Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once again Conservatives applaud SHARIA!
Hip hip hurray! They say...
Just like churches, etc do today. It is completely artificial to say this non profit corporation is entitled to rights while this for profit one forfeits its rights. There is no brief in the law for such a distinction.I doubt the OP's argument is what hobby lobby owners are trying to make. Corporations are run by humans and humans shouldn't be force to allocate corporate funds to pay for abortions. Humans on behalf of the corporation shouldn't have to agree with those ugly Obamacare rules. It violates their religious beliefs.
So you can decide to not pay your taxes or not follow child labor laws, or safety regulations if you claim it is a part of your faith?Corporations are made up of people. People don't give up their Constitutional Rights when they incorporate.
No, idiot.
The state must show a compelling interest in over riding religious objections. There are none here, of course.
So you can decide to not pay your taxes or not follow child labor laws, or safety regulations if you claim it is a part of your faith?
No, idiot.
The state must show a compelling interest in over riding religious objections. There are none here, of course.
Yup. The burden is on the Statists...er, er, er State.
That won't really matter to three of the Justices. They'd declare genocide Constitutional if a dimocrap were behind it.
I think the good guys win this one, 6 - 3. Maybe even 7-2. But I've been wrong before.
Although, not all that often
"And God formed corporations from the dust of the ground, and breathed into its CEOs a fear of women's rights " - Genesis 2:7
"And God formed corporations from the dust of the ground, and breathed into its CEOs a fear of women's rights " - Genesis 2:7
The sun rises, the sun sets. And the jackass brays on.
Corporations are people, my friend. That's the line, as we have all heard it. Citizens United basically affirmed it.
Generally, this has been applied to political speech, nonetheless, it provides Freedom of Speech to Corporations -- but the question is: Are Corporations persons that can have a sincerely held religious belief?
In the recent mishmash of that ill-begotten AZ bill SB1062, one aspect was little touched on, mainly this:
![]()
See that there? What has been defined as a "Person" was amended to not only include "a religious assembly or institution" but also:
"ANY INDIVIDUAL, ASSOCIATION, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, CHURCH, RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY, OR INSTITUTION, ESTATE, TRUST, FOUNDATION OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY."
SB1062 - 512R - I Ver
The definition there is far broader in scope and applicability in that Corporations, et al, could have discriminated if they held sincerely held religious beliefs.
Which brings us to the recent SCOTUS cases up soon involving Hobby Lobby v Sebelius - and the other entities that are suing to be able to deny specific contraceptive coverage on religious beliefs grounds.
We are at crossroad where not only are for-profit corporate commercial entities and organizations considered to be persons regarding Freedom of Speech, but now the trend is to carve out laws to give these Corporations Freedom of Religion.
How do Corporations, fictitious persons under the law - practice religion? Can they go to Church? Do they partake in sacraments?
Should they be protected fully as a person under the cherished Free Exercise clause?
Do you think this trend to be something good for America?
Just like churches, etc do today. It is completely artificial to say this non profit corporation is entitled to rights while this for profit one forfeits its rights. There is no brief in the law for such a distinction.I doubt the OP's argument is what hobby lobby owners are trying to make. Corporations are run by humans and humans shouldn't be force to allocate corporate funds to pay for abortions. Humans on behalf of the corporation shouldn't have to agree with those ugly Obamacare rules. It violates their religious beliefs.
I doubt the OP's argument is what hobby lobby owners are trying to make. Corporations are run by humans and humans shouldn't be force to allocate corporate funds to pay for abortions. Humans on behalf of the corporation shouldn't have to agree with those ugly Obamacare rules. It violates their religious beliefs.
I doubt the OP's argument is what hobby lobby owners are trying to make. Corporations are run by humans and humans shouldn't be force to allocate corporate funds to pay for abortions. Humans on behalf of the corporation shouldn't have to agree with those ugly Obamacare rules. It violates their religious beliefs.
So you can decide to not pay your taxes or not follow child labor laws, or safety regulations if you claim it is a part of your faith?Corporations are made up of people. People don't give up their Constitutional Rights when they incorporate.
No, idiot.
The state must show a compelling interest in over riding religious objections. There are none here, of course.
Just like churches, etc do today. It is completely artificial to say this non profit corporation is entitled to rights while this for profit one forfeits its rights. There is no brief in the law for such a distinction.I doubt the OP's argument is what hobby lobby owners are trying to make. Corporations are run by humans and humans shouldn't be force to allocate corporate funds to pay for abortions. Humans on behalf of the corporation shouldn't have to agree with those ugly Obamacare rules. It violates their religious beliefs.
So Payperview, the OP, is full of shit cheering on this liberal agenda against Christian run businesses? Some people won't rest until everyone is required to pay for the murder of someone else's innocent baby.
What is wrong with contraception. Please explain.