Couples Fare
You might want to go back and review post 116 in it's entirity:There is considerable data - and all of it proves that a same-sex couple environment does not produce results as good as traditional families.There is a considerable body of data, some of which I ( and others- see just above) have posted here, that shows that children raised by same sex couple do as well as children raised in "traditional" homes and that having a "mom and a dad" is not important to their development. There are many factors that far out weigh that by far.
This leaves only four studies that are methodologically sound. And as the American College of Pediatricians brief shows, all four—the four most recent—find that children do not fare as well when raised by same-sex couples as when raised by married, biological parents.
How Children Raised By Same-Sex Married Couples Fare
Congratulation !! You get the prize for stupidest post of the week on USMB!!This reminds me of a recent trip I had to make to a very deep blue state. My driver gets hypoglycemic, and so we were forced to stop to eat on a regular schedule. A little less than an hour before our dinner time, I looked ahead on an e-map, and found the best restaurant in the geographical range in which my driver would not turn into a raging asshole was a Red Lobster about 30 minutes out. I called ahead for a table.
The place was jammed. Every table was occupied and the waiting area was overflowing to the outdoors. This would have doomed my man except for the fact I had called ahead, and so our wait was only two minutes. The flea-ridden liberal idiots had not thought to call ahead and had to suffer much longer waits. Too bad for them.
After ordering our drinks, I made a trip to the washroom. As the place was packed, I expected the Men's to be crowded, with hippie urine all over the floor, and no clean paper towels.
To my utter surprise, it was empty. I had it all to myself, and it was sparkling.
I then realized that since Obama has let all the queers and freaks use the Ladies, I would have the Men's all to myself in the blue states.
God Bless Obama!
