Lumpy 1
Diamond Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 42,712
- 17,202
Why do you post such childish nonsense that has been thoroughly debunked? Check out Snopes...
Who trusts Snopes... it would be like trusting TDS Democrat Propaganda News...
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do you post such childish nonsense that has been thoroughly debunked? Check out Snopes...
No he did not. What the Mueller reports contains is evidence of collusion but not beyond a reasonable doubt.
Excellent twist and lie, Goebbels.
His EXACT words were NO EVIDENCE, NO CRIME, NO COLLUSION.
Schoolyard collusion...not a crime.“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”
Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone
All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK
HAHA HAAG Barr heads the list. He's says he'll only turn over his own special censored summary, one where he redacts anything considered to be "executive privilege", meaning most of the report will be redacted.
Mueller report: Barr won't commit to sharing full findings, Democrat says
The FBI should handle any redactions, not corrupt Barr, and such a full report should be sent to Congress, pronto.
Be honest...If you had a tape of Trump offering CIA names you'd find a way to excuse itSchoolyard collusion...not a crime.“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”
Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone
All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK
You can vote...a crime.
Trump is a very bad man for wanting to expose Hillary’s crimes.Be honest...If you had a tape of Trump offering CIA names you'd find a way to excuse itSchoolyard collusion...not a crime.“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”
Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone
All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK
You can vote...a crime.
“My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign,” he said. “My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help — no, instead that son said he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians. You might think it was ok that he took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s ok that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think it’s OK. I don’t.”
Adam Schiff Presents His ‘Evidence of Collusion’ – Rolling Stone
All of the things noted are in the public record and they are NOT OK
The bitch destroyed 33K emails AFTER they had been subpoenaed! She had someone 'bleach' her hard drive. Smash her phones with a hammer before they removed the SIM cards.Unfortunately, Hillary was stupid enough to believe that every email she sent to any government person, was saved to the National Archives and could be retrieved at a later date. She thought all of her emails were already saved and stupidly believed there was an easy access to them.There WAS a basis for this investigation. There was a reason for the initial Benghazi hearings. Since Hillary's server was NOT illegal at the time she installed and used it, and since no one in the Department ever said boo about it, I am not sure where they managed to find evidence of criminal wrongdoing enough to begin an investigation into the server, either.. And no, it's not "different."
My highlight.
That's just foolish. Since...Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, ANYTHING she emailed is the property of the government and NOT Clinton's cabal property.
but the way our government archives work, is not that efficient, and we can not do what she thought the archives did.
There is no way for the National archives to simply do something similar to a google search, on her name, Hillary Clinton, with all of the emails with State department staff or with her Diplomats.... and pull them all up.
they are individual files that are given to the Archives from the employee gvt worker, themselves.
So, she most certainly broke the rules on making certain all of her gvt emails were in a file in the National Archives, she did not send them to the National Archives, until after she left and the State Department asked for them.
this was definitely WRONG DOING, and broke their rules on it, but it was NOT criminal, not a crime.
You put Prog Socialist Party ahead of country. And have been.I'm just flabbergasted that you put Trump ahead of country
Like any decent person cares what the party of scumpt says? Traitors Butt kissers"Republicans are stepping up calls for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to resign or give up his committee post for repeatedly pushing claims of collusion between President Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian operatives.
“He’s been on every TV show 50 times a day for practically the last two years, promising Americans that this president would either be impeached or indicted”
“He has no right, as somebody who has been peddling a lie, day after day after day, unchallenged. Unchallenged and not under oath. Somebody should have put him under oath and said, ‘You have evidence, where is it? He's saying there was evidence of collusion in plain sight, that he knew of it. If he's got evidence, put him under oath.”
For two years, Schiff routinely sounded ominous warnings about what Special Counsel Robert Mueller might find on Trump.
Despite Schiff’s claims, Mueller found no evidence of coordination or conspiracy involving Trump, his campaign and the Russian government, Attorney General William Barr wrote in a letter released on Sunday."
In addition to claiming he has clear evidence of Trump collusion and promising Americans for almost 2 years now the President would be indicted Schiff ADMITTED TO LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION in an attempt to aid in Mueller's investigation in hopes the President would be found 'Guilty' in Mueller's report. RATHER THAN LEADING THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, SCHIFF SHOULD BE INDICTED FOR LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION!
Schiff faces mounting GOP calls for resignation over collusion claims
.
OP's are to be 3-4 paragraphs, a link, and comment. easyt65
- Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.
USMB Rules and Guidelines
How about your 'messiah', parasite?Like any decent person cares what the party of scumpt says? Traitors Butt kissers
the 33k emails were her private emails that she deleted...The bitch destroyed 33K emails AFTER they had been subpoenaed! She had someone 'bleach' her hard drive. Smash her phones with a hammer before they removed the SIM cards.Unfortunately, Hillary was stupid enough to believe that every email she sent to any government person, was saved to the National Archives and could be retrieved at a later date. She thought all of her emails were already saved and stupidly believed there was an easy access to them.There WAS a basis for this investigation. There was a reason for the initial Benghazi hearings. Since Hillary's server was NOT illegal at the time she installed and used it, and since no one in the Department ever said boo about it, I am not sure where they managed to find evidence of criminal wrongdoing enough to begin an investigation into the server, either.. And no, it's not "different."
My highlight.
That's just foolish. Since...Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, ANYTHING she emailed is the property of the government and NOT Clinton's cabal property.
but the way our government archives work, is not that efficient, and we can not do what she thought the archives did.
There is no way for the National archives to simply do something similar to a google search, on her name, Hillary Clinton, with all of the emails with State department staff or with her Diplomats.... and pull them all up.
they are individual files that are given to the Archives from the employee gvt worker, themselves.
So, she most certainly broke the rules on making certain all of her gvt emails were in a file in the National Archives, she did not send them to the National Archives, until after she left and the State Department asked for them.
this was definitely WRONG DOING, and broke their rules on it, but it was NOT criminal, not a crime.
Oh Ya the bitch was just an innocent dummy who didn't know what she was doing.
You wait! The Israelis or the Chinese or the Russians are going to release all 33K emails when it serves their purpose best.
If I had been involved in any of her crimes I'd be terrified I would commit suicide before Graham's new Special Council comes knocking!
You never CEASE ....the 33k emails were her private emails that she deleted...
No he did not. What the Mueller reports contains is evidence of collusion but not beyond a reasonable doubt.
LIAR.
His EXACT words were NO EVIDENCE, NO CRIME, NO COLLUSION.
NO indictment of Trump for collusion.
NO indictment of Trump family for collusion.
NO indictment of Trump associates for collusion.
WHY?
NO EVIDENCE OF THE NON-CRIME OF 'COLLUSION'.
You dumbasses continue to accuse Trump of something that ISN'T even a crime she ignoring to an knowledge the existing EVIDENCE OF REAL DEMOCRAT CRIME!
The bitch destroyed 33K emails AFTER they had been subpoenaed! She had someone 'bleach' her hard drive. Smash her phones with a hammer before they removed the SIM cards.Unfortunately, Hillary was stupid enough to believe that every email she sent to any government person, was saved to the National Archives and could be retrieved at a later date. She thought all of her emails were already saved and stupidly believed there was an easy access to them.There WAS a basis for this investigation. There was a reason for the initial Benghazi hearings. Since Hillary's server was NOT illegal at the time she installed and used it, and since no one in the Department ever said boo about it, I am not sure where they managed to find evidence of criminal wrongdoing enough to begin an investigation into the server, either.. And no, it's not "different."
My highlight.
That's just foolish. Since...Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, ANYTHING she emailed is the property of the government and NOT Clinton's cabal property.
but the way our government archives work, is not that efficient, and we can not do what she thought the archives did.
There is no way for the National archives to simply do something similar to a google search, on her name, Hillary Clinton, with all of the emails with State department staff or with her Diplomats.... and pull them all up.
they are individual files that are given to the Archives from the employee gvt worker, themselves.
So, she most certainly broke the rules on making certain all of her gvt emails were in a file in the National Archives, she did not send them to the National Archives, until after she left and the State Department asked for them.
this was definitely WRONG DOING, and broke their rules on it, but it was NOT criminal, not a crime.
Oh Ya the bitch was just an innocent dummy who didn't know what she was doing.
You wait! The Israelis or the Chinese or the Russians are going to release all 33K emails when it serves their purpose best.
If I had been involved in any of her crimes I'd be terrified I would commit suicide before Graham's new Special Council comes knocking!
You continue to spew LIES...No he did not. What the Mueller reports contains is evidence of collusion but not beyond a reasonable doubt.
LIAR.
His EXACT words were NO EVIDENCE, NO CRIME, NO COLLUSION.
NO indictment of Trump for collusion.
NO indictment of Trump family for collusion.
NO indictment of Trump associates for collusion.
WHY?
NO EVIDENCE OF THE NON-CRIME OF 'COLLUSION'.
You dumbasses continue to accuse Trump of something that ISN'T even a crime she ignoring to an knowledge the existing EVIDENCE OF REAL DEMOCRAT CRIME!
LIAR.
Even Barr admits the report does not exonerate Trump.
The Justice Department says a sitting President cannot be indicted. Mueller clearly left that up to the DOJ.
Manafort was convicted of lying about giving campaign data to a Russian business associate with ties to Russian intelligence which hacked the DNC servers
Papadopoulus pleaded guilty6 for lying about contacting Russians to get dirt on Clinton.
Stone is under indictment for lying about his contacts with WikiLeaks which fenced the stolen e-mails he got from Russia.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF REAL DEMOCRAT CRIMES. YOUR CRAZY CONSPIRACY THEORIES ARE NOT EVIDENCE. The DOJ has been in the hands of Republicans for over 2 years. Even Sessions admits you need evidence.