Scalia question

[WinterBorn]

You can't anull a previous recent election at your whim. This president was elected and those votes say this president should and will exercise the power THE PEOPLE gave him.

Period.

Change your Tampon if you're on your period. The people voted in the last election overwhelmingly for the right, exactly because of obama. And congress doesn't have to rubber stamp his pick. Sorry.

Obama won the last presidential election by almost 5 million votes. The people spoke then.

I get disliking Obama. But the idea that you should change the rules based on that dislike is laughable.

 

[Care4all]

sillie me....isnt obama still our president? so he should be doing the presidential duties....

Why? He hasn't done them yet, in seven years.

One of his duties is to appoint a nominee to the Supreme Court let him do his job

No President has nominated a SCJ in that President's last year in office in 80 years.
Who claimed "elections have consequences"? Was 'Bonobo' not speaking of the ELECTED members of Congress and the Senate?
'Bonobo' is free to nominate fucking Daffy Duck.
One thing is a certainty. The Senate ain't going on no vacation this year.
McConnell is a fucking wimp. There's no doubt. BUT he's smart enough to know there is no way in hell the Senate will EVER allow one of Bonobo's 'fisting buddies' onto the SC.
The DEMs are basically well and truly fucked.
No chance in hell Sanders gets the nomination. When that doesn't happen 95% of his supporters are going to say "FUCK IT THE GAME IS RIGGED!". No way in hell will they then vote for the old bitch Clinton. They will stay home handing the election to TRUMP.
President Trump will nominate someone young who is a Ultra-Conservative just to rub it in the DEM's/Clinton's faces.
Then in his first term he will be able to nominate likely another 2-3 ultra-Conservatives to the SC.
Trump to SC nominee: "How do you feel about building a fucking fence along the entire Mexican border and putting a trade tariff on everything Mexico sends to the US to pay for the fence? How do you feel about shutting down 100% on muslims entering the US until they are thoroughly vetted? Welcome to the SC pal".

That's simply NOT TRUE. 8 supreme court justices were appointed and then approved by the Senate in our presidents last year in office. And Justice Kennedy was one of them, and his appointment WAS NOT 80 YEARS AGO.

PLEASE INFORM YOURSELF, and stop passing LIES around.

 

[dannyboys]

Why? He hasn't done them yet, in seven years.

One of his duties is to appoint a nominee to the Supreme Court let him do his job

One of the duties of the current Senate majority is to block Obama at every turn. That's why they were put in there. That's what their constituents expect.

They have not done a good job of it. Here's their chance to redeem themselves.

This is the sort of crap that has screwed the American people at every turn.

If you disagree with a specific thing Obama has done, I respect that. I don't care for much of what he has done.

But this idea that every action must be opposed, regardless of whether it is good for the people or not, is insanity.

This is EXACTLY why Trump and Sanders are hijacking the presidential race. People don't like it--watch out, super conservatives. I have been entirely open, up to now, in considering a Republican as my vote for president in November. I absolutely, positively will NOT vote for any candidate who opposes even considering the president's nomination. I'm only one, but I'm not alone. I DO NOT SEE why a nominee can't be considered and voted down, if not acceptable.

Luckily Republicans can't win. Voters will see them for what they are. We welcome scalias timing.

Right now the DNC is plotting away

As long as the Senate stays in session the fucking DNC can 'plot' all they want. There is ZERO they can do to circumvent the US CONSTITUTION. ZERO!
You really believe the REP voters waiting to elect a REP President are going to somehow have a problem with the REP controlled Senate upholding the Constitution?
Wise up.
Don't forget the number of declared LIB voters in the 18-35 demographic will NEVER turn out to vote for Cankles the female enabler for Bill Clinton's years of sexual predation against innocent females. When Clinton gets handed the nomination 95% of this demographic are going to stay home. A small percent of them will vote for Trump.
The DNC is totally fucked now.
They are going to have to watch President Trump put 3 of 4 radical young Conservatives on the SC. The REP controlled Senate will gleefully rubber stamp Trump's nominees.
Aside: I hear Debbie's days are now numbered. BTW. I give her one month left from today before she jumps instead of being publicly pushed.
SHE was the MAIN driving force behind doing whatever was necessary to get Hillary the nomination. She fucked up big-time in the opinion of a LOT of very powerful DNC backroom boys and girls.
They wanted Biden. He was willing privately. It was Debbie who basically told him to back off.
The original ticket was going to be Biden with 'Pocahontas' Warren as running mate.
Trump will be President for two terms. The Senate and Congress and SC will be fucking wall-to-wall REPS for at least a decade.
By then the LIBs will have changed their name as often as a crack whore changes her panties.

 

[jillian]

sillie me....isnt obama still our president? so he should be doing the presidential duties....

Why? He hasn't done them yet, in seven years.

One of his duties is to appoint a nominee to the Supreme Court let him do his job

No President has nominated a SCJ in that President's last year in office in 80 years.
Who claimed "elections have consequences"? Was 'Bonobo' not speaking of the ELECTED members of Congress and the Senate?
'Bonobo' is free to nominate fucking Daffy Duck.
One thing is a certainty. The Senate ain't going on no vacation this year.
McConnell is a fucking wimp. There's no doubt. BUT he's smart enough to know there is no way in hell the Senate will EVER allow one of Bonobo's 'fisting buddies' onto the SC.
The DEMs are basically well and truly fucked.
No chance in hell Sanders gets the nomination. When that doesn't happen 95% of his supporters are going to say "FUCK IT THE GAME IS RIGGED!". No way in hell will they then vote for the old bitch Clinton. They will stay home handing the election to TRUMP.
President Trump will nominate someone young who is a Ultra-Conservative just to rub it in the DEM's/Clinton's faces.
Then in his first term he will be able to nominate likely another 2-3 ultra-Conservatives to the SC.
Trump to SC nominee: "How do you feel about building a fucking fence along the entire Mexican border and putting a trade tariff on everything Mexico sends to the US to pay for the fence? How do you feel about shutting down 100% on muslims entering the US until they are thoroughly vetted? Welcome to the SC pal".

That's simply NOT TRUE. 8 supreme court justices were appointed and then approved by the Senate in our presidents last year in office. And Justice Kennedy was one of them, and his appointment WAS NOT 80 YEARS AGO.

PLEASE INFORM YOURSELF, and stop passing LIES around.

they always lie. reality has no bearing on what they spew

 

[jon_berzerk]

Can Republican's prevent Obama from making new appointment? I think appointment should be made by the new President. Obama lame duck, USSC lifetime position, so if new Justice is say 46 years old to 50 years old, he or she can be on bench for 30 years or even 40 years. Obama choose Leftist of course, so your First and Second Amendments might be at risk.

The new President should make this appointment IMHO.

they can and they should hold the line

unless the prezbo truly picks a nominee that Constitutionalists like

 

[jillian]

One of his duties is to appoint a nominee to the Supreme Court let him do his job

One of the duties of the current Senate majority is to block Obama at every turn. That's why they were put in there. That's what their constituents expect.

They have not done a good job of it. Here's their chance to redeem themselves.

This is the sort of crap that has screwed the American people at every turn.

If you disagree with a specific thing Obama has done, I respect that. I don't care for much of what he has done.

But this idea that every action must be opposed, regardless of whether it is good for the people or not, is insanity.

This is EXACTLY why Trump and Sanders are hijacking the presidential race. People don't like it--watch out, super conservatives. I have been entirely open, up to now, in considering a Republican as my vote for president in November. I absolutely, positively will NOT vote for any candidate who opposes even considering the president's nomination. I'm only one, but I'm not alone. I DO NOT SEE why a nominee can't be considered and voted down, if not acceptable.

Luckily Republicans can't win. Voters will see them for what they are. We welcome scalias timing.

Right now the DNC is plotting away

As long as the Senate stays in session the fucking DNC can 'plot' all they want. There is ZERO they can do to circumvent the US CONSTITUTION. ZERO!
You really believe the REP voters waiting to elect a REP President are going to somehow have a problem with the REP controlled Senate upholding the Constitution?
Wise up.
Don't forget the number of declared LIB voters in the 18-35 demographic will NEVER turn out to vote for Cankles the female enabler for Bill Clinton's years of sexual predation against innocent females. When Clinton gets handed the nomination 95% of this demographic are going to stay home. A small percent of them will vote for Trump.
The DNC is totally fucked now.
They are going to have to watch President Trump put 3 of 4 radical young Conservatives on the SC. The REP controlled Senate will gleefully rubber stamp Trump's nominees.
Aside: I hear Debbie's days are now numbered. BTW. I give her one month left from today before she jumps instead of being publicly pushed.
SHE was the MAIN driving force behind doing whatever was necessary to get Hillary the nomination. She fucked up big-time in the opinion of a LOT of very powerful DNC backroom boys and girls.
They wanted Biden. He was willing privately. It was Debbie who basically told him to back off.
The original ticket was going to be Biden with 'Pocahontas' Warren as running mate.
Trump will be President for two terms. The Senate and Congress and SC will be fucking wall-to-wall REPS for at least a decade.
By then the LIBs will have changed their name as often as a crack whore changes her panties.

if only there was a word of truth in that entire rant

moron. pochahontas?

this is why we ignore your dumbasses.

 

[Iceweasel]

You can't anull a previous recent election at your whim. This president was elected and those votes say this president should and will exercise the power THE PEOPLE gave him.

Period.

Change your Tampon if you're on your period. The people voted in the last election overwhelmingly for the right, exactly because of obama. And congress doesn't have to rubber stamp his pick. Sorry.

Obama won the last presidential election by almost 5 million votes. The people spoke then.

I get disliking Obama. But the idea that you should change the rules based on that dislike is laughable.

People rejected obama big time, the facts were in long ago. The rules can't force congress to install a liberal activist judge. So laugh until you get a hernia, your loss.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Can Republican's prevent Obama from making new appointment? I think appointment should be made by the new President. Obama lame duck, USSC lifetime position, so if new Justice is say 46 years old to 50 years old, he or she can be on bench for 30 years or even 40 years. Obama choose Leftist of course, so your First and Second Amendments might be at risk.

The new President should make this appointment IMHO.

Sorry you don't like who the president is. Rules are rules. It's Obama's pick.

If they have no real objection the court just got a lot less conservative.

he can pick away all he wants

he can pick his nose for all i care


he does not get to place one until he has consent of congress

that is just the way it is

 

[Care4all]

So you guys hate the republican establishment, thus your support for Trump, but NOW you Love the Republican establishment AGAIN???

Quite confusing....seems wishy washy....

 

[peach174]

One of his duties is to appoint a nominee to the Supreme Court let him do his job

One of the duties of the current Senate majority is to block Obama at every turn. That's why they were put in there. That's what their constituents expect.

They have not done a good job of it. Here's their chance to redeem themselves.

This is the sort of crap that has screwed the American people at every turn.

If you disagree with a specific thing Obama has done, I respect that. I don't care for much of what he has done.

But this idea that every action must be opposed, regardless of whether it is good for the people or not, is insanity.

This is EXACTLY why Trump and Sanders are hijacking the presidential race. People don't like it--watch out, super conservatives. I have been entirely open, up to now, in considering a Republican as my vote for president in November. I absolutely, positively will NOT vote for any candidate who opposes even considering the president's nomination. I'm only one, but I'm not alone. I DO NOT SEE why a nominee can't be considered and voted down, if not acceptable.

Luckily Republicans can't win. Voters will see them for what they are. We welcome scalias timing.

Right now the DNC is plotting away

Maybe Republicans have some good ideas, but their attitude sucks at the moment.

Add independents to that.

 

[dannyboys]

sillie me....isnt obama still our president? so he should be doing the presidential duties....

Why? He hasn't done them yet, in seven years.

One of his duties is to appoint a nominee to the Supreme Court let him do his job

No President has nominated a SCJ in that President's last year in office in 80 years.
Who claimed "elections have consequences"? Was 'Bonobo' not speaking of the ELECTED members of Congress and the Senate?
'Bonobo' is free to nominate fucking Daffy Duck.
One thing is a certainty. The Senate ain't going on no vacation this year.
McConnell is a fucking wimp. There's no doubt. BUT he's smart enough to know there is no way in hell the Senate will EVER allow one of Bonobo's 'fisting buddies' onto the SC.
The DEMs are basically well and truly fucked.
No chance in hell Sanders gets the nomination. When that doesn't happen 95% of his supporters are going to say "FUCK IT THE GAME IS RIGGED!". No way in hell will they then vote for the old bitch Clinton. They will stay home handing the election to TRUMP.
President Trump will nominate someone young who is a Ultra-Conservative just to rub it in the DEM's/Clinton's faces.
Then in his first term he will be able to nominate likely another 2-3 ultra-Conservatives to the SC.
Trump to SC nominee: "How do you feel about building a fucking fence along the entire Mexican border and putting a trade tariff on everything Mexico sends to the US to pay for the fence? How do you feel about shutting down 100% on muslims entering the US until they are thoroughly vetted? Welcome to the SC pal".

That's simply NOT TRUE. 8 supreme court justices were appointed and then approved by the Senate in our presidents last year in office. And Justice Kennedy was one of them, and his appointment WAS NOT 80 YEARS AGO.

PLEASE INFORM YOURSELF, and stop passing LIES around.

Obama To Nominate Successor To Justice Scalia

 

[Care4all]

Can Republican's prevent Obama from making new appointment? I think appointment should be made by the new President. Obama lame duck, USSC lifetime position, so if new Justice is say 46 years old to 50 years old, he or she can be on bench for 30 years or even 40 years. Obama choose Leftist of course, so your First and Second Amendments might be at risk.

The new President should make this appointment IMHO.

Sorry you don't like who the president is. Rules are rules. It's Obama's pick.

If they have no real objection the court just got a lot less conservative.

he can pick away all he wants

he can pick his nose for all i care


he does not get to place one until he has consent of congress

that is just the way it is

Unless he appoints one during the Senate's Recess....

So the Repubs will need to keep the Senate opened and not in recess for the next year.

 

[jon_berzerk]

You can't anull a previous recent election at your whim. This president was elected and those votes say this president should and will exercise the power THE PEOPLE gave him.

Period.

Change your Tampon if you're on your period. The people voted in the last election overwhelmingly for the right, exactly because of obama. And congress doesn't have to rubber stamp his pick. Sorry.

Obama won the last presidential election by almost 5 million votes. The people spoke then.

I get disliking Obama. But the idea that you should change the rules based on that dislike is laughable.

People rejected obama big time, the facts were in long ago. The rules can't force congress to install a liberal activist judge. So laugh until you get a hernia, your loss.

he also lost about 5 million voters between his first and second election

 

[sealybobo]

One of his duties is to appoint a nominee to the Supreme Court let him do his job

One of the duties of the current Senate majority is to block Obama at every turn. That's why they were put in there. That's what their constituents expect.

They have not done a good job of it. Here's their chance to redeem themselves.

This is the sort of crap that has screwed the American people at every turn.

If you disagree with a specific thing Obama has done, I respect that. I don't care for much of what he has done.

But this idea that every action must be opposed, regardless of whether it is good for the people or not, is insanity.

This is EXACTLY why Trump and Sanders are hijacking the presidential race. People don't like it--watch out, super conservatives. I have been entirely open, up to now, in considering a Republican as my vote for president in November. I absolutely, positively will NOT vote for any candidate who opposes even considering the president's nomination. I'm only one, but I'm not alone. I DO NOT SEE why a nominee can't be considered and voted down, if not acceptable.

Luckily Republicans can't win. Voters will see them for what they are. We welcome scalias timing.

Right now the DNC is plotting away

As long as the Senate stays in session the fucking DNC can 'plot' all they want. There is ZERO they can do to circumvent the US CONSTITUTION. ZERO!
You really believe the REP voters waiting to elect a REP President are going to somehow have a problem with the REP controlled Senate upholding the Constitution?
Wise up.
Don't forget the number of declared LIB voters in the 18-35 demographic will NEVER turn out to vote for Cankles the female enabler for Bill Clinton's years of sexual predation against innocent females. When Clinton gets handed the nomination 95% of this demographic are going to stay home. A small percent of them will vote for Trump.
The DNC is totally fucked now.
They are going to have to watch President Trump put 3 of 4 radical young Conservatives on the SC. The REP controlled Senate will gleefully rubber stamp Trump's nominees.
Aside: I hear Debbie's days are now numbered. BTW. I give her one month left from today before she jumps instead of being publicly pushed.
SHE was the MAIN driving force behind doing whatever was necessary to get Hillary the nomination. She fucked up big-time in the opinion of a LOT of very powerful DNC backroom boys and girls.
They wanted Biden. He was willing privately. It was Debbie who basically told him to back off.
The original ticket was going to be Biden with 'Pocahontas' Warren as running mate.
Trump will be President for two terms. The Senate and Congress and SC will be fucking wall-to-wall REPS for at least a decade.
By then the LIBs will have changed their name as often as a crack whore changes her panties.

We will nominate a justice who is a moderate and if your side objects you'll have to explain why. I welcome the conversation.

The stakes have never been higher and I feel confident.

 

[sealybobo]

You can't anull a previous recent election at your whim. This president was elected and those votes say this president should and will exercise the power THE PEOPLE gave him.

Period.

Change your Tampon if you're on your period. The people voted in the last election overwhelmingly for the right, exactly because of obama. And congress doesn't have to rubber stamp his pick. Sorry.

Obama won the last presidential election by almost 5 million votes. The people spoke then.

I get disliking Obama. But the idea that you should change the rules based on that dislike is laughable.

People rejected obama big time, the facts were in long ago. The rules can't force congress to install a liberal activist judge. So laugh until you get a hernia, your loss.

he also lost about 5 million voters between his first and second election

So did Republican obstructionists

 

[peach174]

So you guys hate the republican establishment, thus your support for Trump, but NOW you Love the Republican establishment AGAIN???

Quite confusing....seems wishy washy....

Only if they dig their heals in.
What we don't like about them is they don't take a stand on their ideology like the left does. they just always cave like cowards.

 

[Iceweasel]

You can't anull a previous recent election at your whim. This president was elected and those votes say this president should and will exercise the power THE PEOPLE gave him.

Period.

Change your Tampon if you're on your period. The people voted in the last election overwhelmingly for the right, exactly because of obama. And congress doesn't have to rubber stamp his pick. Sorry.

Obama won the last presidential election by almost 5 million votes. The people spoke then.

I get disliking Obama. But the idea that you should change the rules based on that dislike is laughable.

People rejected obama big time, the facts were in long ago. The rules can't force congress to install a liberal activist judge. So laugh until you get a hernia, your loss.

he also lost about 5 million voters between his first and second election

So did Republican obstructionists

They made up for in Nov 2014.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Can Republican's prevent Obama from making new appointment? I think appointment should be made by the new President. Obama lame duck, USSC lifetime position, so if new Justice is say 46 years old to 50 years old, he or she can be on bench for 30 years or even 40 years. Obama choose Leftist of course, so your First and Second Amendments might be at risk.

The new President should make this appointment IMHO.

Sorry you don't like who the president is. Rules are rules. It's Obama's pick.

If they have no real objection the court just got a lot less conservative.

he can pick away all he wants

he can pick his nose for all i care


he does not get to place one until he has consent of congress

that is just the way it is

Unless he appoints one during the Senate's Recess....

So the Repubs will need to keep the Senate opened and not in recess for the next year.

there is not going to be a recess

and as for him trying to declare a recess himself

on a on a three day off week and placing someone

in 2014 the supreme court handed him his ass for trying it

and also that would be a "temporary" fill

 

[sealybobo]

You can't anull a previous recent election at your whim. This president was elected and those votes say this president should and will exercise the power THE PEOPLE gave him.

Period.

Change your Tampon if you're on your period. The people voted in the last election overwhelmingly for the right, exactly because of obama. And congress doesn't have to rubber stamp his pick. Sorry.

Obama won the last presidential election by almost 5 million votes. The people spoke then.

I get disliking Obama. But the idea that you should change the rules based on that dislike is laughable.

People rejected obama big time, the facts were in long ago. The rules can't force congress to install a liberal activist judge. So laugh until you get a hernia, your loss.

As he picks up his football and goes home.

 

[Iceweasel]

You can't anull a previous recent election at your whim. This president was elected and those votes say this president should and will exercise the power THE PEOPLE gave him.

Period.

Change your Tampon if you're on your period. The people voted in the last election overwhelmingly for the right, exactly because of obama. And congress doesn't have to rubber stamp his pick. Sorry.

Obama won the last presidential election by almost 5 million votes. The people spoke then.

I get disliking Obama. But the idea that you should change the rules based on that dislike is laughable.

People rejected obama big time, the facts were in long ago. The rules can't force congress to install a liberal activist judge. So laugh until you get a hernia, your loss.

As he picks up his football and goes home.

You're stoned already.