Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am 100% certain that Trump did not believe he was entitled nor did he want votes he didn't win. But he didn't want to be defeated via fraudulent votes. And he believed then and still believes there were enough fraudulent votes added to the mix after 2 a.m. the day after the election to make a difference. Right or wrong it is not illegal to believe that.The problem is that Trump believe he was entitled to votes he did not win.
The states counted the votes, recounted the votes and even audited the votes, and time after time concluded that Trump lost, and was not entitled, no matter what Trump "THOUGHT" he deserved. He did not get their electoral votes.
There is no way to have a reasoned discussion with somebody totally infected with TDS so I'll just wish you a pleasant evening and say good night.Sounds just like Trump and the Presidential Records Act material, that Trump believed he was entitled to also.
It's a pattern with Trump. Thinking he's entitled to whatever he wants.
You think a partisan media totally in bed with the Democrats is going to honestly report ANYTHING about Trump? Even their headlines are blatantly dishonest. So I'll just wish you a pleasant evening. If you can find a credible source doing actual objective reporting to back up your argument go for it.
Trump campaign asks Michigan lawmakers to steal electors from Biden; GOP leaders say it won’t happen
Trump lost Michigan by 154,000 votes.www.mlive.com
Trump calls on GOP state legislatures to overturn election results
The president’s comment comes after a series of legal defeats, and with his options dwindling.www.politico.com
Arizona Official Emotionally Testifies About Standing Up To Trump
Rusty Bowers smacked down Trump's claims of election fraud, saying, "I do not want to be a winner by cheating."www.huffpost.com
We know exactly what Trump wanted. It’s been investigated.
A cultist like yourself equates credibility with telling you what you want to hear.You think a partisan media totally in bed with the Democrats is going to honestly report ANYTHING about Trump? Even their headlines are blatantly dishonest. So I'll just wish you a pleasant evening. If you can find a credible source doing actual objective reporting to back up your argument go for it.
You still have complete liberty to find a credible objective source to back up your opinion. But until you produce one I can't accept your point of view as anything other than TDS.A cultist like yourself equates credibility with telling you what you want to hear.
You’ve lost the ability to determine what is and isn’t credible.
Yeah that’s why we want xiden’s bank records and him to release his business tax returns.Banking records are by law confidential also. But the difference is one belonged to somebody running for president, and the voters right to know that the person running for president is not a crook.
Suddenly republicans want the affairs of private citizens that have not been accused of any crime, to be released to the public.
This would be like congress subpoenaing your bank records, and letting people know where your money came from, and where it went. And all without any legal reason, like evidence of a crime.
Marener said "Trump’s own private investigation team found no evidence of fraud.", which you had responded to.
~~~~~~Ah, but I do have a source.
The irregularities never amounted to anything before or after the election.
Still, it’s a lie to suggest Trump only wanted an investigation. We have testimony and reporting that he was trying to get state legislatures to take away our electors and appoint ones for him.
That’s what you’re required to think by your cult.~~~~~~
WAPO. NY Slimes, CNN have been exposed as Leftist spokesmen for their Marxist Socialist ideology and Democrat liberalism...
LOL Thank you defense counsel. more than a Mountain of evidence for opening an impeachment inquiry. 10x more than you guys had for Trump's impeachment "inquiry."Which you don’t know what that means. You don’t even know it was a deal after he left office that never was signed.
Perfect phone calls. No business transactions. Just saying hi.
Not just business partners, but long term friends. Fathers seeing their son’s friends isn’t illegal.
Legal.
Doing business is legal.
Legal.
Giving money to family members is legal.
Perfect transcript. Describes nothing illegal. Has been the source of many lies including that the whistleblowers who punished it lied about who it is about.
Because it’s lacked probable cause. Darn that constitution!
Impeachment. No prosecutor.Uh…a prosecutor must be able to show a crime associated with their evidence or it is meaningless. Like bloody gloves for example.
Yet again, you guys spend all your time trying to convince us of the existence or something without actually doing this obvious thing or showing it to us.LOL Thank you defense counsel. more than a Mountain of evidence for opening an impeachment inquiry. 10x more than you guys had for Trump's impeachment "inquiry."
Well, if you all suck so bad at getting it out there, how do you ever hope to succeed?Schiff is an idiot! He has NO idea and neither does any Democrat WHAT the evidence is. He needs to shut his lying mouth and wait for the evidence to be presented.
Yes. Just like Trump.Just like with Trump, let’s wait and see what they have.
Bless your heart.I am 100% certain that Trump did not believe he was entitled nor did he want votes he didn't win. But he didn't want to be defeated via fraudulent votes. And he believed then and still believes there were enough fraudulent votes added to the mix after 2 a.m. the day after the election to make a difference. Right or wrong it is not illegal to believe that.
Pray for clarity of thought.There is no way to have a reasoned discussion with somebody totally infected with TDS so I'll just wish you a pleasant evening and say good night.
~~~~~~Banking records are by law confidential also. But the difference is one belonged to somebody running for president, and the voters right to know that the person running for president is not a crook.
Suddenly republicans want the affairs of private citizens that have not been accused of any crime, to be released to the public.
This would be like congress subpoenaing your bank records, and letting people know where your money came from, and where it went. And all without any legal reason, like evidence of a crime.
dailycaller.com
~~~~~~~Well, if you all suck so bad at getting it out there, how do you ever hope to succeed?
Poor child! When did you ever reach that conclusion about American politics at large? Hopefully before your 18'th birthday.After the bank records reveal nothing nefarious, if they haven't already, they'll move on to the next conspiracy theory. Because the entire enterprise is about sustaining a smear campaign long enough to affect the 2024 election. Surely you understand that.
