Schiff withholding transcript that exposes his prior contact with whistleblower

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,877
400
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!
 
This is why the House of Representatives doesn't vote on articles of Impeachment. Mr. Schiff et al doesn't want to produce this evidence for the Senate trial, as required by the Constitution.

The Dems should really start slow walking the impeachment process, and look toward 2021 and the first year of the 2nd Trump Administration to do their dirty work.
 
I'm thinking that a few Republican congressmen should vote for impeachment just to get the MFs on the stand in the Senate.
 
I'm thinking that a few Republican congressmen should vote for impeachment just to get the MFs on the stand in the Senate.


That's why it might not be put up for a vote.

The Dems might look stupid, but they are savvier than people give them credit for.
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could not have committed perjury.
 
Last edited:
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could have committed perjury.


He didn't testify yet.

But if articles of impeachment were passed, he would be called to testify during the Senate trial which would open him up to a perjury rap
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could have committed perjury.
Then perhaps we get ALL THE STAFF MEMBERS to testify to the FACT that they all knew the WB but NONE OF THEM EVER TOLD SCHITT ABOUT it!....Seems might odd that THEY had direct contact and didn't tell the chairman?....We are expected to believe in unicorns!!!
 
Democrats don't believe in the rule of law. They believe that laws are just guidelines that can be twisted to conform to their agenda. That's especially evident with due process. But they do know that what they are doing with this impeachment is wrong. That's why they hide behind closed doors and keep everything secret until it's too late to change or dispute any of it. Communist China is probably getting some new pointers from this process.
 
Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript
Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript
odd. they demand EVERYTHING from the right, but don't follow their own demands for "fair play".

Yeah.

IMO, the whole thing was manufactured for TEE VEE and ratings. Or to distract folks from other things that are going on. Much more serious things. The teetering economy, the coup in Bolivia, etc.

I find it somehow comforting that in their haste to create scandal, what it has inadvertently done, is brought to light so much corruption that the public would have otherwise just been blissfully unaware of.

. . . but, in the end, nothing will be done about this, or anything else.

All of government, other than the bloated corruption and waste, seems to be completely useless.
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Too bad. We do not need his transcript for the impeachment. Tell Ratcliffe to suck on a rat.
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Too bad. We do not need his transcript for the impeachment.



President Trump needs it for the defense, and our system of Due Process guarantees his right to view it and use it during any trial.
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could have committed perjury.


He didn't testify yet.

But if articles of impeachment were passed, he would be called to testify during the Senate trial which would open him up to a perjury rap

On what grounds would he be called to testify? Even assuming that he could be called to testify as to his conduct of official business, what is the basis for your assertion that he would, in the future, commit perjury?
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!
Wing-Nut Daily.

Almost guaranteed to be a false story.
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!
FOIO Time
 
Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript
Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript
odd. they demand EVERYTHING from the right, but don't follow their own demands for "fair play".

Yeah.

IMO, the whole thing was manufactured for TEE VEE and ratings. Or to distract folks from other things that are going on. Much more serious things. The teetering economy, the coup in Bolivia, etc.

I find it somehow comforting that in their haste to create scandal, what it has inadvertently done, is brought to light so much corruption that the public would have otherwise just been blissfully unaware of.

. . . but, in the end, nothing will be done about this, or anything else.

All of government, other than the bloated corruption and waste, seems to be completely useless.
that's the part that scares me the most. both sides are so deep in we "can't" recover. the only thing left at that point is waiting for our gov to fall and we start over.
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!
Wing-Nut Daily.

Almost guaranteed to be a false story.
Says the turd who unplugs toilets for a living who always cries FAKE POOHs FAKE POOHS!
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!
Wing-Nut Daily.

Almost guaranteed to be a false story.
Says the turd who unplugs toilets for a living who always cries FAKE POOHs FAKE POOHS!
Fuck off stumpy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top